|
|
confused about greenstar vs. kempo (hippocrates)
Posted by:
Anonymous User
()
Date: May 04, 2008 04:30PM Hi everyone
I've been doing a bunch of research and had narrowed my purchase down to the greenstar 3000, until someone told me that the Kempo (hippocrates) was comparable and cheaper. There seems to be a ton of 'political' misinformation and catfighting out there on the subject, so I thought I'd see if anyone has any first hand experience on this topic. Is there a big difference in machine quality or juice output? I'll only be juicing for 2 - can I settle for a less heavy-duty model? I'm not rich! I'd love to be able to get the Kempo if I won't be sacrificing too much. But, being not rich, I also would rather spend more if it means I won't be wasting my money on something I'll need to upgrade later anyway.. Thank in advance for your help! Re: confused about greenstar vs. kempo (hippocrates)
Posted by:
Wheatgrass Yogi
()
Date: May 04, 2008 05:21PM Of the two Juicers you mentioned, I'd go with the GreenStar. I've owned both and like the larger twin-gears of the GS better. There is less effort required to push a Carrot through. Clean-up is a 'pain' with both.....WY Re: confused about greenstar vs. kempo (hippocrates)
Posted by:
llulu
()
Date: May 06, 2008 01:43AM I have the Kempo and love it -- I had a Champion beforehand and it clogged and heated up the juice. I've never used the Green Star, but have absolutely NO complaints about the Kempo. Also, although people complain about cleaning, I don't find the Kempo taxing to clean -- I actually appreciate caring for something that gives me so much in return!
Peace. Re: confused about greenstar vs. kempo (hippocrates)
Posted by:
juicin' john
()
Date: May 09, 2008 12:29PM you cannot go wrong getting the greenstar.
the kempo is like a smaller more cheaply made twin gear and it cost almost the same as a greenstar. go all the way and get the best with no future regrets. jj Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
|
|
