How can Moderna conclude their vaccine candidate is 94.5% effective? Here's why that's WRONG.
Posted by:
John Rose
()
Date: November 18, 2020 02:03PM How can Moderna conclude their vaccine candidate is 94.5% effective? Here's why that's WRONG.
Nov 18, 2020 Dr. Tom Cowan Re: How can Moderna conclude their vaccine candidate is 94.5% effective? Here's why that's WRONG.
Posted by:
John Rose
()
Date: November 18, 2020 05:37PM Here are some of my notes - most of which are not verbatim...
JR’s Notes: 30,000 Assume… 15,000 people got the Vaccine 15,000 people didn’t get the Vaccine 90 of the people who didn’t get the Vaccine got evidence of a Coronavirus Infection - .006 or .6%. Evidence, i.e. PCR Test is Bogus 5 of the people who got the Vaccine got the Coronavirus - .000333 or .0333% What’s the difference? It’s .57% - that’s called the Absolute Reduction - that is the difference between people who got Coronavirus Infection - Vaccinated or Unvaccinated. Where did they come up with the 94.5% difference? 90 + 5 = 95 90 / 95 = 94.5% [94.7%] This is called Risk Reduction or Relative Risk Analysis. …which is meaningless… [youtu.be] 9:21 MM So this whole thing is a Statistical Arithmetic Fraud. Now this is not even counting the fact that I don’t even know what the Placebo in this Moderna Trial was. I know in the Pfizer Trial the Placebo was actually a very toxic Meningococcus Vaccine. Re: How can Moderna conclude their vaccine candidate is 94.5% effective? Here's why that's WRONG.
Posted by:
Jennifer
()
Date: November 18, 2020 07:26PM Michele Malkin who is Anti-Lockdown, Anti-Mask, Anti-Vax, etc. (Conservative of course) criticizing the Clinical Trials of the Vaccine -
Michelle Malkin: COVIDGATE: The Corruption of Clinical Trials [www.cnsnews.com] Re: How can Moderna conclude their vaccine candidate is 94.5% effective? Here's why that's WRONG.
Posted by:
Jennifer
()
Date: November 18, 2020 11:21PM I just went back to finish watching the Dr. Cowan video and it's been removed.
It says: This video is unavailable. Re: How can Moderna conclude their vaccine candidate is 94.5% effective? Here's why that's WRONG.
Posted by:
John Rose
()
Date: November 22, 2020 01:58PM Video unavailable
This video is private. It hasn't been removed - it was simply made private for whatever reason probably because Cowan made a mistake or a slip of tongue with the numbers. Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
|
|