Living and Raw Foods web site.  Educating the world about the power of living and raw plant based diet.  This site has the most resources online including articles, recipes, chat, information, personals and more!
 

Click this banner to check it out!
Click here to find out more!

Current Page: 8 of 20
The Polio Scam...
Posted by: John Rose ()
Date: October 20, 2014 12:47PM

[christianparty.net]
...
Dr. Bernard Greenberg, a biostatistics expert, was chairman of the Committee on Evaluation and Standards of the American Public Health Association during the 1950s. He testified at a panel discussion that was used as evidence for the congressional hearings on polio vaccine in 1962. During these hearings he elaborated on the problems associated with polio statistics and disputed claims for the vaccine's effectiveness. He attributed the dramatic decline in polio cases to a change in reporting practices by physicians. Less cases were identified as polio after the vaccination for very specific reasons. "Prior to 1954 any physician who reported paralytic poliomyelitis was doing his patient a service by way of subsidising the cost of hospitalisation and was being community-minded in reporting a communicable disease. The criterion of diagnosis at that time in most health departments followed the World Health Organisation definition: "Spinal paralytic poliomyelitis: signs and symptoms of non-paralytic poliomyelitis with the addition of partial or complete paralysis of one or more muscle groups, detected on two examinations at least 24 hours apart." Note that "two examinations at least 24 hours apart" was all that was required. Laboratory confirmation and presence of residual paralysis was not required. In 1955 the criteria were changed to conform more closely to the definition used in the 1954 field trials: residual paralysis was determined 10 to 20 days after onset of illness and again 50 to 70 days after onset.... This change in definition meant that in 1955 we started reporting a new disease, namely, paralytic poliomyelitis with a longer-lasting paralysis. Furthermore, diagnostic procedures have continued to be refined. Coxsackie virus infections and aseptic meningitis have been distinguished from paralytic poliomyelitis. Prior to 1954 large numbers of these cases undoubtedly were mislabeled as paralytic poliomyelitis. Thus, simply by changes in diagnostic criteria, the number of paralytic cases was predetermined as used.

...

A case-control study has shown that 41 percent of meningitis occurred in children vaccinated against the disease. The vaccine's protective efficacy was minus 58 percent. This means that children are much more likely to get the disease if they are vaccinated. (JAMA, 1988, Osterholm et al., 260: 1423-1428.)

...
[christianparty.net]


Options: ReplyQuote
The Polio Scam...
Posted by: John Rose ()
Date: October 20, 2014 12:48PM

[www.drday.com]
Vaccinations

...

Most people trust vaccines to be safe and effective. The government is mandating children to be vaccinated at earlier and earlier ages, when they are very fragile and far more vulnerable to the introduction of foreign materials into their tiny bodies. The public and the medical profession have been totally convinced that it was the introduction of vaccinations that caused the decrease in the incidence of polio.

Polio is virtually non-existent in the United States today. However, there is no credible scientific evidence that the vaccine caused polio to disappear. Before the Salk polio vaccine was introduced in 1953, the polio death rate in the United States had already declined by 47% on its own. It had also declined by 55% in England. Other European countries also showed a similar decline. When the vaccine did become available, many European countries questioned its effectiveness and refused to inoculate their citizens. Yet polio epidemics also ended in those countries.

The number of reported cases of polio after mass inoculations with the vaccine was significantly greater than before mass inoculations. And in many states the incidence of polio more than doubled after inoculations were introduced. In Rhode Island there was a 450 % increase, and in Massachusetts almost a 650 % increase in polio cases after the introduction of polio vaccinations.

After the vaccine was introduced, cases of polio were often reported under another name, aseptic meningitis, rather than as polio, even though they were counted as "polio" before the vaccine was introduced.

In 1976 Dr. Jonas Salk, creator of the killed virus vaccine that was used throughout the 1950s testified that the live virus vaccine produced by Dr. Sabin, and which was used almost exclusively in the United States since the early 1960s, was the "principle if not sole cause" of all reported cases of polio in the United States since 1961. According to the Centers for Disease Control figures, 87% of all cases of polio in the United States between 1973 and 1983 were caused by the vaccine. It is now admitted that since 1979 virtually every case of polio in the United States has been CAUSED by the vaccine.

The same situation holds true for nearly all other diseases including diphtheria, measles, rubella, mumps and whooping cough. In virtually all of these diseases, the incidence was dropping dramatically before the introduction of the vaccine. And since the introduction of the vaccine, close to 100% of all cases of the disease are in individuals who have been vaccinated for that particular disease, proving clearly, that vaccinations are not effective and they often cause the very disease they are supposed to prevent.

...
[www.drday.com]


Options: ReplyQuote
The Polio Scam...
Posted by: John Rose ()
Date: October 20, 2014 12:48PM

[www.garynull.com]
VACCINES:
A SECOND OPINION
By Gary Null, Ph.D.
©Copyright 2000, Gary Null & Associates, Inc.
All Rights Reserved

...

LIVE ORAL POLIO VACCINE (OPV): The live oral polio vaccine in the U.S. is a mixture of three types of attenuated (weakened or partially inactivated) polioviruses which have been grown in African green monkey kidney cell culture. The cells are then grown in a medium consisting of a salt solution containing amino acids, antibiotics and calf serum. After cell growth, the medium is removed and replaced with a medium containing the virus but no calf serum. The vaccine contains sorbitol and the antibiotics streptomycin and neomycin."

INACTIVATED POLIO VACCINE (IPV): The inactivated poliovirus vaccine used in the U.S. is a sterile suspension of three types of poliovirus grown in cultures of VERO cells, a continuous line of African green monkey kidney cells. The viruses are concentrated, purified and made noninfectious by inactivation with formaldehyde. IPV vaccine contains phenoxyethanol and formaldehyde as preservatives and the antibiotics neomycin, streptomycin and polymyxin. An IPV vaccine using human diploid cell cultures, rather than monkey kidney cell cultures, is used in some other countries."

...
[www.garynull.com]


Options: ReplyQuote
The Polio Scam...
Posted by: John Rose ()
Date: October 20, 2014 12:50PM

[www.unc.edu]
DISPELLING VACCINATION MYTHS: Part I
An introduction to the contradictions between medical science and immunization policy.
© by Alan Phillips, Director, Citizens for Healthcare Freedom, P.O. Box 62282, Durham, NC, 27715. Revised periodically. This Posting Revised February 5, 1998.

...

VACCINATION MYTH #3:

"Vaccines are the main reason for low disease rates in the U.S. today..."
...or are they?

According to the British Association for the Advancement of Science, childhood diseases decreased 90% between 1850 and 1940, paralleling improved sanitation and hygienic practices, well before mandatory vaccination programs. Infectious disease deaths in the U.S. and England declined steadily by an average of about 80% during this century (measles mortality declined over 97%) prior to vaccinations. In Great Britain, the polio epidemics peaked in 1950, and had declined 82% by the time the vaccine was introduced there in 1956. Thus, at best, vaccinations can be credited with only a small percentage of the overall decline in disease related deaths this century. Yet even this small portion is questionable, as the rate of decline remained virtually the same after vaccines were introduced. Furthermore, European countries that refused immunization for small pox and polio saw the epidemics end along with those countries that mandated it.

...
[www.unc.edu]


Options: ReplyQuote
The Polio Scam...
Posted by: John Rose ()
Date: October 20, 2014 12:51PM

[www.whale.to]

...

While it is certainly not as reactive as the DPT, the OPV or Oral Polio Vaccine is also steeped in controversy. The OPV contains the live polio virus, while another form of the polio vaccination, the IPV or inactivated Polio Vaccine contains a killed form of the virus. Jonas Salk, inventor of the IPV, testified before a Senate sub-committee that since 1961, all cases of polio in the U.S. were caused by the Oral Polio Vaccine.

What many parents may not realize is that the live virus can be transmitted through the child's stool for up to eight weeks. Caretakers of children who have recently received the OPV are advised to thoroughly wash their hands immediately after changing the child's diaper. (The IPV may have some adverse effects, but it does not cause polio in recipients).

The fact that polio can be transmitted via a child's feces should be cause for alarm for those living in developing nations where living conditions are unsanitary and sewage systems are minimal or non-existent. The OPV is used in these countries because each dose is about $3 less than the IPV, but the potential for a polio epidemic in nations such as India and Bangladesh is very real.

...
[www.whale.to]


Options: ReplyQuote
The Polio Scam...
Posted by: John Rose ()
Date: October 20, 2014 12:53PM

VACCINATIONS
ALEX LOGLIA ON "THE HOUR OF THE TIME"
(212) 517-0253 (Mr. Loglia's phone)
...
Now, I want to tell you about a much bigger lie that you've been fed. I want to talk to you about polio, because polio is a disease that most people think was the great success story of vaccinations. Let me read again from Walene James' book. Jonas Salk, the discoverer of the Salk polio vaccine has been called the 20th century miracle maker, and the savior of countless lives. We read glowing reports of the dramatic decrease in polio in the U.S. as a result of the Salk vaccine.

For instance, the Virginia State Department of Health distributes a folder which tells us that polio vaccines reduced the incidence of polio in the U.S. from 18,000 cases in 1954 to fewer than 20 in 1973-78. A recent article in Modern Maturity states that in 1953 there were 15,000 some odd cases of polio in the U.S. and by 1957 due to the Salk vaccine, the number had dropped to 2499.

However, during the 1962 Congressional hearings on HR10541, Dr. Bernard Greenberg, head of the Department of Biostatistics at the University of North Carolina, School of Public Health, testified that not only [now listen to this, folks...] not only did polio increase substantially after the introduction of mass and frequently compulsory immunization programs, but statistics were manipulated and statements made by the Public Health Service to give the opposite impression.

You have been lied to folks. The polio vaccine caused more polio than it protected people from. Moving on...

For instance, in 1957, the North Carolina Health Department made glowing claims for the efficacy of the Salk vaccine, showing how polio steadily decreased from 1953 to 1957. These figures were challenged by Dr. Fred Klenner who pointed out that it wasn't until 1955 that a single person in the state even received the polio vaccine injection.

Even then, the injections were administered on a very limited basis because of the number of polio cases resulting from the vaccine. It wasn't until 1956 that polio vaccinations assumed inspiring proportions. The 61% drop in polio cases in 1954 was credited to the Salk vaccine, when it wasn't even in the state yet. Nevertheless, by 1957, when the massive vaccination program had taken place, polio was again on the increase.

Digest that for a minute, folks, let Bill flip the tape over, and we'll be back in a minute......... Okay, back to the Salk vaccine.

Other ways polio statistics were manipulated to give the impression of Salk vaccine success follow:

1- Redefinition of an epidemic. More cases were required to refer to polio as an epidemic after the introduction of the Salk vaccine. In other words, you needed 20 cases per hundred thousand to have an epidemic before the vaccine was introduced, and after the vaccine they changed that number to 35 cases per hundred thousand per year to require the definition of epidemic.

2- Redefinition of the disease. In order to qualify for classification as paralytic polio mytolitis, the patient had to exhibit paralytic symptoms for at least 60 days after the onset of the disease.

Now that's after they started the vaccination programs, folks. Before the vaccination program started in 1954, the patient had to exhibit paralytic symptoms for only 24 hours. What this means folks, is that if you walked into a doctor's office before the vaccine was introduced, and you said, "Oh, I have paralytic symptoms here. I've had them for about 2 weeks." They'd say, "Oh, that's polio. You've had it for more than a day." But after the vaccine, if after the vaccine, you walked into that same doctor's office, and you say, "Oh, I've had these symptoms for 2 or 3 weeks, now." They'd say, "Oh, wait two months, then we can call it polio." That's how the statistics get manipulated, folks. Moving on...

Doctor Greenberg said, "This change in definition meant that in 1955 we started reporting a new disease, namely paralytic poliomyelitis, with a longer lasting paralysis.

The third way statistics were manipulated was mislabeling. After the introduction of the Salk vaccine, cocsacci virus and aseptic meningitis have been distinguished from paralytic poliomyelitis," explained Dr. Greenberg, "and in 1954 large numbers of these cases were undoubtedly mislabeled as paralytic polio." Now, another way of reducing the incidence of disease by way of semantics or statistical artifacts, as Dr. Greenberg calls it, is to simply reclassify the disease.

Now, I have my own version of this here, folks. From the Los Angeles County Health Index Morbidity and Mortality Reportable Disease Data, I'm looking at a chart of cases of viral or aseptic meningitis and polio from 1955 to 1966, and lo and behold, what do I find. From 1955 to 1966 cases of polio dropped from 273 cases to 5. Ah, but, the number of cases of aseptic meningitis from 1955 to 1966 increases in almost the same proportion from 50 cases to 256 cases. They simply changed the name, same disease, and you thought polio was wiped out at that point.

Now, folks, the reality is this. Diseases, like everything else in nature, follow cycles. They come in, they reach their peak and leave, and no vaccination program on Earth has ever been able to change that. Polio disappeared in Europe between 1940 and 1950 without any vaccination programs, whatsoever.

In 1958, Israel had a massive type 1 polio epidemic after mass immunizations. And from the same hearings on HR10541, that I talked about earlier, we find out that Massachusetts had a type 2 polio outbreak and there were more paralytic cases in people who were triple vaccinated than in the people who were unvaccinated. Surprise, surprise! You thought the vaccine protected you, didn't you? Well, most of those cases of polio came from the vaccination. And that's fact, folks. Even Jonas Salk has admitted it now that more than two-thirds of the polio in this country [then] came from his vaccine.
...


Options: ReplyQuote
The Polio Scam...
Posted by: John Rose ()
Date: October 20, 2014 12:59PM

[www.whale.to]
Hiding Polio quotes
Diagnosis Polio

Viral or aseptic meningitis, Guillaine Barre Syndrome (GBS), Chinese Paralytic syndrome, CHRONIC FATIGUE SYNDROME, epidemic cholera, cholera morbus, spinal meningitis, spinal apoplexy, inhibitory palsy, intermittent fever, famine fever, worm fever, bilious remittent fever, ergotism, ME, post-polio syndrome, acute flaccid paralysis Synonyms for GBS […see below…]

"Polio has not been eradicated by vaccination, it is lurking behind a redefinition and new diagnostic names like viral or aseptic meningitis.......According to one of the 1997 issues of the MMWR, there are some 30,000 to 50,000 cases of viral meningitis per year in the United States alone. That's where all those 30,000 - 50,000 cases of polio disappeared after the introduction of mass vaccination"---Viera Scheibner

"Today, various other forms of the the word "polio" are still used to describe the effects of poisoning, though usually with regard to paralysis in animals. A search of Medline ["polio" and "poison"] finds about 45 contemporary articles where poisoning causality is attributed to polio. The terminology found was: "polioencephalomalacia", "poliomyelomalacia", "polyradiculoneuritis", "neurological picture similar to that of poliomyelitis", "polioencephalomyelomalacia", "lumbal poliomyelomalacia", "cerebrocortical necrosis (polioencephalomalacia)", "Lead poisoning in grey-headed fruit bats (Pteropus poliocephalus)", "multifocal-poliomyelomalacia", "spinal poliomalacia", "Polio and high-sulfate diets", "Atypical porcine enterovirus encephalomyelitis: possible interraction between enteroviruses and arsenicals", "Polioencephalomalacia and photosensitization associated with Kochia scoparia consumption in range cattle", "bovine polioencephalomalacia". ---Jim West, Health and Research Publications, [www.geocities.com]

"The United States Public Health Bureau is extremely reticent about reporting diseases caused by vaccination but the report from 1922 to 1931 admitted that there had been 85 cases of post-vaccinal encephalitis, which DeKruif states "is the twin of infantile paralysis."" --Eleanor McBean

"Paralytic cases were not distinguished from non-paralytic cases until a recommendation was made by the Dominion Council of Health in 1949- The LCDC figures provided from 1952 and onward represent this administrative change: recording only those cases adhering to the requirements for a diagnosis of paralytic poliomyelitis. In a report released in June of 1959, another adminis¬trative change was recommended by the Dominion Council of Health, further altering the way in which apparent cases of poliomyelitis would be reported. All non-paralytic cases of poliomyelitis were to be henceforth recorded as "meningitis, viral or aseptic," a disease which itself only became reportable in 1952." These two administrative changes effectively reduced the apparent incidence of poliomyelitis. In particular, since the latter change is temporally correlative to the introduction of the polio vaccines, the vaccines appear to have been responsible for a reduction in poliomyelitis cases when it is entirely possible that the administrative changes are primarily responsible." --Catherine Diodati MA (Immunization History, Ethics, Law and Health p116)

Statistics on polio were manipulated. One such way was to redefine the disease, renaming it "viral or aseptic meningitis" or "cocksackie virus". In one US county, for example, in July 1955 there were 273 cases of polio reported for 50 cases of asceptic meningitis, compared to 5 cases of polio in 1966 and 256 cases of aseptic meningitis. These new diagnostic guideline's were issued by the CDC. If you object to polio vaccination, and you get polio--it is usually called "polio." If you have been vaccinated and you get "polio", it is called meningitis.

Beddow Bayly, author of the book “The Case Against Vaccination” said: “After vaccination was introduced, cases of aseptic meningitis were more often reported as a separate disease from polio, but such cases were counted as polio before the vaccine was introduced. The Ministry of Health admitted that the vaccine status of the individual is a guiding factor in diagnosis. If a person who is vaccinated contracts the disease, the disease is simply recorded under a different name.”

Coxsackievirus and echoviruses can cause paralytic syndromes that are clinically indistinguishable from paralytic poliomyelitis. (John H. Menkes, Textbook Of Child Neurology, 5th ed., page 420) [www3.bcity.com]
The definition of 'epidemic' was changed from 20 cases/1000,000 to 35 cases/100,000. Pre-vaccination, cocksackie virus and aseptic meningitis were classified as polio; post-vaccination they were classified separately. In addition, non-paralytic polio cases were now reported as viral or aseptic meningitis.

"Ralf R. Scobey, M.D., president of the Poliomyelitis Research Institute. Inc. Syracuse, New York (in the Archives of Pediatrics, Sept. 1950) lists 170 diseases of polio-like symptoms and effects but with different names such as: epidemic cholera, cholera morbus, spinal meningitis, spinal apoplexy, inhibitory palsy, intermittent fever, famine fever, worm fever, bilious remittent fever, ergotism, etc. There are also such common nutritional deficiency diseases as beriberi, scurvy, Asiatic plague, pellagra, prison edema, acidosis etc." --E. McBean

"Dr. Thomas Francis did not mention in his key evaluation of the 1954 Salk field trials that those who contracted polio after their first innoculation and before their second inoculation were placed in the "not-inoculated" list.' (Maurice B. Bayly, The Story Of The Salk Anti-poliomyelitis Vaccine, 1956).

Dr. Buchwald responds that prior to the introduction of polio vaccinations in Germany, anyone was counted as having polio, even if they only had the virus in their feces. It is known, he goes on, that there are people who are healthy but who evacuate polio viruses when they go to the bathroom. Based on this criteria, the number of cases was approximately 4,000 per year. After the introduction of the vaccine, statistics included only those polio cases of people who were paralyzed for at least six weeks. --Testimony of Dr Buchwald MD

A former public health officer, Dr Ratner, reported that just before the introduction of the first polio vaccine the National Foundation For Infant Paralysis was paying physicians $25 for each reported diagnosis. "A patient would walk into a doctors office with a limp from an accident. He'd say he had a fever a few days ago...and guess what the diagnosis would be?" It was well known Paralytic polio cured itself 50% of the time within 60 days. After the Salk vaccine was introduced, the definition of polio was changed by the CDC. Now, in order to have paralytic polio, you had to have it longer than 60 days.

Because the Salk vaccine was promoted as being incapable of causing polio, cases that occurred following administration of the vaccine were denied, and excluded from the Vaccine injury table.

Dr. Bernard Greenberg, a biostatistics expert, was chairman of the Committee on Evaluation and Standards of the American Public Health Association during the 1950s. He testified at a panel discussion that was used as evidence for the congressional hearings on polio vaccine in 1962. During these hearings he elaborated on the problems associated with polio statistics and disputed claims for the vaccine's effectiveness. He attributed the dramatic decline in polio cases to a change in reporting practices by physicians. Less cases were identified as polio after the vaccination for very specific reasons.

"Prior to 1954 any physician who reported paralytic poliomyelitis was doing his patient a service by way of subsidizing the cost of hospitalization and was being community-minded in reporting a communicable disease. The criterion of diagnosis at that time in most health departments followed the World Health Organization definition: "Spinal paralytic poliomyelitis: signs and symptoms of nonparalytic poliomyelitis with the addition of partial or complete paralysis of one or more muscle groups, detected on two examinations at least 24 hours apart." Note that "two examinations at least 24 hours apart" was all that was required. Laboratory confirmation and presence of residual paralysis was not required.

In 1955 the criteria were changed to conform more closely to the definition used in the 1954 field trials: residual paralysis was determined 10 to 20 days after onset of illness and again 50 to 70 days after onset.... This change in definition meant that in 1955 we started reporting a new disease, namely, paralytic poliomyelitis with a longer-lasting paralysis. Furthermore, diagnostic procedures have continued to be refined. Coxsackie virus infections and aseptic meningitis have been distinguished from paralytic poliomyelitis. Prior to 1954 large numbers of these cases undoubtedly were mislabeled as paralytic poliomyelitis. Thus, simply by changes in diagnostic criteria, the number of paralytic cases was predetermined to decrease in 1955-1957, whether or not any vaccine was used.

Health officials convinced the Chinese to rename the bulk of their polio to Guillaine Barre Syndrome (GBS). A study found that the new disorder (Chinese Paralytic syndrome) and the GBS was really polio. After mass vaccination in 1971, reports of polio went down but GBS increased about 10 fold.......In the WHO polio vaccine eradication in the Americas, there were 930 cases of paralytic disease—all called polio. Five years later, at the end of the campaign, roughly 2000 cases of paralytic disease occurred—but only 6 of them were called polio (41). The rate of paralytic disease doubled, but the disease definition changed so drastically that hardly any of it was called polio any more." —Greg Beattie

"They started vaccinating in 1985 (in the Americas). Within 4 months they had 350 cases…They caused a substantial, huge outbreak of polio but they started ‘discarding’ most of the cases (put as flaccid paralysis)." —Viera Scheibner, Ph.D.

Chronic Fatigue: A polio by another name [www.sonic.net]

CHRONIC FATIGUE SYNDROME: THE HIDDEN POLIO EPIDEMIC by Dr. William Campbell Douglas

Bruno RL, et al. Parallels between post-polio fatigue and chronic fatigue syndrome: a common pathophysiology? Am J Med. 1998 Sep 28;105(3A):66S-73S. PMID: 9790485; UI: 99005146.

Similarity of polio to pellagra, beriberi, and other deficiency diseases--Eleanor McBean

[www.whale.to]


Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Ebola your thoughts?
Posted by: SueZ ()
Date: October 20, 2014 01:19PM

SueZ Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> How sweet it is...
>
> [www.businessinsider.com]
> -a-killer-in-close-up-2014-10


No wonder it chooses fruit bats as a reservoir. Lots of food for replication there. Ebola needs lots of sugar.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Ebola your thoughts?
Posted by: SueZ ()
Date: October 20, 2014 01:27PM

Opps. The easier to understand link in my posts above were broken. Here's some more on the little sweet tooth...

[www.cgl.ucsf.edu]

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Ebola your thoughts?
Posted by: John Rose ()
Date: October 20, 2014 02:08PM

Here are a few more Articles from my file on Polio:

[www.naturalnews.com]
Bill Gates Spends $630 Million to Vaccinate Children Against Polio
By Mike Adams, January 21, 2009 |

...


[articles.mercola.com]
Polio Vaccine Blamed for Outbreaks in Nigeria
Posted by: Dr. Mercola
December 01 2009

...


[articles.mercola.com]
Why Medical Authorities Went to Such Extremes to Silence Dr. Andrew Wakefield
Posted by Dr. Mercola | April 10 2010

...


[www.naturalnews.com]
Dr. Jonas Salk, inventor of polio vaccine, exposed as criminal-minded scientist who conducted illicit medical experiments on mental patients
Wednesday, March 02, 2011
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
Editor of NaturalNews.com

...


[www.naturalnews.com]
History shows polio caused by pesticide exposure, then was eradicated by decline in DDT use
Monday, June 25, 2012 by: Jonathan Benson, staff writer

...


[vactruth.com]
7 Trivia Facts About Polio
By Jeffry John Aufderheide | June 3rd, 2012 | Category: Jeffry John Aufderheide,

It’s called the “Gold Standard of Medicine.”

I’m referring to the current vaccine schedule. But is there an apparent hidden catch? Can justification for the aggressive vaccine schedule arguably be traced back to the polio vaccine that is trotted out as proof vaccines work?

If you don’t believe me, question any parent on vaccines. The knee-jerk question in almost every case is, “What about polio?”

Well, what about it? Here I discuss 7 trivia facts for VacTruth.com readers to investigate further about polio and question the motives of those who would profit from vaccines and disease.

Trivia Fact #1 – Chemicals Used in Pesticides Increased Your Chance for Viral Infections

...

Trivia Fact #2 – Milk Was Heavily Contaminated with Pesticides; Quietly Taken Off Shelves While Farmers Paid

...

Trivia Fact #3 – Polio Is/Was Transmitted Through Contaminated Milk

...

Trivia Fact #4–Removing Your Tonsils Exposed You to the Worst Kind of Paralysis
Tonsillectomy surgery was cautioned in the presence of a polio epidemic. [17]

...

Trivia Fact #5 – Pharmaceutical Companies Funded the writing of the “History of Poliomyelitis”

...

Trivia Fact #6 – A Dangerous Vaccine: Americans Not Told Vaccine Caused Paralysis

...

Trivia Fact #7 – Researchers Discover How to Paralyze Monkeys with Vaccines

...
[vactruth.com]


[naturalsociety.com]
Tips for Countering Vaccination Advocates and Influencing Others
by Paul Fassa
December 10th, 2013

...


[www.naturalnews.com]
Could polio or other vaccinations be behind the new "polio-like" Illness outbreak in California?
Friday, February 28, 2014 by: Tony Isaacs

...


[www.naturalnews.com]
Link between polio vaccine and rare childhood cancers exposed in 1997 documentary
Friday, May 09, 2014 by: Ethan A. Huff, staff writer

...


[www.naturalnews.com]
Polio 'global health emergency' entirely fabricated by W.H.O. to sell more vaccines almost nobody needs
Tuesday, May 20, 2014
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger

...


Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Ebola your thoughts?
Posted by: SueZ ()
Date: October 20, 2014 02:16PM

SueZ Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Another person to add to the prayer list. Nina
> Phan's boyfriend, who has been hospitalized
> during his quarantine since Nina's temperature
> rose, is now exhibiting symptoms himself.

This morning there was a press conference in Dallas. What Judge, Ebola shirt, Jensen had to say was much more telling than what he did say. Not a word about Nina's now symptomatic boyfriend. Etc.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Ebola your thoughts?
Posted by: John Rose ()
Date: October 20, 2014 02:36PM

<<<press conference in Dallas>>>

The Media is OWNED by a very small group of people who depend on us being SICK, so almost everything you read or hear from the Media is BS!!!

Karen Hudes: OK, I’ll answer your last question first because I’m sure your listeners are saying why should I take this lady’s word for it? It’s not my word for it, there’s very accurate data on who owns the Transnational Company - 40,000 of them and there’s a group of mathematicians in Switzerland in an Institute that’s the #1 University in Europe and what they did was they did a model of that accurate ownership data and they found out that there’s a group of 147 Companies and most of these are Financial Institutions and they own 40% of the Net Worth of the Stock Market all over the world and they own 60% of the Earnings. But it’s not like they have a lot of Money. It’s they did it through Interlocking Corporate Directorate in a clever way in a secret way and it’s only because those mathematicians were able to model it that they found out that guess what? All of these separate companies because of the Interlocking Directorate (board of directors), they’re all actually One Conglomerate.

So you have a World Conglomerate of Corporation that goes around and they’re the ones that own the Federal Reserve, they’re the ones that own all of the Media. Now in the last 20 years, the number of owners of the Major Media in the US went from 50 down to 5. Guess what? Those 5 are actually - through Interlocking Directorate - they’re all One Company - One Group.


Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Ebola your thoughts?
Posted by: coconutcream ()
Date: October 20, 2014 06:01PM

Have any of you guys seen the green neon in alot of ebola pics ?











Neon Green shirt = death by Ebola, Neon Orange shirt = death by Isis?





Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 10/21/2014 06:46AM by Prana.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Ebola your thoughts?
Posted by: suncloud ()
Date: October 20, 2014 07:18PM

At this point, it could be just a rumor about Nina's boyfriend showing symptoms. I hope so!

[www.ibtimes.com]

When the nurse in Spain - Teresa Romero - got sick, her dog was euthanized. I'm so glad this didn't happen to Nina Pham's little dog!

Coconutcream, I don't think you have to worry about green shirts. If this were a hoax or conspiracy, there wouldn't be a blatant uniform to identify conspirators. Does that make sense?

People in Africa who thought this was a hoax stayed home from the hospital and infected their families and neighborhoods. Others attacked a hospital to "free" the patients, because they thought doctors had kidnapped patients to steal their blood. The attackers looted the hospital and took infected bedding and equipment, which of course put many more at risk. That's why activists are trying to spread the truth by wearing neon shirts that say "Ebola is real".

But if people want to think thousands of deaths are just fake, OK. Maybe some people are frightened, and the "hoax" thing fills a need. Others are profiting from the rumor by attracting viewers to their websites. Too bad if more people die because of this; but not so surprising, given that some humans are extremely greedy and just don't care.

Humans - such a range of good to bad.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Ebola your thoughts?
Posted by: Raw4ever ()
Date: October 21, 2014 02:00AM

I believe enough in ebola to not want to come in contact with it. But then again, would I, as a rawfooder, be susceptible? After all, I am healthier than my friends.

Well, this is what I think about that. Yes, I could.

I have been completely raw for a total of more than five years, and most recently for just a month short of two and a half years. And I would like to think when it comes to infections, I'm coated in teflon but, in fact, that is not exactly what I've experienced.

I do pick up different things from time to time BUT they just don't produce the same symptoms that they do in other people. I can tell that my immune system is working overtime but the signs and symptoms are nearly nonexistent.

If you look at the statistics we are being given, about 50% of those infected survive. I am not too sure that I wouldn't be infected with ebola but I do think I have a much better than 50% chance of surviving thanks to my exclusively raw food choices.

It doesn't matter what I think. It's a theory I won't be testing intentionally.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Ebola your thoughts?
Posted by: SueZ ()
Date: October 21, 2014 02:09AM

Suncloud, I think pandemics are just too much for many to let into their minds much less seriously contemplate. It's much more fun to look at pretty pictures of food in far off places and get dreamy and wistful. Maybe it's for the best.

While it has never been yet proved that Ebola can infect humans from dogs it is very well known that dogs are, as are some humans, asymptomatic carriers. God help us all if in order to stop a pandemic pet dogs would have to be killed. I honestly don't think Americans could handle that. People dying? Yes. Dogs being killed to save people? No.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Ebola your thoughts?
Posted by: John Rose ()
Date: October 21, 2014 05:00AM

[www.youtube.com]
THE EBOLA DECEPTION: VACCINE AGENDA FULLY EXPOSED


QUESTION EVERYTHING!!!


Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Ebola your thoughts?
Posted by: suncloud ()
Date: October 21, 2014 06:27AM

Raw4ever - liked your very sincere post!

SueZ, yes. The "Ebola hoax" hoax. So true what you wrote about the dogs. Over 390 million people in Spain signed a petition to keep Teresa Romero's dog Excalibur alive, and there were protests on the street.

[www.independent.co.uk]

So sad.

The good news: Teresa Romero is now Ebola-free. (Yay!) That's a relief, poor woman. She was very sick for a long time.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Ebola your thoughts?
Posted by: Prana ()
Date: October 21, 2014 06:44AM

If you go to the CDC website, the total known confirmed ebola deaths since it was found in the 1970's is 4555. Thats about 115 people a year died from ebola.

In the United States, it is estimated that 20,000-50,000 or so people die each year from the flu. Worldwide, there are somewhere between 250,000 to 500,000 who die each year from the flu.


Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Ebola your thoughts?
Posted by: Prana ()
Date: October 21, 2014 06:52AM

I guess is ebola is so virulent and communicable and deadly, why aren't there more dead? Could ebola be the next AIDS? AIDS was supposed to be a big killer, but its numbers fizzed out, and most of the people who supposedly died from AIDS were in Africa, where they were never given an HIV test (meaning many of the Africans could have died from random disease / causes -- maybe even the flu).


Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Ebola your thoughts?
Posted by: HH ()
Date: October 21, 2014 12:19PM

Is that really a fair comparison? I suspect that the overwhelming majority of flu deaths that you mention occur in the elderly or those who are already plagued by a lot of serious health problems. Just because flu is listed as the official cause of death doesn't mean that it's as simple as that. Ebola appears to be capable of killing anyone no matter their level of health. That's obviously why it's getting so much attention.

Prana Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If you go to the CDC website, the total known
> confirmed ebola deaths since it was found in the
> 1970's is 4555. Thats about 115 people a year died
> from ebola.
>
> In the United States, it is estimated that
> 20,000-50,000 or so people die each year from the
> flu. Worldwide, there are somewhere between
> 250,000 to 500,000 who die each year from the flu.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Ebola your thoughts?
Posted by: SueZ ()
Date: October 21, 2014 01:11PM

This is a new Ebola.

If you're in a hurry you can preview the first few minutes and the last few minute for now. It's well worth everyone's time to watch this one.

Michael Osterholm, University of Minnesota Center for Infectious Disease Reasearch and Policy on Ebola. Video taken from C-Span.

[www.youtube.com]

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Ebola your thoughts?
Posted by: John Rose ()
Date: October 21, 2014 02:03PM

EBOLA = MANUFACTURED FEAR

[www.youtube.com]

Why do you FOOLS keep watching the Presstitute Media?

The Media is OWNED by a very small group of people who depend on us being SICK, so almost everything you read or hear from the Media is BS!!!

Karen Hudes: OK, I’ll answer your last question first because I’m sure your listeners are saying why should I take this lady’s word for it? It’s not my word for it, there’s very accurate data on who owns the Transnational Company - 40,000 of them and there’s a group of mathematicians in Switzerland in an Institute that’s the #1 University in Europe and what they did was they did a model of that accurate ownership data and they found out that there’s a group of 147 Companies and most of these are Financial Institutions and they own 40% of the Net Worth of the Stock Market all over the world and they own 60% of the Earnings. But it’s not like they have a lot of Money. It’s they did it through Interlocking Corporate Directorate in a clever way in a secret way and it’s only because those mathematicians were able to model it that they found out that guess what? All of these separate companies because of the Interlocking Directorate (board of directors), they’re all actually One Conglomerate.

So you have a World Conglomerate of Corporation that goes around and they’re the ones that own the Federal Reserve, they’re the ones that own all of the Media. Now in the last 20 years, the number of owners of the Major Media in the US went from 50 down to 5. Guess what? Those 5 are actually - through Interlocking Directorate - they’re all One Company - One Group.


Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Ebola your thoughts?
Posted by: John Rose ()
Date: October 21, 2014 02:58PM

Dick Gregory speaks on Ebola Hoax...
[www.youtube.com]


Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Ebola your thoughts?
Posted by: HH ()
Date: October 21, 2014 03:16PM

Do people actually have 45 plus minutes of their day to spend on a non-authority like Dick Gregory? LOL. I wonder what Eddie Murphy has to say about the enterovirus?

John Rose Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Dick Gregory speaks on Ebola Hoax...
> [www.youtube.com]

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Ebola your thoughts?
Posted by: SueZ ()
Date: October 21, 2014 03:21PM

HH Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Do people actually have 45 plus minutes of their
> day to spend on a non-authority like Dick Gregory?
> LOL. I wonder what Eddie Murphy has to say about
> the enterovirus?
>
> John Rose Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Dick Gregory speaks on Ebola Hoax...
> > [www.youtube.com]

Lol, isn't it an amazing diversion of life source wasting time with such mindless nonsense? He'll never get that book done.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Ebola your thoughts?
Posted by: SueZ ()
Date: October 21, 2014 03:33PM

My, how things have changed.


"Rwanda requires US, Spain visitors health reports" (from AP)


[news.yahoo.com]

Mandatory daily health checks!



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/21/2014 03:36PM by SueZ.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Ebola your thoughts?
Posted by: SueZ ()
Date: October 21, 2014 03:48PM

From TheLancet.

Three people infected with Ebola predicted to fly from West Africa every month if no exit screening takes place.

[www.thelancet.com]

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Ebola your thoughts?
Posted by: suncloud ()
Date: October 21, 2014 04:34PM

Prana Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If you go to the CDC website, the total known
> confirmed ebola deaths since it was found in the
> 1970's is 4555. Thats about 115 people a year died
> from ebola.
>

Prana, 4555 is the number of confirmed Ebola deaths since the 2014 outbreak (meaning just from March of this year, when it was first reported). Here's a link to the number of cases by country in 2014. Notice the title at the top of the page: "2014 Ebola Outbreak in West Africa - Case Counts"

[www.cdc.gov]

Your annual estimate is closer for the years prior to 2014, because Ebola was then confined to rural areas (low population). The reason why the outbreak is now so huge is because it has spread into urban centers of three West African nations - Sierra Leone, Guinea, and Liberia.

Here's a link to WHO that includes a chart of Ebola cases prior to 2014 (by country).

[www.who.int]

I agree that like AIDS, Ebola can be controlled. Right now though, it's way out of control in West Africa, with cases multiplying exponentially. That's because for every case there that is currently isolated, 2.5 cases are not. The United Nations goal by December is to isolate and treat 70%; but by then, there may be 5,000 to 10,000 new cases per week.

Meanwhile, the UN has reportedly missed it's goal to raise $1 billion. They have about $20,000,000 pledged, but they've so far received only $100,000 in actual cash (all from Colombia).

[www.nytimes.com]



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 10/21/2014 04:47PM by suncloud.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Ebola your thoughts?
Posted by: suncloud ()
Date: October 21, 2014 05:10PM

SueZ,

Definitely an interesting take from Rwanda (the article you posted above)!

Shucks. I will have to wait to watch the video you posted of Michael Osterholm from CIDRAP (Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy), because of limited Mbytes until this evening.

Thanks for posting, and I have it scheduled for priority viewing.

I will always love Dick Gregory. He wrote Dick Gregory's Natural Diet for Folks Who Eat: Cookin' With Mother Nature (1974) - a book on raw food - and was also an avid anti-war protester during the Vietnam War. But I agree with you and HH that better resources are available on Ebola!

Options: ReplyQuote
Current Page: 8 of 20


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.


Navigate Living and Raw Foods below:

Search Living and Raw Foods below:

Search Amazon.com for:

Eat more raw fruits and vegetables

Living and Raw Foods Button
1998 Living-Foods.com
All Rights Reserved

USE OF THIS SITE SIGNIFIES YOUR AGREEMENT TO THE DISCLAIMER.

Privacy Policy Statement

Eat more Raw Fruits and Vegetables