—The CDC (US Centers for Disease Control) admits the coronavirus test is flawed. That’s the overview and the takeaway—

As my readers know, I’ve described why the widespread diagnostic test for the coronavirus is insufficient, misleading, useless, and deceptive.

That test, used all over the world where it is available, is called the PCR.

It DIAGNOSES patients. “Yes, you have the virus.” “No you don’t.”

A very alert reader sent me a link to a US Centers for Disease Control (CDC) document about the test. The CDC establishes the guidelines for how the test should be done, and what the results mean.

Here is a CDC paragraph about results. I suggest you read it several times.

“Positive [test] results are indicative of active infection with 2019-nCoV but do not rule out bacterial infection or co-infection with other viruses. The agent detected may not be the definite cause of disease. Laboratories within the United States and its territories are required to report all positive results to the appropriate public health authorities.”

I’m going to blow past the blatant contradiction in that CDC paragraph and cut to the chase.

The key line in that paragraph is: “The agent detected [the coronavirus] may not be the definite cause of disease.”

BANG.

CDC: Yeah, you see, folks, ahem, the test could say the coronavirus is there in somebody’s body, but the virus may not be causing disease…

On one level, the CDC is admitting the test could turn up false positives: the test could SAY a patient has the coronavirus, but he really doesn’t.

This isn’t a footnote stuck at the bottom of a report. It’s right there near the top of the section about the meaning of the test.

On a deeper level, the CDC is saying straight out, IF THE TEST SHOWS A CORONAVIRUS IS PRESENT, THAT DOESN’T MEAN IT’S CAUSING DISEASE.

Well, yes, I’ve pointed out that the test has an inherent problem. At best, it might show that a virus is present in the patient’s body. But the test is incapable of determining HOW MUCH virus is ACTIVELY REPLICATING in the patient’s body.

And why is that important? Because, to even begin to say a virus is causing actual illness in a human, there would have to be millions and millions of a virus replicating in his body—and the PCR test has never been proven, in the real world, to be able to make such a judgment call accurately.

But, if you read that CDC quote again, you’ll see the CDC is ordering labs to report a positive test result to public health agencies—where it will be counted as a “coronavirus case” come hell or high water.

Thank you, CDC. So very, very much. The next ship for Uranus leaves tomorrow. Pile on board and make the trip. You can run tests there to your heart’s content.

J rappoport

@Fresh. I am glad you are here, that you are sticking to your guns.

[blog.nomorefakenews.com]

It's a sick joke.
A farce
Hoax
Scam



People's lives ruined by CDC and government



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/26/2020 07:34PM by fresh.

Here is a snippet from my file on Molecular Markers...

[www.promega.com]
PCR Amplification
Introduction to PCR

The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a relatively simple technique that amplifies a DNA template to produce specific DNA fragments in vitro. Traditional methods of cloning a DNA sequence into a vector and replicating it in a living cell often require days or weeks of work, but amplification of DNA sequences by PCR requires only hours. While most biochemical analyses, including nucleic acid detection with radioisotopes, require the input of significant amounts of biological material, the PCR process requires very little. Thus, PCR can achieve more sensitive detection and higher levels of amplification of specific sequences in less time than previously used methods. These features make the technique extremely useful, not only in basic research, but also in commercial uses, including genetic identity testing, forensics, industrial quality control and in vitro diagnostics. Basic PCR is commonplace in many molecular biology labs where it is used to amplify DNA fragments and detect DNA or RNA sequences within a cell or environment. However, PCR has evolved far beyond simple amplification and detection, and many extensions of the original PCR method have been described. This chapter provides an overview of different types of PCR methods, applications and optimization.

3:58 Minute Video
The polymerase chain reaction or PCR is a method to amplify a DNA template to produce specific DNA fragments in vitro. Each PCR cycle doubles the amount of target sequence or amplicon in the reaction. 0:21 MM

Basic PCR

The PCR process was originally developed to amplify short segments of a longer DNA molecule (Saiki et al. 1985). A typical amplification reaction includes target DNA, a thermostable DNA polymerase, two oligonucleotide primers, deoxynucleotide triphosphates (dNTPs), reaction buffer and magnesium. Once assembled, the reaction is placed in a thermal cycler, an instrument that subjects the reaction to a series of different temperatures for set amounts of time. This series of temperature and time adjustments is referred to as one cycle of amplification. Each PCR cycle theoretically doubles the amount of targeted sequence (amplicon) in the reaction. Ten cycles theoretically multiply the amplicon by a factor of about one thousand; 20 cycles, by a factor of more than a million in a matter of hours.

Each cycle of PCR includes steps for template denaturation, primer annealing and primer extension. The initial step denatures the target DNA by heating it to 94°C [201.2°F] or higher for 15 seconds to 2 minutes. In the denaturation process, the two intertwined strands of DNA separate from one another, producing the necessary single-stranded DNA template for replication by the thermostable DNA polymerase. In the next step of a cycle, the temperature is reduced to approximately 40–60°C [104-140°F]. At this temperature, the oligonucleotide primers can form stable associations (anneal) with the denatured target DNA and serve as primers for the DNA polymerase. This step lasts approximately 15–60 seconds. Finally, the synthesis of new DNA begins as the reaction temperature is raised to the optimum for the DNA polymerase. For most thermostable DNA polymerases, this temperature is in the range of 70–74°C [158-165.2°F]. The extension step lasts approximately 1–2 minutes. The next cycle begins with a return to 94°C for denaturation.

WOW, I had no idea this PCR Test was as BOGUS as it is!!!

Remember what the former president of the Electron Microscopy Society of America Dr. Etienne De Harven said, "they invented molecular markers to compensate for the missing viral particles"!

'She just had a cough': Teen's COVID-19 death shakes France

[www.yahoo.com]


Maybe the test was bogus?



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/28/2020 01:55AM by RawPracticalist.

. Story is bogus

Or

. Scared her to death plus deadly treatment



My heart hurts?
Dies in a week?

The manipulative drama words these people are using is so transparently fake.



Nobody dies in a week at age 19
From a cough or a "virus"

I say the whole story is fake

The people putting out these stories behind the scenes are literally psychopaths

And they are using this nonsense for lockdowns
Vaccinations
Wealth transfer
And digital currency

Maybe the French girl was given medication that killed her.

Interesting.

What about Prince Charles and prime minister Boris Johnson

[www.nbcnews.com]

Fake.

Bogus test

False positives

Or accurate test and SO WHAT? It identified "virus"
Means nothing

What about all the thousands positive without using a test in china?
CT scan. So what?

With the junk people eat plus pollution there's always gonna be congestion in lungs

What about the 10x more people last year sick and dead from flu?
We shut country down then?

You don't understand this cuz you don't read .

Read Jon rappaport blog and you won't be asking these questions

But no he has no validity to you



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 03/28/2020 11:52AM by fresh.

So because viruses do not exist
you are not
social distancing
washing your hands
your food is exposed to the elements
anything that falls on your food is beneficial

So because viruses do not exist


...Never said that. Viruses exist like bacteria exist
whether they cause disease is a different question

you are not
social distancing

..No
Whoever came up with that phrase and the enforcement of it should be jettisoned to Mars immediately

washing your hands

..Not more than normal

your food is exposed to the elements

...Yes
Like food is exposed to the elements in the wild