It looks like the WHO tried to create Pandemic Hysteria with the Swine Flu and now with the Coronavirus, they've perfected it. Succeeded. Why?

This Article is from 2010.

Why The WHO Faked A Pandemic

[www.forbes.com]

The World Health Organization has suddenly gone from crying "The sky is falling!" like a cackling Chicken Little to squealing like a stuck pig. The reason: charges that the agency deliberately fomented swine flu hysteria. "The world is going through a real pandemic. The description of it as a fake is wrong and irresponsible," the agency claims on its Web site. A WHO spokesman declined to specify who or what gave this "description," but the primary accuser is hard to ignore.

The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE), a human rights watchdog, is publicly investigating the WHO's motives in declaring a pandemic. Indeed, the chairman of its influential health committee, epidemiologist Wolfgang Wodarg, has declared that the "false pandemic" is "one of the greatest medicine scandals of the century."

Even within the agency, the director of the WHO Collaborating Center for Epidemiology in Munster, Germany, Dr. Ulrich Kiel, has essentially labeled the pandemic a hoax. "We are witnessing a gigantic misallocation of resources [$18 billion so far] in terms of public health," he said.

They're right. This wasn't merely overcautiousness or simple misjudgment. The pandemic declaration and all the Klaxon-ringing since reflect sheer dishonesty motivated not by medical concerns but political ones.

Unquestionably, swine flu has proved to be vastly milder than ordinary seasonal flu. It kills at a third to a tenth the rate, according to U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates. Data from other countries like France and Japan indicate it's far tamer than that.

Indeed, judging by what we've seen in New Zealand and Australia (where the epidemics have ended), and by what we're seeing elsewhere in the world, we'll have considerably fewer flu deaths this season than normal. That's because swine flu muscles aside seasonal flu, acting as a sort of inoculation against the far deadlier strain.

Did the WHO have any indicators of this mildness when it declared the pandemic in June?

Absolutely, as I wrote at the time. We were then fully 11 weeks into the outbreak and swine flu had only killed 144 people worldwide--the same number who die of seasonal flu worldwide every few hours. (An estimated 250,000 to 500,000 per year by the WHO's own numbers.) The mildest pandemics of the 20th century killed at least a million people.

But how could the organization declare a pandemic when its own official definition required "simultaneous epidemics worldwide with enormous numbers of deaths and illness." Severity--that is, the number of deaths--is crucial, because every year flu causes "a global spread of disease."

Easy. In May, in what it admitted was a direct response to the outbreak of swine flu the month before, WHO promulgated a new definition matched to swine flu that simply eliminated severity as a factor. You could now have a pandemic with zero deaths.

Under fire, the organization is boldly lying about the change, to which anybody with an Internet connection can attest. In a mid-January virtual conference WHO swine flu chief Keiji Fukuda stated: "Did WHO change its definition of a pandemic? The answer is no: WHO did not change its definition." Two weeks later at a PACE conference he insisted: "Having severe deaths has never been part of the WHO definition."

They did it; but why?

In part, it was CYA for the WHO. The agency was losing credibility over the refusal of avian flu H5N1 to go pandemic and kill as many as 150 million people worldwide, as its "flu czar" had predicted in 2005.

Around the world nations heeded the warnings and spent vast sums developing vaccines and making other preparations. So when swine flu conveniently trotted in, the WHO essentially crossed out "avian," inserted "swine," and WHO Director-General Margaret Chan arrogantly boasted, "The world can now reap the benefits of investments over the last five years in pandemic preparedness."

But there's more than bureaucratic self-interest at work here. Bizarrely enough, the WHO has also exploited its phony pandemic to push a hard left political agenda.

In a September speech WHO Director-General Chan said "ministers of health" should take advantage of the "devastating impact" swine flu will have on poorer nations to get out the message that "changes in the functioning of the global economy" are needed to "distribute wealth on the basis of" values "like community, solidarity, equity and social justice." She further declared it should be used as a weapon against "international policies and systems that govern financial markets, economies, commerce, trade and foreign affairs."

Chan's dream now lies in tatters. All the WHO has done, says PACE's Wodart, is to destroy "much of the credibility that they should have, which is invaluable to us if there's a future scare that might turn out to be a killer on a large scale."

(There are links to the article, etc., at the website)

***********

What does this mean?

WHO is responsible for this Corona Plandemic?

Why?

Is this WHY?

(Change the word, "swine flu" to "Coronavirus" )

In a September speech WHO Director-General Chan said "ministers of health" should take advantage of the "devastating impact" Swine Flu will have on poorer nations to get out the message that "changes in the functioning of the global economy" are needed to "distribute wealth on the basis of" values "like community, solidarity, equity and social justice." She further declared it should be used as a weapon against "international policies and systems that govern financial markets, economies, commerce, trade and foreign affairs."

world bank
UN
CDC
WHO
world economic forum
bill gates
etc
etc
etc

by the way the WHO is now saying that there is no immunity
if you get "coronavirus"

doesn't that negate the value of "immunity papers"?

they'll probably just keep pushing contact tracing
surveillance
and mask wearing

lunatics

Yes, since this last week, it's all about 'testing' and 'tracing'. Not good. It seems they think they're going to be testing everybody and tracing all their contacts, quarantining everybody for 14 days ... oh and taking our temperatures. Will that be rectal or oral? The Sheeple are already bending over and taking it ...



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/26/2020 02:12AM by Jennifer.

ha

kaufman refused getting his temp taken at his job a while back and talked to boss and they let it slide.

i think they hold it to your forehead? is that a new temp taker?

they didn't let the mask thing slide

So I was looking up a couple guys from the above article about the WHO and the Swine Flu Hoax:

The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE), a human rights watchdog, is publicly investigating the WHO's motives in declaring a pandemic. Indeed, the chairman of its influential health committee, epidemiologist Wolfgang Wodarg, has declared that the "false pandemic" is "one of the greatest medicine scandals of the century."

The Chairman from PACE who investigated the Swine Flu Pandemic - Wolfgang Wodarg

Here is his Twitter Account -

[twitter.com]

Here is a Video of Dr. Wodarg explaining his view of the Coronavirus on Global Research Website:

[www.globalresearch.ca]

It gets good at 7:40 where he starts talking about the Coronavirus hype job.

Here is the video on YouTube -

[www.youtube.com]



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/26/2020 05:48PM by Jennifer.

I've Seen wodarg yes thx

So from the above YouTube link to the Global Research Dr. Wodarg Video, there is a link to this Video -

It's an Amazon Video - free with Prime -

TrustWHO?

[www.amazon.com]

"The World Health Organization (WHO) was founded with the aim of building a healthier future for people all over the world. Whether it’s the effects of smoking, the Swine flu pandemic, or a nuclear disaster, the WHO is the body we rely on to advise on and resolve a public health crisis. But can it be trusted? TrustWho documents filmmaker Lilian Franck’s quest to discover what lies behind the altruistic façade of the world’s largest public health body. What she uncovers is an alarming picture of corruption and opacity. This powerful investigative doc shines a light on how industry lobbies have infiltrated the WHO and ask whether the organization can be trusted to keep the public healthy."

I'll watch it when I have a chance. One thing I read - WHO is financed 70% by Corporations.

********

Article -

Trust WHO: The Business of Global Health

Investigating the hidden motives behind actions of the World Health Organisation and the real powers that control it.

[www.aljazeera.com]



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/26/2020 06:51PM by Jennifer.

Kennedy spoke about WHO saying they're worse than the CDC
If that's possible

And again
There is no need for government ,CDC,who to promote health.
None of their business