This is from Epoch Times - The Accurate Election Map -

[www.theepochtimes.com]

Oh, oh, 'hand count' - still with observers 20 feet away! And who are doing the 'hand counts'? The same people who put in all the fake ballots?

**************

One of our observers at the hand count of the ballots ordered by Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger. Does this inspire confidence?

We are limited to one credentialed monitor for each ten counting tables. Congressman Doug Collins and I asked for a one to one ratio yesterday but our request was refused.

We are allowed an unlimited number of observers but they must remain outside the yellow tape line

[twitter.com]

Just like I said - Hand Recount is a Sham -

GA Recount To Possibly Invalidate Hundreds Of Thousands Of Biden Ballots, But What Are They Actually Auditing?

[creativedestructionmedia.com]

UPDATE: GA GOP HOLDING SHAM AUDIT, NOT VERIFYING BALLOTS…JUST RECOUNTING THEM

Questions have arisen as to process which will be followed in Georgia’s coming ‘recount’ of the votes as required by the GA Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, who to say the least, has not inspired confidence in a fair process. Both GA GOP Senatorial candidates have demanded he resign for incompetence at best, sedition at worst.

The question is – what will the recount be counting? Will it audit every vote as far as just matching a voting card to the electronic count, or will they verify the vote itself, due to the obvious massive fraud and hundreds of thousands of fraudulent votes counted according to affidavits filed by eyewitnesses.

I’m sending this to all the poll workers who worked at Jim Miller Park for the last election. We are again in need of your help. We will be conducting an audit of all 396,549 ballots to verify the presidential race. We will begin at 8am on Friday and will work every day until finished. We must complete the audit by Wednesday night. The pay for this will again be on dayworker forms at $9.55 per hour. We may be too late for the November election payroll, although we will try to get it in. If not you will be paid in the next election payroll, pay date January 7, declared an email sent to poll workers in one GA county.

The Georgia Secretary of State office is requiring a recount of all poll locations in the state and from what I understand they are counting paper ballots to make sure they match the electronic ballots marked on the machines, declared a supervisor of one GA county polling operation.

The 2020 presidential election may come down to one state – Georgia. It is critical Trump-supporting officials and lawyers demand that the votes be actually ‘audited’ and that someone we can trust watches the ‘auditors’. If it is done fairly, Trump wins. But, as we well know, there is massive incentive to cheat by the Left, as they have shown themselves quite capable of already.

Trump lost, so it must be a sham...

Um, no ...

It's a sham because The Evidence proves there was rampant Voter Fraud, Rigged Voting Machines, Illegal and Unconstitutional changes to Election Rules, Anomalies, Irregularities, and Mathematical and Statistical Improbabilities and Impossibilities, etc. Also sending millions of unsolicited Ballots to millions of people for Mail-In Voting which is rife with Fraud - that's why all the other countries will not allow Mail-In Voting. That's why it's going to the Supreme Court for sure.

You would not do well if given a Test on The Stolen Election of 2020.

**********

So the Lawsuit in PA -

Trump's Pennsylvania complaint is brilliant

[www.americanthinker.com]

The complaint filed in Pennsylvania by the Trump campaign is a superb piece of legal craftsmanship.

It was filed in federal court, not state. The gist is that some of the state's actions, and particularly the exclusion of Republican poll-watchers during the counting of hundreds of thousands of mail-in ballots, violated federal constitutional requirements.

The point is obvious enough once one thinks of it, but it's brilliant all the same. It shifts the focus from state law, where a politicized Pennsylvania court has the last word, to federal law, where the U.S. Supreme Court rules.

As for the obviousness of the point, consider as a thought experiment a state law requiring that all votes be counted in secret by an unelected board named by the party in power. Could it survive a constitutional challenge?

As my old Harvard constitutional law professors would have said, "to ask the question is to answer it." It is hard to count all the constitutional guarantees violated here: Equal Protection, Due Process, Privileges and Immunities. Indeed, the complaint stacks up the Supreme Court precedents supporting its arguments, including the long line of ringing statements in the chain of one-person-one-vote decisions.

Even the late Justice Ginsburg, who never met a progressive argument she could not support, would have trouble upholding such a law.

Given this framework, the historic decision in Bush v. Gore becomes useful but unimportant. The problem there was that the Florida Supreme Court pretended to be interpreting state law, and the legal convention is that the U.S. Supreme Court must defer on state issues, even though the Florida court was making up new law as it went along and changing its mind shamelessly.

The U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Bush v. Gore was muddled by the need to wiggle around this problem without addressing it head-on, because it would not do to cast doubt on the integrity of fellow judges. (The union is strong.) Only a three-justice concurrence said flatly that the Florida Court was contradicting the Legislature, and that would not do. Four justices went off on an opaque Equal Protection argument.

A result of this muddle, say friends in academia, is that progressive legal scholars are contemptuous of the decision and dismiss it as irrelevant.

Trump's Pennsylvania case does not have the complication of the state versus federal law interaction because it jumps over the state law and, as noted, relies on a host of U.S. SCOTUS cases about the importance of voting.

The complaint has much more, designed to bolster its central point. Many other instances of fraudulent activity are cited, which lends credibility to the main accusation. They are also indispensable to establish a factual case — that the exclusion not only occurred, but mattered, because thousands of ballots were counted in secret.

Reading the news reports, it appears likely that similar complaints are going to be filed in other swing states and that perhaps we are seeing the exposure of a broad-based effort to corrupt the election. Joe Biden claimed that the Democrats were mounting the biggest voter fraud effort in history, and a good rule for living is that when someone tells you he is about to screw you over, believe him.

It is possible, then, that a number of cases will hit the Supreme Court in about three weeks.

Everyone in the legal world assumes that the justices, bruised by the excoriation the Court has received over Bush v. Gore (even though the result was right), would never put itself in the position of reversing the apparent results of a presidential election. This assumption is the reason for the Democrats' efforts to create an irresistible bandwagon effect, but the president's lawyers may have out-maneuvered them. The justices may have no choice except to decide the election, one way or the other, and to be put to the choice of reversing the media-claimed results or ratifying massive fraud.

The legitimacy of the Court could survive through, and even be enhanced by, a carefully explained reversal of initial results. It could not survive a mealy-mouthed ratification of obvious fraud. If Trump's lawyers make their case factually, the Court must agree.

He still lost by a long way fraud and all...

Rudy Giuliani has a YouTube channel where he gives updates on the Lawsuits -

[www.youtube.com]

So first of all, subtract 1.8 Million votes from Biden's total -

1.8 million dead voters found in 29 States!

[twitter.com]

You're all alone now. JR told fresh to not participate because of me and he's an obedient soldier and a good puppy...



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/14/2020 03:52PM by NuNativs.

US Election 2020: The 'dead voters' in Michigan who are still alive

"Am I swallowing the Official Narrative, and/or pointing out discrepancies? You usually will find what you're looking for..."

Donald Trump's supporters have claimed that thousands of votes were cast in the US election using the names of people who had died.

"I may be 72," Maria Arredondo from Michigan told us when we called her. "But I'm alive and breathing. My mind is working fine and I'm healthy."

Maria said she had voted for Joe Biden and was surprised to hear that her name had appeared on a list of supposedly dead voters in the state.

We spoke to other people in similar situations to that of Maria in Michigan and found similar stories.

There have been occasions in previous US elections of dead people having apparently voted.

This could happen through clerical errors or perhaps other family members with similar names voting with their ballots, but Trump supporters have alleged this has happened on a massive scale at this election.

We set out to find out whether there is evidence for this claim.

t purports to be of people who have died, but who have also voted in the presidential election in Michigan.

Claims such as this have been repeated many times on different social-media platforms, including by Republican legislators.

The list of 10,000 contains the name, zip code, and the date a ballot was received. It then lists a full date of birth and a full date of death. Some of the people supposedly died more than 50 years ago.

Michigan has a database that lets you enter someone's name, zip code, month of birth and year of birth and allows you to see if they voted by absentee ballot this year. So you can easily check whether people on the list voted.

There are also several US websites that include databases of death records.

But there's a fundamental problem with this list of 10,000.

With an exercise like this you are going to find false matches - somebody born in January 1940 voted in Michigan in the election, and there was somebody born somewhere else in the US in January 1940 who has the same name and is now dead. This will happen a lot in a country as big as the US (328 million people), and particularly with common names.

To test the list, we picked 30 names at random. To this we added the oldest person on the list.

Of this list of 31 names, we managed to speak directly to 11 people (or to a family member, neighbour or care home worker) to confirm they were still alive.

For 17 others, there was no public record of their death, and we found clear evidence that they were alive after the alleged date of death on the list of 10,000. A clear pattern emerged - the wrong records had been joined together to create a false match.

Finally, we found that three people on the list were indeed dead. We examine these cases later.

'It's simply a matter of statistics'

Our selection of 31 cases is only a small sample of the 10,000 names on the list, but it has clearly revealed the flaws in the database shared by Trump supporters.

From our investigation it's clear that in almost all of our 31 test cases, the data for genuine voters in Michigan has been combined with records of dead people with the same name and birth month and year from across the United States to yield false matches.

"If the lists are linked based on name and birth date alone, in a state the size of Michigan, you're guaranteed to get false positives," says Prof Justin Levitt, an expert on the law of democracy.

It's known as the birthday problem - the high probability that two students in the same class share the same birthday.

So if you compare millions of voters in Michigan with a database of deaths across the United States you're bound to find cross-over, particularly if the voter database doesn't include the day of the month on which a person is born.

"It's simply a matter of statistics that if you cross-reference millions of records with millions of other records, you'll get a sizable number of false positive matches. We've seen this before," says Prof Justin Levitt.

With her vote safely cast, and counted, Maria Arredondo tells us she's looking forward to the new administration.

"He was a great vice-president under Obama. I'm so pleased. A weight has lifted off my shoulders."
Section divider



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/14/2020 03:55PM by NuNativs.

This gives home -

Hillary Clinton Supporter Alan Dershowitz: 'Trump Will Win the Pennsylvania Lawsuit'

[redstate.com]


This is the worrying part -

Could a win lead to electoral conquering in The Keystone State?

Such will — in Alan’s view — determine whether SCOTUS takes a look:

“The Supreme Court will take that case only if it would make a difference, only if the plaintiffs — the Republicans — can show that the number of disputed ballots that were subject to sequestration by Justice Alito’s decision exceeds the difference between the winning margin and the losing margin.”

"This will get you hot & bothered Jennifer. Lot's of "research" from our friend Mike Adams.."...

More massive vote fraud laid out by WH spokeswoman Kayleigh McEnany in the form of sworn affidavits Trump campaign has obtained

As of Friday, Arizona was called for Democrat Joe Biden while North Carolina voted to reelect President Donald Trump — but that doesn’t matter because the media have already proclaimed Biden “president-elect.”

So no matter what happens now in the remaining states, Trump is simply going to lose, right?

Not so fast. We’re about to find out whether we still have some semblance of the rule of law in America or if we have become the world’s best-armed banana republic.

A day earlier, White House spokeswoman Kayleigh McEnany, who is a lawyer by the way, took to Twitter to lay out the president’s case that this election was stolen from him and in a big way.

The campaign, as of this writing, has 234 pages of sworn affidavits from people who say they witnessed massive fraud in Wayne County, Mich., which is home to the Democratic-owned Detroit political machine.

(You can spend weeks of your time "researching" and taking notes. NOT RECOMMENDED!!!)



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/15/2020 02:04AM by NuNativs.

Politics doesn't make me hot and bothered. I'm not a Lib who made fools of themselves fainting at just the thought of Obama. "Yes, we can!" "Be the change you want to see!" "The World is Watching!" Teaching children to sing Obama songs! How pathetic was that? And then he turned out to be a worse warmonger than Bush even. Oh, and Michelle's Arms, wow - cringeworthy. Yet they ripped Sarah Palin to shreds and Melania Trump is totally ignored ...

Yes, Kayleigh McEnany is a great spokesperson for The White House. Right now my favorite female patriot is Sidney Powell -

Here she is on Lou Dobbs, who's also on 'our side' and hasn't wimped out like the RINO Republican and RINO Fox News.


[twitter.com]

Quote
Jennifer
How pathetic was that?

It's ALL pretty pathetic really. I find it fascinating that JR is watching the coverage and buys the propaganda machine getting all Patriotic, Idiocracy. D Wolfe even more shocking. Never in my 59 years...



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 11/15/2020 03:58AM by NuNativs.

Quote

Historically, voter fraud seems to be a consistent complaint when two things happen: when Republicans lose, and when Black people are the ones to defeat them. The idea that Black, brown and Indigenous voters could deliver a decisive blow to the white supremacist political aspirations of the Trump administration is, in some ways, an offense to those who’ve spent their careers — and certainly this election cycle — ensuring that would be nearly impossible.

[www.msnbc.com]

Quote
RawPracticalist

Quote

Historically, voter fraud seems to be a consistent complaint when two things happen: when Republicans lose, and when Black people are the ones to defeat them. The idea that Black, brown and Indigenous voters could deliver a decisive blow to the white supremacist political aspirations of the Trump administration is, in some ways, an offense to those who’ve spent their careers — and certainly this election cycle — ensuring that would be nearly impossible.

[www.msnbc.com]

Oh, come on, RawPracticalist, you really want to get into it?

To clarify:

Are you a proponent of the 'White Supremacy' 'White Privilege' 'White Fragility' 'Systemic Racism' and all the other Nonsense 'White' Social Constructs of The Left, based on Theory - that your posting of this quote would suggest?

Here's the Article's title, btw -

'Voter fraud' claims are a racist attack on Black voters so let's act like it

Right away - Wow! It never even entered my head that any of these Voter Fraud Claims had anything at all to do with Race; THIS VOTER FRAUD is all about THE DEMOCRATS.

Every single aspect of Life and Society and Culture and Politics always has to come down to and be connected with "RACE" according to THE LEFT.

Because -

IDENTITY POLITICS is THE LEFT'S Stock in Trade. (Look up that idiom/expression if you don't know what it means. It's just the most apropos description of their go-to attack of The Right.)

RP, I give you a big thumbs up for that comment. TRUTH BOMB!!!...

Here's a good website to keep track of what's happening with the Stolen Election - updates on lawsuits, etc. You may have to sign in or get a free subscription. I did that.

ELECTION OUTCOME UNCLEAR AMID PENDING RECOUNTS AND LEGAL CHALLENGES

[www.theepochtimes.com]

***********

And here's an article about Sidney Powell - She's so cool and so upbeat it gives me hope -

Trump Lawyer Sidney Powell: ‘We’re Getting Ready to Overturn Election Results in Multiple States’

[www.theepochtimes.com]

Former federal prosecutor Sidney Powell, a Trump campaign lawyer, suggested in a Sunday interview that there is still more evidence coming out in President Donald Trump’s claims of voter fraud and irregularities.

“We’re getting ready to overturn election results in multiple states,” Powell said, saying that she has enough evidence of election fraud to launch a widespread criminal investigation. “I don’t make comments without having the evidence to back it up,” she added, saying that elections software switched “millions of votes” from Trump to Democratic nominee Joe Biden.

Powell notably provided legal counsel to Gen. Michael Flynn in 2019. She was named to Trump’s legal team in the past several days.

Powell said a whistleblower came forward and said the elections software was designed to “rig elections,” saying that “he saw it happen in other countries,” referring to voting systems Dominion Voting Systems and Smartmatic, or perhaps other software and machines.

“We have so much evidence, I feel like it’s coming in through a fire hose,” Powell said, while noting that she won’t reveal the evidence that she has.

“They can stick a thumb drive in the [voting] machine, they can upload software to it even from the Internet … from Germany or Venezuela even,” she said, adding that operations “can watch votes in real-time” and “can shift votes in real-time,” or alleged bad actors can “remote access anything.”

“We’ve identified mathematically the exact algorithm they’ve used—and planned to use from the beginning” that allegedly switched votes to Biden, Powell remarked.

Powell also made reference to a 2019 investigation from Sens. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), as well as other Democratic lawmakers into Dominion Voting Systems, Election Systems & Software, and Hart InterCivic. The senators had expressed concerns about the security of the voting systems.

“(W)e have concerns about the spread and effect of private equity investment in many sectors of the economy, including the election technology industry—an integral part of our nation’s democratic process,” wrote the lawmakers in their letters to the firms about a year ago. “These problems threaten the integrity of our elections and demonstrate the importance of election systems that are strong, durable, and not vulnerable to attack.”

Later in the Sunday morning interview, Powell said that her team has “detected voting irregularities that are inexplicable” in states where officials believe they have valid systems.

During the election, Republicans in the House were able to flip at least 11 seats while the GOP is poised to maintain control of the Senate. Some conservatives have questioned how such a voting pattern is possible for Biden to win the presidential election, let alone receive more votes than any other presidential candidate in American history, including President Barack Obama’s victory in 2008.

Companies Respond

The Department of Homeland Security’s cybersecurity agency issued a statement on Thursday calling the 2020 general election the “most secure in American history,” despite multiple legal challenges alleging a variety of alleged voting irregularities across a number of battleground states.

“The November 3rd election was the most secure in American history. Right now, across the country, election officials are reviewing and double-checking the entire election process prior to finalizing the result,” read the statement released by the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA).

Smartmatic, in a statement on Saturday, said that it has no ties with Dominion Voting Systems. Powell suggested that Smartmatic is operated by Dominion in the interview.

Dominion, over the past several weeks, has repeatedly denied its systems were compromised in some way.

“In the aftermath of the 2020 general election, there has been a great deal of misinformation being circulated about Smartmatic and other companies that provide election technology to voting jurisdictions in the US. We would like to dispel these incorrect statements with facts,” the firm wrote, adding that it “has never owned any shares or had any financial stake in Dominion Voting Systems.”

Dominion also refuted allegations that its machines changed votes from Trump to Biden on Election Day and beyond.

“Dominion Voting Systems categorically denies any claims about any vote switching or alleged software issues with our voting systems,” a company spokesperson said in a statement to The Denver Post. “Our systems continue to reliably and accurately count ballots, and state and local election authorities have publicly confirmed the integrity of the process.”

*********

So definitely DHS and CISA were taken over by The Left, like the FBI, CIA, etc.

Here's Sidney Powell with Marie Bartiloma - she mentions the CIA -

Attorney Powell on election legal challenges that remain active in several states

Nov. 15, 2020 - 10:16 - Sidney Powell, of President Trump's legal team, tells 'Sunday Morning Futures' that 'the evidence is coming in so fast' she 'can't even process it all.'

[video.foxnews.com]'

*********

Giuliani: Trump is contesting the election 'vigorously' in the courts

Nov. 15, 2020 - 12:05 - President Trump's personal attorney Rudy Giuliani tells 'Sunday Morning Futures' that 'right now our cases are the most developed in Pennsylvania and in Michigan.'

[video.foxnews.com]

Quote
NuNativs
RP, I give you a big thumbs up for that comment. TRUTH BOMB!!!...

Yes thank you
They need to be reminded of their inconsistencies and the realities on the ground.

Quote
RawPracticalist

Yes thank you
They need to be reminded of their inconsistencies and the realities on the ground.

Lol - the 'Realities on the Ground' are this -

Trumps Rallies were Massive! Whereas Biden and Harris Rallies got like 10 or 20 people!

The Democrats Only Won THE PRESIDENCY - and that was by Voter Fraud.

They lost Many House Seats and States Legislatures and Governors and Did Not Take Over the Senate.

10 Million more people (really more because of the aforementioned Voter Fraud) Voted for Trump this year than in his first election four years ago.

More MINORITIES voted for Trump than the last Election.

More White Women Voted for Trump this time.

This Election was a Definite REBUKE of THE LEFT!

**********

Leftist Bill Maher agrees with me! THE LEFT GOT SMACKED DOWN!

“This idea of purity and you’re never compromised, and you’re always politically woke and all that stuff — you should get over that quickly.”

[twitter.com]



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/15/2020 11:38PM by Jennifer.

Another Anomaly among many that just goes to show - Stolen Election/Voter Fraud by The Democrats ...

Bellwether Counties Went Overwhelmingly for Trump in 2020

[www.theepochtimes.com]

Over the past nearly 40 years, presidential elections have observed an intriguing phenomenon: 19 counties in the nation have always voted for the winner, be it Republican or Democrat. They’ve been dubbed “bellwether counties” and until this year, no president since at least Ronald Reagan has missed even one.

Ah Jen , you're all alone with the POS, T U R D, idiot, moron, psychopath, shill. I hope they are least sending you some PM's....

Quote
Jennifer

More White Women Voted for Trump this time.

Should have added that also More Black Women - twice as many as in 2016 - voted for Trump this Stolen Election.

There's a Press Conference at noon today with Trump, Rudy Giuliani and Trump Campaign Senior Legal Advisor Jenna Ellis

Quote
Jennifer
There's a Press Conference at noon today with Trump, Rudy Giuliani and Trump Campaign Senior Legal Advisor Jenna Ellis

I was just about to go for a bike ride out into the desert and get some fresh Air and take in the beautiful vistas but hey I should stay inside and watch TV instead, much more important...
NOT!!!

(There's always an excuse)...

Quote
Jennifer
There's a Press Conference at noon today with Trump, Rudy Giuliani and Trump Campaign Senior Legal Advisor Jenna Ellis

Thanks Jen, I just did a quick search to see what this might be more about and all I could find were the uncensored sources they want you to find, so I just set my recorder to tape the News on 3 different stations, which is something I NEVER do, so I can watch it when I get back from my bike ride.

THANKS AGAIN for the heads up!

This press conference is Great! Good idea having a press conference -

Here's the Press Conference from the beginning -

[www.c-span.org]



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/19/2020 06:46PM by Jennifer.

Highlight of the Press Conference -

At the 32 minute mark, where Rudy Giuliani's hair color starts running down his face

[www.c-span.org]

**********





Edited 4 time(s). Last edit at 11/19/2020 06:52PM by Jennifer.

[www.c-span.org]
November 19, 2020
Campaign 2020
Trump Campaign News Conference on Legal Challenges
The Trump campaign provided an update on their election legal challenges from the Republican National Committee. Personal attorney for President Trump, Rudy Giuliani said the campaign will likely file a lawsuit in Georgia and are looking into filing lawsuits in New Mexico and Virginia.

1:31:57 Minute Video
00:00:00
HI. FIRST I'D LIKE TO THANK YOU, C-SPAN, BECAUSE I'VE LEARNED A LOT ABOUT GOVERNMENT AND HOW IT WORKS BY WATCHING PEOPLE DEBATE ON THE FLOOR OF THE...
Show Full Text
00:00:06 MM

GOOD AFTERNOON, AND THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR COMING. THIS IS A REPRESENTATIVE OF OUR LEGAL TEAM. WE'RE REPRESENTING PRESIDENT TRUMP AND THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN. WHEN...
Show Full Text
00:10:53 MM

NO, I DIDN'T. YES, YOU DID. NO, I DIDN'T. YES, YOU DID. SO WHY DOES THAT HAPPEN 17,000 TIMES IN PITTSBURGH? PEOPLE WALKED IN THINKING -- ACTUALLY 15,000 TO BE PRECISE. WHY DID IT HAPPEN 15,000 TIMES THAT PEOPLE IN PITTSBURGH WALKED IN TO VOTE AND THEY THIS ALREADY VOTED ACCORDING TO THE DEMOCRAT ELECTION MACHINE. DID THEY FORGET? THAT MANY PEOPLE WITH BAD MEMORIES IN PITTSBURGH? OR IS THE FOLLOWING CORRECT? AS WITNESSES WILL TESTIFY, THEY WERE INSTRUCTED BY DEMOCRAT BOSSES WHEN THEY HAD A BALLOT IN WHICH THERE WAS NO ONE REGISTERED, JUST ASSIGN IT TO SOMEBODY. JUST ASIGN IT TO RUDY GIULIANI. MAYBE RUDY GIULIANI WON'T SHOW UP TO VOTE. IF HE DOES SHOW UP TO VOTE, WE'LL GIVE HIM A PROVISIONAL BALLOT. THAT IS WHAT WE CALL CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE OF THE FRAUD. THE DIRECTED OF IS PEOPLE WILL TESTIFY THAT'S WHAT HAPPENED TO IT, AS WELL AS THE 50 TO 60 WITNESSES WE HAVE FOR THE WAY THEY WERE TREATED AND NOT ALLOWED TO INSPECT THE BALLOTS. THEY WEREN'T JUST NOT ALLOWED TO DO IT, THEY WERE PUSHED. IN A FEW CASES THEY WERE ASSAULTED. IN ALL CASES THEY WERE PUT IN A CORAL SO FAR AWAY, PROBABLY THE CLOSEST THEY GOT WAS FROM HERE TO THE BACK OF THAT ROOM. WE COULD DO LIKE A -- DID YOU-ALL WATCH "MY COUSIN VINNY?" YOU KNOW THE MOVIE? ONE OF MY FAVORITE LAW MOVIES BECAUSE HE COMES FROM BROOKLYN. THE NICE LADY WHO SAID SHE SAW AND SAYS HOW MANY -- HOW MANY FINGERS DO I GOT UP? SHE SAYS THREE. SHE WAS TOO FAR AWAY TO SEE IT WAS ONLY TWO. THESE PEOPLE WERE FURTHER AWAY THAN MY COUSIN VINNY WAS FROM THE WITNESS. THEY COULDN'T SEE A THING. I DON'T KNOW. ARE YOU GOING TO TELL ME 060 PEOPLE ARE LYING? THEY DIDN'T JUST TELL ME THIS. THEY SWORE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, WHICH IS SOMETHING NO DEMOCRAT HAS DONE. YOU DON'T EVEN ASK BIDEN ABOUT THIS, PUT HIM UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY. YOU DON'T EVEN GET ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS, DOESN'T GET ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT THE CRIMES HE COMMITTED. THESE PEOPLE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY. THEIR NAMES ARE ON AN AFFIDAVIT. THEY SPAREWEAR THEY WEREN'T ALLOWED TO CARRY OUT THEIR JOB AS INSPECTORS. THERE'S A REASON THEY DID IT. WHY WOULD YOU NOT ALLOW PEOPLE TO CARRY OUT THE FUNCTION THEY HAVE ALLOWED TO DO 50 OR 60 YEARS? BECAUSE YOU KNEW YOU WERE GOING TO USE THOSE BALLOTS TO CATCH BIDEN UP, AND YOU HAD A BIG ROAD AHEAD OF YOU. YOU HAD TO CATCH UP 700,000 TO 800,000 VOTES THAT HE WAS BEHIND. THE ONLY WAY YOU WERE GOING TO DO IT WAS WITH THE MAIL-IN BALLOT. YOU COULDN'T HAVE A DEMOCRAT AND REPUBLICAN INSPECTOR AROUND. THEY DON'T EVEN HAVE DEMOCRATS WATCHING. THEY WOULD BE AFRAID THEY WOULD BE HONEST DEMOCRATS THAT WOULD SAY, "YOU'RE CHEATING." SO THAT TAKES US TO MICHIGAN WHERE THERE WAS AN HONEST DEMOCRAT WHO SAID THEY WERE CHEATING. WE'LL SHOW YOU HER AFFIDAVIT, BECAUSE I KNOW YOU KEEP REPORTING, FALSELY, THAT WE HAVE NO EVIDENCE, THAT WE HAVE NO SPECIFIC ACTS OF FRAUD. THAT'S BECAUSE THE COVERAGE OF THIS HAS BEEN ALMOST AS DISHONEST AS THE SCHEME ITSELF. THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE ENTITLED TO KNOW THIS. YOU DON'T HAVE A RIGHT TO KEEP IT FROM THEM. YOU DON'T HAVE A RIGHT TO LIE ABOUT IT. YOU ARE. YOU DON'T REPORT TO THEM THAT A CITIZEN OF THIS COUNTRY, A VERY FINE WOMAN, WHO IS WILLING TO ALLOW ME TO GIVE YOU HER NAME, I CAN'T GIVE YOU ALL THESE AFFIDAVITS, BECAUSE IF I DO, THESE PEOPLE WILL BE HARASSED, THEY WILL BE THREATENED. THEY MAY LOSE THEIR JOB. THEY WILL LOSE THEIR FRIENDS. WE'VE LOST LAWYERS IN THIS CASE BECAUSE THEY HAVE BEEN THREATENED. WE HAVE LAWYERS THAT NEED PROTECTION. WHAT'S GOING ON IN THIS COUNTRY IS HORRIBLE. THE CENSORSHIP YOU'RE IMPOSING IS MAKING IT WORSE. JESSIE JACOB IS AN ADULT CITIZEN AND RESIDENT OF MICHIGAN. SHE'S BEEN AN EMPLOYEE OF THE CITY OF DETROIT FOR DECADES. I KNOW HER AGE. SHE CAN TELL YOU HER AGE. SHE WAS ASSIGNED TO VOTING DUTIES IN SEPTEMBER. SHE WAS TRAINED BY THE CITY OF DETROIT AND THE STATE OF MICHIGAN. SHE WAS BASICALLY TRAINED TO CHEAT. SHE SAID, I WAS INSTRUCTED BY MY SUPERVISOR TO ADJUST THE MAILING DATE OF THESE ABSENTEE MAIL-IN PACKAGES TO BE EARLIER THAN WHEN THEY WERE SENT IN. THE SUPERVISOR MADE THAT ANNOUNCEMENT FOR ALL WORKERS TO ENGAGE IN THAT FRAUDULENT PRACTICE. THAT'S NOT ME SAYING THAT. THAT'S AN AMERICAN CITIZEN SAYING THAT UNDER OATH. I DON'T KNOW. MAYBE YOU CAN SAY SHE'S LYING BUT YOU CAN'T SAY THERE'S NO EVIDENCE. THIS IS WHAT WE CALL EVIDENCE. THIS IS DIRECT EVIDENCE, NOT CIRCUMSTANTIAL. I TRIED MANY, MANY CASES AS DID MY COLLEAGUES HERE. YOU PUT A WITNESS ON THE WITNESS STAND, THE WITNESS TESTIFIES TO THEIR OWN KNOWLEDGE. THIS WITNESS WENT ON THE WITNESS STAND AND SHE WILL SAY, I WAS TOLD TO ADJUST THE DATE ON THE ABSENTEE BALLOTS. I WITNESSED ELECTION WORKERS AND EMPLOYEES GOING OVER TO THE VOTING BOOTH WITH VOTERS IN ORDER TO WATCH THEM VOTE AND COACH THEM FOR WHOM TO VOTE. COMPLETELY ILLEGAL. SHE WILL TESTIFY TO THAT. I DON'T KNOW. BIDEN'S PEOPLE CAN CROSS-EXAMINATION HER, BUT YOU CAN'T JUST THROW IT AWAY. GEE, THERE'S NO EVIDENCE. NEXT TIME YOU SAY THAT, YOU'LL BE LYING, BECAUSE THERE IS EVIDENCE. BY THE WAY, THIS IS PUBLIC. YOU CAN ALL GET IT. IT'S ATTACHED TO THE COMPLAINT IN CONSTANTINO VERSUS THE CITY OF DETROIT. THEN SHE WAS INSTRUCTED BY MY SUPERVISOR NOT TO ASK FOR A DRIVER'S LICENSE OR ANY PHOTO ID WHEN A PERSON WAS TRYING TO VOTE, DON'T ASK FOR IDENTIFICATION. WHY WOULD YOU NOT ASK FOR IDENTIFICATION? BECAUSE YOU KNEW THAT A LOT OF PEOPLE NOT ENTITLED TO VOTE ARE GOING TO COME IN AND EARLY VOTE. BECAUSE YOU KNEWILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS WOULD BE ALLOWED TO VOTE, OR AN ITALIAN EXPRESSION, UNLESS YOU'RE STUPID. UNLESS YOU'RE STUPID YOU KNOW A LOT OF PEOPLE FROM CAMDEN CAME OVER. IT HAPPENS ALL THE TIME. IT'S ABOUT AS FREQUENT AS GETTING BEATEN UP AT PHILADELPHIA EAGLES FOOTBALL GAME. HAPPENS ALL THE TIME. ALL THE TIME. IT IS ALLOWED TO HAPPEN BECAUSE IT IS A DEMOCRAT, CORRUPT CITY AND HAS BEEN FOR YEARS, MANY, MANY YEARS. THEY CARRIED IT OUT IN PLACES THEY COULD GET AWAY WITH IT. THEY DIDN'T CARRY IT OUT IN NEUTRAL PLACES. THEY DIDN'T CARRY IT OUT IN REPUBLICAN PLACES. THEY DIDN'T CARRY THE IT OUT WHERE THE LAW WAS RESPECTED. THEY CARRIED IT OUT IN A CITY WHERE THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY RELEASES CRIMINALS EN MASSE, WHICH IS WHY IT HAS SO MUCH CRIME. SHE ALSO SAID, I OBSERVED A LARGE NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO CAME TO THE SATELLITE LOCATION AND VOTED IN PERSON. THEY HAD ALREADY APPLIED FOR AND SUBMITTED AN ABSENTEE BALLOT. SHE OBSERVED A LOT OF PEOPLE VOTING TWICE. AGAIN, THIS IS JESSIE JACOB, NOT ME. I WAS INSTRUCTED NOT TO INVALIDATE ANY BALLOTS AND NOT TO LOOK FOR ANY DEFICIENCIES IN THE BALLOTS. WHY WOULD YOU DO THAT? BECAUSE YOU'RE CHEATING. ON PURPOSE CHEATING. YOU'RE CHEATING AS AN INSTITUTION. THIS IS AN INSTRUCTION FROM THE ELECTION COMMISSION TO THE WORKER. DON'T LOOK FOR ANY DEFICIENCIES IN THE BALLOT. I WAS INSTRUCTED NOT TO LOOK AT ANY OF THE SIGNATURES ON THE ABSENTEE BALLOT. IF SHE WAS INSTRUCTED TO LOOK FOR SIGNATURES ON THE ABSENTEE BALLOTS, WHY DO YOU SIGN IT IN THE FIRST PLACE? IN ORDER TO IDENTIFY IT. SHE WAS INSTRUCTED NOT TO DO THAT, BECAUSE MANY OF THE ABSENTEE BALLOTS WERE FRAUDULENT AND THEY KNEW THAT. ON NOVEMBER 4, 2020, I WAS INSTRUCTED TO IMPROPERLY PREDATE THE ABSENTEE BALLOTS WHEN THE RECEIPT DATE WAS ACTUALLY NOVEMBER -- WAS AFTER NOVEMBER 3rd, 2020. THIS IS REALLY SIGNIFICANT BECAUSE JUSTICE ALITO, SUPREME COURT, INSTRUCTED PENNSYLVANIA THAT ANY BALLOT THAT COMES IN AFTER 8:00 ON NOVEMBER 3rd,2020, HAD TO BE PUT ASIDE AND NOT OPENED BECAUSE THERE'S A QUESTION AS TO ITS LEGALITY AND ITS CONSTITUTIONALITY. WHAT SHE'S TELLING YOU IS THEY BLATANTLY DISREGARD THAT ORDER. THEY TOOK BALLOTS MARKED THE 4th AND 5th AND 6th AND MARKED IT DOWN FOR THE 4RD IN BLATANT DISREGARD OF THE ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT. THIS IS -- I DON'T KNOW IF SHE'S A DEMOCRAT OR A REPUBLICAN. I ASSUME IF SHE'S WORKING FOR THE -- I ASSUME IF SHE'S WORKING FOR THE CITY OF DETROIT THAT SHE'S A DEMOCRAT. I ASSUME, BUT I MAY BE WRONG. SHE'S A CITIZEN. I NEVER MET HER, NEVER COACHED HER. I'D LIKE YOU TO NOTE THAT IT'S SIGNED UNDER PENALTIES OF PERCENTAGE PERJURY. WE HAVE 100 MORE OF THESE. I CAN'T SHOW YOU. THESE PEOPLE DON'T WANT TO BE HARASSED, HAVE THEIR LIVES TORN APART BY THE GOONS ON THE OTHER SIDE. WE DON'T DO THAT TO THEM. THEY HAVE DONE IT TO A LOT OF OUR PEOPLE. THEY HAVE DONE IT FOR FOUR YEARS. IT'S OUTRAGEOUS THAT IT'S TOLERATED. IT'S TOLERATED BECAUSE YOU CONDONE IT IN THE PRESS. YOU DON'T COVER IT, AND YOU DON'T CONDEMN IT. IT SHOULDN'T HAPPEN TO A REPUBLICAN OR A DEMOCRAT. A LAWYER SHOULDN'T HAVE TO WITHDRAW FROM A CASE BECAUSE HE'S REPRESENTING THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES. THERE ARE MANY MORE AFFIDAVITS HERE. I'D LIKE TO READ THEM ALL TO YOU BUT I DON'T HAVE THE TIME. YOU SHOULD HAVE HAD THE TIME AND ENERGY TO GO LOOK FOR THEM. THAT'S YOUR JOB, LIKE IT'S MY JOB TO DEFEND THE PRESIDENT AND REPRESENT THE PRESIDENT. IT'S YOUR JOB TO READ THESE THINGS AND NOT FALSELY REPORT THERE'S NO EVIDENCE. DO YOU KNOW HOW MANY AFFIDAVITS WE HAVE IN THE MICHIGAN CASE? 220 AFFIDAVITS. THEY ARE NOT ALL PUBLIC BUT EIGHT OF THEM ARE. FOR AFFIANTS, THAT'S PEOPLE WHO GIVE AN AFFIDAVIT, REPORT AN INCIDENT WHICH WOULD BE ON THE FRONT PAGE OF THE NEWSPAPERS IF IT DIDN'T INVOLVE HATRED, ILLOGICAL PATHOLOGICAL HATRED YOU HAVE FOR THE PRESIDENT. WHAT THEY SWEAR TO IS AT 4:30 IN THE MORNING, A TRUCK PULLED UP TO THE DETROIT CENTER WHERE THEY WERE COUNTING BALLOTS. THE PEOPLE THOUGHT IT WAS FOOD, SO THEY ALL RAN TO THE TRUCK. IT WASN'T FOOD. IT WAS THOUSANDS AND THOUSANDS OF BALLOTS. THE BALLOTS WERE IN GARBAGE CANS. THEY WERE IN PAPER BAGS. THEY WERE IN CARDBOARD BOXES, AND THEY WERE TAKEN INTO THE CENTER. THEY WERE PUT ON A NUMBER OF TABLES. AT THAT TIME THEY THOUGHT ALL THE REPUBLICAN INSPECTORS HAD LEFT. ALL BUT TWO HAD, AND AN EMPLOYEE OF DOMINION, WHO WE'LL ADDRESS A LITTLE BIT LATER. DOMINION. HERE IS WHAT THEY JOINTLY SWEAR TO, THAT EVERY BALLOT THEY COULD SEE, EVERYTHING THEY COULD HEAR, THESE BALLOTS, THE ONLY THEY COULD SEE WAS DOWN TICKET FOR BIDEN. MANY OF THEM DIDN'T HAVE ANYTHING ON THE OUTER ENVELOPE BECAUSE THESE BALLOTS PRODUCED VERY QUICK LYLY SWIFTLY, MINIMUM OF 60,000, MAXIMUM OF 100,000. MANY OF THEM WERE TRIPLE COUNTED, PUT IN THIS WAY. ONCE, TWICE, THREE TIMES. I DIDN'T SEE THAT. I DON'T KNOW THAT BUT FOR THE FACT THAT THREE AMERICAN CITIZENS ARE WILLING TO SWEAR TO IT. WE'RE NOT GOING TO LET THEM GO TO COURT AND DO THAT? WE'RE GOING TO LET THIS ELECTION GO BY WHEN THERE ARE IN THIS CASE 60 WITNESSES THAT CAN PROVE WHAT I'M SAYING TO YOU AND OTHER ACTS OF FRAUD IN MICHIGAN. WHAT'S HAPPENED TO THIS TON IF WE'RE GOING TO LET THAT HAPPEN? WHAT HAPPENED TO THIS COUNTRY IF WE'RE GOING TO COVER IT UP. WE LET AL GORE CARRY ON AN ELECTION DISPUTE LONGER THAN THIS HAS BEEN GOING ON FOR ONE STATE AND FOR CHADS. THIS HAPPENED IN PENNSYLVANIA. IT HAPPENED IN MICHIGAN. MICHIGAN PROBABLY RIGHT NOW, IF I COUNT UP THE AFFIDAVITS, JUST ONE CASE ALONE, TRUMP V. BENSON, A CASE WE DISMISSED TODAY BECAUSE THAT CASE WAS TRYING TO GET THE WAYNE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO DECERTIFY. THEY DID. THEY DECERTIFIED. THAT CASE HAS 100 AFFIDAVITS. THE 100 AFFIDAVITS SHOW ESSENTIALLY WHAT I'VE TALKED TO YOU ABOUT, COUNTING BALLOTS IMPROPERLY, COUNTING THEM THREE AND FOUR TIMES, HAVING PEOPLE VOTE THREE AND FOUR TIMES, CHANGING AND BACK DATING BALLOTS TO THE POINT OF AT LEAST 300,000 ILLEGITIMATE BALLOTS THAT WE CAN SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFY. THE MARGIN IN MICHIGAN WAS 146,121. THESE BALLOTS WERE ALL CAST BASICALLY IN DETROIT THAT BIDEN WON 80/20. YOU SEE THE RESULT OF THE ELECTION IN MICHIGAN IF YOU TAKE OUT WAYNE COUNTY. SO IT'S A VERY SIGNIFICANT CASE. THAT IS RAISED IN THE CASE OF CONSTANTINO VERSUS CITY OF DETROIT. NOT BUT US, BY AN INDIVIDUAL PLAINTIFF. WE ARE HELPING ASSIST IN THAT CASE. YOU CAN FIND ALL THE AFFIDAVITS YOU WANT FILED IN THAT CASE. YOU CAN FIND OUT THEY ARE NOT JUST ALLEGATIONS, THEY ARE ALLEGATIONS SUPPORTED BY SWORN TESTIMONY TESTIMONY, WHICH IS A LOT MORE THAN JOE BIDEN HAS DONE FOR ANYBODY. HE DOESN'T ANSWER ANYTHING, MUCH LESS SWORN AFFIDAVITS. WISCONSIN. WISCONSIN HAD A VERY SMALL MARGIN, 20,544 LAST TIME I LOOKED. IN WISCONSIN, WITHOUT GOING INTO GREAT DETAIL, VERY SIMILAR PLAN, SHOUT OUT IN MADISON, REPUBLICANS SHUT OUT FROM THE ABSENTEE PROCESS, NOT ALLOWED TO INSPECTOR, NOT ALLOWED TO LOOK AT THE BALLOTS WE HAVE IN MILWAUKEE AND STATE OF WISCONSIN A MUCH STRICTER LAW. WISCONSIN DOESN'T ALLOW MAIL-IN BALLOTS BALLOTS. THEY DIDN'T BUY INTO THE MAIL-IN BALLOTS SITUATION. WISCONSIN WHEN YOU LOOK INTO THEIR CONSTITUTION THEY ALMOST DON'T LIKE MAIL-IN BALLOTS. THEY STATE IT'S NOT A RIGHT, IT'S A PRIVILEGE, AND THEY HAVE VERY, VERY STRICT PROCEDURES. THE STRICT PROCEDURES SAYS YOU CAN'T BE GIVEN AN ABSENTEE BALLOT, HAVE YOU TO PERSONALLY APPLY FOR IT. IT'S ILLEGAL BASICALLY TO SOLICIT A VOTE. THEY HAVE MANY REASONS FOR IT THAT PROBABLY GOES BACK TO THEIR PROGRESSIVE DAYS. WHEN I SAY PROGRESSIVE, I MEAN LATE 19th CENTURY, EARLY 20thCENTURY PROGRESSIVE WHEN IT REALLY MEANT PROGRESSIVE, NOT RETRO RETRO RETRO RETROGRESSIVE. 60,000 IN WAYNE COUNTY AND 40,000 IN MADISON, AS FAR AS WE CAN TELL, THIS IS WHY WE'RE AUDITING, BECAUSE WE HAVE GOOD INFORMATION, THOSE NUMBERS WILL COME OUT HERE THAT DON'T HAVE APPLICATIONS. UNDER THE LAW OF THE STATE OF WISCONSIN, ALREADY DECIDED, THERE'S NO APPLICATION FOR AN ABSENTEE BALLOT, THE ABSENTEE BALLOT IS THROWN AWAY. THIS ALL HAPPENED IN TWO PLACES IN WISCONSIN. DIDN'T HAPPEN NORTHERN WISCONSIN, DIDN'T HAPPEN IN REPUBLICAN WISCONSIN, DIDN'T HAPPEN IN NEUTRAL WISCONSIN WHERE AN EQUAL NUMBER OF REPUBLICANS AND DEMOCRATS, IT HAPPENED IN A PLACE WHERE THE VOTE WAS 75, 80% FOR THE DEMOCRAT. YOU TAKE AWAY ANY NUMBER OF THOSE INAND THAT 20,000 LEAD DISAPPEARS. IN OTHER WORDS, IF YOU COUNT LAWFUL VOTES, TRUMP WON WISCONSIN BY A GOOD MARGIN. INSTEAD, IF YOU COUNT THE LAWFUL VOTES IN PENNSYLVANIA, HE WON IT BY 300,000 VOTES. ALSO, IN THE LAWSUIT FILED IN WISCONSIN, WHICH IS REALLY A PETITION BECAUSE OF THEIR PROCEDURES, THERE WERE NO INSPECTORS PROVIDED FOR THE COUNT OF THE ILLEGAL BALLOTS. THERE WERE NUMEROUS BACK DATED BALLOTS, WE'RE JUST COUNTING THEM NOW, RUN OVER INTO THE THOUSANDS AND THERE WERE MANY PRECINCTS IN WHICH THERE WAS AN OVERVOTE. LET ME EXPLAIN TO YOU WHAT AN OVERVOTE IS, WHICH IS SOMETHING YOU SHOULD HAVE EXPLAINED TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. IT'S ABOUT THE CLEAREST CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE OF MASSIVE FRAUD YOU CAN HAVE. AN OVERVOTE IS IF 200% OF THE PEOPLE WHO ARE REGISTERED IN A DISTRICT VOTE. THINK ABOUT THAT. 200% OF THE REGISTERED VOTERS IN A DISTRICT VOTE. WHAT DOES THAT MEAN? THAT MEANS SOMEBODY VOTED TWICE. THAT MEANS SOMEBODY WHO IS NOT ENTITLED TO VOTE VOTED, AN ILLEGAL, A PERSON FROM ANOTHER CITY OR STATE, A PERSON THAT'S NOT REGISTERED. BUT WHAT IT MEANS IS THAT THOSE ARE ILLEGITIMATE VOTES. YOU DON'T HAVE AN OVERVOTE FOR 200% OR 300%. YOU DON'T HAVE AN OVERVOTE OF 100%. MOST PRECINCTS DON'T HAVE 100% TURNOUT. IN FACT, CLASSICALLY IT'S CONSIDERED TO BE AN OVERVOTE IF YOU GO OVER 80%. WELL, IN MICHIGAN AND WISCONSIN, WE HAVE OVERVOTES IN NUMEROUS PRECINCTS PRECINCTS, 200% AND 300%. ONE OF THE REASONS WHY THE TWO REPUBLICANS DID NOT CERTIFY IN WAYNE COUNTY, MICHIGAN, WAS BECAUSE THE OVERVOTE WAS SO HIGH, MONSTROUSLY HIGH IN TWO-THIRDS OF THE PRECINCTS IN THE CITY OF DETROIT, WHICH MEANS MAGICALLY TWO AND THREE TIMES THE NUMBER OF REGISTERED VOTERS TURNED OUT TO VOTE. HE IN FACT IN FACT, WE HAVE PRECINCTS WHERE TWO TIMES THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE THAT LIVE THERE VOTED, INCLUDING CHILDREN. WHEN I'M DESCRIBING TO YOU IS A MASSIVE FRAUD. IT ISN'T A LITTLE TEENY ONE. IT ISN'T 100 VOTES HERE OR THERE. GEORGIA, WE'RE ABOUT TO FILE A MAJOR LAWSUIT IN GEORGIA. THAT WILL BE FILED TOMORROW. I DON'T NEED TO GO THROUGH IT. VIRTUALLY THE SAME THINGS I'VE TOLD YOU BEFORE. IN THE CITY OF ATLANTA, REPUBLICANS WERE NOT ALLOWED TO WATCH THE ABSENTEE MAIL-IN BALLOT PROCESS. INSPECTIONS CAST ASIDE. WE HAVE NUMEROUS DOUBLE VOTERS, NUMEROUS OUT OF STATE VOTERS, AND WE HAVE SPECIFIC EVIDENCE THAT WILL COME OUT ON THE VOTE. THAT WILL COME OUT TOMORROW. ARIZONA IS A STATE WE'RE LOOKING AT VERY, VERY CAREFULLY. I WOULD SAY WE'RE PROBABLY GOING TO BRING A LAWSUIT IN ARIZONA. MORE THAN PROBABLY. I THINK WE ARE GOING TO BRING A LAWSUIT IN ARIZONA. WE'RE STILL LOOKING AT THE ARIZONA. A STATE WE'RE LOOKING AT THAT WILL SURPRISE YOU, WE HAVE VERY, VERY SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF FRAUD ALLEGATIONS IN THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO, AND WE HAVE A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF ALLEGATIONS IN THE STATE OF VIRGINIA. I DON'T KNOW YET WHETHER THE NUMBER IN VIRGINIA WILL REACH THE NUMBER THAT WILL TURN THE ELECTION. IN THE STATE WE HAVE INDICATED IN RED, GEORGIA, PENNSYLVANIA, MICHIGAN, WISCONSIN, NEVADA AND ARIZONA, WE MORE THAN DOUBLE THE NUMBER OF VOTES NEEDED TO OVERTURN THE ELECTION IN TERMS OF PROVABLE, ILLEGAL BALLOTS. ALL YOU'VE GOT TO DO TO FIND OUT IF I'M MISLEADING YOU AT ALL IS TO LOOK AT THE LAWSUITS. LOOK WHAT'S ALLEGED, LOOK IF HE AFFIDAVITS. MAYBE WE CAN SUPPLY MORE AFFIDAVITS. IN ORDER TO DO IT, I HAVE TO GET PERMISSION FROM THE PEOPLE. IN THE MATERIALS I HAVE HERE, THERE ARE AT LEAST 10 THAT COME FROM CITIZENS. WE HAVE 1,000 AT LEAST AND WE'RE GETTING MORE EVERY DAY. THERE ARE OTHER ASPECTS OF THIS FRAUD THAT AT THIS POINT I REALLY CAN'T REVEAL. THIS IS REALLY ENOUGH TO OVERTURN ANY ELECTION. IT'S DISGRACEFUL FOR ANY ELECTION. I'LL CONCLUDE BY ASKING YOU TO THINK ABOUT THIS FOR A MINUTE. WHAT HAPPENED ON THE MORNING OF NOVEMBER 3rd WHEN THEY WEREGOING TO COUNT THIS NEW KIND OF BALLOT, THIS MAIL-IN BALLOT. DID EVERY DEMOCRAT LEADER IN PENNSYLVANIA AND IN MICHIGAN AND WISCONSIN AND IN GEORGIA AND NEVADA AND ARIZONA, DID THEY ALL WAKE UP AND ALL SEPARATELY HAVE THE SAME IDEA? DID THEY SEPARATELY HAVE THE IDEA WE'RE GOING TO PUT REPUBLICAN INSPECTORS IN PENS. WE'RE NOT GOING TO LET THEM LOOK AT MAIL-IN OR ABSENTEE BALLOTS. THEY ALL INDEPENDENTLY COME UP WITH THAT JUST BY COINCIDENCE. SAY, HEY, YOU KNOW, WE'RE GOING TO PUT THE REPUBLICANS IN PENS AND CORALS. WE'RE GOING TO DO IT IN PITTSBURGH. WE'RE GOING TO DO IT IN PHILADELPHIA. WE'RE GOING TO DO IT IN DETROIT. WE'RE GOING TO DO IT IN MILWAUKEE. WE'RE GOING TO DO IT IN LAS VEGAS. WE'RE GOING TO DO IT IN PHOENIX. WHAT DID I MISS? WE'RE GOT TO DO IT IN ATLANTA. OR ISN'T THE LOGICAL CONCLUSION THAT I THINK ANY JURY WOULD ACCEPT AFTER THEY HEARD THIS EVIDENCE THAT SOMEBODY HAD THIS PLAN, MAYBE THAT WAS ALWAYS THE PLAN, TO DO THIS VERY, VERY QUESTIONABLE FORM OF VOTING, WHICH HAS BEEN CRITICIZED BY PRESIDENT CARTER, BY SECRETARY BAKER, MOST EXPERTS ON ELECTION REFORM. I THINK THE LOGICAL CONCLUSION IS THIS IS A COMMON PLAN, A COMMON SCHEME. IT COMES DIRECTLY FROM THE DEMOCRAT PARTY AND COMES FROM THE CANDIDATE. CLEARLY. THAT'S THE REASON WHY HILLARY CLINTON SAID, DON'T CONCEDE, EVEN IF YOU'RE LOSING. THAT'S THE REASON WE HAD A FREUDIAN SLIP BY THE CANDIDATE, AND HE SAID HE HAD THE BEST VOTER FRAUD TEAM IN THE COUNTRY. THAT'S THE REASON WHY HE PROBABLY DIDN'T HAVE TO GO OUT AND CAMPAIGN. HE HAD TO HAVE KNOWN WHAT THEY WERE GOING TO DO. THIS HAD TO BE PLANNED IN ADVANCE. I'M KIND OF CHECKING, DID THEY GO TO THE SAME CONTRACTOR TO GET THE CORALS TO PUT THE REPUBLICANS IN. THIS IS A DISGRACEFUL THING THEY HAVE DONE TO THIS COUNTRY. PROBABLY NOT MUCH MORE DISGRACEFUL THAN THE THINGS THE PEOPLE DID IN OFFICE WHICH YOU DIDN'T AND DON'T BOTHER TO COVER AND YOU CONCEAL FROM THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. BUT WE'VE LET THIS HAPPEN. WE USE LARGELY VENEZUELAN VOTING MACHINE, IN ESSENCE, TO COUNT OUR VOTE. WE LET THIS HAPPEN, WE'RE GOING TO BECOME VENEZUELA. WE CANNOT LET THIS HAPPEN TO US. WE CANNOT ALLOW THESE CROOKS TO STEAL AN ELECTION FROM THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. THEY ELECTED DONALD TRUMP. THEY DIDN'T ELECT JOE BIDEN. JOE BIDEN IS IN THE LEAD BECAUSE OF THE FRAUDULENT BALLOTS, THE ILLEGAL BALLOTS THAT WERE PRODUCED AND ALLOWED TO BE USED AFTER THE ELECTION WAS OVER. GIVE US AN OPPORTUNITY TO PROVE IT IMPORTANT, AND WE WILL.

NOW I'M GOING TO ASK SIDNEY POWELL TO DESCRIBE TO YOU WHAT WE CAN DESCRIBE ABOUT ANOTHER TOTALLY OUTRAGEOUS SITUATION. I DON'T THINK MOST AMERICANS KNOW THAT OUR BALLOTS GET CALCULATED, MANY OF THEM, OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES AND ARE COMPLETELY OPEN TO HACKING, COMPLETELY OPEN TO CHANGE. AND IT'S BEING DONE BY A COMPANY THAT SPECIALIZES IN VOTER FRAUD. I'LL LET SIDNEY DESCRIBE THAT TO YOU.

00:38:29 MM
WHAT WE ARE REALLY DEALING WITH AND UNCOVERING MORE BY THE DAY IS THE MASSIVE INFLUENCE OF COMMUNIST MONEY THROUGH VENEZUELA, CUBA, AND LIKELY CHINA AND THE INTERFERENCE WITH OUR ELECTIONS HERE IN THE UNITED STATES. THE DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS, SMART-MATIC TECHNOLOGY SOFTWARE AND SOFTWARE THAT GOES IN OTHER COMPUTERIZED VOTING SYSTEMS AS WELL, NOT JUST DOMINION, WERE CREATED IN VENEZUELA AT THE DIRECTION OF HUGO CHAVEZ TO MAKE SURE HE NEVER LOST AN ELECTION AFTER ONE CONSTITUTIONAL REFERENDUM CAME OUT THE WAY HE DID NOT WANT IT TO COME OUT. WE HAVE ONE VERY STRONG WITNESS WHO HAS EXPLAINED HOW IT ALL WORKS. HIS AFFIDAVIT IS ATTACHED TO THE PLEADINGS OF LYNN WOOD AND THE LAWSUIT HE FILED IN GEORGIA. IT IS A STUNNING, DETAILED AFFIDAVIT BECAUSE HE WAS WITH HUGO CHAVEZ WHILE HE WAS BEING BRIEFED ON HOW IT WORKED. HE WAS WITH HUGO CHAVEZ WHEN HE SAW IT OPERATE TO MAKE SURE THE ELECTION CAME OUT HIS WAY. THAT WAS THE EXPRESS PURPOSE FOR CREATING THIS SOFTWARE. HE HAD SEEN IT OPERATE. AS SOON AS HE SAW THE MULTIPLE STATES SHUT DOWN THE VOTING ON THE NIGHT OF THE ELECTION, HE KNEW THE SAME THING WAS HAPPENING HERE, THAT THAT WAS WHAT HAD GONE ON. THE SOFTWARE ITSELF WAS CREATED WITH SO MANY VARIABLES AND SO MANY BACK DOORS THAT CAN BE HOOKED UP TO THE INTERNET OR THUMB DRIVES STUCK IN IT OR WHATEVER, BUT ONE OF ITS MOST CASHINGISTIC FEATURES IS ITS ABILITY TO FLIP VOTES. IT CAN SET AN ALGORITHM THAT PROBABLY RAN ALL OVER THE COUNTRY TO TAKE A CERTAIN PERCENTAGE OF VOTES FROM PRESIDENT TRUMP AND PRESIDENT TRUMP AND FLIP THEM TO VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN. NOT SO OVERWHELMING IN SO MANY STATES THAT IT BROKE THE ALGORITHM THAT HAD BEEN PLUGGED INTO THE SYSTEM, AND THAT'S WHAT CAUSED THEM TO HAVE TO SHUT DOWN IN THE STATES THEY SHUT DOWN IN. THAT'S WHEN THEY CAME IN THE BACK DOOR WITH ALL OF THE MAIL-IN BALLOTS, MANY OF WHICH THEY HAD ACTUALLY FABRICATED. SOME WERE ON PRISTINE PAPER WITH IDENTICALLY MATCHING PERFECT CIRCLE DOTS FOR MR. BIDEN. OTHERS WERE SHOVED IN, IN BATCHES. THEY'RE ALWAYS PUT IN A CERTAIN NUMBER OF BATCHES AND PEOPLE WOULD RERUN THE SAME BATCH. THIS CORRESPONDS TO OUR STATISTICAL EVIDENCE THAT SHOWS INCREDIBLE SPIKES IN THE VOTE COUNTS AT PARTICULAR TIMES. AND THAT CORRESPONDS TO EYEWITNESS TESTIMONY OF NUMEROUS PEOPLE WHO HAVE COME FORWARD AND SAID THEY SAW THE BALLOTS COME IN THE BACK DOOR AT THAT TIME. NOTABLY, THE DOMINION EXECUTIVES ARE NOWHERE TO BE FOUND NOW. THEY ARE MOVING THEIR OFFICES OVERNIGHT. TO DIFFERENT PLACES. THEIR OFFICE IN TORONTO WAS SHARED WITH ONE OF THE SOURCE ENTITIES. ONE OF THE LEADERS OF THE DOMINION PROJECT OVERALL IS LORD MALLET BROWN, MR. SORICE'S NUMBER TWO PERSON IN THE UK AND HIS LEADERSHIP. THERE ARE TIES TO THE CLINTON FOUNDATION AND OTHER KNOWN POLICIES IN THE COUNTRY. JUST TO GIVE A DESCRIPTION OF HOW THIS WAS, I'M GOING TO QUOTE FROM A THAT'S RIGHT WAS WRITTEN AND I'LL READ THAT. THIS PERSON WAS OBJECTING TO THE UNITED STATES SYSTEM OF VOTING SYSTEMS SMARTMATIC, I BELIEVE THIS TRANSACTION RAISES EXACTLY THE SAME FOREIGN OWNERSHIP ISSUES FOR NATIONAL SECURITY PURPOSES. IT'S UNDISPUTED THAT SMARTMATIC IS FAR KNOWN AND CALLED SEQUOIA. THEY JUST CALL IT A DIFFERENT NAME. BUT IT WAS A VOTING MACHINE BUSINESS COMPANY DOING BUSINESS IN THE UNITED STATES. USED TO RECORD 105 MILLION VOTES IN THE 2004 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION IN THE UNITED STATES. SMARTMATIC NOW ACKNOWLEDGES A VENEZUELA BUSINESSMAN HAS CONTROLLING INTEREST IN SMARTMATIC, BUT THE COMPANY HAS NOT REVEALED WHO ALL OF THE SMARTMATIC OWNERS ARE. HIDDEN IN A WEB OF OFFSHORE PRIVATE ENTITIES. AND THAT IS IN FACT TRUE. SMARTMATIC HAS BEEN ASSOCIATED WITH THE VENEZUELAN GOVERNMENT LED BY HUGO CHAVEZ OPENLY HOSTILE TO THE UNITESD STATES, AND OF COURSE, WE KNOW, COMMUNIST AND BRUTAL AND SMARTMATIC'S POSSIBLE CONNECTION TO THE VENEZUELA GOVERNMENT POSES A NATIONAL SECURITY CONCERN TO SEQUOIA BECAUSE ELECTRONIC VOTING MACHINES ARE SUSCEPTIBLE TO TAMPERING. THIS GOES TO THE 2006 PRIMARY ELECTION. AND IT ENDS BY SAYING THE PRODUCTS AND SERVICES THAT ARE OF VENEZUELAN OR RA BEGINIGIN TO DETERMINE. AND THIS LETTER WAS WRITTEN TO HANK PAULSON, ON OCTOBER 6, 2006 BY CONGRESSWOMAN CAROLYN B. MALONEY. SENATORS KLOBUCHAR AND WARREN HAVE RAISED THESE CONCERNS AS RECENTLY AS DECEMBER 2019. WHY OUR GOVERNMENT HAS NOT TAKEN THEM SERIOUSLY IS BEYOND MY COMPREHENSION, UNLESS THEY HAVE SOME OF THE THREE LETTER AGENCIES HAVE USED THEM THEMSELVES, IN OTHER PARTS OF THE WORLD. WE KNOW THAT THE TECHNOLOGY WAS EXPORTED TO AFFECT AN ELECTION IN ARGENTINA. THAT'S ADMITTED BY OUR FRIEND WHO WROTE THE AFFIDAVIT ABOUT HUGO CHAVEZ AND HIS INTEREST IN SMARTMATIC. AGAIN IN 2006, CAROLYN MALONEY WROTE THE HONORABLE JOHN SNOW, THE SECRETARY OF THE TREASUREYTREASURY, ABOUT THE ISSUES. SPEAKING OF SMARTMATIC'S LEADERSHIP. ONE OF THE SMARTMATIC PATENT HOLDERS, ERIC KUMAR I BELIEVE HIS NAME IS, IS ON THE WEB AS BEING RECORDED IN A CONVERSATION WITH ANTIFA. MEMBERS SAYING THAT HE HAD THE ELECTION RIGGED FOR MR. BIDEN. NOTHING TO WORRY ABOUT HERE. AND HE WAS GOING TO -- THEY WERE GOING TO F TRUMP. HIS SOCIAL MEDIA IS FILLED WITH HATRED FOR THE PRESIDENT AND FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AS A WHOLE. AS ARE THE SOCIAL MEDIA ACCOUNTS OF MANY OTHER SMARTMATIC PEOPLE. THERE HAS BEEN WIDESPREAD USE OF THIS. DOMINION ITSELF IS UTILIZED IN 2,000 JURISDICTIONS IN 30 STATES. IT'S UNCERTIFIABLE IN MULTIPLE STATES WHO REALIZED THE PROBLEMS IT HAD INCLUDING TEXAS. EXPERTS HAVE DESCRIBED ACROSS THE BOARD FROM A PRINCETON GROUP OF THREE PROFESSORS TO EXPERTS WE HAVE TALKED TO ABOUT ITS END USER VULNERABILITIES. PEOPLE CAN ADMITTEDLY GOING IN AND CHANGE WHATEVER THEY WANT. THEY CAN SET THE RATIO OF VOTES FROM ONE THING TO ANOTHER. THEY CAN SAY A BIDEN VOTE COUNTS AS 1.25. AND A TRUMP VOTE COUNTS AS .75. THOSE MAY BE THE NUMBERS THAT WERE ACTUALLY USED HERE. IT'S NOT JUST THE SWING STATES THAT WERE AFFECTED. THE ALGORITHM WAS LIKELY RUN ACROSS THE COUNTRY TO AFFECT THE ELECTION. LIKE I SAID, WE ONLY DISCOVERED IT HERE BECAUSE THE OVERWHELMING NUMBER OF VOTES FOR PRESIDENT TRUMP IN THE SWING STATES CAUSED THE MACHINES TO HAVE TO SHUT DOWN FOR THEM TO BACKFILL FOR ADDING VOTES. WE HAVE EVIDENCE OF DIFFERENT NUMBERS OF VOTES BEING INJECTED INTO THE SYSTEM. THE SAME IDENTICAL UNIQUE SIX-DIGIT NUMBER, MULTIPLE TIMES, IN AT LEAST TWO STATES THAT WE'VE ANALYZED SO FAR. AND I'M TALK ABOUT LIKE 341,542 FOR BIDEN. AND 105,012 FOR TRUMP. THE SOFT WARE MANUAL ITSELF, YOU CAN DOWNLOAD IT FROM THE INTERNET. I WOULD ENCOURAGE YOU ALL TO READ IT BECAUSE IT SPECIFICALLY ADVERTISING SOME OF THESE THINGS AS FEATURES OF THE SYSTEM. WHY IT WAS EVER ALLOWED INTO THIS COUNTRY IS BEYOND MY COMPREHENSION. AND WHY NOBODY HAS DEALT WITH IT IS ABSOLUTELY APPALLING. THE MACHINES WERE EASILY ACCESSIBLE TO HACKERS. THERE'S VIDEO ON THE NET THAT WILL EXPLAIN TO YOU HOW A KID WITH A CELL PHONE CAN HACK ONE OF THESE VOTING MACHINES. THERE'S BEEN NO OVERSIGHT OF DOMINION OR ITS SOFTWARE. WORKERS IN EACH COUNTY WERE TRAINED BY DOMINION, BUT THERE'S NO EVIDENCE OF MONITORING OTHERWISE. WE HAVE TESTIMONY OF DIFFERENT WORKERS ADMITTING THAT THEY WERE TRAINED HOW TO DISPOSE OF TRUMP VOTES AND ADD TO BIDEN VOTES. SOFTWARE HAS A FEATURE PURSUANT TO WHICH YOU CAN DRAG AND DROP ANY NUMBER OF BATCHES OF VOTES TO THE CANDIDATE OF YOUR CHOICE OR SIMPLY THROW THEM AWAY. SO, WE HAVE MATHEMATICAL EVIDENCE IN A NUMBER OF STATES OF MASSIVE QUANTITIES OF TRUMP VOTES BEING TRSHASHED. JUST SIMPLY PUT IN THE TRASH LIKE YOU WOULD IN YOUR COMPUTER WITH ANY FILE AND BIDEN VOTES BEING EJECTED. IT'S IN ADDITION TO FLIPPING. THERE'S AN ALGORITHM THAT FLIPS AUTOMATICALLY THE VOTES, EACH OPERATOR HAS THE ABILITY TO GO IN, OVERRIDE SETTINGS. THEY CAN IGNORE THE SIGNATURE, DOWN THE TOP BALLOT, THEY CAN SELECT WHO THEY WANT TO CHANGE RESULTS FOR. THE GENTLEMAN WHO FOUNDED SMARTMATIC, THERE'S VIDEO OF HIM ON THE INTERNET THAT, YES, AT LEAST ON ONE OCCASION, HE ADMITS THEY CHANGED 1 MILLION VOTES WITH NO PROBLEM. MANY OF THE JURISDICTIONS THAT HAD THIS PROBLEM MIGHT NOT HAVE KNOWN OF THE ISSUES, BUT MANY DID. AND I THINK A FULL-SCALE CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION NEEDS TO BE UNDERTAKEN IMMEDIATELY BY THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AND BY EVERY STATE'S EQUIVALENT. ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE OR STATE INVESTIGATORY UNIT BECAUSE THERE'S EVIDENCE OF DIFFERENT BENEFITS BEING PROVIDED TO THE PEOPLE WHO SPENT $0000 $100 MILLION OF TAXPAYER MONEY FOR THEIR STATE TO GET THE DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS PUT IN TIME FOR THE ELECTIONS IN DIFFERENT WAYS. THERE'S ONE WAY THAT A LAWYER GOT, QUOTE, ELECTION INSURANCE. MEANING THAT HE WOULD BE ABLE TO MAKE SURE HE WAS ELECTED. I'M SURE THEY EXPLAINED THAT FEATURE IN DETAIL TO MANY PEOPLE WHO EXPRESSED INTEREST IN PUTTING THIS VOTING SYSTEM IN. TEXAS DENIED CERTIFICATION OF THE DOMINION SYSTEM IN 2019, BUT THERE ARE NO DOUBT ISSUES WITH THE SOFTWARE THAT TEXAS DID USE, UNBEKNOWNST TO TEXAS, I WOULD IMAGINE, SINCE THEY WENT TO GREAT TROUBLE TO EXAMINE THE DOMINION SYSTEMS AND REJECT THEM. BUT OTHER SOFTWARE, THE SOURCE CODE THAT DOES THE ALTERCATIONS IS EMBEDDED WE'VE BEEN TOLD IN THE SOURCE CODE ACROSS THE COUNTRY IN ALL VOTING MACHINES. THERE'S NO DOUBT IT'S BEEN USED TO ALTER ELECTIONS IN OTHER COUNTRIES. WE KNOW SPECIFICALLY VENEZUELA EXPORTED IT FOR THAT PURPOSE TO ARGENTINA AND OTHER LATIN AMERICA COUNTRIES. TO MAKE SURE THAT THE CORRUPT RURALS WILLING TO PAY THE HIGHEST PRICE TO BE IN OFFICE WERE ALLOWED TO RIG THEIR ELECTIONS. THIS IS STUNNING, HEARTBREAKING, INFURIATING AND THE MOST UNPATRIOTIC ACTS I CAN EVEN IMAGINE FOR PEOPLE IN THIS COUNTRY TO HAVE PARTICIPATED IN, IN ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM. AND I WANT THE AMERICAN PUBLIC TO KNOW RIGHT NOW THAT WE WILL NOT BE INTIMIDATED. AMERICAN PATRIOTS ARE FED UP WITH THE CORRUPTION FROM THE LOCAL LEVEL TO THE HIGHEST LEVEL OF OUR GOVERNMENT. AND WE ARE GOING TO TAKE THIS COUNTRY BACK. WE ARE NOT GOING TO BE INTIMIDATED. WE ARE NOT GOING TO BACK DOWN. WE ARE GOING TO CLEAN THIS MESS UP NOW. PRESIDENT TRUMP WON BY A LANDSLIDE. WE ARE GOING TO PROVE IT. AND WE'RE GOING RECLAIM THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR PEOPLE WHO VOTE FOR FREEDOM.

00:52:06 MM
EXCUSE ME, WE'RE NOT UP TO THE QUESTIONS AT THIS POINT -- EXCUSE ME, WE'RE NOT AT THE QUESTIONS. MY NAME IS JENNA ELLIS AND I'M A SENIOR LEGAL ADVISER TO THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN. AND I'D LIKE TO EXPLAIN NOW WHERE WE'VE BEEN AND WHERE WE'RE AT AND WHAT YOU CAN EXPECT FROM THE PROCESS. SO WHAT YOU HAVE HEARD IN THE FAKE NEWSPAPERS TOMORROW WILL BE ONE OF TWO THINGS. EITHER THERE WAS NOT SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE THAT WE'VE PRESENTED OR WE SPEAK TOO LONG. OKAY. SO WHAT YOU'VE HEARD NOW IS BASICALLY AN OPENING STATEMENT. THIS IS WHAT YOU CAN EXPECT TO SEE WHEN WE GET TO COURT, TO ACTUALLY HAVE A FULL TRIAL ON THE MERITS. TO ACTUALLY SHOW THIS EVIDENCE IN COURT. AND PROVE OUR CASE. THIS IS NOT A "LAW & ORDER" EPISODE WHERE EVERYTHING IS NEATLY WRAPPED UP IN 60 MINUTES. FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO ARE HERE IN THIS RUIN OR TUNE OUT IN OTHER NETWORKS, CLEARLY, YOU'VE NEVER BEEN COURT REPORTERS. TRIALS TAKE TIME. PUTTING ON EVIDENCE TAKES TIME. THIS IS BASICALLY AN OPENING STATE SO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE CAN UNDERSTAND WHAT THE NETWORKS HAVE BEEN HIDING AND WHAT THEY REFUSE TO COVER BECAUSE ALL OF YOUR FAKE NEWS HEADLINES ARE DANCING AROUND THE MERITS OF THIS CASE AND ARE TRYING TO DELEGITIMATEIZE WHAT WE'RE DOING HERE. LET ME BE VERY CLEAR THAT OUR OBJECTIVE IS TO PRESERVE ELECTION INTEGRITY. PRESIDENT TRUMP HAS BEEN SAYING FROM DAY ONE THIS IS ABOUT MAINTAINING FREE AND FAIR ELECTIONS. IT'S NOT ABOUT OVERTURNING AN OUTCOME. IT'S ABOUT MAKING SURE THAT ELECTION INTEGRITY IS PRESERVED. AND EVERY AMERICAN SHOULD WANT THAT. IF EVERY AMERICAN IS NOT ON BOARD WITH THAT, YOU HAVE TO ASK YOURSELF WHY. IF YOUR FAKE NEWS NETWORK IS NOT COVERING AND ALLOWING YOU TO COVER IT FAIRLY AND ACCURATELY, YOU SHOULD ASK YOURSELF WHY. THIS IS ABSOLUTELY A LEGITIMATE BASIS. WE HAVE BEEN ASKED TO PROVIDE AN ENTIRE CASE THAT GENERALLY WOULD TAKE YEARS IN CIVIL LITIGATION. I'VE BEEN A PROSECUTOR. I HAVE TRIED CASES WITH FAR SIMPLER FACTS. ONE THING HAPPENED IN A MATTER OF MINUTES AND IT STILL TAKES DAYS. AND WE GO THROUGH A JURY PROCESS. THIS IS THE COURT OF PUBLIC OPINION RIGHT NOW. WE'RE NOT TRYING OUR CASE IN THE COURT OF PUBLIC OPINION, BECAUSE IF WE WERE, WE WOULD GET UNBIASED JURORS. I WOULD STRIKE 99% OF YOU FROM THE JURY AND I WOULD BE ALLOWED TO BECAUSE OF THE FAKE USE COVERAGE YOU PROVIDE. YOU'RE NOT UNBIASED JURORS. UNTIL YOU STEP OUT OF YOUR ROLE AS A JOURNALIST AND ACTUALLY GO INTO A COURTROOM AND YOU ARE A JUDGE ON A BENCH THAT HAS SWORN AN OATH TO BE UNBIASED IN OUR SEPARATION OF POWERS, THEN YOUR OPINION DOES NOT MATTER. THE FACTS MATTER. THE TRUTH MATTERS. AND IF YOU ARE FAIR REPORTERS, YOU WILL COVER THAT FAIRLY AND APPROPRIATELY. AND YOU WILL ALLOW COVERAGE OF OUR MEDIA TEAM HERE AND OUR LEGAL TEAM. THAT IS ABSOLUTELY SHOCKING THAT ALL YOU COVER ARE AROUND THE MARGINS. AND I'VE SEEN ALL OF YOU TAKING PICTURES RIGHT NOW. AND I CAN ANTICIPATE WHAT YOUR HEADLINES ARE GOING TO BE. IF YOU ARE NOT WILLING TO TALK ABOUT THE EVIDENCE THAT HAS BEEN PRESENTED, THEN THAT IS ABSOLUTELY UNACCEPTABLE FOR JOURNALISTIC STANDARDS. THIS IS AN OPENING STATEMENT. THIS IS SOMETHING WHERE WE HAVE TOLD YOU WHAT THE EVIDENCE WILL SHOW. AND WE'VE GIVEN YOU A BRIEF DESCRIPTION. THAT HAPPENS IN A COURTROOM ALL THE TIME WHERE THAT'S NOT THE FACT-FINDING PROCESS. THAT IS JUST AN OVERVIEW. THAT IS WHAT WE'VE GIVEN YOU TODAY BECAUSE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE DESERVE TO KNOW WHAT WE HAVE UNCOVERED IN THE LAST COUPLE OF WEEKS. REMEMBER, THIS IS SUCH A SHORT TIME FRAME. AND THIS IS AN ELITE STRIKE FORCE TEAM THAT IS WORKING ON BEHALF OF THE PRESIDENT AND THE CAMPAIGN TO MAKE SURE THAT OUR CONSTITUTION IS PROTECTED. WE ARE A NATION OF RULES. NOT A NATION OF RULERS. THERE IS NOT SOMEONE THAT JUST GETS TO PICK WHO THE NEXT PRESIDENT IS OUTSIDE THE WILL OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. AND THAT IS OUR TASK BECAUSE WHEN WE TALK ABOUT VOTER FRAUD, IT'S ACTUALLY ELECTION OFFICIAL FRAUD. THAT CANNOT STAND. THE CONSTITUTION REQUIRES THAT THE STATE LEGISLATURES ARE THE ONES THAT MAKE ELECTION LAW. IT STILL HAS TO GO BY THE U.S. CONSTITUTION. BUT WHAT HAS HAPPENED IN THIS CASE IS THAT STATE AND LOCAL LEVEL OFFICIALS AND ALL THE WAY UP HAVE CHANGED THE RULES. THAT'S WHAT THE DEMOCRATS DO. IF THEY DON'T LIKE THE RULES, THEY CHANGE THEM. AND THEY CHANGE THEM AT THE LAST MINUTE. THEY MANIPULATE THEM, THEY WANT TO THE TEAR DOWN OUR AMERICAN SYSTEM. OUR FOUNDERS WERE SO BRILLIANT THAT THEY ANTICIPATED THIS, THAT THERE WOULD BE CORRUPTION. THERE WOULD BE FOREIGN INFLUENCE. THERE WOULD BE ATTEMPTS TO MANIPULATE THE OUTCOME OF THE ELECTION, ESPECIALLY WITH WHOM THEY CALLED OUR CHIEF MAGISTRATE. I'D ENCOURAGE YOU ALL TO GO HOME AND ACTUALLY READ ALEXANDER HAMILTON'S FEDERALIST ICIC. AND WE SELECT OUR PRESIDENT THROUGH THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE NOT BECAUSE IT DISINFRANCHISES VOTERS BUT BECAUSE IT'S A SECURITY MECHANISM FOR EXACTLY THE TYPE OF CORRUPTION THAT WE'RE UNCOVERING. AND EVERY AMERICAN SHOULD BE GRATEFUL AND THANKFUL THAT OUR FOUNDERS HAVE THE FORESIGHT TO PUT IN THE PROTECTIONS AND PROVISIONS TO MAKE SURE THAT YOUR LEGITIMATE LEGAL VOTE IS NOT DISENFRANCHISED. THAT IS WHAT YOU'RE ADVOCATING FOR. WE WANT TO MAKE SURE TO PROTECT ELECTION INTEGRITY. AND YOUR PRESIDENT, PRESIDENT TRUMP, WE ARE SO PROUD HE IS IN THIS FIGHT BECAUSE HE UNDERSTANDS WHEN HE SWORE HIS OATH OF OFFICE, HE SWORE AN OATH TO UPHOLD AND DEFEND THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION. THAT IS WHAT HE'S DOING. THAT IS WHAT WE ARE DOING. WE'RE CONFIDENT THROUGH THIS MULTIPLE PATH OF VICTORY THAT WE'LL GET TO THE OUTCOME. THIS IS NOT ABOUT OVERTURNING AN ELECTION ON OUR PART. IT'S ABOUT MAKING SURE THAT WE PROTECT FREE AND FAIR ELECTIONS FOR ALL ELECTIONS. IF THE UNITED STATES CAVES TO CORRUPTION OR THIS TYPE OF ELECTION INTEGRITY DISASTER, THEN NOLL ELECTION WILL BE SECURE FROM HERE ON OUT. AND WE ALL NEED TO BE KEENLY AWARE OF THAT. WE ARE THE REPRESENTATIVES HERE THAT ARE STANDING IN THIS GAP AND DEFENDING PRESIDENT TRUMP. AND DEFENDING YOU, THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, AT THE END OF THE DAY. THIS IS ULTIMATELY ABOUT THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. AND WE WANT TO MAKE SURE TO PROTECT AND DEFEND THAT. AND AS MY COLLEAGUES HAVE SAID, WE WILL NOT BACK DOWN. WE WON'T BE INTIMIDATED. PRESIDENT TRUMP WILL NOT BE INTIMIDATED. YOU THE AMERICAN PEOPLE SHOULD NOT BE INTIMIDATED. YOU, THE PRESS, SHOULD COVER THIS FAIRLY AND SHOULD KNOW THAT THIS MATTERS TO ELECTION INTEGRITY, AND IT MATTERS TO THE FUTURE OF OUR NATION. SO, WE HAVE GIVEN YOU AN OVERVIEW. BUT RECOGNIZE, THIS IS NOT A COURT OF LAW. WE WILL GET THERE AND WE HAVE TIME AND WE HAVE CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS THAT WILL STEP IN WHEN WE SHOW THE CORRUPTION AND THE IRREDEEMABLY CHALLENGED AND OVERTURNED VOTES THAT ARE ABSOLUTELY CORRUPT IN ALL OF THESE COUNTIES. IT IS IRDEEMABLY COMPROMISED. WE WILL SHOW THAT. YOU HAVE TO GIVE US THAT OPPORTUNITY. THIS IS JUST OUR OPENING STATEMENT. WE HAVE OPPORTUNITY TO GET THERE AND WE HAVE TIME AND WE WILL DO THAT. THIS IS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND WE STAND PROUDLY FOR PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP. THANK YOU.

00:59:59 MM
THE WORLD IS WATCHING THIS, I HAVE GOTTEN MULTIPLE EMAILS FROM OTHER COUNTRIES WHO WATCH THE SAME PATTERN THERE. WE HAVE WITNESS TESTIMONY THAT THE SAME THINGS WERE DONE IN THOSE COUNTRIES AS THIS WAS EXPORTED FROM VENEZUELA BY MADURO AND BY MR. CHAVEZ AND BY CUBA. AND, OF COURSE, WE KNOW CHINA ALSO HAS A SUBSTANTIAL PRESENCE IN VENEZUELA. AND SUBSTANTIAL INTEREST IN MAKING SURE THAT PRESIDENT TRUMP DOES NOT CONTINUE IN OFFICE. THIS IS THE CONSUMMATE FOREIGN INTERFERENCE IN OUR ELECTION IN THE MOST CRIMINAL WAY YOU CAN POSSIBLY IMAGINE. IT MUST BE SHUT DOWN. WE KNOW FOR EXAMPLE ONE OF DOMINION'S HIGHEST LEVELS EMPLOYEES OR OFFICERS WENT TO DETROIT HIMSELF TO MAN THE DETROIT OPERATION CENTER WHERE HE COULD WATCH THE VOTES COMING IN REALTIME. AND DECIDE WHICH FILE FOLDER IN THE SYSTEM TO PUT THOSE VOTES INTO. THAT'S WHY YOU SEE MASSIVE SPIKES AFTER HOURS WHEN PEOPLE WERE TOLD THAT ALL OF THE VOTES WERE IN, AND ALL OF THE VOTES WERE COUNTED. MANY DOMINION EMPLOYEES HAVE REACHED OUT TO US TO TELL US THE TRUTH, THEY ARE AMERICANS WHO WANT TO ENSURE ELECTION INTEGRITY LIKE WE DO. I WOULD ENCOURAGE EVERY DOMINION OR SMARTMATIC EMPLOYEE WHO IS FED UP WITH CORRUPTION IN THIS COUNTRY TO COME FORWARD AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. BECAUSE THESE ARE SERIOUS FEDERAL OFFENSES THAT I'M CONFIDENT THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE WILL BE IN PURSUIT OF IN VERY SHORT ORDER, IF THEY ARE NOT ALREADY.

01:01:39 MM
YEAH, MAYOR GG, THISIULIANI, THIS REMINDS US YEARS AGO, THEY HAD FEDERAL JUDGES OVERSEEING ELECTIONS, THE FEDERAL JUDGE OVERSEEING THE ELECTION IN CHICAGO. WILL YOU BE ASKING THAT IN GEORGIA? OR THE TWO SENATE RACES? THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGES AND FEDERAL AUTHORITIES MONITORING ELECTIONS?

01:02:12 MM
YEP, I KNOW ABOUT IT. I REALLY CAN'T GIVE YOU AN OPINION ON THAT. I THINK, OBVIOUSLY, EVERY ELECTION OFFICIAL SHOULD LEARN SOMETHING FROM THIS AND BE VERY, VERY CAREFUL WITH THE NEXT ELECTION. I KNOW THIS IS A LOT OF INFORMATION THAT WE'VE GIVEN YOU, PROBABLY BECAUSE WE'RE FRUSTRATED WITH WHAT WE KEEP READING AND HEARING IN THE CENSORED PRESS WHICH IS WE HAVE NO EVIDENCE. WE HAVE NO SPECIFICS. WE HAVE NO BACKUP TO WHAT WE'RE SAYING. AND YOU LARGELY IGNORE THE AFFIDAVITS THAT ARE FILED. WHETHER YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE WITH AN AFFIDAVIT, IT'S EVIDENCE. YOU CAN'T SAY, I MEAN, YOU'RE JUST LYING TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WHEN YOU SAY THERE'S NO EVIDENCE. SYDNEY WAS GIVING YOU INFORMATION THAT COME FROM AFFIDAVITS FROM OTHER PEOPLE THAT ARE GIVEN UNDER OATH. I WAS EXPLAINING THINGS TO YOU FROM AFFIDAVITS THAT CAME FROM OTHER PEOPLE. AMERICAN CITIZENS. WHO SWEAR UNDER OATH THAT THEY SAW 100,000 BALLOTS COME IN AND THAT THEY WERE ALL FOR JOE BIDEN. AND I SHOULD POINT OUT, NOW THAT SYDNEY HAS SPOKEN, THAT THOSE HAPPENED JUST AROUND THE TIME THAT THE DOMINION OR SMARTMATIC PEOPLE CALLED A HALT TO THE ELECTION. AND THEN YOU CAN ALSO TRACE IT WITH A VERY BIG SPIKE IN THE VOTE COUNT AT EXACTLY THAT TIME. SO WHAT WE'RE TELLING YOU IS SUPPORTED BY EVIDENCE. AND WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO PRESENT THESE, BECAUSE OF THE PROCEDURES THAT EXIST. ACCORDING TO THE DIFFERENT VOTING LAWS OF THE DIFFERENT STATES. FOR EXAMPLE, YOU ASKED US ABOUT WISCONSIN. WE HAVE TO FIRST CREATE A CONTEST IN WISCONSIN BEFORE WE CAN MOVE TO BRINGING A FULSOME FEDERAL LAWSUIT. THE CONTEST, FROM EVERYTHING I CAN SEE, IS GOING TO OVERTURN THE VOTE, BECAUSE IT'S GOING TO SHOW SOMEWHERE AROUND 100,000 ILLEGAL BALLOTS IN TWO COUNTIES THAT BIDEN CARRIED BY 75%, 80%. YOU KNOW HOW CLOSE WISCONSIN IS. AND WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT IS THE ABSENTEE BALLOTS FOR WHICH THERE WERE NO APPLICATIONS. AND THAT'S NOT JUST A SMALL MATTER. THE REASON FOR THE APPLICATION AND TO KEEP THIS TOGETHER IS TO PRECISELY AVOID WHAT THE DEMOCRATS DID IN THIS ELECTION WHICH IS TO MISUSE THE ABSENTEE BALLOT PROCESS IN ORDER TO CHEAT. THEY REALLY CHEATED IN TWO RESPECTS. THEY CHEATED WITH THE MACHINES. INSTEAD OF ASKING ME ARE WE GOING TO BRING A LAWSUIT IN WISCONSIN, WHICH WE WILL IF WE HAVE TO, YOU SHOULD HAVE ASKED ME, AND YOU SHOULD BE MORE ASTOUNDED BY THE FACT THAT OUR VOTES ARE COUNTED IN GERMANY AND IN SPAIN BY A COMPANY OWNED BY AFFILIATES OF CHAVEZ AND MADURO. DID YOU EVER BELIEVE THAT WAS TRUE? DID ANY OF YOU HERE BELIEVE THAT WAS POSSIBLE, OF COURSE IT SHOULDN'T BE POSSIBLE. I DIDN'T KNOW IF WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TIME TO DEVELOP ALL OF THAT. IN TIME TO FILL THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL OF THESE CASES. WE HAVE ENOUGH EVIDENCE WITHOUT THAT TO OVERTURN THIS ELECTION. WE HAVE IT FROM THE AFFIDAVITS OF AMERICAN CITIZENS. BUT THAT'S A MATTER OF NATIONAL SECURITY THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT NOW. VERY, VERY SERIOUS OF NATIONAL SECURITY. PLEASE DON'T MAKE LIGHT OF IT. AND DON'T ACT LIKE YOU KNEW IT. DON'T ACT LIKE IT ISN'T A SURPRISE. IF THAT'S NOT A HEADLINE TOMORROW, THEN YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT A HEADLINE IS. THERE ISN'T A SINGLE PERSON IN THIS COUNTRY THAT WOULD HAVE BELIEVED WE HAVE STATES STUPID ENOUGH TO HAVE OUR VOTE SENT OUT OF THIS COUNTRY. YOU COULDN'T POSSIBLY BELIEVE THAT THE COMPANY COUNTING OUR CROAT, WITH CONTROL OVER OUR VOTE IS OWNED BY TWO VENEZUELANS WHO WERE ALLIES OF CHAVEZ, ARE PRESENT ALLIES OF MADURO, WITH A COMPANY WHOSE CHAIRMAN IS A CLOSE ASSOCIATE AND BUSINESS PARTNER OF GEORGE FLORES. THE BIGGEST DONOR TO ANTIFA AND THE BIGGEST DONOR TO BLACK LIVES MATTER WHAT DO WE HAVE TO DO TO GET YOU PEOPLE TO BELIEVE THE TRUTH. YES.

01:07:04 MM
THE LEGAL TEAM HAS MENTIONED BEFORE THAT PEOPLE CLOSE TO THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN ARE PRESSURING THEM TO DROP THE INVESTIGATION INTO DDOMINION. CAN YOU GO FURTHER AND TELL US WHO THE PEOPLE ARE? AND ALSO CAN YOU TELL US IF THEY WORK WITH SOME OF OUR GROUPS SUCH AS THE CIA --

01:07:29 MM
WITH DEFENSE GROUPS AND CIA. FIRST, I'M IN CHARGE OF THIS INVESTIGATION WITH SYDNEY AND THE PEOPLE THAT YOU SEE HERE. THERE'S NO PRESSURE TO STOP INVESTIGATING DOMINION. NO, THERE'S –

01:07:43 MM
NO, THERE'S PRESSURE TO GO AS FAST AS WE CAN. I THINK THERE WAS UNIFORM SHOCK WHEN WE FIRST HEARD IT. I THINK WHEN I FIRST HEARD IT, I DIDN'T BELIEVE IT UNTIL SYDNEY SHOWED ME THE DOCUMENTS. IN FACT, I FEEL KIND OF STUPID IN THE LAWSUIT, ALL YOU HAD TO DO IS GO ONLINE AND FIND THAT SMARTMATIC IS OWNED BY VENEZUELANS CLOSE TO SHACHAVOUS.SHACHAVOUSSHACHAVOUS. THE KOUMER CHARACTER TOOK OFF ALL OF HIS SOCIAL MEDIA. THE MAN IS A VICIOUS, VICIOUS MAN. HE WROTE HORRIBLE THINGS ABOUT THE PRESIDENT. HE'S COMPLETELY BIASED. HE SPECIFICALLY SAYS THEY'RE GOING TO FIX THIS ELECTION. I DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU NEED TO WAKE YOU UP, TO DO YOUR JOB. AND IN FACT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, WHETHER YOU LIKE IT OR NOT, OF THE THINGS THEY NEED TO KNOW, THIS IS REAL. IT IS NOT MADE UP -- THERE'S NOBODY HERE THAT ENGAGES IN FANTASY. I'VE TRIED 100 CASES. I'VE PROSECUTED SOME OF THE MOST DANGEROUS CRIMINALS IN THE WORLD. I KNOW CRIMES. I CAN SMELL THEM. YOU DON'T HAVE TO SMELL THIS ONE. I CAN PROVE IT TO YOU 18 DIFFERENT WAYS. I CAN PROVE TO YOU THAT HE WON PENNSYLVANIA BY 300,000 VOTES. I CAN PROVE TO YOU THAT HE WON MICHIGAN BY PROBABLY 50,000 VOTES. WHEN I WENT TO BED ON ELECTION NIGHT, HE WAS AHEAD IN ALL OF THOSE STATES, EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THOSE STATES. HOW IS IT THEY ALL TURNED AROUND? EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM TURNED AROUND? SORE IS IT MORE CONSISTENT THERE WAS A PLAN TO TURN THEM AROUND. SINCE THERE ARE WITNESSES WHO SAY THERE WAS A PLAN TO TURN THEM AROUND. AND IT KIND OF BEGS CREDULITY TO SAY IT ALL HAPPENED IN EVERY SINGLE STATE, MY GOODNESS, THIS IS HOW YOU WIN CASES IN A COURTROOM.

01:09:52 MM
SIR, HAVE THE LAWMAKERS IN BATTLEGROUND STATES. [ INAUDIBLE QUESTION ].

01:10:03 MM
OUR GOAL HERE IS TO GO AROUND THE IRON CURTAIN OF CENSORSHIP. WHAT PUBLICATION ARE YOU WITH?

01:10:11 MM
CNN. IT'S TO GO AROUND THE OUTRAGEOUS IRON CURTAIN OF CENSORSHIP AND GET FACTS TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, THAT IF YOU WERE A FAIR AND HONEST NETWORK, YOU WOULD HAVE BEEN REPORTING FOR THE LAST TWO WEEKS. THESE ARE FACTS. THESE ARE THINGS THAT ACTUALLY HAPPENED. THESE PEOPLE REALLY WROTE THESE AFFIDAVITS. THESE AFFIDAVITS ARE REALLY PART OF THE PUBLIC RECORD. YOU'RE CONCEALING THEM. YOU'RE COVERING THEM UP, AND OUR ROLE HERE IS TO DO YOUR JOB, BECAUSE YOU DON'T DO IT.

01:10:53 MM
WHERE IS OUR -- HAVE THEY EXPRESSED ANY INTERESTS IN LOOKING INTO ALLEGATIONS OF VOTER FRAUD AND ELECTION FRAUD?

01:11:04 MM
COME ON, YOU HAVE TO HAVE A LITTLE HUMOR.

01:11:07 MM
WE HAVE WITNESSES THAT HAVE ACTUALLY REPORTED --

01:11:10 MM
WHERE ARE YOU, FBI?

01:11:13 MM
NOTHING HAS HAPPENED AS A RESULT OF IT.

01:11:14 MM
I DON'T KNOW WHERE THE FBI HAS BEEN FOR THE LAST THREE YEARS. I HAVE NO IDEA WHERE THE FBI HAS BEEN FOR THE LAST FOUR YEARS. EXPLAIN TO ME HOW THE FBI CONCEALED A MEMO IN THE HAND OF BRENNAN, TO OBAMA, SAYING THAT HILLARY BASICALLY MADE UP THE RUSSIAN COLLUSION PART. THEY WITHHELD THAT FOR FOUR YEARS. AND COST OUR COUNTRY $40 MILLION. AND TWO IMPEACHMENT -- ONE ATTEMPTED, ONE ACTUAL, AND THEN ACQUITTAL PROCEEDING. I DON'T KNOW WHERE THEY'VE BEEN. I DON'T KNOW WHERE THEY WERE ON THE HARD DRIVE. THEY GOT IT EIGHT, TEN MONTHS AGO. THERE ARE CLEAR CRIMES REVEALED ON IT. DIDN'T DO ANYTHING WITH THAT. I DON'T KNOW WHERE THEY ARE NOW. OUR COUNTRY HAS HAD ITS BALLOTS COUNTED, CALCULATED AND MANIPULATED IN A FOREIGN COUNTRY, WITH A COMPANY CONTROLLED BY FRIENDS OF AN ENEMY IN THE UNITED STATES. WHAT DO WE HAVE TO DO TO GET THE FBI TO WAKE UP? MAYBE WE NEED A NEW AGENCY TO PROTECT US. I HAVE NO IDEA.

01:12:21 MM
IF ONLY I CAN SPEAK TO THIS FOR JUST A MINUTE. IN TERMS OF THE LEVEL OF CORRUPTION WE'RE LOOKING AT HERE, WE HAVE NO IDEA HOW MANY REPUBLICAN OR DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATES IN ANY STATE ACROSS THE COUNTRY PAID TO HAVE THE SYSTEM RIGGED TO WORK FOR THEM. THESE PEOPLE DIDN'T DO THIS JUST TO TAKE CONTROL. THEY MAKE ONE HECK OF A LOT OF MONEY OFF OF IT. THINK ABOUT THE GLOBAL INTEREST BEHIND YOUR OWN NEWS ORGANIZATIONS. THINK ABOUT THE PRESSURE BEING BROUGHT TO BEAR FROM THE SOCIAL MEDIA COMPANIES TO SHUT DOWN FREE SPEECH ON ANY CHALLENGE TO THE ELECTION. THIS IS A MASSIVE, WELL-FUNDED COORDINATED EFFORT TO DEPRIVE, WE, THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES, OF THE MOST FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT UNDER THE CONSTITUTION TO PRESERVE THIS REPUBLIC THAT WE ALL CHERISH. IT IS OF THE GREATEST CONCERN. IT THE 1775 OF OUR GENERATION AND BEYOND.

01:13:22 MM
SYDNEY, ARE VOTES BEING HELD AND TABULATED OVERSEAS, THERE ARE REPORTS IT WAS IN GERMANY, IS THAT TRUE AND IS IT RELATED TO THIS?

01:13:38 MM
THAT IS TRUE. IT IS SOMEHOW RELATED TO THIS. I DON'T KNOW WHETHER GOOD GUYS GOT IT OR BAD GUYS?

01:13:47 MM
I CAN ONLY HEAR ONE PERSON AT A TIME. I'M GOING TO TAKE THE ONES WITH THE HANDS RAISED. YES.

01:13:54 MM
SO A QUESTION FOR YOU, SYDNEY, FIRST ON THE ISSUE OF THE MACHINES, DO YOU PLAN TO HAVE -- ARE YOU SEEKING A COURT ORDER TO EITHER SEIZE OR GAIN ACCESS TO ANY OF THESE MACHINES IN ANY OF THESE CONTESTED DISTRICTS? HAVE YOU BEGUN THAT PROCESS? AND WHEN CAN WE EXPECT A TIME LINE ON THAT? AND FOR YOU, MR. MAYOR, YOU MENTIONED THE CONFLICT IN MICHIGAN OVERLOAD. WHERE WILL YOU LEARN MORE ABOUT THIS?

01:14:24 MM
UP POSITIVE 350% IN SOME PLACES.

01:14:28 MM
WHERE DID YOU GET ACCESS TO THAT DATA?

01:14:31 MM
AND THEN FOR THOSE PEOPLE WHO SHOWED UP TO VOTE IN PERSON. IN MICHIGAN, THEY DID ALLOW SAME-DAY REGISTRATION.

01:14:40 MM
YES, WELL, THE SAME-DAY REGISTRATION CAUSES PROBLEM WITH THE VOTE SIGNATURE AND THE REGISTRATION ITSELF. THAT'S A WHOLE DIFFERENT SYSTEM THAT MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE, REALLY, TO VALIDATE THE SIGNATURE. I MEAN, ONE PERSON CAN SIGN THE SAME NAME. I MEAN, I COULD SIGN JOHN SMITH. I COULD SIGN KAY SMITH, I COULD SIGN BOTH THINGS AND RUN 50 BALLOTS THAT WAY. AND WE'VE GOT SOME EVIDENCE OF THAT BEING DONE AS WELL. RUDY, DO YOU WANT TO SPEAK TO THE OTHER PART OF IT?

01:15:08 MM
SURE. WE HAVE NOW THREE OVERVOTE ANALYSIS DONE. ONE FOR PENNSYLVANIA, ONE FOR MICHIGAN AND ONE FOR WISCONSIN -- I'M SORRY, GEORGIA. WHERE WE'RE IN THE PROCESS OF DOING THE OTHERS. I'LL CHECK TO SEE IF IT'S APPROPRIATE FOR TO US MAKE IT PUBLIC. I IMAGINE IT IS --

01:15:35 MM
WELL --

01:15:36 MM
YOU CAN DO-IT-YOURSELF.

01:15:38 MM
A LOT OF THE ANALYSIS COMES FROM THE REALTIME DATA THAT CAME THROUGH TO THE NEWS MEDIAS THE NIGHT AND FOLLOWING THE ELECTION. AND SOME ENTREPRENEURS OUT THERE HAVE STARTED CRUNCHING DATA THEMSELVES, IN ADDITION TO MULTIPLE EXPERTS WHO COULD EASILY RECOGNIZE WITH THE MATHEMATICAL BRAIN THAT I DO NOT HAVE, THAT BEYOND EXPLICABLE DEVIATIONS TO THE POINT OF MATHEMATICAL PROBABILITY THAT 11 186,000 VOTES COME IN FOR JOE BIDEN. THAT'S LIKE FLIPPING A COIN 186,000 TIMES AND IT LANDS ON HEADS ALL THE TIME. THAT DOES NOT HAPPEN. THERE IS NO REASONABLE EXPLANATION FOR THE UPCHUTES. THE STRAIGHT LINES UP. I'M NOT TALKING ANGLE, I'M TALKING MASSIVE STRAIGHT LINES UPTALLIES IN THE MIDDLE OF NIGHT WHEN THEY STOPPED COUNTING. THAT'S WHEN THE DOMINION WENT IN AND AFFECTED THE WHOLE SYSTEM. AND IT AFFECTS VOTES AROUND THE WORLD, GLOBALIST DICTATORS, CORPORATIONS. YOU NAME IT, EVERYBODY IS AGAINST US EXCEPT PRESIDENT TRUMP AND WE THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES.

01:17:02 MM
IS THE COUNTRY READY FOR THIS? AMERICA SHOULD BE ASTONISHED WITH WHAT YOU'RE SAYING HERE TODAY ON THE VERGE OF AN ELECTORAL BREAKDOWN?

01:17:10 MM
AND WE'VE ALREADY HAD IT. WE'VE ALREADY HAD THAT ELECTORAL BREAKDOWN. BUT THE CONSTITUTION HAS JENNA EXPLAINS HAS PROVISIONS IN IT FOR HOW YOU FIX THIS. THERE SHOULD NEVER BE ANOTHER ELECTION CONDUCTED IN THE COUNTRY, I DON'T CARE FOR LOCAL DOG CATCHER USING DOMINION MACHINE AND SMARTMATIC SOFTWARE. WE'VE GOT TO HAVE AN AMERICAN COMPANY THAT USES PAPER BALLOTS SO WE HAVE VERIFY THAT EVERY ONE OF US ARE SEEING OUR VOTE IS OUR VOTE.

01:17:42 MM
WHY ARE YOU NOT REQUESTING VOTES IN COUNTIES THAT DON'T USE THE SOFTWARE?

01:17:48 MM
BECAUSE, THIS CASE DIDN'T BEGIN WITH DOMINION -- THIS CASE BEGAN, AND THIS CASE CAN BE PROVEN THE OLD-FASHIONED WAY. IT CAN BE PROVEN BASED ON GOOD OLD-FASHIONED DEMOCRATIC TACTICS THAT GO BACK TO MAYOR DALEY BACK IN THE 1960s WHEN HE HELD THE VOTE BACK IN CHICAGO TO ELECT JOHN F. KENNEDY. OR AS RECENTLY AS LAST YEAR WHEN THEY HELD THE VOTE BACK IN BROWARD AND PALM BEACH COUNTY TO STEAL THAT FROM THE GOVERNOR AND GOT CAUGHT MANUFACTURING BALLOTS. DEMOCRATS HAVE BEEN DOING THIS FOR YEARS ON A SMALL SCALE. WHEN THEY PASSED THE MAIL-IN VOTER STATUTE WHICH ALL OF A SUDDEN MULTIPLIED BY TEN TIMES THE NUMBER OF MAIL-IN VOTES, THEY REALIZED THEY COULD HAVE A FIELD DAY. THEY COULD DO PRECISELY WHAT JIMMY CARTER AND SECRETARY BAKER WARNED US ABOUT. ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS OWN AN ELECTION BOARD. AND YOU CAN GET AWAY WITH IT. AND UNLIKE WHAT SYDNEY IS TALKING ABOUT WHERE YOU CAN HAVE A PAPER TRAIL, A PAPER BALLOT, I TRIED TO POINT OUT TO YOU, THE MINUTE THAT YOU SEPARATE THE OUTER ENVELOPE FROM THE BALLOT, YOU CAN NO LONGER TRACE IT. WHICH IS WHY THE COUNT. WHATEVER THE COUNT IN GEORGIA TODAY IS TOTALLY RIDICULOUS. THEY'RE COUNTING THE SAME FRAUDULENT BALLOTS ONE MORE TIME. BUT STILL VERY CLOSE. [ INAUDIBLE QUESTION ] THAT'S GOT TO BE DISAPPOINTING TO EVEN THE PRESIDENT, HOW DO YOU DESCRIBE HIS -- DO YOU THINK THIS WILL GENUINELY OVERTURN THE ELECTION OR IS IT ABOUT SOMETHING BIGGER FOR YOU?

01:19:35 MM
WELL, IT IS -- BETTER GO FROM THE BIG PICTURE TO THE SMALLER PICTURE. THE MOST IMPORTANT THING HERE IS THIS HAS BEEN A MASSIVE ATTACK ON THE INTEGRITY OF THE VOTING SYSTEM IN THE GREATEST DEMOCRACY ON EARTH. THE PEOPLE WHO DID THIS HAVE COMMITTED ONE OF THE WORST CRIMES THAT I'VE EVER -- THAT I'VE EVER SEEN OR OBSERVED. ONE OF THE THINGS WE'RE MOST PROUD OF IN THIS COUNTRY IS A LONG-STANDING DEMOCRACY BASED ON THE RIGHT TO VOTE. THEY HAVE TRASHED THE RIGHT TO VOTE, DISHONORED THE RIGHT TO VOTE IN THEIR GREED FOR POWER AND MONEY. THERE'S NO DOUBT ABOUT IT. THIS WAS NOT AN INDIVIDUAL IDEA OF TEN OR 12 DEMOCRAT BOSSES. THIS IS A PLAN. YOU'D HAVE TO BE A FOOL NOT TO REALIZE THAT. THEY DO THE SAME THING IN EXACTLY THE SAME WAY IN TEN BIG DEMOCRAT-CONTROLLED IN MOST CASES CROOKED CITY. WHEN I SAY CROOKED CITY. GO LOOK AT HOW MANY OF THEIR OFFICIALS HAVE GONE TO JAIL IN THE LAST 20 OR 30 OR 40 OR 50 OR 60 YEARS THAT THEY HAVE DOMINATED AND DESTROYED THOSE CITIES. THEY PICKED THE PLACES WHERE THEY COULD GET AWAY WITH IT. THEY PICKED THE PLACES WHERE, WHETHER OR NOT REPUBLICANS TESTIFIED TO SOMETHING, JUDGES WOULD JUST DISMISS IT. BECAUSE JUDGES ARE APPOINTED POLITICALLY. AND TO ME OF THEM ARE HACKS. THEY PICK PLACE WHERE IS THEY CAN GET A SHERIFF THAT REFUSED TO ENFORCE A COURT ORDER. WHEN WE GOT A COURT ORDER THAT WE COULD BE TEN FEET CLOSER, OUR REPRESENTATIVES WERE TOLD IF THEY TRY TO DO IT OUT OF RESCUE. [ INAUDIBLE QUESTION ].

01:21:22 MM
PART ONE, PART ONE. IT BEGAN AS A NATIONAL CONSPIRACY, CLEARLY, THAT EVIDENCE EMERGED VERY QUICKLY. THE MINUTE I SAW IT WAS THE SAME THING IN TEN STATES, JUST USING LOGIC, I SAID, THIS CAN'T BE AN ACCIDENT. THEN WHAT I WAS SURPRISED ABOUT IS THE DIMENSION OF IT. I MEAN, NOT INSPECTING ALMOST 700,000 BALLOTS IS ASTOUNDING.

01:21:52 MM
ARE YOU JOE BIDEN -- [ INAUDIBLE QUESTION ].

01:21:56 MM
HONESTLY, I DON'T KNOW WHAT JOE BIDEN IS AWARE OF OR NOT AWARE OF. I MEAN THAT AS A LAWYER. NOT TRYING TO BE CUTE. I'VE WATCHED HIM. I'VE OBSERVED HIM. I...

01:22:16 MM
LET ME ANSWER ONE OTHER THING TO THE QUESTION, YOUR QUESTION IS FUNDAMENTALLY FLAWED WHEN YOU ASK WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE. YOU CLEARLY DON'T UNDERSTAND THE LEGAL PROCESS. WHAT WE HAVE ASKED FOR IN THE COURT IS TO NOT HAVE THE CERTIFICATION OF FALSE RESULTS TO SAY HOLD ON A MINUTE, WE HAVE EVIDENCE WE WILL PRESENT TO THE COURT. WE HAVEN'T HAD THE OPPORTUNITY YET TO PRESENT THAT TO THE COURT. WE'RE GIVING YOU AN OVERVIEW AND A PREVIEW OF WHAT WE'VE DISCOVERED, BUT NO COURT HAS -- WE'VE HAD THAT OPPORTUNITY. SO, AND WE HAVE ALLEGATIONS PENDING, SO WITH THAT SCORE, OUR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDERS OR INJUNCTIONS TO NOT CERTIFY FALSE RESULTS. WE'RE VERY HAPPY THAT MICHIGAN, THE REASON WHY WE DISMISSED THAT LAWSUIT TODAY, MICHIGAN IN WAYNE COUNTY THEY'RE NOT GOING TO CERTIFY THAT, 71% OF COUNTIES HAVE INCONSISTENT DATA. NO PERSON IN THIS ROOM OR IN THIS COUNTRY SHOULD WANT STATES TO RUSH THROUGH AND CORONATE A PRESIDENT WITH FALSE RESULTS.

01:23:24 MM
TWO MORE QUESTIONS.

01:23:24 MM
THE SECRETARY OF STATE THAT WHAT HAPPENED CAN'T BE RESCINDED AND MICHIGAN CURRENTLY STANDS.

01:23:32 MM
THE SECRETARY OF STATE WHERE?

01:23:34 MM
IN MICHIGAN.

01:23:36 MM
THERE ARE PROBLEMS IN MICHIGAN. FOLLOW THE MONEY.

01:23:38 MM
FOLLOW THE POLITICAL PARTY, MA'AM. YOU ACTUALLY WANT ME TO TAKE SERIOUSLY THE SECRETARY OF STATE OF MICHIGAN? WHEN THE SECRETARY OF STATE OF MICHIGAN NEVER BOTHERED TO FIND OUT THAT THE VOTES IN HER STATE WERE BEING COUNTED IN GERMANY BY A VENEZUELAN COMPANY? AND YOU WANT ME TO TAKE HER SERIOUSLY OR HIM SERIOUSLY? I MEAN, I WAS IN GOVERNMENT. IF I WERE THE GOVERNOR OF THAT STATE, I'D FIRE EVERYBODY INVOLVED IN THIS ELECTION. THEY DIDN'T COME AND TELL ME THAT MY STATE WAS GOING TO BE EMBARRASSED, MADE A FOOL OF BECAUSE I'M SENDING MY VOTES OF PEOPLE IN MICHIGAN OVER TO GERMANY TO BE COUNTED BY A COMPANY WHO IS OWNED BY ALLIES OF MADURO AND CHAVEZ. BY THE WAY, CAROLYN MALONEY WHO WROTE THAT IS MY CONGRESSWOMAN. A DEMOCRAT POINTED THAT OUT. THEY DIDN'T DO THE DARNEST BIT OF DUE DILIGENCE. IF YOU BOUGHT A $10 MILLION COMPANY YOU WOULD HAVE DONE MORE DUE DILIGENCE. MAYBE THEY'RE INCOMPETENT OR MAYBE THEY DIDN'T WANT TO KNOW. YOU'RE NOT GOING TO HAVE ME TAKE SERIOUSLY ANYTHING INVOLVED FROM AN ELECTION CONDUCTED IN MICHIGAN.

01:24:59 MM
INAUDIBLE QUESTION ].

01:25:00 MM
THE SECRETARY OF STATE CAN SAY WHATEVER SHE WANTS TO SAY. OF COURSE, SHE'S GOING TO SAY IS THAT. SHE'S A DEMOCRAT. SHE CAN ALSO CREDIT THE AFFIDAVITS OF THE TWO PEOPLE AND SAY THAT THE BOARD IS TIED AND THEREFORE THE VOTE HASN'T BEEN CERTIFIED. SO BECAUSE SHE'S A DEMOCRAT, SHE'S SAYING THAT. DO YOU THINK SHE HAS ANY CREDIBILITY HAVING RUN THE KIND OF ELECTION THEY RAN IN MICHIGAN? DO YOU THINK ANYONE IN THAT GOVERNMENT HAS CREDIBILITY, AFTER USING A MACHINE AND FOOLING THEIR CITIZENS? THERE CAN'T BE A PERSON IN MICHIGAN WHO THOUGHT THEIR VOTE WAS BEING SENT OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES SO SOMEBODY COULD PLAY WITH IT. I MEAN, IT'S DISGRACEFUL WHAT THE GOVERNMENT OF MICHIGAN DID TO ITS CITIZENS.

01:25:41 MM
LAST QUESTION. [ INAUDIBLE QUESTION ] ARE YOU GOING TO SAY WHAT, WHEN, WHERE --

01:25:56 MM
WE ARE LIMITED IN WHAT WE CAN DO. WE'RE NOT THE FBI. WE'RE NOT THE GOVERNMENT. WE DON'T HAVE THAT KIND OF SUBPOENA POWER. WE DON'T HAVE THE POWER TO JUST GO SUBPOENA ANYTHING WE WANT. THE GOVERNMENT DOES. WE WOULD HAVE TO SUBPOENA IN LINE WITH A CASE, OUR FIRST CASE, WE'RE ASKING FOR THAT AUTHORITY IN PENNSYLVANIA AND IN MICHIGAN. BUT YOU HAVE TO GET THAT AUTHORITY FROM THE COURT. WE'RE PRIVATE CITIZENS. WE'RE NOT THE GOVERNMENT. IF I WERE THE GOVERNMENT, LIKE I USED TO BE, THERE WOULD PROBABLY BE A LOT OF PEOPLE ARRESTED BY NOW BECAUSE THERE'S PLENTY OF PROBABLE CAUSE. PLENTY OF PROBABLE CAUSE.

01:26:35 MM
NO, NO -- WE'LL TAKE --

01:26:40 MM
DONALD TRUMP HAS WON BY A LANDSLIDE. WE'VE SEEN THAT A LOT OF YOUR LAWYERS HAVE BEEN -- WHAT DO YOU SAY TO PEOPLE WHO ALL -- FROM THE OTHER SIDE? WHY...

01:26:58 MM
WHAT FAKE NETWORK DO YOU COME FROM?

01:27:02 MM
I DON'T COME FROM A FAKE NETWORK. I'M COMPLETELY INDEPENDENT.

01:27:06 MM
OH, MY GOODNESS, WELL, FIRST OF ALL, OUR CASES HAVEN'T BEEN DISMISSED. WE ONLY HAVE --

01:27:13 MM
LOOK AT THE PLAINTIFFS INVOLVED IN IT.

01:27:16 MM
IT'S NOT OUR CASE, MA'AM. DON'T LIE TO PEOPLE. MA'AM, MA'AM, MA'AM, YOU ARE LYING. YOU ARE LYING. YOU'RE LYING. CONTINUE TO LIE. MA'AM, MA'AM, MA'AM.

01:27:33 MM
INAUDIBLE ].

01:27:34 MM
OKAY. LET ME ANSWER THE QUESTION. LET ME ANSWER THE QUESTION. THE ANSWER TO THE QUESTION IS, WE DON'T HAVE A LOT OF LAWSUITS. WE ONLY HAVE THREE. OUR LAWSUITS HAVE NOT BEEN DROPPED ALL OVERLY THE PLACE. WE --

01:27:51 MM
INAUDIBLE ].

01:27:52 MM
WELL YOU'RE A TOTALLY DISCOURTEOUS PERSON. I'M GOING TO FINISH MY ANSWER. THE FACT IS WE HAVE VERY, VERY FEW LAWSUITS. THE LAWSUITS YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT WERE BROUGHT BY PRIVATE INDIVIDUALS AND GROUPS MOST OF THEM WERE BROUGHT FOR LACK OF STANDING, PROBABLY CORRECTLY BECAUSE THEY WERE BROUGHT BEFORE THE ELECTION TOOK PLACE. THE ONLY ONE WE HAVE, THE ONE IN MICHIGAN, WE HAVE ANOTHER LAWSUIT THAT WILL ACCOMPLISH THE OTHER OBJECTIVE WHAT IS WE WANT TO DO IN MICHIGAN, IT'S SILLY TO HAVE TWO COMPETING LAWSUITS. THE ONLY LAWYER THAT LEFT THE CASE LEFT BECAUSE HE WAS THREATENED. HIS FAMILY WAS THREATENED. HIS FAMILY WAS THREATENED. SO WAS THE OTHER LAWYER. YEAH, IT'S TRUE, WE HAVE DIFFICULTY GETTING LAWYERS BECAUSE ALL OF THE LAWYERS GET THREATENED WITH BEING KILLED BECAUSE OF THE RIDICULOUS WAY IN WHICH YOU COVER THIS --

01:28:46 MM
IT'S NOT HOW I COVER IT.

01:28:49 MM
I'M NOT TALKING ABOUT YOU, BUT I AM TALKING ABOUT EVERYBODY AND I GET A SENSE WITH HOW YOU HANDLED WITH HOW YOU COVER IT. ALL RIGHT. ONE LAST QUESTION -- ONE LAST QUESTION. ONE LAST QUESTION. ONE LAST QUESTION. FROM A REASONABLE CIVIL PERSON. YOU ARE NOT.

01:29:08 MM
YES.

01:29:11 MM
I'M NOT A REASONABLE PERSON?

01:29:12 MM
NO, SHE ISN'T.

01:29:16 MM
I'M FROM -- FOR THE RECORD, IF THE COURTS DON'T LET YOU PRESENT CASES LIKE YOU JUST SAID WILL YOU GIVE THE ENTIRE BULK OF EVIDENCE TO THE MEDIA TO REVIEW? AND IF SO WHEN ARE YOU GOING TO DRAG THIS OUT WITH THE HUNTER BIDEN THING AGAIN?

01:29:31 MM
WE'RE NOT GOING TO DRAG IT OUT. IT'S RIDICULOUS FOR YOU SAY WE'RE DRAGGING IT OUT. AL GORE HAD A LOT MORE TIME THAN WE'VE HAD. AND WE'VE HAD TWO WEEKS TO INVESTIGATE. THAT'S ALSO COMPLETELY UNFAIR TO SAY WE'RE DRAGGING IT OUT. ALSO, IF WE'RE GOING TO PRESENT THINGS IN COURT, IF WE PRESENT IT TO YOU, JUDGES ARE NOT GOING TO BE HAPPY WITH THIS. FINALLY, I HAVE TO TELL YOU, OUR WITNESSES DON'T WANT TO BE EXPOSED TO THE TENDER MERCIES OF THE VICIOUS PRESS. I HAVE GREAT DIFFICULTY GETTING THOSE WITNESSES THAT I DID REVIEW TO ALLOW ME TO DO IT. THEY DON'T TRUST YOU. THEY DON'T LIKE YOU. THEY FEEL YOU PUT THEIR LIVES IN JEOPARDY WITH THE SPIN GOING ON HERE. AND WITH THE UNFAIRNESS.

01:30:15 MM
SO THE ANSWER IS NO?

01:30:16 MM
THE ANSWER IS I CAN'T DO IT BECAUSE I CAN'T -- I CAN'T -- I PUT PUT LIFE IN JEOPARDY OR A PERSON WHO THINKS THEIR LIFE IS IN JEOPARDY. THIS WOMAN TELLS ME WE HAVE LAWYERS DROPPING OUT OF THE CASE. WE HAVE LAWYERS DROPPING OUT OF THE CASE BECAUSE THEY'RE BEING THREATENED. DESTRUCTION OF THEIR CAREERS. DESTRUCTION OF THEIR LIVELIHOODS AND IN SOME CASES THEIR LIVES. WE'RE GOING TO CHANGE THAT. WE'RE GOING TO PROVE IT IN COURT. I WOULD LOVE TO RELEASE THE INFORMATION WE HAVE, I WOULD LOVE TO GIVE IT TO YOU ALL. ACCEPT, MOST OF YOU WOULDN'T COVER IT. A FEW WOULD. THE CENSORSHIP THAT IS GOES ON IN THIS COUNTRY RIGHT NOW BY BIG TECH AND BIG MEDIA IS ALMOST AS DANGEROUS AGENCY THES THE ELECTION FRAUD THAT WE'RE REVEALING. MAYBE JUST AS DANGEROUS. WE'RE HEADED TO A VERY BAD PLACE AND IT IS NOT INAPPROPRIATE THAT A VENEZUELA COMPANY COUNTED OUR VOTES. THANK YOU.

*This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.
[www.c-span.org]



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/19/2020 10:03PM by John Rose.