A COVID-19 virus was never isolated. The Wuhan investigators who reported on correlating this virus with several Wuhan patients never satisfied Koch’s nor River’s criteria for an infectious agent – not even close. They identified an RNA sequence with 80% homolgy with SARS in some patients; that is all. Because the causative agent was never isolated and purified, no valid test for COVID-19 exists because there is no way to furnish true positives and generate a Bayesian analysis. In fact, both the antibody and RT-PCR tests being used have no diagnostic value for the aforementioned reason. Also, an antibody test is always plagued by non-specificity. A PCR-based test is completely unsuited and inappropriate for screen testing as a preponderance of false positives is guaranteed. In sum, there is no proof of a COVID-19 as etiology of a supposed viral pandemic and no proof that anyone dies of a COVID-19 virus. These are objective facts. I am a trained MD-PHD scientist with 35 years experience in basic research and clinical practice. This entire so-called pandemic (the purported cases fall orders of magnitude short of what is required to designate a pandemic) is being promulgated by 24/7 reporting by the MSM and supposed case numbers created by fraudulent testing and blatent falsification of death certificates encouraged by the CDC (a private corporation) and incentivized by government reimbursement to hospitals. The ‘atypical pneumonia’ reportedly a commonality of the deceased could just as readily explained by environmental toxicity (i.e. air pollution, 5G irradiation etc.).

I think that given time and retrospective review, it will become apparent to a critical mass of the population that not only was the societal lock down unjustified and a blatant violation of the US Constitution; but its justification was based on a fictitious viral pandemic having absolutely no basis in scientific fact. It is likely that a mass of class action lawsuits will ensue. While it is fruitless to sue the sovereign United States, law suits against private principals including Fauci. Gates, CDC and Wuhan laboratories have great merit.

Quote
fresh

I think that given time and retrospective review, it will become apparent to a critical mass of the population that not only was the societal lock down unjustified and a blatant violation of the US Constitution; but its justification was based on a fictitious viral pandemic having absolutely no basis in scientific fact. It is likely that a mass of class action lawsuits will ensue. While it is fruitless to sue the sovereign United States, law suits against private principals including Fauci. Gates, CDC and Wuhan laboratories have great merit.

I don't know if you said that or the article, but Dream On! I'm Pessimistic, but just from living through the past, that's never gonna happen. "They" just keep on pushing more and more at us and never get their just desserts, get taken to account, have to answer for past atrocities. And when it says "A critical mass of the population", ha! Right now, if we're lucky, 20% of us are Corona Skeptics and the other 80% are Sheeple/Statists, so good luck with reaching Critical Mass. They're so high on power and success right now, laughing their a*ses off because of The Dumba*s Masses, they're never coming down to Earth.

I didn't say it

And I would tend to agree with you but am always hopeful
To at least manage my own sphere

Yet another article


by a conscientious citizen of planet Earth)

* Zero scientific proof has yet been provided of a new unique virus [1] based on purified isolates in a laboratory, which is the critical first step before any testing for a new virus.

* An NIH (US) study [2] relative the PCR test directly states that virus isolates were not available and that the PCR test is actually synthesized (made up) based on another virus.

* The PCR test cannot identify viral load (only genetic sequences) [3] in any case, so it is useless in testing for virus-related illness. This is stated by the inventor of the PCR test!

* Official guidelines for the PCR test [4] say a “test positive” does not necessarily mean a person is infected, and a “test positive” can be due another corona virus (common cold)!

* So without proof of a new virus and with made up tests that are essentially useless the numbers of deaths claimed to be “from” the supposed “virus” are utterly meaningless.

* The WHO gave formal policy relative this claimed “pandemic” that all deaths with a “test positive” for the “virus” be recorded as “from” the “virus” regardless of the actual cause of death [5] with national health agencies such as the CDC [6] following suit.

* This policy has been discussed by senior health officials [7] and doctors [8] globally, many of whom have made exceedingly clear that never in modern history have they been told what to put as the cause of death on death certificates (as such is fraudulent).

* Mere suspicion of the “virus” is sufficient to label deaths as being “from” the “virus” again clearly stated in WHO/CDC mandates, with hospitals in the USA getting $13,000 per patient stated as having the “virus” and $39,000 for “virus” patients on a ventilator!

* People dying from all manner of life-threatening diseases and illnesses are thus being lumped under a new “Covid-19” heading, to fabricate a fake “pandemic” by tallying up tens of thousands of deaths that were not caused by the supposedly new “virus” at all.

* Gross fraud on death certificates is happening globally due the mandates, meaning that even if there is a new corona virus the numbers are being exaggerated perhaps 10-fold.

* As strong evidence supporting the 10-fold estimate, consider that the National Institute of Health in Italy examined thousands of medical records in March [9] finding that a huge 88% of deaths claimed to be “from” the “virus” were actually from something else! This fact has been known all around the world for some weeks now, yet the huge correction to the Italian death toll has never once been publicized by any mainstream press outlets.

* In New York City less than 1% of deaths claimed to be “from” the “virus” involved no underlying medical conditions [10] which is extremely similar to Italy [11] and this means that most NYC deaths were due whatever illness(es) the person was already dying from.

* In the UK it is similar with 91% of stated deaths [12] involving pre-existing conditions.

* Lockdowns and “social distancing” are the worst way to handle a respiratory virus [13] based on various statements [14] by world experts in epidemiology and disease outbreaks.

* Lockdowns prolong a pandemic unnecessarily as people remain vulnerable to the virus due no exposure. It is more intelligent to allow a mild respiratory virus (ie. corona virus) to move through the community allowing so-called “herd immunity” to develop quickly.

* Lockdowns are causing thousands of deaths globally, due lack of proper medical care. In the UK for the week ending April 3rd there were over 2,500 “excess deaths” that had nothing to do with the claimed “virus” [15] showing that lockdowns and the cancellation of “elective” or scheduled medical appointments is killing thousands of people globally.

* Based on a thorough statistical analysis of officially claimed deaths (as at mid-April) “from” the “virus” globally—in strict lockdown countries and non-lockdown countries (includes Sweden, Japan, South Korea and others)—it is currently 7.7 times safer [16] to be in a non-lockdown country, based on death totals claimed to be “from” the “virus”!

* This proves conclusively that lockdowns have nothing to do with protecting people.

* Recent extensive testing (for whatever it is the made up tests are actually testing for) of thousands of people by Stanford [17] and USC [18] medical researchers found that there are from 28 to 85 times more people testing “positive” than the official “case” numbers.

* This means that even if there is a corona virus causing some amount of deaths globally the mortality rate is very low, no more than the “flu” (0.1% to 0.3% of infected people might end up dying). Yet, the world never got locked down due to the “flu” before now.

* Remember: up to 650,000 people die from “flu” and pneumonia [19] in a bad “flu” year (official numbers from the WHO). So if even 200,000 people died over three months of peak “cases” of “flu” and pneumonia (in a bad “flu” year) it would not be surprising.

* So far, around 195,000 people (at April 24) are stated to have died “from” the claimed new “virus” meaning even if all deaths were truly due the virus it is nothing unusual!

* There is still no excess mortality in the USA based on CDC data to mid-April [20] even with all the claimed deaths in New York, again proving this is an entirely fake pandemic.



~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~



References

[1] [theinfectiousmyth.com] – An excellent 34 page scientific analysis of the fact that no virus isolate has yet been purified (ie. no proof of a new virus has yet been presented), while detailing how useless PCR tests are for viruses.

[2] [www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov] – Note the final paragraph in the introduction, which states that “virus isolates or samples from infected patients have so far not become available to the international public health community” and then this: “Design and validation were enabled by the close genetic relatedness to the 2003 SARS-CoV, and aided by the use of synthetic nucleic acid technology.” Thus, the test was made up by synthesizing a genetic sequence in absence of actual new virus isolates!

[3] [www.globalresearch.ca] – Note the words of the PCR test creator, Kary Mullis (Nobel Prize, 1993, Chemistry) who says “these tests cannot detect free, infectious viruses at all” and this: “The tests can detect genetic sequences of viruses, but not viruses themselves.” Thus, the PCR test is useless for detecting viral-load, infectiousness, or illness, even if it was accurately made based on actual new virus isolates (which it wasn’t, see note 2 above).

[4] [blog.nomorefakenews.com] – An excellent discussion of official documents relating to tests including this from the FDA: “Detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptoms.” So a “test positive” is not confirmation of a person being infected or ill. Then this one: “Some [tests] may also detect other strains … that are genetically similar”! The tests are useless.

[5] [www9.who.int] – See the PDF “International guidelines for certification and classification (coding) of COVID-19 as cause of death” and this statement (p.3): “COVID-19 should be recorded on the medical certificate of cause of death for ALL decedents where the disease caused, or is assumed to have caused, or contributed to death.” The words “or contributed” are hugely significant, as it means that rather than a physician recording the actual real cause of death (ie. heart attack) they are told to record the death as due Covid-19 if it contributed in any way.

[6] [www.cdc.gov] – Towards the end of the page under the heading “Cause-of-death classification and definition of deaths” are these telling statements: “Deaths are coded to U07.1 when coronavirus disease 2019 or COVID-19 are reported as a cause that contributed to death on the death certificate. These can include laboratory confirmed cases, as well as cases without laboratory confirmation. If the certifier suspects COVID-19 or determines it was likely … they can report COVID-19 as ‘probable’ or ‘presumed’ on the death certificate.” So with no lab work and mere suspicion the cause of death can be listed as Covid-19, directly contradicting the CDC’s own manual on death certificate entries that says to focus on “precision and specificity”.

[7] [swprs.org] – See March 24, 2020, and the following statement (such practice is happening all around the world right now): “The director of the German National Health Institute (RKI) admitted that they count all test-positive deaths, irrespective of the actual cause of death, as ‘coronavirus deaths’.”

[8] [www.foxnews.com] – Specifically note the words of a Minnesota doctor and state senator, Dr. Scott Jensen, who says: “I would never put influenza down as the underlying cause of death and yet that’s what we are being asked to do here.” He also mentions the unusually big money on offer to hospitals for “Covid-19” patients with more if a ventilator is used.

[9] [www.telegraph.co.uk] – Further into the article is a stunning admission: “On re-evaluation by the National Institute of Health, only 12 per cent of death certificates have shown a direct causality from coronavirus”! And no global headlines about this?!

[10] [www1.nyc.gov] – See the end of the page under “Download Data” and then “COVID-19 Daily Data Summary: Deaths” PDF. Less than 1% of deaths involved no underlying conditions, very similar to Italy (see note 11).

[11] [www.bloomberg.com] – See this telling statement halfway down: “0.8% of the total had no previous pathology. Almost half of the victims suffered from at least three prior illnesses and about a fourth had either one or two previous conditions.”

[12] [www.bbc.co.uk] – Note the following observations: “In 91% of cases the individuals had other health problems. The most common was heart disease, followed by dementia and respiratory illness. On average, people dying also had roughly three other health conditions.” Again, similar to Italy and New York.

[13] [www.youtube.com] – Prof. Knut Wittkowski (the former head of The Rockefeller University’s Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Research Design for 20 years) states quite emphatically that social distancing and lockdown is the absolutely worst way to deal with a respiratory virus. About 5 minutes into the interview he says: “I’m not paid by the government. So I’m entitled to actually do science. If there had been no intervention, the epidemic would have been over.”

[14] [www.youtube.com] – Prof. Johan Giesecke (one of the world’s most senior epidemiologists, former head of the Swedish government agency for public health, and also the first Chief Scientist of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control) says: “UK policy on lockdown and other European countries are not evidence-based” and “the correct policy is to protect the old and the frail only.”

[15] [globalcooperative.wordpress.com] – Dr. Vernon Coleman from the UK discussed on March 18th (in a video statement) the likely terrible effect that lockdowns would have for the elderly. His observations are sadly proving accurate based on news stories from around the world. Thousands of elderly and ill people are dying due the lockdowns that are claimed to protect them! Horror stories of terrible neglect are surfacing such as from the nursing home in Quebec where 31 elderly people tragically died primarily due them being ignored (malnutrition, lack of water, and so on). All due to the “virus” panic.

[16] [mileswmathis.com] – On page 7 are these very critical observations based on thorough analysis of all the available data: “non-lockdown countries have just 13% of deaths per population to those in lockdown, 19% of cases per population, and 50% of deaths per cases. This means that by far the safest place to be in the world right now, if you don’t wish to catch Covid-19, is in a country not enforcing lockdown!”

[17] [www.medrxiv.org] – Based on testing 3,330 people for antibodies the study in Santa Clara County found: “These prevalence estimates represent a range … 50-85-fold more than the number of confirmed cases” meaning a fatality rate ranging from 50 to 85 times lower than earlier estimates.

[18] [news.usc.edu] – Based on testing results from 863 adults “the research team estimates that approximately 4.1% of the county’s adult population has an antibody to the virus.” Then: “That estimate is 28 to 55 times higher than the 7,994 confirmed cases” again meaning a fatality rate ranging from 28 to 55 times lower than earlier estimates. So two studies done in populations hundreds of miles apart came to quite similar conclusions.

[19] [www.who.int]) – Under the heading “Signs and symptoms” note these statements: “annual epidemics are estimated to result in about 3 to 5 million cases of severe illness, and about 290,000 to 650,000 respiratory deaths.” This statement is very telling. It informs us that epidemics are in fact annual occurrences with severe illness in 3 to 5 million cases every year! So far there are around 194,000 deaths globally (at April 24th) stated as “from” the “virus” with around 59,000 people stated as “serious or critical” making a grand total of only 253,000. This compared 3 to 5 million severe illnesses and up to 650,000 deaths in a bad “flu” year!

[20] [www.cdc.gov] – In the USA a total of 621,554 deaths (all causes) have been recorded for the 11 weeks of Jan 26th through April 11th. In the bad “flu” season of 2017-18 a total of 678,677 deaths were recorded in the USA (see [www.cdc.gov]) during an 11 week period (Dec 10th through Feb 24th). Thus, even with all of the deaths said to be “from” the “virus” overall mortality is only 92% of a recent bad “flu” season

Yup, and that summary doesn't go into the Societal effects of this Plandemic!

There's the Economic/Financial angle which I don't understand, but I'm sure AOC would because she has a degree in Economics ...

But I know that the first 'Relief Package' was $2.2 Trillion, with an additional about $4 Trillion going to The Fed. The Fed is buying Treasury notes and doing who-knows-what-else with those Trillions.

I did read this on Twitter:

[twitter.com]

"The Fed. is literally now the NEW World Central Bank with unprecedented power.. Last month alone, The Fed. opened up 14 "swap lines" to nations such as Australia, Japan, Mexico, and Norway. A "swap line" is like an emergency pipeline of dollars to countries that need them."

*****

So my take on the Financial/Economic Fallout of this Corona-Scam is that one reason all the States are holding off their opening up of Businesses and people going back to work, etc. and some are padding their Number of Deaths, and having their 'Hospitals in Crisis' is that all those states (Cuomo) are asking for/Demanding that The Government give them loads of money to bail out their Hospitals, bail out the businesses - Big Businesses - Pension Plans, all the States Economies are wanting and getting Bailouts Galore, Money Galore!

We're on the Third Relief Package for God's Sakes!

And here's my theory on all the Dumb Countries who have very few Coronavirus Deaths, yet are in Lockdown/Shut-In state. The US Fed or the World Bank, like I saw on Twitter, has a Slush Fund, and is going to be giving all the Countries all kinds of Millions/Billions of Dollars to Bail them all out! Not that simplistic, but something like that only more complex and nefarious.

What a Scam! Bankrupting the World! Is this ushering in the New World Order maybe.

....hat a Scam! Bankrupting the World! Is this ushering in the New World Order maybe.


well, when they start deploying drones I would say so.
already did it in westport CT and other places
then retracted it from westport

they will do whatever they can get away with