[www.yahoo.com]



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/22/2020 11:46PM by fresh.

That's good, but what exactly did this 'whistleblower' blow the whistle about? What secrets or shocking information about Fauci did he write in his pieces that was so enlightening? He 'spilled the beans' about what, what did he expose? It sounds like it's just his opinion that this is a fraud, but what are the specifics, I wonder, if there are even any.

Correct . Nothing specific
Other than the whole thing is a fraud
And has sinister purposes


William B. Crews is, by day, a public affairs specialist for the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. But for years he has been writing for RedState under the streiff pseudonym. And in that capacity he has been contributing to the very same disinformation campaign that his superiors at the NIAID say is a major challenge to widespread efforts to control a pandemic that has claimed roughly 200,000 U.S. lives.

Under his pseudonym, Crews has derided his own colleagues as part of a left-wing anti-Trump conspiracy and vehemently criticized the man who leads his agency, whom he described as the “attention-grubbing and media-whoring Anthony Fauci.” He has gone after other public health officials at the state and federal levels, as well—“the public health Karenwaffen,'' as he’s called them—over measures such as the closures of businesses and other public establishments and the promotion of social distancing and mask-wearing. Those policies, Crews insists, have no basis in science and are simply surreptitious efforts to usurp Americans’ rights, destroy the U.S. economy, and damage President Donald Trump’s reelection effort.

“I think we’re at the point where it is safe to say that the entire Wuhan virus scare was nothing more or less than a massive fraud perpetrated upon the American people by ‘experts’ who were determined to fundamentally change the way the country lives and is organized and governed,” Crews wrote in a June post on RedState.

“If there were justice,” he added, “we’d send and [sic] few dozen of these fascists to the gallows and gibbet their tarred bodies in chains until they fall apart.”

Yawn...

Dude of course its a yawn for you

youre a soulless
Psycho on the cowardly
Deranged global reset team

We get it.

That guy's saying what we and loads of others in all walks of life have been saying - that this whole thing is a fraud and orchestrated - since this started, but the fact that he's working for Fauci's federal agency is the story, I get it. More power to him.

Quote
fresh
Dude of course its a yawn for you

youre a soulless
Psycho on the cowardly
Deranged global reset team

We get it.

Yup, that's me in a nutshell...
(Yawn)

Quote
Jennifer
That guy's saying what we and loads of others in all walks of life have been saying - that this whole thing is a fraud and orchestrated - since this started, but the fact that he's working for Fauci's federal agency is the story, I get it. More power to him.

And of course absurdly he has to resign because we live in in opposite world

Narrative.
Control.

Quote
fresh

Quote
Jennifer
That guy's saying what we and loads of others in all walks of life have been saying - that this whole thing is a fraud and orchestrated - since this started, but the fact that he's working for Fauci's federal agency is the story, I get it. More power to him.

And of course absurdly he has to resign because we live in in opposite world

Narrative.
Control.

“Following a manipulation of belief in one conspiracy theory people saw events in the world as more strongly casually connected, which in turn predicted unrelated irrational beliefs,” write the authors.

What happened
On 911?

Criticism

"this one collapses under its own weight and contradicts itself." Hmmm, sounds like the stance you take on most things like Covid, Hitler (OUR savior), etc.

Critics of these conspiracy theories say they are a form of conspiracism common throughout history after a traumatic event in which conspiracy theories emerge as a mythic form of explanation.[242] A related criticism addresses the form of research on which the theories are based. Thomas W. Eagar, an engineering professor at MIT, suggested they "use the 'reverse scientific method'. They determine what happened, throw out all the data that doesn't fit their conclusion, and then hail their findings as the only possible conclusion." Eagar's criticisms also exemplify a common stance that the theories are best ignored. "I've told people that if the argument gets too mainstream, I'll engage in the debate." According to him, this happened when Steve Jones, a physics professor at Brigham Young University, took up the issue.[243]

Michael Shermer, writing in Scientific American, said: "The mistaken belief that a handful of unexplained anomalies can undermine a well-established theory lies at the heart of all conspiratorial thinking. All the evidence for a 9/11 conspiracy falls under the rubric of this fallacy. Such notions are easily refuted by noting that scientific theories are not built on single facts alone but on a convergence of evidence assembled from multiple lines of inquiry."[244]

Scientific American,[244] Popular Mechanics,[245] and The Skeptic's Dictionary[246] have published articles that rebut various 9/11 conspiracy theories. Popular Mechanics has published a book entitled Debunking 9/11 Myths that expands upon the research first presented in the article.[247] In the foreword for the book Senator John McCain wrote that blaming the U.S. government for the events "mars the memories of all those lost on that day" and "exploits the public's anger and sadness. It shakes Americans' faith in their government at a time when that faith is already near an all-time low. It trafficks in ugly, unfounded accusations of extraordinary evil against fellow Americans."[248] Der Spiegel dismissed 9/11 conspiracy theories as a "panoply of the absurd", stating "as diverse as these theories and their adherents may be, they share a basic thought pattern: great tragedies must have great reasons."[249]

Journalist Matt Taibbi, in his book The Great Derangement, discusses 9/11 conspiracy theories as symptomatic of what he calls the "derangement" of American society; a disconnection from reality due to widespread "disgust with our political system".[184] Drawing a parallel with the Charismatic Movement, he argues that both "chose to battle bugbears that were completely idiotic, fanciful, and imaginary," instead of taking control of their own lives.[184] While critical, Taibbi explains that 9/11 conspiracy theories are different from "Clinton-era black-helicopter paranoia", and constitute more than "a small, scattered group of nutcases [...] they really were, just as they claim to be, almost everyone you meet."[184]

Columnist Matt Mankelow, writing for the online edition of the British Socialist Worker, concludes that 9/11 Truthers, while "desperately trying to legitimately question a version of events", end up playing into the hands of the neoconservatives they are trying to take down by creating a diversion. Mankelow noted that this has irritated many people who are politically left-wing.[250]

David Aaronovitch, a columnist for The Times, in his book entitled Voodoo Histories: The Role of the Conspiracy Theory in Shaping Modern History that was published in May 2009, claimed that the theories strain credulity.[76] He charges that 9/11 conspiracy theorists have exaggerated the expertise of those supporting their theories, and notes that 9/11 conspiracy theorists including David Ray Griffin cross-cite each other.[251] He also claims the popularity of 9/11 conspiracy theories has hurt the War on Terror. According to Aaronovitch, because a significant portion of educated Pakistanis believe that George W. Bush brought the towers down, dealing with the Taliban is difficult "because they actually don't believe the fundamental premise on which the war against terror was waged".[252]

Harvard law professor Cass Sunstein co-authored a 2009 paper which used members of the 9/11 Truth movement and others as examples of people who suffer from "crippled epistemologies", to public trust and the political system. He wrote that "[t]hey do not merely undermine democratic debate [...] In extreme cases, they create or fuel violence. If government can dispel such theories, it should do so."[42]

In June 2011, the Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA) was criticized for hosting a lecture by Richard Gage, president of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. Rick Bell, the director of the American Institute of Architects (AIA) New York chapter, who was a witness to the 9/11 attacks, said that "no amount of money" would persuade him to allow the group to talk at his headquarters and said that Gage lacks credibility among the professional community. Eugine Kohn, former spokesperson for the AIA, said Gage's theories were "ridiculous", "[t]here were no explosives planted", and "[t]he buildings were definitely brought down by the planes". The decision to host the event was also criticized by the former president of RIBA and the founding president of the AIA's United Kingdom chapter. Gage has been warned by the AIA against giving a false impression that he has a relationship with it. A July 2012 article in the AIA's magazine criticized Gage for continuing to intimate that he has an association with the organization, and claimed that there were no architects at an Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth screening held in an AIA boardroom.[253] RIBA released a statement saying the perception that it endorses events held in its buildings is "regrettable", and said it would review policy on "private hire" of its buildings.[254] Anthony Summers and Robbyn Swan offer scathing criticism of many of the above theories in The Eleventh Day, their 2011 investigation of the attacks.[255]

U.S. representative Peter T. King, chairmen of the House Homeland Security Committee, said 9/11 conspiracy theorists "trivialize" the "most tragic event to affect the United States" and that "[p]eople making these claims are disgraceful, and they should be ashamed of themselves".[256]

The hosts of "The Skeptics' Guide to the Universe" (the "SGU" have spoken repeatedly about the "absurdity of 9/11 conspiracy theories". In addition to critiquing the theories using the same or similar arguments as the above, the "SGU" hosts say that, like most conspiracy theories, this one collapses under its own weight and contradicts itself. In order for the 9/11 conspiracy theories to be correct, the U.S. government would not only have to orchestrate the claimed false flag operation regarding the airplanes that crashed into the World Trade Center, but they would also have to orchestrate a superfluous controlled demolition and cover their tracks so flawlessly that it becomes indistinguishable to physicists from the "official story", yet the plan would have to be flawed enough so that "losers in their mothers' basement" will discover the conspiracy.[257]

Well, for me - one thing that made me say "What!" was how passengers on the Flights that went into the Towers made cellphone calls to their families. You don't get any reception from your cellphone when you're in the air.

Like these -

-- The Wall Street Journal, Sept. 12

Alice Hoglan's son, Mark, called her from United Airlines Flight 93, which was hijacked as it traveled from Newark to San Francisco. . . .

Alice Hoglan knew her son was upset as soon as she heard him. He said, ''Hi Mom, this is Mark Bingham.'' She said her son told her: ''We've been taken over. There are three men that say they have a bomb.'' Bingham, who spoke first with his aunt, also told his mother, ''I love you, I love you, I love you.''

*******

-- ''The Early Show,'' CBS, Sept. 12

Brian Sweeney, 38, of Barnstable, a passenger on Flight 175 that crashed into the World Trade Center's South Tower, left a message for his wife, Julie, on their answering machine shortly before 9 a.m.

''Hey Jules, it's Brian, I'm on a plane and it's hijacked and it doesn't look good. I just wanted to let you know that I love you and I hope to see you again. If I don't, please have fun in life and live your life the best you can. Know that I love you and no matter what, I'll see you again.''

**********

Jane Pauley [NBC anchor]: What words from that phone call [with her husband Jeremy Glick on United 93] give you the most comfort now?

Lyzbeth Glick: We said, 'I love you' a thousand times, over and over and over again, and it just brought so much peace to us. . . . He said, ''I love Emmy,'' who's our daughter, and to take care of her.

And then he said . . . ''Whatever decisions you make in your life, I need you to be happy, and I will respect any decisions that you make.'' . . . I think that gives me the most comfort.

**************
-- PBS ''NewsHour,'' Sept. 12

Moments before [United Flight 93] went down, businessman Thomas Burnett of San Ramon, Calif., called his wife, telling her he feared the flight was doomed but he and two other passengers planned to take action, the family's priest told The San Francisco Chronicle. . . .

The Rev. Frank Colacicco, pastor of St. Isidore's Catholic Church, said Burnett's wife, Deena, told him Burnett said: ''I know we're all going to die; there's three of us who are going to do something about it.''

Then, the priest said, Burnett told his wife, ''I love you, honey,'' and the call ended.

*********

Brian David Sweeney tried calling his wife, Julie, at 08:58, but ended up leaving a message, telling her that the plane had been hijacked. He then called his parents at 09:00 and spoke with his mother, Louise. Sweeney told his mother about the hijacking and mentioned that passengers were considering storming the cockpit and taking control of the aircraft.[12]

At 08:52, Peter Hanson called his father, Lee Hanson, in Easton, Connecticut, telling him of the hijacking. Hanson was traveling with his wife, Sue, and their 2½-year-old daughter, Christine. The family was originally seated in Row 19, in seats C, D, and E; however, Peter placed the call to his father from seat 30E. Speaking softly, Hanson said that the hijackers had commandeered the cockpit, that a flight attendant had been stabbed, and that possibly someone else in the front of the aircraft had been killed. He also said that the plane was flying erratically. Hanson asked his father to contact United Airlines, but Lee could not get through and instead called the police.[21][22]

Peter Hanson made a second phone call to his father at 09:00:

It's getting bad, Dad. A stewardess was stabbed. They seem to have knives and Mace. They said they have a bomb. It's getting very bad on the plane. The plane is making jerky movements. I don't think the pilot is flying the plane. I think we are going down. I think they intend to go to Chicago or someplace and fly into a building. Don't worry, Dad. If it happens, it'll be very fast ... Oh my God ... oh my God, oh my God.[17]

As the call abruptly ended, Hanson's father heard a woman screaming.[17]

************

So how did so many passengers get cellphone reception from their Flights in 2001?

Because they were not in the air they were on the ground they were told to make the calls

No terrorists were in any planes smashing into buildings.

Video fakery and or missiles in all cases



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/23/2020 07:16PM by fresh.

That's typical I asked what happened I didn't get any answer

Nunativs cant think for himself and defers to authority.sad!

Quote
fresh
That's typical I asked what happened I didn't get any answer

Nunativs cant think for himself and defers to authority.sad!

I AM thinking for mself and I don't think it was faked or an inside job...

Critics of these conspiracy theories say they are a form of conspiracism common throughout history after a traumatic event in which conspiracy theories emerge as a mythic form of explanation.[242] A related criticism addresses the form of research on which the theories are based. Thomas W. Eagar, an engineering professor at MIT, suggested they "use the 'reverse scientific method'. They determine what happened, throw out all the data that doesn't fit their conclusion, and then hail their findings as the only possible conclusion."

Still cant answer
No integrity

Quote
fresh
Still cant answer
No integrity

Yes I understand that your brain can't make sense of a tragedy of this scale, not unlike the Holocaust so you need to immerse yourself in blame/enemy filled explanations...

Still no answer.
Just say you dont know
Or you accept the official explanation

Whats so hard about that coward?

At least he admitted he 'didn't think it was faked or an inside job'.

It's like pulling teeth getting an opinion or his viewpoint out of him, so when he posts an article, I assume the content of the article is his belief, also.

I kind of forgot a lot of the specifics, but I remember how suspicious it seemed that some passport or identification of one of the airplane highjackers ended up right on top of the pile of rubble in NYC and another one was right in plain sight in that field where another plane went down.

Right. The passport
Was another
Clue to the fakery

The more you research in the right places the more obvious is gets

Quote
fresh
The more you "research" in the right places the more obvious is gets

That means read obscure websites and watch YouTube documentaries right?

It's a harsh world right now fresh, tough to believe that men could commit such cruelty to each other I know.

Come on scream it loud, "I wish I were in Kansas"...

Quote
Jennifer
At least he admitted he 'didn't think it was faked or an inside job'.

It's like pulling teeth getting an opinion or his viewpoint out of him, so when he posts an article, I assume the content of the article is his belief, also.

I already stated I'm in the middle. You conspiracy enthusiasts and right wing political nutz need a toning down. I could care less about either side of the argument really...

Quote
NuNativs

Quote
Jennifer
At least he admitted he 'didn't think it was faked or an inside job'.

It's like pulling teeth getting an opinion or his viewpoint out of him, so when he posts an article, I assume the content of the article is his belief, also.

I already stated I'm in the middle. You conspiracy enthusiasts and right wing political nutz need a toning down. I could care less about either side of the argument really...

Yes, you could care. That's why you're easily triggered. You're such a sensitive guy ...

He says conspiracy people are nuts
Then says he is in the middle

Right

"The Middle" means too cowardly to take a stand, to define yourself.

Quote
Jennifer
Yes, you could care. That's why you're easily triggered. You're such a sensitive guy ...

Easily triggered. Go read your blathering about racism on the CDC post...

Quote
Jennifer
"The Middle" means too cowardly to take a stand, to define yourself.

Do I have to put up the Rumi quote again for a reminder?

Middle means it's all ARGUABLE phenomenon, thus I walk away except for jokes.

UNARGUABLE phenomenon is the movement of Sun/Light, that's where my attention goes. You want chills, pay attention to something that MATTERS!

(((No one sees the LIGHT of LIFE (Sun/Light). Blind man leads blind on the dark paths of sins, diseases and sufferings; and at the last all fall into the pit of DEATH. And there's Jennifer leading the way into the NOTHINGNESS...)))



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 09/24/2020 01:08AM by NuNativs.