I wonder if this explains the success rate of eating a VegaN high carb diet.


[nutritionfacts.org]

Sources Cited

L. Radzevivciene, R. Ostrauskas. Egg consumption and the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a case-control study. Public Health Nutr. 2012 15(8):1437 - 1441.

U. Ericson, E. Sonestedt, B. Gullberg, S. Hellstrand, G. Hindy, E. Wirfalt, M. Orho-Melander. High intakes of protein and processed meat associate with increased incidence of type 2 diabetes. Br. J. Nutr. 2013 109(6):1143 - 1153.

Z. Shi, B. Yuan, C. Zhang, M. Zhou, G. Holmboe-Ottesen. Egg consumption and the risk of diabetes in adults, Jiangsu, China. Nutrition 2011 27(2):194 - 198.

L. Djousse, A. Kamineni, T. L. Nelson, M. Carnethon, D. Mozaffarian, D. Siscovick, K. J. Mukamal. Egg consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes in older adults. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2010 92(2):422 - 427

L. Djousse, J. M. Gaziano. Egg consumption in relation to cardiovascular disease and mortality: the Physicians' Health Study. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2008 87(4):964 - 969.

L. Djousse, J. M. Gaziano, J. E. Buring, I.-M. Lee. Egg consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes in men and women. Diabetes Care 2009 32(2):295 - 300.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 12/11/2013 09:59PM by Panchito.

I think that everyone should familiarize themselves with the term "confounding factors."

can you read?

[www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov]

"After adjustment for possible confounders more than twofold increased risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus was determined for individuals consuming 3-4·9 eggs/week (OR = 2·60; 95 % CI 1·34, 5·08) and threefold increased risk of the disease was determined for individuals consuming >5 eggs/week (OR = 3·02; 95 % CI 1·14, 7·98) compared with those eating <1 egg/week."


[www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov]

" Intakes in the highest quintiles of processed meat (HR 1.16; 95 % CI 1.00, 1.36; P for trend = 0.01) and eggs (HR 1.21; 95 % CI 1.04, 1.41; P for trend = 0.02) were associated with increased risk. Intake of fibre-rich bread and cereals was inversely associated with type 2 diabetes (HR 0.84; 95 % CI 0.73, 0.98; P for trend = 0.004). In conclusion, results from the present large population-based prospective study indicate that high protein intake is associated with increased risk of type 2 diabetes."


[www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov]

"egg consumption was significantly and positively associated with diabetes risk, particularly in women."


[www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov]

"CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that high levels of egg consumption (daily) are associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes in men and women. Confirmation of these findings in other populations is warranted."

powerlifter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Yes High levels/daily consumption it concluded,
> not 1 egg a week or sensible quantities.

again. do you read? let me spell it for you.

[www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov]

"After adjustment for possible confounders more than twofold increased risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus was determined for individuals consuming 3-4·9 eggs/week (OR = 2·60; 95 % CI 1·34, 5·08) and threefold increased risk of the disease was determined for individuals consuming >5 eggs/week (OR = 3·02; 95 % CI 1·14, 7·98) compared with those eating <1 egg/week.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our data support a possible relationship of egg consumption and increased risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus."

The study says you are at risk if you eat 1 egg a week. NOTICE it says less than (<1 egg a week). Therefore, one egg a week does increas the chances of T2D according to the study.

> The other studies found no correlation.


studies (plural)? As far as I know there was only one linked. Or should we take your word for it? lets see, 4 studies found association to DT2 while one didn't (4 to 1). As far as I know, you misguided people by manipulating the interpretation of the results you claim people needed to read (joke?), and having the balls to tell people to read the article.

>



Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 12/24/2014 12:16AM by Prana.