Rabies is one of the few Dis-Eases that I can’t seem to find as much information about from alternative sources as I have with almost all of the other Dis-Eases, especially the so-called Bogus Contagious Dis-Eases. I’m convinced beyond any doubt that Small Pox, Scarlet Fever, Diphtheria, Whooping Cough, Measles, Tuberculosis and Typhoid are simply Dis-Eases of Poor Sanitation due to Bad Plumbing and that Polio was due to Pesticides, especially DDT, but I’m still looking for some good alternative sources for Rabies, so if any of y’all have anything to share, I would appreciate it.

In the meantime, here is a snippet from my file on Rabies…

[www.youtube.com]
THE EBOLA DECEPTION: VACCINE AGENDA FULLY EXPOSED
23:30 Minute Video

JR’s Notes:

2:48 MM
Now let’s take a look at this - Zombie Apocalypse According to 3 Resected Scientists. This is a college newspaper for St. Mary’s College of Maryland called The Point News and according to Chemistry and Biology double major Steven Rees, we are closer to a Zombie Apocalypse than we think.

In the first Natural Science and Mathematics Colloquium (NS&M) of the semester, in which not an open seat was to be found, the three departments combined to discuss three main components of a zombie apocalypse and what it would mean for humans: biological plausibility, the chemistry of basic survival needs, and the psychological aspects of survival.

Rees opened the lecture discussing what exactly a zombie virus might biologically look like. Though Rees claimed that we actually have no idea what a zombie virus would look like, through looking back in history, scientists have come closer to finding possibilities.

Italian physician Girolamo Fracastaro first recorded a condition with zombie-like symptoms in 1594, which was rabies. Rees explained the two different types of the rabies virus: furious and paralytic. Furious rabies symptoms include fever, irritability, violence, and salivation while paralytic rabies symptoms include depression, confusion, hallucinations, and disorientation.

But though such symptoms like biting others people and foaming at the mouth, which all lead mostly to death, were recorded, the disease usually is only recorded in Africa, Asia, and South America. Also, human-to-human transmission is highly unlikely.

However, other viruses known to humans, like Ebola viruses could have an epidemic ability to significantly affect the human population. The Ebola virus can cause viral hemorrhagic fever and other serious symptoms. But Rees concluded the virus is not easily transmissible among humans and is mostly in low sanitation areas.

Now listen to this:

But what if we were to combine the Ebola Virus and Furious Rabies?” asked Rees. Taking the zombie-like symptoms of furious rabies and the often-fatal Ebola virus, the world could see a rapid third-world spread. However, Rees concluded that even this deadly combination might not exactly be a plausible model for a zombie endemic. 5:18 MM

[www.youtube.com]

The main thing that bothers me the most about Rabies is that Louis Pasteur supposedly developed a Vaccine for Rabies in 1885, but we must NOT forget Pasteur’s death bed confession, “The microbe is nothing. The terrain is everything.”

Here is my File Preview for my file on Rabies…

…File Preview…
• THE VIRUS CON—A LETHAL GAME!
• RABIES
• What about rabies? Bats and skunks are supposedly infected with rabies. They are mammals just like dogs, so why do they not die off from rabies? We say, stay away from bats, they might have rabies. Why don’t we say, stay away from dogs, they might have rabies? The owner of a dog kennel in Texas decided to test all 22 of his dogs for rabies and included a sam¬ple of the owners’ and vets’ blood. It came back 11 dogs and the vet had rabies. He sent in samples again from the same dogs. It came back 9 dogs and the owner and the vet had ra¬bies, but 5 of the dogs were different dogs this time.
• T. C. Fry was bitten by a dog. It was tested and it had ra¬bies. They killed the dog; then the county health officials pleaded with Fry to take the shots. He laughed at them and told them he did not accept their voodoo nonsense. He never devel¬oped ra¬bies. What about people who die of rabies? They prob¬ably died from the 21 shots they tried to endure. What about venereal disease? Venereal diseases are often not contagious (only one spouse has the disease). There must be something else involved. Just because we have been taught these things all our life does not make them so. At one time nearly everybody in the world knew for a positive fact that the Earth was flat. Ev¬erybody was wrong. If everybody believes it, it is probably wrong anyway! Or you might say, if everybody believes the world is flat, then the world is flat.
• Two Frenchmen were bitten at the same time by the same “rabid” dog. One died within a month from the “infection”, but the other had sailed to the United States and was unaware of the death of the first. FIFTEEN YEARS later he returned to France and learned of his former companion’s death. He im¬mediately developed symptoms and within three weeks was dead of “rabies”! THERE IS GOOD EVIDENCE THAT RABIES DOES NOT EXIST EXCEPT IN THE IMAGINATION, BUT IF YOU IMAGINE IT, YOU MAKE IT REAL.
• Dave Klein - Moderator
• If a person is bitten by a bat or snake or insect and poison enters the bloodstream then the body works to get rid of it. We can call the symptoms, rabies or anything else, but it is self-healing action. The poison is real and the disease symptoms are signs or vigorous vitality and not to be masked. If you are asking whether it is contagious, it is not. Contagion is a myth.
• 1. First Aid: The Life Science Approach
• 1.2 Should "First" Be "Last"?
• First" aid can save a life. The "second," "third," or "fourth" aid a person receives in the hospital or at the hands of a surgeon can end a life. In many cases, first aid should also be the last aid a person needs.
• For example, a dog bite on the leg may often be treated safely at home by letting the wound bleed briefly, cleaning it with water, and then stopping the blood flow with a clean cloth. On the other hand, if the dog attacked the person around the face and actually tore an ear half-off, then surgery should be employed to reattach the ear. In neither case, however, should rabies shots be taken or any other injections be received. Rabies is yet another of the "contagion" myths and shots cannot protect you from a myth.
• In vitro inactivation of the rabies virus by ascorbic acid.
• RESULTS: An optimal concentration of 0.5 mg/ml of ascorbic acid and 5 microg/ml of copper sulfate completely inactivated the virus after 72 hours. The inactivated virus retained good antigenicity and potency value, which was comparable with using BPL. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that ascorbic acid can be used as an inactivating agent for fixed rabies virus grown in cell culture particularly for the preparation of diagnostic reagents.
• NB: Ascorbic acid was shown to inactivate (1930's) the vaccinia virus by Kliger and Bernkopf. The Hoof and mouth virus by Langenbusch and Enderling. Rabies virus by Amato etc etc
• Rabies
•
• Prevention
• Every infected case with rabies resulted in death until a vaccine was developed by Louis Pasteur and Émile Roux in 1885.
•
• History
• Cultural impact
• Rabies was considered a scourge for its prevalence in the 19th century. Fear of rabies related to methods of transmissions was almost irrational;[4] however, this gave Louis Pasteur ample opportunity to test post-exposure treatments from 1885.[44]
•
• Rabies in animals
• Rabies is infectious to mammals. Three stages of rabies are recognized in dogs and other animals. The first stage is a one- to three-day period characterized by behavioral changes and is known as the prodromal stage. The second stage is the excitative stage, which lasts three to four days. It is this stage that is often known as furious rabies for the tendency of the affected dog to be hyperreactive to external stimuli and bite at anything near. The third stage is the paralytic stage and is caused by damage to motor neurons. Incoordination is seen owing to rear limb paralysis and drooling and difficulty swallowing is caused by paralysis of facial and throat muscles. Death is usually caused by respiratory arrest.[45]
•
• The Vaccine that's Mandatory in EVERY State in America...
•
•
• Vaccination: The pet controversy
•
• The rabies vaccine is required by law for most animals in most jurisdictions because it is a public health hazard. Therefore, it is important from a legal standpoint to follow your jurisdiction's regulations concerning rabies vaccines for your pets. Killed rabies vaccines are labeled for either one or three years; but the vaccine in the bottle is exactly the same in both cases. The label itself is the only difference. Request that your dog or cat receive the three-year vaccine, only once every three years. Better yet, consider a nonadjuvanted vaccine. If your vet clinic does not carry it, ask if they will order it, if not find one who will.
•
• Does Your Pet Really Need That Rabies Shot?
•
• Are Rabies Vaccinations Really Needed Every Year or Three Years?
•
• Is There a Difference Between the 1-Year and 3-Year Vaccines?
•
• The Vaccine Protocol Dr. Schultz Would Use with a New Puppy or Kitten in His Family
•
• He would also give a rabies vaccine (which is technically also considered a core vaccine), the frequency of which is not dictated by Dr. Schultz's knowledge of immunology, but is dictated by the law. He gives the first rabies vaccine sometime after 4 months of age, re-vaccinates in a year, and then again in 3 years and every 3 years thereafter. Dr. Schultz reiterates his rabies vaccine protocol is because of the law, not because every 3 year vaccines are necessary immunologically.
• The law is not interested in when an animal actually needs another rabies vaccine to be protected – the law simply demands every 1, 2 or 3 year vaccinations with no consideration for whether the animal's body is already immune to the rabies virus thanks to a prior vaccine.
• If you choose not to re-vaccinate your pet for rabies, it is your choice, but you should be aware it is also against the law. Neither Dr. Schultz nor I are suggesting you do anything illegal. However, if you choose not to re-vaccinate, be aware your pet is probably protected for life from the virus anyway due to prior rabies vaccination.
• If Dr. Schultz's 7-year rabies study can prove the vaccine is good for at least that long, prompting a change in current vaccination laws, then a dog might only receive 2 rabies vaccines in a lifetime.
• Dr. Karen Becker Interviews Dr. Schultz (part 4of 4)
• I would give the puppy a core vaccine (distemper, parvo, and adeno) at that time. I would check it two or more weeks later to make sure that it has responded. I would probably not revaccinate the animal again for the rest of its life, which I’ve been doing since 1974.
• Would I give a rabies vaccine? Absolutely. That is considered a core, but I was referring just to the distemper-parvo-adeno part of the core. My protocol for rabies is not dictated by my understanding of immunology; it’s dictated by the law. In that regard, I would give the first dose of rabies sometime after four months of age. In this state, it better be shortly thereafter. Otherwise, I would be in violation of the state rules. I would then revaccinate at a year or within a year of that, and then every three years.
• Dr. Becker: If you choose to follow the law, it is important to recognize that your dog may have lifelong protective immunity after a single rabies vaccine. And if you decide to be a rebel, which we’re not advocating, your dogs or cats could still have protection for the rest of his or her life.
• Dr. Schultz: That’s why we’re doing this study, to try and get that type of information, to see whether or not we may only have to revaccinate every seven years instead of every three years. This would mean that a dog could really end up only getting three or four rabies at the most. That would be going from what used to be annual to three or four in a lifetime, which would be a real advantage.
•
• Do Vaccinations Affect the Health of our Pets?
•
• Vaccinations: How Many Does a Dog or Cat Really Need?
• The foundation is actively involved in supporting the Rabies Challenge Fund, a research project intended to show the rabies vaccine actually provides protection for at least five to seven years, and perhaps for a lifetime.
• The Rabies Challenge Fund involves ongoing FDA-level research that Dr. Royal believes will ultimately change the way veterinary medicine is practiced. Repetitive vaccinations are not only unnecessary in the vast majority of cases, they also carry significant risk of adverse reactions and establishment of permanent, chronic disease.
• Rabies Vaccine Dropped from the Sky
• Story at-a-glance
o There are only 2-4 human rabies cases in the US each year, but annual prevention costs are more than $300 million
o The Texas Department of Health is using helicopters to spread 100,000 rabies vaccines for skunks in the wilderness; other states have also conducted similar vaccination efforts
o No one knows if such programs are effective or if the indiscriminate spreading of a pharmaceutical product into the environment is going to have any unforeseen consequences to wildlife or the surrounding ecosystem
• In 2009, there were just four human cases of rabies in the US. In 2010, there were two1… yet each year the US spends more than $300 million for rabies prevention,2 which includes the vaccination of companion animals, animal control programs, maintenance of rabies laboratories and medical costs.
• Even at the turn of the century, rabies-related human deaths only numbered around 100 annually, and by the 1990s this had dropped to one or two. While rabies is a serious, potentially deadly, illness, it is most often transmitted through the bite of a rabid wild animal – a risk factor that is negligible for many in the US.
• Texas Department of Health is Dropping Experimental Rabies Vaccines From the Sky
• About 92 percent of the reported rabies cases in 2010 were in wild animals, including raccoons, skunks, bats, foxes, rodents and others. This poses a theoretical risk not only to humans but also to family pets, which could then transmit rabies to their owners.
• Nonetheless, human rabies cases remain extremely rare … but efforts are still underway to knock out the rabies virus in wild skunk populations in Texas.
• The Texas Department of Health is actually using helicopters to spread 100,000 rabies vaccines in two counties. The vaccines, which are contained in plastic cases coated with fishmeal to entice wildlife to eat them, are part of a pilot program to help reduce the number of rabid skunks in the area.
• No one knows yet if the program is going to work – skunks will need to be caught and tested for rabies 30-60 days after the vaccines are dropped – or if the indiscriminate spreading of a pharmaceutical product into the environment is going to have any unforeseen consequences to wildlife or the surrounding ecosystem.
• Should Wildlife be Vaccinated Against a Disease that Infects 2-4 People a Year?
• It’s also unclear why Texas is taking such aggressive measures against rabies. There has so far been only one reported case of human rabies in Texas in 2013, and the man was exposed in Guatemala, Mexico -- not in Texas. The last case of human rabies in Texas prior to that was in 2009 and prior to that in 2004 – for a total of just 6 human cases in the last decade.3
•
• What Exactly is Rabies?
• Rabies is a viral disease that most often enters your body through a bite or wound contaminated by the saliva from an infected animal. If it manages to infect the central nervous system it can lead to early symptoms that include fever, headache, weakness and discomfort. As the disease progresses it can lead to insomnia, anxiety, confusion, paralysis, hallucinations, difficulty swallowing, fear of water and death.
•
• What About Rabies Vaccines for Pets?
•
• How Long Will Your Pet's Rabies Shot Last? You Might Be Surprised...
•
•
• Understanding Titers for Your Pets
•
• KB: Okay, all great information. Let’s talk a little bit about rabies vaccine. The rabies vaccine, depending on your state, is approved for dogs as young as three months and, in some situations, four months. Holistic veterinarians will oftentimes push that vaccine off to six months or so to give the body a chance to be a little bit more developed, because that’s a hard vaccine in terms of reactivity. Talk to us a little bit about duration of immunity for rabies because it is a killed product.
• JD: Yeah, well, part of the problem is that people still think that we have modified-live rabies vaccines. I was teaching last weekend and somebody said, “Oh, they’re horrible. The animals could get rabies.” I said, “Well, years ago, we did have modified-live cat rabies vaccines, and they did occasionally produce rabies.” There are no modified-live rabies vaccines. People should know that. It’s sort of like a bacterin, but it’s a killed-virus product.
It’s very, very potent. We don’t want to give it earlier than we can. Even though the label says you could give it at 12 weeks, we don’t want to do that. We don’t want to give it before 16 weeks. California legislation recently was in a big controversy about that, but we’ve got that resolved thankfully.
How long do rabies antibodies persist? The antibodies in the blood through titer testing can be seven to nine years or maybe longer. The question is: are those animals truly protected? TheRabiesChallengeFund.org has just finished the five years of the five- and seven-year trials. We’re about nearly six years into it now with the studies done by Dr. Ronald Schultz. The animals are rented actually. They’re in a fine, lovely kennel-home situation. We’ve actually done a study on them. We’ve looked at the antibody titers all the way through – three years, four years, five years, etc. Three years, everybody had good immunity. Four years, they had measurable immunity. But lastly, five years, some of the animals did not have measurable titers. However, we found out with a vaccinal challenge – not a live-virus challenge – that they produce good immune memory cells that all responded extremely well upon challenge even though some of them had titers below the 0.1 international units per milliliter deemed to be inadequate to protect a person against rabies. We’re confident that even five years out, these animals have good immune memory to protect them from rabies upon exposure
•
• Is Your Pet Receiving Any of These Useless Vaccines?
•
• Vaccination or Revaccination is NOT a Guarantee of Protection Against Disease
• Dr. Schultz points out that what many people fail to understand is that vaccination or revaccination is by no means an assurance that the animal is protected. He has seen dogs that have been vaccinated repeatedly who have no antibody. When challenged (exposed to a disease), they are susceptible. And that includes rabies vaccines. Dr. Schultz has seen dogs that have been vaccinated five or more times against rabies that have no antibody. In the case of rabies, distemper and parvo, if there’s no antibody, the animal is not protected.
•
• THE EBOLA DECEPTION: VACCINE AGENDA FULLY EXPOSE
• Now let’s take a look at this - Zombie Apocalypse According to 3 Resected Scientists. This is a college newspaper for St. Mary’s College of Maryland called The Point News and according to Chemistry and Biology double major Steven Rees, we are closer to a Zombie Apocalypse than we think.
• Italian physician Girolamo Fracastaro first recorded a condition with zombie-like symptoms in 1594, which was rabies. Rees explained the two different types of the rabies virus: furious and paralytic. Furious rabies symptoms include fever, irritability, violence, and salivation while paralytic rabies symptoms include depression, confusion, hallucinations, and disorientation.
• But though such symptoms like biting others people and foaming at the mouth, which all lead mostly to death, were recorded, the disease usually is only recorded in Africa, Asia, and South America. Also, human-to-human transmission is highly unlikely.
• But what if we were to combine the Ebola Virus and Furious Rabies?” asked Rees. Taking the zombie-like symptoms of furious rabies and the often-fatal Ebola virus, the world could see a rapid third-world spread. However, Rees concluded that even this deadly combination might not exactly be a plausible model for a zombie endemic.
• from NIAID — promising results of vaccine against both rabies and Ebola
• Recent testing in non-human primates of a vaccine shows good protection against both rabies and Ebola.
• Rabies Vaccine Protects Nonhuman Primates Against Deadly Ebola Virus
• Researchers from NIAID and Thomas Jefferson University, in Philadelphia, developed a vaccine based on the established rabies virus vaccine that, when tested in mice, proved safe and provided protection against both rabies and Ebola infection. As the next step to that success, the researchers tested three different types of the novel rabies/Ebola vaccine in nonhuman primates to determine their protective effect.
• In their investigation, the results of which were published online May 30, 2013, the researchers tested a replication-competent rabies virus vaccine, a replication-deficient rabies virus vaccine, and a chemically inactivated rabies virus vaccine expressing Ebola glycoprotein. Fifteen rhesus macaques, divided into four groups, were immunized intramuscularly with one of the three vaccines or a control vaccine. All of the animals were followed for both rabies and Ebola-specific immune responses. After 42 days, all of the nonhuman primates were transferred to NIAID’s biosafety level-4 facility at Rocky Mountain Laboratories in Hamilton, Montana, for challenge with the Ebola virus.
• All three vaccines produced potent immune responses against both rabies and Ebola. In terms of protection, the live replication-competent vaccines provided 100 percent protection following challenge with the Ebola virus.
•
• Prospective Grant of Exclusive License: Multivalent Vaccines for Rabies Virus and Ebola and Marburg (Filoviruses)
•
•
• Symptoms of rabies
•
•
…End of File Preview…

One more thing that really bothers me about Rabies is that the Rabies Vaccine is Mandatory in EVERY State in America, which makes me extremely suspect.

Here is a really good article on Rabies by Hans Ruesch, who also wrote Slaughter of the Innocent and Naked Empress or The Great Medical Fraud:

[www.whale.to]
Rabies vaccination
Hans Ruesch (Slaughter of the Innocent)

Robert Koch was the first to obtain a pure culture of anthrax germs, responsible for the cattle and sheep disease, and Pasteur made a vaccine from it by reducing the power of germs. Many historians call that the first vaccine in history, as if Jenner and the Orientals had never existed. At any rate, an immediate controversy between Pasteur and Koch ensued, each one accusing the other of plagiarism.

Pasteur then proceeded to develop a vaccine against rabies, or hydrophobia, which may represent the most disconcerting case in the entire disconcerting field of vaccines.

Only an infinitesimal percentage of people bitten by a rabid animal catch the infection. But if it develops, it is supposed to be always mortal. So to be safe, everybody who has been bitten by an animal suspected to be rabid gets the special treatment developed originally by Pasteur. But sometimes the vaccinated person dies anyway. In that case the death is attributed to a defective vaccine. But often it has been demonstrated that the vaccine and not the bite caused the infection—for instance when the animal later on turned out to be healthy. Even if the animal is rabid, the bite very seldom causes the infection—and never causes it if the normal hygienic rules are followed, like the immediate washing out of the wound with water.

In his best-selling Microbe Hunters,, (Harcourt, Brace, 1926/1953) Paul de Kruif gave a highly fanciful account of 19 Russian peasants who, bitten by an allegedly rabid wolf, traveled to Paris in order to receive the newly announced Pasteur treatment from the old master himself. According to de Kruif, 16 of these Russian patients were "saved" by Pasteur’s shots and "only three" died. Pasteur became an international hero after that exploit and contributed substantially to the glamorization of "modern" laboratory Science. Three deaths out of 19 makes over 15 percent casualties. But knowing, as we know today, that not one in a hundred people bitten by a rabid dog is likely to catch the infection, we must infer that at least some and probably all three of those Russian peasants died because of Pasteur’s vaccine, as did uncounted people later on. Besides, at the time there were no facilities in Russia to find out whether a wolf had rabies. Hungry wolves attacking villagers in winter were a common occurrence; and even today many people, in Italy for instance, believe that any dog that bites them must be affected with rabies, otherwise it wouldn’t have bitten them.

Some informed doctors believe that rabies, as a separate and distinguishable disease, exists only in animals and not in man, and that what is diagnosed as rabies is often tetanus (lockjaw), which has similar symptoms. Contamination of any kind of wound can cause tetanus, and it is interesting to note that today in Germany those who get bitten by a dog are regularly given just an anti-tetanus shot. According to Germany’s most authoritative weekly, exactly 5 Germans are supposed to have died of rabies in 20 years (Der Spiegel, 18/1972, p. 175). But how can anyone be sure that they died of rabies? Hundreds die of tetanus.

Among the many doctors I have questioned in the U.S. and Europe, I have not yet found one who can guarantee that he has seen a case of rabies in man. The number of cases reported by the U.S. Public Health Service in its Morbidity and Mortality Annual Supplement for all of 1970 was exactly two—among 205,000,000 people. Provided the diagnosis was correct. This compares with 148 cases of tetanus reported, 22,096 of salmonellosis, 56,797 of infectious hepatitis, 433,405 of streptococcal infections and scarlet fever.

Doctors who are faced for the first time with a case of suspected rabies complain that they have no precedents to go by. The main difficulty Pasteur met with in perfecting his alleged vaccine, which often caused paralysis, consisted in finding rabid dogs; finally he had to get healthy dogs, open their cranium and infect them with the brain substance of the only rabid dog he had been able to get hold of.

Pasteur never identified the rabies virus. Today, everything concerning this malady is still more insecure than at Pasteur’s time.

Only one thing is sure: ever since Pasteur developed his "vaccine," the cases of death from rabies have in-creased, not diminished.

Currently, rabies is presumed to be established in autopsies by the presence of "Negri corpuscles," so named after an Italian physician who in 1903 announced to have discovered them in the plasma of the nerve cells and the spinal nerves of rabid dogs. However, Dr. John A. McLaughlin, a prominent American veterinarian who in the sixties was called to investigate a widespread outbreak of alleged rabies in the State of Rhode Island and performed numerous autopsies on dogs during the height of the scare, found animals with "rabies" symptoms that had no Negri corpuscles whatever, whereas dogs that died of unrelated diseases had them in abundance. A veterinarian from Naples, where there is a fixation of fear of rabies, showed me in a textbook the image of a Negri corpuscle—the only one he had ever seen—that looked undistinguishable from the Lentz-Sinigallia corpuscles that occur in dogs who have distemper. Nobody knows how many dogs affected by mere distemper have been killed by order of sanitary authorities whose zeal overshadowed their knowledge.

A few years ago, Dr. Charles W. Dulles, widely-known Philadelphia physician and surgeon and lecturer at the University of Pennsylvania on the History of Medicine, had this to say: "I might cite my own experience in the treatment of persons bitten by dogs supposed to be rabid, which has furnished not a single case of the developed disease in 30 years, and I probably have seen more cases of so-called hydrophobia than any other medical man.

Every real expert is aware that nothing is known for sure except what Hippocrates already knew: that the best protection also against this infection is cleanliness. The No. 523 of the World Health Organization Technical Report Series, entitled WHO Expert Committee on Rabies, Sixth Report, 1973 (meaning that there have been no less than five previous WHO reports on the same subject) announces that evidence is accumulating that parenteral injection of antirabies vaccine causes human deaths "under certain conditions" (p. 20), and states (p. 17): "The Committee recommends that production of Fermi-type vaccines, since they contain residual living virus, should be discontinued."

"Residual living virus" is a pretty serious charge to bring from high quarters against a vaccine, but nobody seems to pay much attention to all this, or to understand what it means. It simply means that probably the very rare cases of humans who died of what has been diagnosed as rabies, have not died from something received from a dog but from a doctor.

But the climax of that WHO report is on page 27: "The Committee emphasized that the most valuable procedure in post-exposure treatment is the local treatment of wounds. This should be done by thorough washing with soap and water. . ." And on the next page the point is repeated: "Immediate first-aid procedures recommended are the flushing and washing of the wound with soap and water." So it took no less than 6 reports by WHO "experts" to reach the conclusion that Hippocrates had been advocating.

In fact whoever reads carefully this and other WHO reports, notices that serious students of medicine can rely on very little except Hippocratic hygiene and common sense. But WHO can’t admit it, otherwise the public might ask: "What is the use of WHO?" Who is housed in one of the biggest, costliest buildings of modern times, with large, empty halls, libraries lined with every medical publication issued throughout the world, with numerous executives who draw fat salaries to do nothing, and a regiment of smart secretaries to help them. This huge real-estate complex, surrounded by the silence of well-groomed lawns and flower gardens in one of the most beautiful Alpine settings outside Geneva, represents the counterpart of the millions of laboratory animals wasting away under scientific torture the world over.

Lately, still a new vaccine against rabies has been developed, which has been described as a "fantastic breakthrough" by WHO officials. The report in Time (Dec. 27, 1976) reads in part: "Writing in the Journal of the American Medical Association, a team of US and Iranian doctors last week reported that they recently administered the vaccine in a series of only six shots to 45 Iranians who had been bitten by rabid animals. Not a single victim developed rabies or showed a severe allergic reaction. Reason: the new vaccine, unlike the old, is cultured in human rather than animal cells. Thus, while the patients develop antibodies against rabies, they do not suffer painful reactions to the foreign animal protein."

For the past hundred years antivivisectionists and other sensible people have been saying that there must be better ways for medical science than the ones recommended by Claude Bernard, and that Pasteur’s alleged antirabies vaccination was humbug. Now official science is at last catching up to this obvious truth, and all the big men want to get into the act.

A headline in Germany’s medical news weekly Sdecta (May 16, 1977), which read "Problem of Rabies Vaccine Solved?" must have surprised many readers who had until then been brainwashed into believing that Pasteur had solved that problem long ago, since it has always been presented as his main claim to fame. The article reported a round-table of German virologists, who gave hell to Pasteur’s alleged vaccine, and cited one Prof. Richard Haas who had defined it ‘an archaic monster."
[www.whale.to]

John Rose Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> One more thing that really bothers me about Rabies
> is that the Rabies Vaccine is Mandatory in EVERY
> State in America, which makes me extremely
> suspect.

Hawaii doesn't have mandatory rabies vaccination for animals born/raised in Hawaii, because there is no rabies in Hawaii. Only animals coming from the Mainland must be vaccinated.

Kansas, Missouri, North Dakota, and Utah also don't have mandatory vaccination - except that in Utah, if an animal is quarantined due to suspected rabies, the animal must be vaccinated prior to release.

[www.avma.org]

<<<Hawaii doesn't have mandatory rabies vaccination for animals born/raised in Hawaii, because there is no rabies in Hawaii. Only animals coming from the Mainland must be vaccinated.

Kansas, Missouri, North Dakota, and Utah also don't have mandatory vaccination - except that in Utah, if an animal is quarantined due to suspected rabies, the animal must be vaccinated prior to release.>>>

Thanks for the feedback.

This is the article I read and I'm surprised that they didn't know any better...

[healthypets.mercola.com]
The Vaccine that's Mandatory in EVERY State in America...

13:10 Minute Video
[www.youtube.com]

Download Video Transcript

In part 3 of this 4-part series, Dr. Becker continues her discussion with Dr. Ronald Schultz, a pioneer and expert in the field of veterinary vaccines. Listen as the doctors discuss rabies vaccines, vaccine adjuvants, and adverse vaccine reactions.

...

[healthypets.mercola.com]

John Rose Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> This is the article I read and I'm surprised that
> they didn't know any better...

(regarding the article's assertion that a rabies vaccine is mandatory in every state)

> [healthypets.mercola.com]
> rchive/2011/06/14/unraveling-the-pet-vaccine-tangl
> e--what-to-know-about-rabies-vaccine.aspx
> The Vaccine that's Mandatory in EVERY State in
> America...
>

Thanks for the link John.

You know, it appears to me that only Dr. Becker - not Dr. Schultz - makes the assertion that the rabies vaccine is mandatory in every state. Dr. Becker (the interviewer and author of the article) mentions it in the title and in the intro to the interview, but Dr. Schultz (the expert being interviewed) may never have said this.

The article is a little confusing in parts, because it's not a transcript of the interview but rather a summary by Dr. Becker of the interview.

I think Dr. Becker makes at least one other mistake when she calls Thimerosal an "adjuvant". Thimerosal is a mercury "preservative" added to some human vaccines. An "adjuvant" is added for the purpose of enhancing or modifying the action of the vaccine. "Preservatives" and "adjuvants" can both be considered "additives" when added to a vaccine, but they are not the same thing because they have different functions.

Dr. Schultz appears to have correctly described Thimerosal as a preservative, not an "adjuvant". Anyway, this is my impression.

<<<The article is a little confusing in parts, because it's not a transcript of the interview but rather a summary by Dr. Becker of the interview.>>>

Hey suncloud,

I included a link above to the transcript!

John Rose Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> <<>>
>
> Hey suncloud,
>
> I included a link above to the transcript!

Thanks John! I missed the transcript. Yes, it does seem that only Dr. Becker made the mistake of thinking rabies vaccinations are mandatory in every state.

But if Dr. Schultz knew this wasn't the case, maybe he should have said something in response to Dr. Becker's introductory statement.