So yeah, The Libs and Lib Media are either Ignoring the New Sex Abuse Revelations - of which there is no doubt that they are credible - pertaining to MLK's Abusive Character or else they're choosing to attack J. Edgar Hoover because he had a lot of dirt on a lot of people and he wire-tapped MLK - you know, like Obama Wire-Tapped Trump.

But the one thing The Libs are definitely not doing, is criticizing MLK for his Abuse of Women. No, The Libs and Lib Women are defending MLK to the nines.

Can we say Lib Hypocrisy.

In a Nutshell -

Martin Luther King was a Hypocrite (besides a Sex Abuser) for saying everyone should be judged by their CHARACTER, not on their Skin Color, while The Libs and MLK are judging MLK on His Skin Color, Not His Sh*tty Abusive Character.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 06/08/2019 10:50PM by Jennifer.

Laura Ingraham and Dinesh D'Souza (you know Dinesh D'Souza - he's the guy Obama jailed for a minor Campaign Finance Violation, yet Ilhan Omar and AOC get off scot free for their Campaign Finance Violations! Hypocrisy Abounds/Double Standard/Slimy Libs

Dinesh D'Souza SLAMS the Left for hypocrisy over MLK and #MeToo

[www.youtube.com]

The latest revelations about Martin Luther King, Jr. pose a painful challenge to the Left.

That's why the media and the progressive historians have gone into hiding!

Oh, yeah -

The Libs are calling for all Thomas Jefferson - who wrote the United States Declaration of Independence - Statues to be torn down and all Jefferson to be renamed, so I say:

Everything MLK must be torn down or renamed. Justice for the women he abused must be served.

Can you say Lib Hypocrisy...

J Egar Hoover New sex Abuse revelations New say what new what drugs are you on?

So yeah, The Libs and Lib Media are either Ignoring the New Sex Abuse Revelations

Evidence from J Edgar Hoover New???

you are a full blown nut case citing Hoover as evidence
Y Hoover OMG's

Yes, MLK Statues/Monuments need to be torn down and everything named after MLK needs to be renamed, and definitely get rid of MLK Day. Remember how The Libs got rid of Lincoln and Washington's Holidays by combining them into "Presidents Day". Yeah and The Libs got rid of Christopher Columbus Holiday. So no more MLK because he had the Character of a dirtbag - Sex Abuser of Women.


******

On The Legacies, And The Monuments, Of Thomas Jefferson And Martin Luther King Jr.

[townhall.com]

Leftists have expanded their war against historical monuments to include statues of one of our nation’s key founders and its third president, Thomas Jefferson. Their basis - at least in part - is the claim that the Declaration of Independence author “raped” one of his slaves, Sally Hemmings, over 200 years ago.

However, even if Jefferson had a sexual relationship with Hemmings and children by her, which is now generally accepted but also legitimately disputed, the notion that the former U.S. president “raped” her is also suspect, as least in the sense that one would typically describe a forcible rape. But none of that matters to liberals with an agenda. To them, the fact that Jefferson allegedly had sex with his slave equals rape.

“When a man has sex with a human being he owns, consent is forced, no matter the circumstance,” writes professional race baiter Shaun King in an article titled, “Thomas Jefferson was a horrible man who owned 600 human beings, raped them, and literally worked them to death.” The reality, however, was likely far more complicated and, more than that, ultimately unknowable, as fair historians acknowledge.

Shaun King says he understands the “vital role” Jefferson played in the nation’s founding, but still contends he “should not be celebrated in any way.” “He should not have statues, or be on money, or even have a monument celebrating his positive contributions,” he wrote.

Sounds harsh, especially when we’re talking about dubious claims against one of the key founders of the greatest country to ever exist.

Predictably though, leftists aren’t quite so judgemental when the individual under scrutiny is a leftist hero.

Unless you’ve been living under a rock or only digesting liberal media sources, you’ve probably heard about the latest allegations regarding civil rights icon Martin Luther King Jr., uncovered by Pulitzer Prize-winning biographer David Garrow.

Using recently-released FBI surveillance summaries, Garrow unearthed several shocking allegations about King’s past, including a January 1964 rape at Washington, D.C.’s historic Willard Hotel during which the civil rights leader allegedly “looked on, laughed and offered advice.”

A fellow pastor and friend, Logan Kearse, “had brought to Washington several women ‘parishioners’ of his church,” the FBI summaries revealed. “The group met in his room and discussed which women among the parishioners would be suitable for natural or unnatural sex acts. When one of the women protested that she did not approve of this, the Baptist minister immediately and forcibly raped her.” The allegation that the King “looked on, laughed and offered advice” was added to the notes in handwriting.

There’s more, including a “sex orgy” during which a woman who “shied away” was allegedly told by King, a Christian minister, that participating would “help your soul,” but I think we can pretty much all agree that witnessing and encouraging a rape, if true, is heinous new ground and an entirely new level altogether as far as King allegations are concerned.


From several major media outlets’ refusal to cover Garrow’s discoveries to muted reaction after the piece was eventually published last Thursday in the British magazine “Standpoint,” leftist reaction to the King information has been hypocritical to say the least, especially considering the fact that, though the FBI surveillance of King was wrong and should never have happened, much more hard evidence exists of the civil rights leader’s guilt than Jefferson’s.

Yet, leftists like journalist Roland Martin - as he did during our recent Twitter exchange - will summarily dismiss the allegations about King while insisting that Jefferson “raped” Hemmings.

We’ll never know for certain whether Thomas Jefferson forcibly raped Sally Hemmings, had a genuine, mutually reciprocal relationship with her, or if it all was just a nasty politically-motivated rumor, in which case the real genetic father of all those Hemmings children could have been his brother or another Jefferson male. However, in 2027, when the MLK tapes are finally unsealed, we WILL know for sure, if we don’t already, whether the legendary civil rights leader was indeed the kind of person who would look on and laugh while a rape was being committed in his presence.

Regardless, in light of recent allegations and assuming the forthcoming tape releases do not disprove them, Martin Luther King Jr. clearly no longer deserves to rest on the pedestal upon which he has been placed. While I do believe it would be unfair to call for the man and his significant contributions to the civil rights movement to be memory-holed and all his monuments torn down in the same way a leftist might do to Thomas Jefferson, I do think his godlike status in American society should at least be questioned. Because arguably, no American has ever been memorialized, canonized, and idolized like Martin Luther King Jr.

The problem for MLK is, if you expect to fly with the gods, you’d damn well better have acted like one.

REALLY NOW Evidence from J Edgar Hoover your very lost dear
HOOVER ha Ha HA HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

Must have been rush hour here 47 views in just a few hours

Ha Ha HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 06/10/2019 01:58AM by riverhousebill.