|
|
Virology voodoo exposed again
Posted by:
fresh
()
Date: December 19, 2020 05:31AM One of the key “fatal errors” in the Corman-Drosten paper is that they wrote it — and developed the PCR test — before there was any viral isolate available. All they used was the genetic sequence published online by Chinese scientists in January 2020.
Interestingly, the paper was published a mere 24 hours after it was submitted, which suggests it wasn’t even peer-reviewed before being embraced by the whole world. Undercover DC interviewed Kevin Corbett, Ph.D., one of the 22 scientists who are now demanding the paper’s retraction, who stated:31 “Every scientific rationale for the development of that test has been totally destroyed by this paper. It’s like Hiroshima/Nagasaki to the COVID test. When Drosten developed the test, China hadn’t given them a viral isolate. They developed the test from a sequence in a gene bank. Do you see? China gave them a genetic sequence with no corresponding viral isolate. They had a code, but no body for the code. No viral morphology. In the fish market, it’s like giving you a few bones and saying ‘that’s your fish.’ It could be any fish … Listen, the Corman-Drosten paper, there’s nothing from a patient in it. It’s all from gene banks. And the bits of the virus sequence that weren’t there they made up. They synthetically created them to fill in the blanks. That’s what genetics is; it’s a code. So, its ABBBCCDDD and you’re missing some, what you think is EEE, so you put it in … This is basically a computer virus. There are 10 fatal errors in this Drosten test paper … But here is the bottom line: There was no viral isolate to validate what they were doing. The PCR products of the amplification didn’t correspond to any viral isolate at that time. I call it ‘donut ring science.’ There is nothing at the center of it. It’s all about code, genetics, nothing to do with reality … There have since been papers saying they’ve produced viral isolates. But there are no controls for them. The CDC produced a paper in July … where they said: ‘Here’s the viral isolate.’ Do you know what they did? They swabbed one person. One person, who’d been to China and had cold symptoms. One person. And they assumed he had [COVID-19] to begin with. So, it’s all full of holes, the whole thing.” No Viable Virus Found in Positive Cases The critique against PCR testing is further strengthened by a November 20, 2020, study32 in Nature Communications, which found no viable virus in PCR-positive cases. The study evaluated data from 9,865,404 residents of Wuhan, China, who had undergone PCR testing between May 14 and June 1, 2020. A total of 300 tested positive but had no symptoms. Of the 34,424 people with a history of COVID-19, 107 tested positive a second time. Yet when they did virus cultures on these 407 individuals who had tested positive (either for the first or second time), no live virus was found. [www.lewrockwell.com] Re: Virology voodoo exposed again
Posted by:
John Rose
()
Date: December 19, 2020 02:56PM It looks like what was going to reinforce the Germ Theory forever might just blow up in these PSYCHOS' faces and expose the whole VIRUS/GERM THEORY FRAUD! Re: Virology voodoo exposed again
Posted by:
Horsea
()
Date: December 19, 2020 03:11PM John, I don't know about that - exposing the whole virus/germ theory fraud. Here's the reality: people love considering themselves victims. Look at the giant victimology industry. People group together with others who think they are "victimized" by someone or other. Even those who don't belong to some precious minority or even majority group (wimminz) have got something to glom onto: We're victimized by...germs!
There's all these Dangerous Things out there, floating around or harbored within everyone's lungs - viruses! Gotta lock down all of society. Even this wonderful article's author feels he has to pay at least a bit of homage to the virus & germ propatanda: [www.henrymakow.com] And he pays this bit of homage to the germ theory by meeting the germ-theory believers halfway. This was a wise decision on his part. Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
|
|
