accepted views of industries defining science
Posted by:
Panchito
()
Date: September 22, 2014 09:05PM Pharma companies sell vaccines by using "their" science. Society is geared towards economic industrialism. If they cannot make money out of a product (like a vaccine) is not called science but pseudoscience. Then the army of doctors that drive the Bmers (BMWs) are part of the system that accepts only the right type of "science" (the one that brings them money). Schools use science if it can be patented and sold. The definition of science is a defined commercial product aimed at sales and profit, not truth for the sake of truth. Then to make it more official, paid scientist proclaim the definition of science from their point of profit too to cover their financial future. Everybody is biting at the cheese of science
[theweek.com]
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/22/2014 09:09PM by Panchito. Re: accepted views of industries defining science
Posted by:
riverhousebill
()
Date: September 24, 2014 10:05PM Carl Sagan sums it up best I think- Science is a candle in the dark nothing nothing more nothing less!
If we cant go with what we call science today I guess we could ask religons or tarot cards or ojigi boards. Yes science is often overturned but I will take a candle in the dark over baseless opion And again who can benifit by junking legit science. BIG OIL Read about Alec - American Legislative Exchange Concil, John Rose works for these people, ALEC is front page San Francisco Cronicle Today sept 24th read all about it. Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/24/2014 10:11PM by riverhousebill. Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
|
|