[www.lewrockwell.com]

Quote

In the face mask group, 9 participants (0.5%) were found to develop any of 11 other respiratory viral infections compared to 11 (0.6%) in the no-face-mask group. Again, this was not statistically significant nor meaningful clinically.

Thank you at least statistics are not dead.

Quote
RawPracticalist

Quote

In the face mask group, 9 participants (0.5%) were found to develop any of 11 other respiratory viral infections compared to 11 (0.6%) in the no-face-mask group. Again, this was not statistically significant nor meaningful clinically.

Thank you at least statistics are not dead.

lol. Reading Comprehension. I feel like you misconstrued how the results of this study - 'not statistically significant nor meaningful clinically' - does not bolster your view that masks are helpful in warding off the contageousness of the Corona Fake Virus.

The conclusion of the study is that Wearing a Face Mask has no value over Not Wearing a Face Mask. Meaning the group who DID NOT wear a face mask had the same rate of infection as the group who DID wear a face mask. AN INSIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE. So therefore, MASKS DO NOT WORK to Mitigate Respiratory Viral Infections.

*********

This is crutial:

Is infection bad?

Another issue that goes unmentioned is that infection among healthy individuals would result in the production of antibodies and T-cells and long-term immunity. In the mind of modern medicine, infection is bad if it was acquired naturally, but good if it was acquired via vaccination.

Thanks for that article, Fresh!

This last paragraph:

Woe to the vaccinated: choose whom ye shall believe

As for the reported 30% of Americans who have elected to be inoculated, they face both immediate and long-term side effects and no immunity from mutant coronavirus strains. This was by design. The substitution of a nucleotide (pseudo-uridine in place of uridine) in RNA in RNA-vaccines was intentionally manipulated to reduce symptoms but not surveillance by the immune system (imperfect vaccination) that then permits shedding of the virus to uninfected others. Vaccine critics now say the vaccinated should be quarantined as super-spreaders! Licensure of these vaccines will only be accomplished by public health authorities overlooking their many side effects, some mortal. Everyone should posit in their mind that vaccines don’t work without an operable immune system that requires zinc, vitamin C, vitamin D, selenium, lysine. Maybe natural immunity is superior to synthetic vaccines.

**********

That's a different angle on why the shedding -

"The substitution of a nucleotide (pseudo-uridine in place of uridine) in RNA in RNA-vaccines was intentionally manipulated to reduce symptoms but not surveillance by the immune system (imperfect vaccination)"

And that the shedding is by design.

And he's saying it's a shedding of THE VIRUS, whereas others say it's a shedding of THE SPIKE PROTEIN and I've heard also a shedding of THE ANTIBODIES to the Spike Protein.

only the banker angle was interesting to me.

the rest was rubbish

but to each his/her own

Quote

In the face mask group, 9 participants (0.5%) were found to develop any of 11 other respiratory viral infections compared to 11 (0.6%) in the no-face-mask group. Again, this was not statistically significant nor meaningful clinically.

Thank you at least statistics are not dead

Quote
fresh
only the banker angle was interesting to me.

the rest was rubbish

but to each his/her own

EXACTLY!!!

Of course, those who are in cahoots with the enemy will try to DISTRACT the mob by focusing on the rubbish.

Yes, that's the subject of your thread. The Great Reset. Glenn Beck has done a lot of investigation and reporting on that.

I thought you were also interested in the vaccine shedding angle. Like everybody's trying to understand it. How the vaccine works, how it affects people, what is shedding, why it's shedding, how the shedding affects us, etc. That's what I'm obsessed with these days.