Living and Raw Foods web site.  Educating the world about the power of living and raw plant based diet.  This site has the most resources online including articles, recipes, chat, information, personals and more!
 

Click this banner to check it out!
Click here to find out more!

Pages: 123Next
Current Page: 1 of 3
The Social Contract
Posted by: RawPracticalist ()
Date: June 13, 2020 08:22PM

Rousseau shows us that there is a way to break the chains – from within


Quote

Man is born free and everywhere he is in chains." The opening sentence of Rousseau's The Social Contract not only summarises his entire philosophical system, it also proves how important he still is today.

Written in 1762, The Social Contract picks up where his Discourse on the Origin and Basis of Inequality Among Men left off, defining natural man as being free and happy and living in the forest. Rousseau explains how man went from this state of autonomy to the modern condition, dominated by inequality, dependency, violence and unhappiness. There were positive aspects to this process too, he admits, including the creation of families, the discovery of tools and technology, and the building of cities and social organisations. Unfortunately, this also gives way to what Rousseau called the "right of the strongest", where a reign of inequality destroys man's original state of happiness and freedom. Humanity becomes alienated, and the Discourse on Inequality ends unhappily in general war.


The Social Contract is an attempt to find a solution to this problem. For Rousseau, because of man's "perfectibility", the passage from a natural state to a social one is both an accident and necessary. Unlike animals, men are programmed to create and progress from one condition to the next. Rousseau discovers a way men can associate themselves with each other while maintaining their own individual freedom inside a social and political organisation. He calls that concept the "general will". Simply put, it is a form of association in which an individual alienates himself completely to the general will, and therefore regains his freedom in a political form. This of course has been criticised: some say it leads directly to dictatorship. Others, like Louis Althusser, say it is based on the premise that the people enter into a contract with nobody else but themselves – a logical impossibility.







[www.theguardian.com]

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: The Social Contract
Posted by: Jennifer ()
Date: June 14, 2020 04:02PM

Quote
RawPracticalist
Rousseau shows us that there is a way to break the chains – from within


Quote

Man is born free and everywhere he is in chains." The opening sentence of Rousseau's The Social Contract not only summarises his entire philosophical system, it also proves how important he still is today.

Written in 1762, The Social Contract picks up where his Discourse on the Origin and Basis of Inequality Among Men left off, defining natural man as being free and happy and living in the forest. Rousseau explains how man went from this state of autonomy to the modern condition, dominated by inequality, dependency, violence and unhappiness. There were positive aspects to this process too, he admits, including the creation of families, the discovery of tools and technology, and the building of cities and social organisations. Unfortunately, this also gives way to what Rousseau called the "right of the strongest", where a reign of inequality destroys man's original state of happiness and freedom. Humanity becomes alienated, and the Discourse on Inequality ends unhappily in general war.

The Social Contract is an attempt to find a solution to this problem. For Rousseau, because of man's "perfectibility", the passage from a natural state to a social one is both an accident and necessary. Unlike animals, men are programmed to create and progress from one condition to the next. Rousseau discovers a way men can associate themselves with each other while maintaining their own individual freedom inside a social and political organisation. He calls that concept the "general will". Simply put, it is a form of association in which an individual alienates himself completely to the general will, and therefore regains his freedom in a political form. This of course has been criticised: some say it leads directly to dictatorship. Others, like Louis Althusser, say it is based on the premise that the people enter into a contract with nobody else but themselves – a logical impossibility.


[www.theguardian.com]

Actually, man is born completely helpless and vulnerable and dependent on someone - like his mother - just to survive and for protection until he can take care of himself at least foodwise. So already it's a shitshow.

And as far as 'inequality' goes, man is born unequal because we are not all born identical in every way, and we only become more unequal because that's the way Life was designed. Yet there are those who will never give up harping on 'equality' and denigrating those who possess a more favorable quality than someone else and trying to create divisions for political purposes and take from one to give to another to make themselves look virtuous.

I don't call the creation of 'cities' and 'social organizations' positive aspects. Cities end up being nasty places and are unnatural, full of noise and air pollution, crime-ridden, dirty, just plain icky dirty stinky crowded overpopulated and unhealthy. 'Social Organizations' are only great for those who are energy vampires, those who are 'people who need people' to spout off at for Validation and to gain power.

"Right of the strongest" and "inequality", yes, he needs to get over it, we're born unequal and so there will always be inequality, so trying to make everybody equal is futile and detrimental and tyrannical. Give everybody Equal Opportunity, which is what we have now in the USA, and that's the best you can do. They will get to where they're supposed to be with their God-given abilities. And good on them and more power to them, those who are high-achievers and successful in whatever way they aspire, and those who are 'lucky' or 'fortunate' or by whatever power there is end up in a good place in whatever way.

"Discourse on Inequality" is only from guys like him who just can't accept the fact that we're all born unequal and we always will be no matter what the petty would-be dictators do to us. So can these people ever stop harping on 'inequality' because 'fixing inequality' is what Politics and Power is all about - The Party of Division.

The Social Contract is an attempt to find a solution to this problem. That whole last paragraph is a Man-Made Political/Social CONSTRUCT * so totally bullshit.

So if Rousseau spent his whole life railing against 'Inequality' and trying to fix it when it's the way Life was designed, then he's a dumbass.

Instead of all this "Inequality" claptrap which equals Political, Power crap, give me a philosopher who talks about Virtues and Morals, and I'll give his writings credence.

*********

* Definition of Social Construct
Formal : an idea that has been created and accepted by the people in a society. Class distinctions are a Social Construct.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: The Social Contract
Posted by: RawPracticalist ()
Date: June 15, 2020 11:16AM

In the animal and human kingdoms, a baby is taken care of by his parents, he does not have the physical capacities to take care of himself.

He is born free from evil, that is what is being outlined here. He does have the instinct of self-preservation, of survival which leads him not to want to share what he is given. That is not a bad thing.

Children do not care what race you are from, how beautiful or tall you are, they will love you the way you are. They are free from evil until they learn the evil doings, the separation, the clans, the importance of the color of their skins, the liberals, the conservatives.

But society is useful even with all of the issues that come from living together. We inherit knowledge from our ancestors, the technology, the tools.

Think about the leap from horse riding, to the modern car, and the comfort of plane trips.

How long will it take for a single isolated family in the forest to reinvent all of that?

So living in cities and societies has big issues but the rewards are much bigger.


Options: ReplyQuote
Re: The Social Contract
Posted by: Jennifer ()
Date: June 15, 2020 01:44PM

Quote
RawPracticalist
In the animal and human kingdoms, a baby is taken care of by his parents, he does not have the physical capacities to take care of himself.

He is born free from evil, that is what is being outlined here. He does have the instinct of self-preservation, of survival which leads him not to want to share what he is given. That is not a bad thing.

Children do not care what race you are from, how beautiful or tall you are, they will love you the way you are. They are free from evil until they learn the evil doings, the separation, the clans, the importance of the color of their skins, the liberals, the conservatives.

But society is useful even with all of the issues that come from living together. We inherit knowledge from our ancestors, the technology, the tools.

Think about the leap from horse riding, to the modern car, and the comfort of plane trips.

How long will it take for a single isolated family in the forest to reinvent all of that?

So living in cities and societies has big issues but the rewards are much bigger.



Actually, I don't even agree that 'men are created equal'. People are born different, not the same. To be created equal, we would all have to be exactly alike. Is it possible that way back in the day when Man was first created, we were all exactly the same, but as time and mutations happened, we started being born different?

For example:

some people are created with a low IQ
some people are created ugly
some people are created physically deformed
some people are created deaf
some people are created dumb
some people are created blind
some people are created short
some people are created evil
some people are created disabled
some people are created with various gene mutations

Men are created with Different Brains, so different Attributes, Abilities, Talents, which makes us born Unequal.

We are born of different mothers and fathers and Inherited their Genes.

Also, I believe we are born with various amounts of Inherent Evil and
Goodness. It's in the Genes. Blood will out. Breeding will tell.


So I don't believe 'we are born free from evil'. What does that even mean? That we ourselves have no evil in us when we are born or that the nano-second we are born, there is no evil from outside us?

The minute we're born - and before in the womb - we can be physically abused, so I don't call that 'we are born free from Evil'.

Or - I forgot a lot of my Bible learning, so was Man originally born 'free from Evil' and then with the Garden of Eden, the snake, the apple - since then Man is not free from Evil like I say?

Also, as far as 'children do not care how beautiful you are', I disagree. I have two grandsons - 2 and 4. As far back as I can remember, probably when they started speaking to make themselves understood, they've been surrounded with many people, all ages. They have always gotten little crushes on the pretty young girls, not the old ladies. And everybody knows that children can be scared of people who are strange or ugly or scary looking, etc. so who came up with that 'children do not care how beautiful you are' - you, RawPracticalist?

And regarding children, you said - 'They are free from evil until they learn the evil doings', as I said, no, I've had my own children and other children in my family and friends, neighbors, been around many children, as young as babies. From my observation, I've seen signs of 'evil' or at least 'badness', 'nastiness' 'brattiness' 'meanness' in many babies and toddlers, before they had a chance to 'learn' to be evil. For example, when my one-year-old baby girl was with her one-year-old baby cousin, sitting together, the bratty cousin was pinching my baby as hard as she could over and over - with a certain glint in her eyes - that I observed. I call that evil to a certain degree inside her! And as the cousin got older, same type of behavior only different. Like taking my little girl's doll and ripping the doll's socks when no one was looking. Always with that same glint in the eyes. Inherent Evil to a certain degree in that little girl and now that she's older, I still see the glint in the eye at times.

I know other families that have a horrible nasty grandfather and the grandchild will have the Evil Streak in them, also. Inherent degree of Evil. Possibly skipping a generation to my observation. GENES.

Is that Says You - that 'So living in cities and societies has big issues but the rewards are much bigger?' Depends on what you mean by 'Rewards'. An intuitive I know said that Cities are full of Emotionally Dysfunctional people, which we see playing out all the time and why Cities become sh*tholes.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 06/15/2020 01:46PM by Jennifer.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: The Social Contract
Posted by: RawPracticalist ()
Date: June 15, 2020 02:25PM

>some people are created ugly
Really?

Can you find me one, just one who was created ugly?

Just one.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: The Social Contract
Posted by: Jennifer ()
Date: June 15, 2020 02:37PM

Really? You're going to make me go to Google and look up Ugly Baby and post photos of ugly babies to make myself look heartless ...

Or are we in this Liberal Politically Correct Nightmare not allowed to even say that "Some Babies Are Ugly"??? Would that be called Ugly Baby Shaming and I'd be Doxxed by the Angry Liberal Mob?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: The Social Contract
Posted by: Jennifer ()
Date: June 15, 2020 02:44PM

Baby RawPracticalist ...



Options: ReplyQuote
Re: The Social Contract
Posted by: RawPracticalist ()
Date: June 15, 2020 02:45PM

From what position are you seeing an ugly baby?

Please tell us.

From the position of beautiful Jennifer? or Ugly Jennifer?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: The Social Contract
Posted by: Jennifer ()
Date: June 15, 2020 03:05PM

You'll never know tongue sticking out smiley

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: The Social Contract
Posted by: RawPracticalist ()
Date: June 15, 2020 03:23PM

There is no living organism as beautiful as the human body.

Trillions of cells that are able without our own intervention to exchange messages, the brain, and its complexity, the heartbeats, and so many complex functions.

We can run, we can jump, we can smile, we can love

And we did nothing to earn all of that.

Enjoy the beauty you were given free.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 06/15/2020 04:02PM by RawPracticalist.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: The Social Contract
Posted by: RawPracticalist ()
Date: June 15, 2020 04:39PM

Here is Steven Hawking, the physical body disabled but who able to transcends that with the genius of his mind.



and more



and more


Options: ReplyQuote
Re: The Social Contract
Posted by: John Rose ()
Date: June 16, 2020 02:32AM

"As a revolutionary thinker, Rousseau (1712-1778) understood that the general will, or the will of the people, should be sovereign – and that is the catch. It is here where we regain our freedom inside social organisation. Only the general will – general interest as opposed to private interest – guarantees man his autonomy. No society can be free unless individuals understand that the general will or general interest should prevail over their own individual one."

"'Man is born free and everywhere is in chains.' Centuries after that prophetic opening sentence, we should ask ourselves if we can afford to ignore Rousseau's warning, in a world dominated by flashing mobile phones and social media. Man may indeed be born free, but in the 21st century, the chains may be even harder to see."


“None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.” -Goethe (1749-1832)

[www.hitler.org]
Programme of the NSDAP, 24 February 1920

The 25 points of the NSDAP Program were composed by Adolf Hitler and Anton Drexler. They were publically presented on 24 February 1920 "to a crowd of almost two thousand and every single point was accepted amid jubilant approval."

...

Hitler was intent on having a community of mutual interest that desired mutual success instead of one that was divided over the control of money or differing values.


THE COMMON INTEREST BEFORE SELF-INTEREST - THAT IS THE SPIRIT OF THE PROGRAM. BREAKING OF THE THRALDOM OF INTEREST - THAT IS THE KERNEL OF NATIONAL SOCIALISM.

...

The Programme of the German Workers' Party is designed to be of limited duration. The leaders have no intention, once the aims announced in it have been achieved, of establishing fresh ones, merely in order to increase, artificially, the discontent of the masses and so ensure the continued existence of the Party.

...

18. We demand the ruthless prosecution of those whose activities are injurious to the common interest. Common criminals, usurers, profiteers, etc., must be punished with death, whatever their creed or race.

...

24. We demand freedom for all religious denominations in the State, provided they do not threaten its existence nor offend the moral feelings of the German race.

The Party, as such, stands for positive Christianity, but does not commit itself to any particular denomination. It combats the Jewish-materialistic spirit within and without us, and is convinced that our nation can achieve permanent health only from within on the basis of the principle:
The common interest before self-interest.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: The Social Contract
Posted by: RawPracticalist ()
Date: June 16, 2020 10:41AM

Quote
John Rose
...
24. We demand freedom for all religious denominations in the State, provided they do not threaten its existence nor offend the moral feelings of the German race.

The Party, as such, stands for positive Christianity, but does not commit itself to any particular denomination. It combats the Jewish-materialistic spirit within and without us, and is convinced that our nation can achieve permanent health only from within on the basis of the principle:[/size] The common interest before self-interest.

Good point John about the common interest before self-interest.

The problem with Program of the German Workers’ Party (1920)
is outlined in red in their manifesto. It was not in the common interest but the interest of the selected few, the Aryan race.


4. Only members of the nation may be citizens of the State. Only those of German blood, whatever their creed, may be members of the nation. Accordingly, no Jew may be a member of the nation.

5. Non-citizens may live in Germany only as guests and must be subject to laws for aliens.

[ghdi.ghi-dc.org]


Quote

the German people—sought the “final solution to the Jewish question,” the murder of all Jews— men, women, and children—and their eradication from the human race. In Nazi ideology that perceived Jewishness to be biological, the elimination of the Jews was essential to the purification and even the salvation of the Aryan race.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: The Social Contract
Posted by: John Rose ()
Date: June 16, 2020 10:57AM

The Jewish Holocaust NEVER Happened!!!


Holocaust Or Holohoax 05: Twenty-One Amazing Facts

“If the Allies did not destroy Hitler and Germany, there would be NO Fake Pandemic, Financial Collapse and NWO

1. International Committee of the Red Cross Records:

1. International Committee of the Red Cross Records:

The International Red Cross was stationed in all German labour, internment, concentration and prison camps throughout World War Two. The Red Cross were never given access to any Russian camps before, during or after World War Two. At his trials in Canada, during the 1980s and 1990s, Professor Ernst Zundel finally got the Red Cross to release their records from the German camps despite strong Israeli objections. The Red Cross records seem to suggest that there were no gas chambers, and a total of 271,301 died during World War Two in these camps, mostly from typhus.

In a letter to the US State Department dated November 22nd 1944 The Red Cross, who were stationed in all the camps, stated: “We have not been able to discover any trace of installations for exterminating civilian prisoners.”

Official Red Cross records. [Go to link to see document.]

5. The British Secret Service Monitored All Concentration Camp Deaths:

Using some of the World’s first computers the British Secret Service had cracked the German top-secret Enigma code and had access to most German Military communications by 1942. Sir Frank H. Hinsley, in his book British Intelligence In The Second World War ; It’s Influence On Strategy And Operations, stated “The returns of Auschwitz mentioned illness as the main cause of death but included references to shootings and hangings. There were no references in the decrypts to gassings.” The numbers of dead in the decoded messages tallied exactly with Red Cross and German Military records of the time. The British Secret Service also monitored various atrocities carried out by the Germans across the rest of Europe – why would the Germans report these to Berlin but not the alleged gas chambers at Auschwitz and other camps?

The British Secret Service were monitoring all German Military and Police communications by 1942.

RECAP

The Red Cross records seem to suggest that there were no gas chambers, and a total of 271,301 died during World War Two in these camps, mostly from typhus.

The numbers of dead in the decoded messages tallied exactly with Red Cross and German Military records of the time.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: The Social Contract
Posted by: John Rose ()
Date: June 16, 2020 11:44AM

“Racial and national groups have a right to protect their racial character. I find it odd that countries like Israel, China and Japan can do this without criticism but countries in Europe and North America cannot. Blacks, Jews and Hispanics can do this but Europeans cannot. I also believe discrimination in favor of a "minority" is as bad as discrimination against one.” -Henry Makow Ph.D.

The Raw Food/Cooked Food & Autarky Connection


Here's an old email from one of my dear departed friends...

Autarky - Individual and National Self-Sufficiency is the Future
Date: Sun, January 20, 2013 6:35:59 PM
From: ....net>
To: ...net>


Adolph Hitler predicated his entire program for the resuscitation of the German Nation upon the principal of “Autarky”. It means individual as well as national self-sufficiency. It was apparently one of the main reasons why National Socialism had to be so thoroughly destroyed and discredited. "Autarky" was not even in my vocabulary until I ran across it in Red Symphony. Most people I talk to have never heard of the word, which is very telling in itself, I think! How can we create something (or even think about it) if we don't have a word for it??

Here's the passage (excerpted for brevity) where it comes up. Red Symphony, the lengthy transcript of the interrogation of Christian Rakovsky (a Trotskyite) by one of Stalin's top agents, feels totally genuine to me, although others may have reservations about it. See the link below for the story behind this intriguing document, if you are not already familiar with it. Rakovsky is explaining the first of three major purposes to be served by the new European war (WWII), which was then (in January 1938) in the planning stages:

R. - One is that which I had already mentioned. Hitler... has restored... an economic system of a very dangerous kind. ...he removed, as we had done it in the USSR, the private and international capital [JR: Hitler read "The International Jew" by Henry Ford - Henry Ford’s Best Kept Secret]. That means that he took over for himself the privilege of manufacturing money, and not only physical moneys, but also financial ones; he took over the untouched machinery of falsification and put it to work for the benefit of the State. He exceeded us, as we, having abolished it in Russia, replaced it merely by this crude apparatus called State Capitalism; this was a very expensive triumph in view of the necessities of pre-revolutionary demagogy ... I shall even say that Hitler had been lucky; he had almost no gold and for that reason he was not tempted to create a gold reserve. Insofar as he only possessed a full monetary guarantee of technical equipment and colossal working capacity of the Germans, his "gold reserve" was technical capacity and work ..., something so completely counter-revolutionary that, as you already see, he has by means of magic, as it were, radically eliminated unemployment among more than seven million technicians and workers...

R. - ... If Hitler reached this despite all the bourgeois economists who surround him, then he was quite capable, in the absence of the danger of war, of applying his system also to peaceful production ... Are you capable of imagining what would have come of this system if it had infected a number of other States and brought about the creation of a period of autarky ... If you can, then imagine its counter-revolutionary functions ... ...there is a hidden danger as at any moment there can appear, as the consequence of deduction, a formula. This is very serious... We do not attack it in our propaganda as it could happen that through theoretical polemics we would ourselves provoke a formulation and systematization of this so decisive economic doctrine. There is only one solution - war. See [www.bibliotecapleyades.net]

Hey rp, I have files on Autarky and Red Symphony, so in case you ever want to learn the truth, let me know and I'll send them to you.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: The Social Contract
Posted by: RawPracticalist ()
Date: June 16, 2020 12:42PM

>Racial and national groups have a right to protect their racial character

Protect their racial character by exterminating other races?

That is so stupid and against the points, you made about the interest of the whole society, not the selected few.

I can understand somebody boasting about the education he has achieved, our physical abilities he has acquired in the gym but race?

We are born with it, we did nothing to acquire the race, the color of the skin, and we make ourselves superior and others have to die so we can live.




The Holaucost never happened ??????????????????????????









[www.timesofisrael.com]



Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 06/16/2020 01:11PM by RawPracticalist.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: The Social Contract
Posted by: John Rose ()
Date: June 16, 2020 05:51PM

The very first picture you show is a perfect example of what happens when we take a closer look at the Holocaust where the Official Version we've been given is RIDDLED with DECEPTION - see "So where's the naked Jew guy?" below.

[ww2truth.com]
15. Fake Photographic And Film Holocaust Evidence And The Ever Changing Numbers:

The first time fake evidence was used was during the Nuremberg Trials. This however became an industry in its own right after 1945, with large rewards paid to investigators for “finding” Holocaust evidence. At the time a lot of this evidence was very cutting-edge, but under modern scrutiny it simply doesn’t stand up.

Modern forensic techniques have exposed a lot of “Holocaust” photographic evidence as faked.

So where's the naked Jew guy? -Go to link to see the same picture rp posted above, but without the naked guy.

New systems of examining photographs and film have exposed large amounts of it as totally fake, other evidence has been exposed as coming from completely different sources e.g. The Russian Gulags.

If the Holocaust is “Historical Fact” then why are Faked Photos, Forged Documents and Forced Confessions the only Evidence ever presented?

As evidence has emerged discrediting large parts, if not all, of the alleged Holocaust narrative the jews have been forced to constantly change the numbers in their claims. They have, however, constantly stuck to an overall total of 6 million jewish deaths, even though this makes no mathematical sense as the component numbers are revised downwards. This hasn’t led to a partial refund of the damages paid to Israel by Germany based on the 6 million figure.

[ww2truth.com]

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: The Social Contract
Posted by: John Rose ()
Date: June 16, 2020 05:53PM

The TRUTH Fears NO Investigation!!!

The Holocaust is the only event in history to be enforced by Law!

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: The Social Contract
Posted by: fresh ()
Date: June 16, 2020 09:27PM

You can often tell what is true by how vehemently people fight against it.

Holohoax
Anti vax
911 truth
Homeschooling
Raw diet
Germ theory

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: The Social Contract
Posted by: RawPracticalist ()
Date: June 17, 2020 03:04AM

So according to you, Hilter was a good person who was doing good work and the holocaust never happened.

Here are Hitler quotes from his book Mein Kampf. I guess you will say he did not write the book or the book text was modified.

Hitler's evil thoughts are about his race being a pure race and other races are inferior. That is pure evil.
He does not even understand how the body, the blood, the races were created by the divine forces, and yet he believes his to be superior and others are inferior and need to perish. There is nothing eviler than that.


"For a racially pure people which is conscious of its blood can never be enslaved by the Jew. In this world he will forever be master over bastards and bastards alone."

"Eternal Nature inexorably avenges the infringement of her commands. Hence today I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator: by defending myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord .”


"With satanic joy in his face, the black-haired Jewish youth lurks in wait for the unsuspecting girl whom he defiles with his blood, thus stealing her from her people. With every means he tries to destroy the racial foundations of the people he has set out to subjugate. Just as he himself systematically ruins women and girls, he does not shrink back from pulling down the blood barriers for others, even on a large scale. It was and it is Jews who bring the Negroes into the Rhineland, always with the same secret thought and clear aim of ruining the hated white race by the necessarily resulting bastardization, throwing it down from its cultural and political height, and himself rising to be its master.

The most frightful example of this kind is offered by Russia, where he killed or starved about thirty million people with positively fanatical savagery, in part amid inhuman tortures, in order to give a gang of Jewish journalists and stock exchange bandits domination over a great people.

The end is not only the end of the freedom of the peoples oppressed by the Jew, but also the end of this parasite upon the nations. After the death of his victim, the vampire sooner or later dies too [pp. 293-296]"




[www.yadvashem.org]



Edited 5 time(s). Last edit at 06/17/2020 03:19AM by RawPracticalist.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: The Social Contract
Posted by: John Rose ()
Date: June 17, 2020 09:53AM

<<<You can often tell what is true by how vehemently people fight against it.

Holohoax
Anti vax
911 truth
Homeschooling
Raw diet
Germ theory>>>

Exactly!!!


The TRUTH Fears NO Investigation!!!

The Holocaust is the only event in history to be enforced by Law!

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: The Social Contract
Posted by: RawPracticalist ()
Date: June 17, 2020 10:09AM

At the 1936 Olympics, Hitler could not accept that a black man won at the long jump against his pure race athletes. He refused to shake Jesse Owen's hands.

For Hitler, the Blacks were less humans than the Jew.

President Obama's father was black, Hitler would not have accepted Obama as human, less as President of the greatest country on earth.

When you have no argument against some historical facts, for you they did not exist. There was no Olympics in 1936, no Jesse Owen, no Hitler, all of that was fabricated.

Moments in Time: The day Hitler lost the war for hearts and minds [www.sportsmax.tv]









Hitler's pure race athletes are left behind.



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 06/17/2020 10:47AM by RawPracticalist.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: The Social Contract
Posted by: John Rose ()
Date: June 17, 2020 10:59AM

Another one of the many Lies, which just goes to show everyone that you obviously do NOT have an intelligent mind!!!

“It is the mark of an intelligent mind, to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.” -Aristotle

[www.sweetliberty.org]
WITNESS TO HISTORY
Michael Walsh
CHAPTER 7
THE BERLIN OLYMPICS, 1936
SEPARATING FACT FROM FICTION

Despite his unprecedented Olympic performance and the widely published -- but false -- story that Hitler had snubbed Owens after he won his medals, he returned home to face a racial struggle in his own country.

JESSE OWENS
"When I came back, after all the stories about Hitler and his snub, I came back to my native country and I couldn't ride in the front of the bus, I had to go to the back door. I couldn't live where I wanted . . . I wasn't invited up to shake hands with Hitler . . . but I wasn't invited to the White House to shake hands with the President, either.
"Joe Louis and I were the first modern national sports figures who were black, But neither of us could do national advertising because the South wouldn't buy it. That was the social stigma we lived under."

The Hitler snub story is explained this way: After the opening day of the 1936 Olympics, the winners were escorted to the dictator's box to be congratulated.

But International Olympic Committee President Count Henri de Baillet-Latour of Belgium told Hitler he had no business congratulating any of the athletes. After that, Hitler left the stadium each day without congratulating anyone. The Tampa Tribune Tuesday, April 1,1980

Sixty-years of fanciful embellishment, ignorance and mischievous comment has created an image of National Socialist Germany that owes little to reality. A typical example of such distortion is woven around the 1936 Berlin Olympics.
This international event is often mentioned in the context of it being the Olympics at which the American Negro, Jesse Owens, 'humiliated Nazi Germany and destroyed the myth of Aryan superiority.' What are the true facts?

Jesse Owens, a fine athlete was the citizen of a country whose racism would have made Hitler blush. The contrast between the two countries would have been quite remarkable for this humble and likeable ex-cotton picker.

In Hitler's Germany, Jesse Owens could share a bus or tram ride with white people. Treated equally in all respects before the law, he could sit in a cinema next to whites, use public toilets, and dine in restaurants, stay in hotels without any discrimination being shown towards him. There was much that he could do in Hitler's Germany that was forbidden at home in the United States.

In the United States Negro athletes were required to eat apart from their white fellow athletes. If they were allowed to share the same hotel at all, which was unlikely, it would be necessary for them to use the tradesmen's back entrance.
There were no Negroes on any major league baseball team and there were no Negro swimmers. This was of course in the so-called enlightened north. In the southern states there was no possibility of a Negro being allowed to participate in any sport unless he competed solely with other Negroes.

For Jesse Owens, his days in Hitler's Germany must have been happy indeed. There he received a great deal of pre-Olympic media hype and the German people idolised him.

"Once at the stadium, the mere appearance of Jesse Owens neatly moulded head from some pit below the stands would cause sections of the crowd to break out in chants of, 'Yes-sa Ov-enss! Yes-sa Ov-enss!' -- Richard D. Mandell. The Nazi Olympics

"Some mornings at the Olympic village the athletic hero of the hour was awakened by amateur photographers who flocked outside his bedroom window to click at the athlete before he could gather poise for one of his many appearances before the mobs in Berlin." -- Richard D. Mandell. The Nazi Olympics

"Jesse Owens was cheered as loudly as any Aryan." -- Lawrence N. Snyder; Jesse's coach. Saturday Evening Post Nov. 7th, 1936

THE HITLER SNUB MYTH
One of the common tales that is perpetuated in the media is that at the 'Nazi Olympics', Adolf Hitler snubbed Jesse Owens by refusing to shake his hand.

The reality is far different. Hitler on the first day of the Berlin Olympics did indeed shake the hands of several successful competitors from Germany and Finland. It was a mistake made in good faith. That evening the Fuhrer received a message from Count Baillet-Latour, President of the International Olympic Committee. It was respectfully pointed out to the German Leader that as he was merely a guest of honour at the Games, he should congratulate all or none -- in public at least.

Hitler, in common with all other national leaders before and since chose the latter as being the most sensible course. With 156 gold medals being awarded at various locations and times, it was not physically possible to personally congratulate every winner. Jesse Owens was not personally congratulated by the Fuhrer; nor were any of the other successful competitors, white or otherwise . . . at the request of the President of the I.O.C.

It is interesting to note that Jesse Owens' own President Roosevelt, failed to honour this great athlete and did in fact refuse to meet him, despite there being no such protocol restriction imposed upon him.

But afterwards, Jesse Owens said:
"When I passed the Chancellor he arose, waved his hand at me, and I waved back at him. I think the writers showed bad taste in criticising the man of the hour in Germany."

Afterwards, Owens and his coach, Larry Snyder on arrival in London complained that they felt like 'trained seals'. They were subjected to a barrage of 'fraudulent publicity offers', so much so that they refused further engagements. Time proved Larry Snyder and Jesse Owens right. None of the offers came to anything but big name promoters like Eddy Cantor had received a great deal of favourable publicity.

Back home in the United States, Jesse Owens was treated like a freak and an animal.

"Before curious crowds he raced horses (and won). He ran against cars, trucks, dogs, and baseball players with a head start." -- Norman Katkov. Jesse Owens Revisited. The World of Sport, p.289

His was a thirties America that had seen 26 lynchings -- all Negroes; an America where Negroes had to use separate public toilets and public transport; went to all-black schools, and couldn't mix with white people in restaurants, cinemas, hotels, stadiums, etc. Hitler's Germany and the German people must have seemed very welcoming by contrast.

FOR THE RECORD:
Hitler's Germany won a total of 101 medals (41 gold) and 223 points. Their only credible rival was the United States which though three times bigger in population won 40% fewer medals and points. (25 gold medals -- 4 to Jesse Owens -- and just 132 points). The U.S.A's size and its reliance on coloured athletes did little to reduce its humiliation, which in fact justified Hitler's claim to the potential of Aryan superiority.

Hitler's Germany (population 80 millions) won more gold medals than the United States, Great Britain, India, Canada, Argentina, France, and Norway together; a combined population of 1,160 millions: 14 times bigger than Germany's. If this is humiliation, perhaps we could do with a dash of it ourselves.
SUMMER OLYMPICS:
GOLD SILVER BRONZE POINTS
HITLER'S GERMANY: 33 26 30 (181)
UNITED STATES: 24 20 12 (124)
FASCIST ITALY: 8 9 5 (47)
GREAT BRITAIN: 4 7 23 (29)
OLYMPIC ART POINTS:
GERMANY (27)
ITALY (11)
BRITAIN (0)
U.S.A (2)
THE WINTER OLYMPICS:
GERMANY (15)
BRITAIN (6)
U.S.A. (6)
Next -- Chapter 8 -- PEACE GETS THE NELSON'S EYE

[www.sweetliberty.org]

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: The Social Contract
Posted by: RawPracticalist ()
Date: June 17, 2020 11:34AM

You have some points about racism in the USA and the country still continue to have big issues with that.

[indiancountrytoday.com]

But the historical facts you refuse to address are these.

The superiority of the Aryan race, the pure race

The treatment of the jew

The blacks were even less humans than the jew.


Quote

Denial of rights and work

The 1935 Nuremberg Laws stripped Jews of their German citizenship and prohibited them from marrying or having sexual relations with “people of German blood”.

A subsequent ruling confirmed that black people (like “gypsies”) were to be regarded as being “of alien blood” and subject to the Nuremberg principles. Very few people of African descent had German citizenship, even if they were born in Germany, but this became irreversible when they were given passports that designated them as “stateless negroes”.

...

Sterilisation: an assault on families

It was the Nazi fear of “racial pollution” that led to the most common trauma suffered by black Germans: the break-up of families. “Mixed” couples were harassed into separating. When others applied for marriage licences, or when a woman was known to be pregnant or had a baby, the black partner became a target for involuntary sterilisation.

In a secret action in 1937, some 400 of the Rhineland children were forcibly sterilised. Other black Germans went into hiding or fled the country to escape sterilisation, while news of friends and relatives who had not escaped intensified the fear that dominated people’s lives.

The black German community was new in 1933; in most families the first generation born in Germany was just coming of age. In that respect it was similar to the communities in France and Britain that were forming around families founded by men from the colonies.
[theconversation.com]



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 06/17/2020 11:41AM by RawPracticalist.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: The Social Contract
Posted by: John Rose ()
Date: June 17, 2020 11:43AM

YES, THERE ARE LOTS OF LIES WITH THE OFFICIAL VERSION!!!

DECEPTION - DECEPTION - DECEPTION - DECEPTION!!!


AND YOU, once again, have PROVEN that YOU DO NOT HAVE AN INTELLIGENT MIND!!!

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: The Social Contract
Posted by: John Rose ()
Date: June 17, 2020 11:47AM

WARNING - you have to have a working brain to see this obvious Connection, which will soon be illustrated by one or more people who obviously do NOT have a working brain.

All of the Stories you hear about World War II are Lies! Listen to General Patton! Do you know what General Patton said? Military Governor of Germany - he went over there - he ran the place - he took over Germany - he saw the French - he saw the Brits - he saw the Russians - he saw the Jews and do you know what he said?

My God, we Destroyed the Wrong people - we Fought the Wrong people!

What did the Rulers of the World do to General Patton?

They Killed him because he was telling his wife and his friends saying, hey; look at what I’m finding out over here. We made a Mistake. There’s a reason why we came over here and Bombed the hell out of Germany so that no one can see that they were Prospering, just like Japan was Prospering. Enact an Embargo on them - Starve them - we can’t Prove to the World we Live on an Abundant Planet.

Here is my Best of the Best of the File Preview and the Best of the File Preview for my file on General George S. Patton followed by my Notes on a very enlightening Video with Eustace Mullins:

…Best of the Best of the File Preview…
• … World War II had been fought against the wrong people.
• … We have destroyed what could have been a good race, and we are about to replace them with Mongolian savages. …
• … the English and the Americans have destroyed in Europe the only sound country -- and I do not mean France. …
• … Germans are the only decent people left in Europe. … "What we are doing is to destroy the only semi-modern state in Europe, so that Russia can swallow the whole."
• … not unhappy with his new assignment, because "I would like it much better than being a sort of executioner to the best race in Europe."

…End of the Best of the Best of the File Preview…

…Best of the File Preview…
• It was only in the final days of the war and during his tenure as military governor of Germany -- after he had gotten to know both the Germans and America's "gallant Soviet allies" -- that Patton's understanding of the true situation grew and his opinions changed. In his diary and in many letters to his family, friends, various military colleagues, and government officials, he expressed his new understanding and his apprehensions for the future. His diary and his letters were published in 1974 by the Houghton Mifflin Company under the title The Patton Papers.
• His duties as military governor took Patton to all parts of Germany and intimately acquainted him with the German people and their condition. He could not help but compare them with the French, the Italians, the Belgians, and even the British. This comparison gradually forced him to the conclusion that World War II had been fought against the wrong people.
• After a visit to ruined Berlin, he wrote his wife on July 21, 1945: "Berlin gave me the blues. We have destroyed what could have been a good race, and we are about to replace them with Mongolian savages. And all Europe will be communist. It's said that for the first week after they took it (Berlin), all women who ran were shot and those who did not were raped. I could have taken it (instead of the Soviets) had I been allowed."
• This conviction, that the politicians had used him and the U.S. Army for a criminal purpose, grew in the following weeks. During a dinner with French General Alphonse Juin in August, Patton was surprised to find the Frenchman in agreement with him. His diary entry for August 18 quotes Gen. Juin: "It is indeed unfortunate, mon General, that the English and the Americans have destroyed in Europe the only sound country -- and I do not mean France. Therefore, the road is now open for the advent of Russian communism."
• Later diary entries and letters to his wife reiterate this same conclusion. On August 31 he wrote: "Actually, the Germans are the only decent people left in Europe. It’s a choice between them and the Russians. I prefer the Germans." And on September 2: "What we are doing is to destroy the only semi-modern state in Europe, so that Russia can swallow the whole."
• Eisenhower responded immediately to the press outcry against Patton and made the decision to relieve him of his duties as military governor and "kick him upstairs" as the commander of the Fifteenth Army. In a letter to his wife on September 29, Patton indicated that he was, in a way, not unhappy with his new assignment, because "I would like it much better than being a sort of executioner to the best race in Europe."

• The more he saw of the Soviets, the stronger Patton's conviction grew that the proper course of action would be to stifle communism then and there, while the chance existed. Later in May 1945 he attended several meetings and social affairs with top Red Army officers, and he evaluated them carefully. He noted in his diary on May 14:
• "I have never seen in any army at any time, including the German Imperial Army of 1912, as severe discipline as exists in the Russian army. The officers, with few exceptions, give the appearance of recently civilized Mongolian bandits."
• And Patton's aide, General Hobart Gay, noted in his own journal for May 14: "Everything they (the Russians) did impressed one with the idea of virility and cruelty."
• Having immediately recognized the Soviet danger and urged a course of action which would have freed all of eastern Europe from the communist yoke with the expenditure of far less American blood than was spilled in Korea and Vietnam and would have obviated both those later wars not to mention World War III -- Patton next came to appreciate the true nature of the people for whom World War II was fought: the Jews.
• Most of the Jews swarming over Germany immediately after the war came from Poland and Russia, and Patton found their personal habits shockingly uncivilized.
• He was disgusted by their behavior in the camps for Displaced Persons (DP's) which the Americans built for them and even more disgusted by the way they behaved when they were housed in German hospitals and private homes. He observed with horror that "these people do not understand toilets and refuse to use them except as repositories for tin cans, garbage, and refuse . . . They decline, where practicable, to use latrines, preferring to relieve themselves on the floor."
• He described in his diary one DP camp,
• "where, although room existed, the Jews were crowded together to an appalling extent, and in practically every room there was a pile of garbage in one corner which was also used as a latrine. The Jews were only forced to desist from their nastiness and clean up the mess by the threat of the butt ends of rifles. Of course, I know the expression 'lost tribes of Israel' applied to the tribes which disappeared -- not to the tribe of Judah from which the current sons of bitches are descended. However, it is my personal opinion that this too is a lost tribe -- lost to all decency."
• Patton's initial impressions of the Jews were not improved when he attended a Jewish religious service at Eisenhower's insistence. His diary entry for September 17, 1945, reads in part:
• "This happened to be the feast of Yom Kippur, so they were all collected in a large, wooden building, which they called a synagogue. It behooved General Eisenhower to make a speech to them. We entered the synagogue, which was packed with the greatest stinking bunch of humanity I have ever seen. When we got about halfway up, the head rabbi, who was dressed in a fur hat similar to that worn by Henry VIII of England and in a surplice heavily embroidered and very filthy, came down and met the General . . . The smell was so terrible that I almost fainted and actually about three hours later lost my lunch as the result of remembering it."
• These experiences and a great many others firmly convinced Patton that the Jews were an especially unsavory variety of creature and hardly deserving of all the official concern the American government was bestowing on them.
• General George S. Patton was assassinated to silence his criticism of allied war leaders claims new book
• George S. Patton, America's greatest combat general of the Second World War, was assassinated after the conflict with the connivance of US leaders, according to a new book.
• The newly unearthed diaries of a colourful assassin for the wartime Office of Strategic Services (OSS), the forerunner of the CIA, reveal that American spy chiefs wanted Patton dead because he was threatening to expose allied collusion with the Russians that cost American lives.
• His book, "Target Patton", contains interviews with Mr. Bazata, who died in 1999, and extracts from his diaries, detailing how he staged the car crash by getting a troop truck to plough into Patton's Cadillac and then shot the general with a low-velocity projectile, which broke his neck while his fellow passengers escaped without a scratch.
• Mr. Bazata also suggested that when Patton began to recover from his injuries, US officials turned a blind eye as agents of the NKVD, the forerunner of the KGB, poisoned the general.
• Mr. Wilcox told The Sunday Telegraph that when he spoke to Mr. Bazata: "He was struggling with himself, all these killings he had done. He confessed to me that he had caused the accident that he was ordered to do so by Wild Bill Donovan.
• Mr. Wilcox also tracked down and interviewed Stephen Skubik, an officer in the Counter-Intelligence Corps of the US Army, who said he learnt that Patton was on Stalin's death list. Skubik repeatedly alerted Donovan, who simply had him sent back to the US.
• "You have two strong witnesses here," Mr. Wilcox said. "The evidence is that the Russians finished the job."
• The scenario sounds far-fetched but Mr. Wilcox has assembled a compelling case that US officials had something to hide. At least five documents relating to the car accident have been removed from US archives.
• The driver of the truck was whisked away to London before he could be questioned and no autopsy was performed on Patton's body.
• With the help of a Cadillac expert from Detroit, Mr. Wilcox has proved that the car on display in the Patton museum at Fort Knox is not the one Patton was driving.
• "That is a cover-up," Mr. Wilcox said.
• "He also knew secrets of the war which would have ruined careers.
• Charles Province, President of the George S. Patton Historical Society, said he hopes the book will lead to definitive proof of the plot being uncovered. He said: "There were a lot of people who were pretty damn glad that Patton died. He was going to really open the door on a lot of things that they screwed up over there."
…End of the Best of the File Preview…

Now here is that enlightening Video and my Notes with Eustace Mullins:

[www.youtube.com]
Eustace Mullins - The Death of General Patton
1:28:12 Minute Video

TheRapeOfJustice
Published on May 4, 2017
Eustace Mullins with Rick Adams in Uncensored Radio Free America, RBN, Augustus 23, 2005, on General George S. Patton, Dwight Eisenhower, Harry Truman, Jimmy Carter, George W. Bush, The Bolshevik Revolution, Antony Sutton, Trotsky, John D. Rockefeller, FDR, Gold, Fort Knox, Yugoslavia, Tito, Hitler, Mao, Chiang Kai-Shek, Saddam Hussein, Anthrax, Henry Morgenthau, Bernard Baruch, Joe McCarthy, Cindy Sheehan, Henry Ford, Martin Luther, The Vatican, The Deputy from Rolf Hochhuth, Bill O'Reilly, Larry Patton McDonald, Young Turks, Lord Beveridge, Lindsey Williams, Cardinal Ratzinger, General Patton's Driver, John Birch Society, and more.

JR’s Notes:

[youtu.be]
16:44 MM
RA: Well, one man that didn’t go along with it, as you know, and wound up paying for it with his life was General George Patton and General Patton, you know, his diaries were published, I guess, in 74 - The Patton Papers published and he revealed a lot of what he felt, of course, these seldom get any air play today for obvious reasons, but in 1945 in September when he was ordered to evict German families from their homes and turn the buildings over to Jews, Patton commented in his diary, “Evidently the virus started by Morgenthau (who was Secretary of the Treasury) and Baruch of a Semitic revenge against all Germans is still working.” The same month he wrote to his wife, “I am frankly opposed to this war criminal stuff. It is not cricket and is Semitic. I am also opposed to sending POW's to work as slaves in foreign lands (i.e., the Soviet Union's Gulags), where many will be starved to death.” In other letters to his wife, he wrote, “If what we are doing (to the Germans) is 'Liberty, then give me death.” Boy, he got it, didn’t he?

EM: Well, it’s a strange thing was that German was almost adopted as the official language in the United States when this country was founded and 52% of the present population of the United States or in 1940 was German in origin. We had more German settlers than we had French or English settlers in the United States.

RA: Excellent points, excellent points, well, you see, the Controlled Media started Attacking Patton at the time. You probably remember because you were alive as being a Pro-Nazi sympathizer.

EM: Well, he became the Enemy all of a sudden and you know what’s interesting was that the only American General that the General Staff admired was General Patton. They thought he was the only General we had, which was probably true.

RA: Well, you know, he knew what the War was all about.

EM: Well, he was a professional soldier.

RA: Exactly, he wanted to “Finish the Job” and as you know, he wanted to continue to march on through Moscow.

EM: Oh, he was absolutely devoted to that.

RA: And, of course, because of that because Eisenhower was taking orders from, well, from interesting sources, let’s say he was working hand and glove with the Reds Patton never forgave him and Patton wanted to expose Eisenhower and blow the whistle on the whole Military. Of course, he had an unfortunate accident as we learned from history.

EM: Well, there were 6 attempts on Patton’s Life as we learned from his diaries. A Polish plane tried to shot him down on a routine reconnaissance and he chronicled 6 absolute attempts against his Life, which he all survived.

RA: No, until the final one.

EM: Yes, up the final one.

RA: Until the automobile accident - it will work every time, won’t it, huh?

EM: Well, that was probably the air bubble injuries into his arm which caused the fatal stroke.

RA: But when the Morgenthaus and the Powerful Pack of Zionists in the Government under Roosevelt squawked so much about Patton, Truman was, of course, inheriting the job, Eisenhower obliged the Jews and demanded and finally got the firing of Patton and that was an important step forward in his own career - Eisenhower’s Presidential career to come.

EM: Oh, that was that. Well, he could not run for President. Patton was on his way back to the United States and Eisenhower could never have been elected President if General Patton was walking around in this country.

RA: He would not only not elected President, but he probably would have ended up in the hoosegow. [EM: Very likely.] Well, I mean, you know, you talk about War Crimes and the Crimes that were committed, you know, men like James Bacque, who wrote the book, “Other Losses.”

EM: Oh, that is a terrific story and that’s a Million young German soldiers were deliberately starved to death.

RA: Over a Million, actually, a Million and a half that were documented in camps that were starved. Now Morgenthau himself, Henry Morgenthau, who was the Secretary of the Treasury, had come up with this Plan to further emasculate Germany and even Truman himself, as bad as he was and turned out to be, could not have enough stomach to go through with the Ultimate Plan, so he was let go. But Truman, of course, also paid the price in his career later on, you know, he started making a few ruminations that just didn’t jive with the Power Brokers at the Top, so he too, obviously, was eliminated. 21:30 MM

23:22 MM
RA: And when Joe McCarthy came along and started to start scratching at the surface here and that’s all he did was nibble away at the surface, boy, they went after him with a vengeance and a hatred and a terror because that’s … [interrupted].

EM: Well, that’s today, today, they still, whenever they mention McCarthy’s name, they foam at the mouth.

RA: That’s because they know that it represents a threat to Bolshevikism and Bolsheviks do not, you see, they create a pariah and then, they knock him down, a Straw Man, then, they knock him down and they create buzz words and all sorts of canards that then, anyone else in the future comes along and begins to do a little historical research about any of these atrocities from the Bolshevik Revolution to World War II is automatically labeled, just as they did with Patton and now they’re doing with Cindy Sheehan and others who stand in the way of this Internationalist Globalist Zionist Agenda. 24:18 MM

[youtu.be]
24:49 MM
Caller - Scott: I was just wondering, Eustace, what your take is on the work of Henry Ford and what happened to him.

RA: Good question.

EM: Well, Henry Ford was, he changed the face of America, and he was just a farm boy from Michigan who worked hard all his life and he had no pretensions to anything - he became the Richest Man in the United States. I picked up a New York Times from 1927 and there is a two page article about Henry Ford - the Richest Man in the World in 1927. 25:23 MM

25:50 MM
Caller: I’m particularly interested, have you read his Dearborn Independent Articles he produced from the early 1920s?

EM: I have a few of them and they’re quite rare now, but I’ve read them all, I think.

Caller: So, you know, how, what do you think about his - he had this synopsis on [RA: he had this Series on the International Jew, right?] Right, they have it in a 4 Series Book - you can get it on Amazon.com right now - it’s called the International Jew by Henry Ford.

EM: Oh, Amazon has that on? I can’t believe it. 26:30 MM

26:45 MM
Caller: But my question is that, you know, Henry Ford wrote about this 85 years ago - this hasn’t changed at all.

EM: Oh, nothing has changed - they’re doing just what they did when they went after him - they went after him - they tried to take his Motor Car Company.

Caller: Right, they tried to take everything and they actually made him recant and kind of like cower and you know, as one of my greatest heroes of the 20th century, I’m wondering if you know what they actually did to him in order to make him submissive - I’ve missed that in the history that I like for.

EM: Well, it’s Not in the History, but it is quite a detailed thing. I have read accounts of it. They put so much pressure on all the people at Ford Motor Company - they were going to try to close him down, but he had to make a public apology and they really didn’t do much - a public apology is all they could get, so they got that and everyone walked away satisfied.

Caller: Right and they tried to blame some of his writings for what happened in Germany.

EM: Well, they blamed everybody for what happened in Germany. Two people who financed the Nazi Movement were 2 Jewish Bankers - the Warburgs and Max Hoffenheimer.

Caller: Right, well, Prescott Bush did the whole thing [EM: Yea, he was right in there with them.] Sure he was, but, you know, it goes back even farther than that right to the Protestant Reformation and all people have to do, all of the Protestants out there, God bless you, all you have to do is go back and read what Martin Luther had to say and his words that were written around 1,500 - 1,600 area they’re still applicable today.

EM: They are, indeed, because he was speaking from the heart.

Caller: Right, he wrote more concisely about the Zionist Problem than even Henry Ford [EM: Oh yes.] because from a Spiritual perspective I see Mensheviks and I see Bolsheviks and I see Bolsheviks creating the Death and the Strife and the War because they believe that more Power comes out the end of a gun barrel. [EM: Oh yea, and that was Leon Trotsky.] Right, and then you have the Mensheviks that we have here who believe that Power comes through Control of the Soul and their whole object is to Wage War on each Individual’s Spiritual Morality.

EM: Well, that’s the real Satanism there.

Caller: Well, they’re both Satanists, but we’ve got the Mensheviks here and around the world we’ve got these Bolsheviks doing what they do and it’s all a Zionists Organization.

EM: Oh, it is indeed.

Caller: It’s 2 Groups of Zionists.

EM: And it’s 5,000 years old - it’s Not something that started last week.

Caller: No sir, it hasn’t and Eustace, Good Bless you and the work you do - you 2 are God sent.

RA: Thank you brother, Scott, it’s our pleasure as always, thank you. 30:06 MM

[youtu.be]
34:32 MM
EM: They put the Zionist into the Vatican and the Freemasons right into the Vatican.

[youtu.be]
37:14 MM
EM: Oh yes, Bill O'Reilly was the Attack Dog for the Zionist - he’s the one who went after Cindy Sheehan.

[youtu.be]
1:07:17 MM
Caller: But there’s one thing in particular I heard Mr. Mullins say on a previous interview, I believe it was with Jack McClam, he had, in just in passing, he mentioned that at one time or he was there when The John Birch Society was founded and David Rockefeller had something to do with it. Could you elaborate on that a little bit for me?

EM: Well, it was Nelson Rockefeller that set it up and I had 2 friends of mine there - John Hooker and his son Wes Hooker were there present at that meeting. 1:07:49 MM

[youtu.be]
1:08:29 MM
EM: Well, that’s exactly right and The John Birch Society was set up to Control because, you see, The Ford Foundation and the other Foundations have been so exposed as Pro-Communists and Anti-American that they needed to get the people back into something that they felt was respectable, so they created The John Birch Society out of hope claw [?] and it was a repeat of The Ford Foundation and the others, but … [Interrupted]. 1:08:57 MM

[youtu.be]
1:11:13 MM
EM: Oh, J. P. Morgan and the Rothschilds, you know, actually, bought the New York Times from the Sulzberger family - they put up the money. 1:11:42 MM

1:11:47 MM
RA: They did the same thing, the Powerful International Banking Families, with the Colleges at Harvard, Yale and so forth, they actually set up the History Department - they paid to have the Sciences, the various and sundry, what we know call Social Studies, History Departments, Civics and so forth, so they could Control the publishing of books, the Text Books that would be used and, literally, the Chairmanships of these Departments were bought and paid for by these Banking Conglomerates so they would have to say what they were being paid to say. 1:12:22 MM

[youtu.be]
1:17:56 MM
RA: Don’t forget the History Channel is owned by a few Jewish gentlemen, by the way, and they are part of this Old Revisionism, if you will, the rear guard of the Zionist Internationalist, so they are not going to be the source for truthful or accurate information, so that goes without saying. 1:18:13 MM


[www.youtube.com]

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: The Social Contract
Posted by: John Rose ()
Date: June 17, 2020 12:00PM

"Everyone receives two kinds of education: the one given him by someone else, and the other, far more important, which he gives himself." -Edmond Bordeaux Szekely

Hey rp, you are TOTALLY relying on the Education you've been given by someone else and IT ani't worth s-h-i-t!!!

In contrast, I have amassed over 7,500 Files in the last 30 years and that does not include all of my books, e-books and Videos.

It's never too late to give yourself an EDUCATION!

Don't you think it's about time for you to give yourself an EDUCATION?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: The Social Contract
Posted by: fresh ()
Date: June 17, 2020 12:10PM

Maybe hope claw above
is whole cloth as in created from nothing?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: The Social Contract
Posted by: RawPracticalist ()
Date: June 17, 2020 01:16PM

Patton was a racist.

He was not happy about what was done to destroy Hitler.

He liked his policies of the extermination of the jew and blacks.

Please check your facts maybe you are just like him.


Quote

Disturbingly, Patton had zero sympathy for the Holocaust victims living in wretched, overcrowded collection camps under his command. He was unable to imagine that people living in such misery were not there because of their own flaws. The displaced Jews were “locusts,” “lower than animals,” “lost to all decency.” They were “a subhuman species without any of the cultural or social refinements of our times,” Patton wrote in his diary. A United Nations aid worker tried to explain that they were traumatized, but “personally I doubt it. I have never looked at a group of people who seem to be more lacking in intelligence and spirit.” (Patton was no friend to Arabs, either; in a 1943 letter, he called them “the mixture of all the bad races on earth.”)

The orders from above—Eisenhower wanted him to confiscate the houses of wealthy Germans so Jewish survivors could live in them—embittered Patton. His beloved Third Army was decaying as troops decamped for home, discipline vanished, and meanwhile, “the displaced sons-of-bitches in the various camps are blooming like green trees,” he wrote a friend.

[www.politico.com]



Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 06/17/2020 01:28PM by RawPracticalist.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: The Social Contract
Posted by: fresh ()
Date: June 17, 2020 01:18PM

Zionist Jews say the same things about non jews


But

[www.churchofreality.org]

And

[youtu.be]



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 06/17/2020 01:26PM by fresh.

Options: ReplyQuote
Pages: 123Next
Current Page: 1 of 3


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.


Navigate Living and Raw Foods below:

Search Living and Raw Foods below:

Search Amazon.com for:

Eat more raw fruits and vegetables

Living and Raw Foods Button
1998 Living-Foods.com
All Rights Reserved

USE OF THIS SITE SIGNIFIES YOUR AGREEMENT TO THE DISCLAIMER.

Privacy Policy Statement

Eat more Raw Fruits and Vegetables