"Also, cancer cells bypass the hormonal signals required of normal cells for nutrient uptake so there is no limit to the sources of carbon atoms for ATP production (e.g. fatty acids and amino acids)."

[themedicalbiochemistrypage.org]


The above seems to refute pseudoscientist brian clement on his fruit increases cancer activity theory.

He definitely needs to start backing up his claims more and making his research and data available to the public. I think he's right on cancer and fruit to an extent but I don't think everyone always has to eliminate all fruit if they have cancer, especially since people have healed from cancer while eating fruit. I'd say it depends on the fruit, for example berries over bananas and dates (more antioxidants, less sugar) if you have cancer. It may also depend on the type of cancer, maybe certain forms uptake glucose more rapidly than others. Next time I talk to Brian Clement, I'm going to ask him about the University he attended... his response and whether they delete that part from the recording should be telling.

well done, jt. does david wolfe need to back up his claims too?

;-)

fresh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> well done, jt. does david wolfe need to back up
> his claims too?
>
> ;-)


Nope, raw chocolate cures AIDS.

But seriously though both men are very knowledgeable and experienced and if they're lecturing or speaking on a subject, it likely has evidence behind it but we still need to hear the entire story. And in many cases, you can find out if it's true or is likely true by doing your own research.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 07/11/2014 06:59PM by jtprindl.

this is where Brian Clements "earned" his Dr degree:



more info here:

[www.prisonplanet.com]

jtprindl Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Next time I talk to Brian Clement,
> I'm going to ask him about the University he
> attended... his response and whether they delete
> that part from the recording should be telling.

Sounds good, but l reckon you should ask a few tough questions before the big one. It would take a few call sessions. What do you think? It would be good to have carefully designed questions and back-up plan so he can't wiggle out of it, and get tough if need be.

Yes, the time has come to get tough on the raw food leaders. Temp got tough on Dr Graham, now it's time to get tough on Dr Brian, Dr Jubb, David Wolfe and the rest. If they throw tantrums we need to hold our nerve and finish them off with sternness and toughness, not buy into their carry on, and expose the weakness.

My message to the raw food leaders = earn your stripes by good research and don't embellish the truth, or we will expose you and serve you up on a golden platter for all to see.

www.thesproutarian.com

The Sproutarian Man Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> jtprindl Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Next time I talk to Brian Clement,
> > I'm going to ask him about the University he
> > attended... his response and whether they
> delete
> > that part from the recording should be telling.
>
> Sounds good, but l reckon you should ask a few
> tough questions before the big one. It would take
> a few call sessions. What do you think? It would
> be good to have carefully designed questions and
> back-up plan so he can't wiggle out of it, and get
> tough if need be.
>
> Yes, the time has come to get tough on the raw
> food leaders. Temp got tough on Dr Graham, now
> it's time to get tough on Dr Brian, Dr Jubb, David
> Wolfe and the rest. If they throw tantrums we need
> to hold our nerve and finish them off with
> sternness and toughness, not buy into their carry
> on, and expose the weakness.
>
> My message to the raw food leaders = earn your
> stripes by good research and don't embellish the
> truth, or we will expose you and serve you up on a
> golden platter for all to see.


Sounds good, what kind of questions are you thinking? Your inbox is full by the way.

How about we come up with some questions togeather.

I've had some good questions l would like to ask Dr Brian, but let me try and remember some.

I cleared out one space from my inbox.

jtprindl Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> He definitely needs to start backing up his claims
> more and making his research and data available to
> the public. I think he's right on cancer and fruit
> to an extent but I don't think everyone always has
> to eliminate all fruit if they have cancer,
> especially since people have healed from cancer
> while eating fruit. I'd say it depends on the
> fruit, for example berries over bananas and dates
> (more antioxidants, less sugar) if you have
> cancer. It may also depend on the type of cancer,
> maybe certain forms uptake glucose more rapidly
> than others. Next time I talk to Brian Clement,
> I'm going to ask him about the University he
> attended... his response and whether they delete
> that part from the recording should be telling.


A high fruit diet should be ok and if we have a well functioning digestive system.