Straight from the horse's mouth ...


"THE boyfriend of Freelee the Banana Girl claims he could “retire in 100 countries” on the profits he makes from “pimping her out” on YouTube, court documents assert."



..."We troll the internet with the health message and use whatever means possible to get that message out there ... swearing, sharks or cleavage usually works pretty good."...



“I’m 37, (have) zero debt (and have) enough money in the bank to retire in about 100 different countries for the rest of my life ... thanks, YouTube!”


..."Among the five volumes of evidence filed in support of Mr Pearce and Ms Itsines’ claims is a copy of Mr Johnstone’s e-book.

Chapter titles include “Why I’m the most sued person in the health movement” and “How I often make over $10,000 USD a month on YouTube”.

In the book, Mr Johnstone says YouTube pays video uploaders between $2500 and $3000 for every 1 million views"...



...“The only reason I delete or block someone is so they get fired up and talk about us on someone else’s video,” he writes.

“That way, they advertise us — and for free.”...



P.S. Kudo's to Roger Wyman for his most revealing photo of this pair!


[www.perthnow.com.au]







...“The only reason I delete or block someone is so they get fired up and talk about us on someone else’s video,” he writes.

“That way, they advertise us — and for free.”
les include “Why I’m the most sued person in the health movement” and “How I often make over $10,000 USD a month on YouTube”.

In the book, Mr Johnstone says YouTube pays video uploaders between $2500 and $3000 for every 1 million views."...


..."

SueZ, Harley should be paying you a commission on the new views you are bringing to his youtube site. I am sure he is laughing all the way to the bank.

Prana Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> SueZ, Harley should be paying you a commission on
> the new views you are bringing to his youtube
> site. I am sure he is laughing all the way to the
> bank.



Well maybe in the short run but the lawyers of that young woman they seem to be still trolling will more likely be laughing louder all the way into this pair's bank accounts.

I doubt I have sent one more person to his site than those who already go there anyway. That is not where the information lies.

With all the bragging dr does about his income he still doesn't seem to have contributed one red cent toward Janette-Murray-Wakelin's movie which has been accepted at Cannes but probably can't be shown there due to the pathetic turnout of funding contributors. A vegan movie at Cannes could be a big deal for the vegan movement dr professes to care about, couldn't it? I guess dr just needed her for youtube hits and someone to talk about, too.

SueZ wrote:
I guess dr just needed her for youtube hits and someone to talk about, too.

Tai:
Janette and her husband follow the 80/10/10 diet and Doug Graham. If anyone should support the movie, it should be Doug and his followers, not Durianrider, even though they are friends. Some people in the 811 movement have a lot more money than DR and FL. Durianrider stopped supporting Doug's books and services, so that would be a conflict of interest.

SueZ Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> With all the bragging dr does about his income he
> still doesn't seem to have contributed one red
> cent toward Janette-Murray-Wakelin's movie which
> has been accepted at Cannes but probably can't be
> shown there due to the pathetic turnout of
> funding contributors. A vegan movie at Cannes
> could be a big deal for the vegan movement dr
> professes to care about, couldn't it? I guess dr
> just needed her for youtube hits and someone to
> talk about, too.

P.S. The whole vegan athletics wing of the raw community (which was falling all over this woman with accolades not too long ago) seems to have turned their back on the 'Raw' movie and it's subject's publicity, not just dr and f.

SueZ Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> SueZ Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > With all the bragging dr does about his income
> he
> > still doesn't seem to have contributed one red
> > cent toward Janette-Murray-Wakelin's movie
> which
> > has been accepted at Cannes but probably can't
> be
> > shown there due to the pathetic turnout of
> > funding contributors. A vegan movie at Cannes
> > could be a big deal for the vegan movement dr
> > professes to care about, couldn't it? I guess
> dr
> > just needed her for youtube hits and someone to
> > talk about, too.
>
> P.S. The whole vegan athletics wing of the raw
> community (which was falling all over this woman
> with accolades not too long ago) seems to have
> turned their back on the 'Raw' movie and it's
> subject's publicity, not just dr and f.

Ok, a new "Special Announcement" at the JMW site may explain the lack of her movie backing by the raw gurus and guru wannabes. They are saying that after the release of the movie they will "recommence" with rawsome living food and conscious lifestyle personal programs and raw retreats.

So, in other words, as a couple of us here have expected, they intend to become a new commercial wing of the raw food world themselves. No one wants to donate to their competition.

are you claiming that people MUST give money to their movie?
you don't even realize how idiotic that is?

all posting this stuff does is to show what a humorless
uptight person you are with no life of your own

the thought that you think those comments are incriminating in some way is hilarious.

feel free to leave out freelee's comments too



SueZ Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Straight from the horse's mouth ...
>
>
> "THE boyfriend of Freelee the Banana Girl claims
> he could “retire in 100 countries” on the
> profits he makes from “pimping her out” on
> YouTube, court documents assert."
>
>
>
> ..."We troll the internet with the health message
> and use whatever means possible to get that
> message out there ... swearing, sharks or cleavage
> usually works pretty good."...
>
>
>
> “I’m 37, (have) zero debt (and have) enough
> money in the bank to retire in about 100 different
> countries for the rest of my life ... thanks,
> YouTube!”
>
>
> ..."Among the five volumes of evidence filed in
> support of Mr Pearce and Ms Itsines’ claims is a
> copy of Mr Johnstone’s e-book.
>
> Chapter titles include “Why I’m the most sued
> person in the health movement” and “How I
> often make over $10,000 USD a month on
> YouTube”.
>
> In the book, Mr Johnstone says YouTube pays video
> uploaders between $2500 and $3000 for every 1
> million views"...
>
>
>
> ...“The only reason I delete or block someone is
> so they get fired up and talk about us on someone
> else’s video,” he writes.
>
> “That way, they advertise us — and for
> free.”...
>
>
>
> P.S. Kudo's to Roger Wyman for his most revealing
> photo of this pair!
>
>
> [www.perthnow.com.au]
> rl-versus-banana-girl-starlets-boyfriend-says-he-m
> akes-10k-pimping-her-out-on-youtube/story-fnii5yv8
> -1227279997668
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ...“The only reason I delete or block someone is
> so they get fired up and talk about us on someone
> else’s video,” he writes.
>
> “That way, they advertise us — and for
> free.”
> les include “Why I’m the most sued person in
> the health movement” and “How I often make
> over $10,000 USD a month on YouTube”.
>
> In the book, Mr Johnstone says YouTube pays video
> uploaders between $2500 and $3000 for every 1
> million views."...
>
>
> ..."



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/07/2015 12:37AM by fresh.

fresh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> are you claiming that people MUST give money to
> their movie?


Hell no.

> you don't even realize how idiotic that is?


Yes it would certainly be even more idiotic in my eyes than in almost all raw vegan's eyes. Especially as I see no reason to believe her tale of curing cancer as she hasn't offered a shred of evidence about that or the 365 consecutive blisterless marathons. But then I am not one of those who swooned over her story. I was just wondering why those swooners, who treated her as an almost miraculous gift to the raw vegan cause, have lost interest in in her story hitting the big time - which it could have (and still may) at Cannes.

fresh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> all posting this stuff does is to show what a
> humorless
> uptight person you are with no life of your own



"Hahaha", said the judge.



> feel free to leave out freelee's comments too



Feel free to post that crap for yourself.

SueZ Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> fresh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > are you claiming that people MUST give money to
> > their movie?
>
>
> Hell no.
>

that's what you're implying

fresh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> SueZ Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > fresh Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > are you claiming that people MUST give money
> to
> > > their movie?
> >
> >
> > Hell no.
> >
>
> that's what you're implying


Only in your head. You make way too many unfounded wild assumptions. Not smart.

SueZ Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> SueZ Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > SueZ Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > With all the bragging dr does about his
> income
> > he
> > > still doesn't seem to have contributed one
> red
> > > cent toward Janette-Murray-Wakelin's movie
> > which
> > > has been accepted at Cannes but probably
> can't
> > be
> > > shown there due to the pathetic turnout of
> > > funding contributors. A vegan movie at Cannes
> > > could be a big deal for the vegan movement dr
> > > professes to care about, couldn't it? I guess
> > dr
> > > just needed her for youtube hits and someone
> to
> > > talk about, too.
> >
> > P.S. The whole vegan athletics wing of the raw
> > community (which was falling all over this
> woman
> > with accolades not too long ago) seems to have
> > turned their back on the 'Raw' movie and it's
> > subject's publicity, not just dr and f.
>
> Ok, a new "Special Announcement" at the JMW site
> may explain the lack of her movie backing by the
> raw gurus and guru wannabes. They are saying that
> after the release of the movie they will
> "recommence" with rawsome living food and
> conscious lifestyle personal programs and raw
> retreats.
>
> So, in other words, as a couple of us here have
> expected, they intend to become a new commercial
> wing of the raw food world themselves. No one
> wants to donate to their competition.

I had to laugh when I recently saw dr and f showed their hearts of gold by donating a used bike, or used bike parts, at a raw vegan charity event. They give the bikes to foreign refugees.

I don't know the value of such used bike parts but whatever it is - it's a really skimpy donation to be puffing up about, IMO, for people who have bragged how much money they make and will be making more by their marks, the fruit fly posse, clicking on that video which, no thank you, I will not link.

SueZ Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> fresh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > SueZ Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > fresh Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > are you claiming that people MUST give
> money
> > to
> > > > their movie?
> > >
> > >
> > > Hell no.
> > >
> >
> > that's what you're implying
>
>
> Only in your head. You make way too many unfounded
> wild assumptions. Not smart.

you continually criticize people recently , wondering why they didn't contribute to janette's movie. you are implying that they SHOULD contribute for some reason. whether you want to say that they should, or must is irrelevant. you are not simply innocently wondering. you are being typically controlling of other people. therefore it is not a wild assumption. it is a logical assumption and you are a disingenuous crone for insisting otherwise, especially since you have not proffered another viable reason for your continual bullying of people to contribute to her movie.

fresh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > are you claiming that people MUST give
> > money
> > > to
> > > > > their movie?



> > > > Hell no.



> > > that's what you're implying


> > Only in your head. You make way too many
> unfounded
> > wild assumptions. Not smart.




> you continually criticize people recently ,
> wondering why they didn't contribute to janette's
> movie. you are implying that they SHOULD
> contribute for some reason.


I point out what I notice. I am only implying what people SHOULD contribute to what or who in your own mind. Apparently my answering "Hell no" to your accusation didn't register.


whether you want to
> say that they should, or must is irrelevant. you
> are not simply innocently wondering. you are
> being typically controlling of other people.


Lol. I'm not controlling anyone except in your peculiar mind.


> therefore it is not a wild assumption. it is a
> logical assumption and you are a disingenuous
> crone for insisting otherwise, especially since
> you have not proffered another viable reason for
> your continual bullying of people to contribute to
> her movie.


You're clearly out of your mind if that's what you call your "thinking". As I have said I am just pointing out the facts of where peoples mouths are in relationship to where they put their money. I don't want people to donate but couldn't care less if they do. I can't understand the concept for you - I can just point out that there is one and that you are missing it. It's not worth the effort, though, as you don't want to see so you can't.

are you brain dead?

why aren't you contributing to Tavis on a weekly basis?

why aren't you contributing to high fat intake research?

why aren't you contributing to nuclear power plant cleanup?

why aren't you contributing to raw food's greatest couple?

I'm just noticing.

put your money where your mouth is, hypocrite.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/10/2015 03:23PM by fresh.

What people see in others is just a reflection of how they view themselves. So someone who is very critical of other people will actually have a lot of self judgment and hatred. To see the worst in people is because one has a low opinion of themselves.

Prana Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What people see in others is just a reflection of
> how they view themselves. So someone who is very
> critical of other people will actually have a lot
> of self judgment and hatred. To see the worst in
> people is because one has a low opinion of
> themselves.

Fresh/anon 101/anon 102 is/are far too emotionally invested in his/their one and only "pure" raw vegan diet to overcome his/their perceptual bias to even read patiently enough to comprehend adequately the content of posts by those who disagree with him/them. Such is the sad story of zealots of many stripes.


It's interesting that those in the raw vegan movement that scream most loudly for free speech are the very ones who are most likely to silence opposing thoughts and thinkers to the hclf way and aggressively remove opposing comments on their web sites and YouTube businesses. I'm just pointing such things out as I see them.

SueZ Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> Fresh/anon 101/anon 102 is/are far too emotionally
> invested in his/their one and only "pure" raw
> vegan diet

your attempt ( just as the Ghost always did ) to project views upon others is typical controlling behavior and false.

>to overcome his/their perceptual bias
> to even read patiently enough to comprehend
> adequately the content of posts by those who
> disagree with him/them. Such is the sad story of
> zealots of many stripes.

i read your hypocrisy quite clearly.
it's difficult for you to recognize your hypocrisy while you are engaging in it.
that would require some self reflection that you don't seem capable of.

>
>
> It's interesting that those in the raw vegan
> movement that scream most loudly for free speech
> are the very ones who are most likely to silence
> opposing thoughts

you're being vague. it's a pointless statement without details.

fresh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> SueZ Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > Fresh/anon 101/anon 102 is/are far too
> emotionally
> > invested in his/their one and only "pure" raw
> > vegan diet
>
> your attempt ( just as the Ghost always did ) to
> project views upon others is typical controlling
> behavior and false.
>
> >to overcome his/their perceptual bias
> > to even read patiently enough to comprehend
> > adequately the content of posts by those who
> > disagree with him/them. Such is the sad story
> of
> > zealots of many stripes.
>
> i read your hypocrisy quite clearly.
> it's difficult for you to recognize your hypocrisy
> while you are engaging in it.
> that would require some self reflection that you
> don't seem capable of.
>
> >
> >
> > It's interesting that those in the raw vegan
> > movement that scream most loudly for free
> speech
> > are the very ones who are most likely to
> silence
> > opposing thoughts
>
> you're being vague. it's a pointless statement
> without details.

Your comprehension and reading skills are less than average. Maybe you don't think so but they are. Talking to zealots like you is like talking to a wall. You've wasted enough of my time. I've tried to explain things to you over and over but you can't hear me. I've had it. Enough is enough. Bother someone else.

If they are so rich why does she shop at goodwill, like in her closet tour I saw. 7 dollar jeans..flip flops, tank top...

I dont want to make fun of her, good for her, entrepeneur..a taker carer of her man.

Freelea did it herself, here everyone thought Durianrider was nuts, but it was free who stole the show. I watched their videos for her always.

Alas. the wound is still fresh though..

WAIT did you say he pimps her out? She is too rich for that. To work for..fruit. I hope that is not true on any level.





Edited 5 time(s). Last edit at 04/12/2015 07:30PM by coconutcream.

We make decent money but still love shopping at thrift stores. Some people see "thrifting" as a game where you try to find cool stuff for pennies. It's also better for the environment. 1800 gallons of water are needed for the manufacture of one pair of jeans.

coconutcream Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If they are so rich why does she shop at goodwill,
> like in her closet tour I saw. 7 dollar
> jeans..flip flops, tank top...
>
> I dont want to make fun of her, good for her,
> entrepeneur..a taker carer of her man.
>
> Freelea did it herself, here everyone thought
> Durianrider was nuts, but it was free who stole
> the show. I watched their videos for her always.
>
> Alas. the wound is still fresh though..
>
> WAIT did you say he pimps her out? She is too rich
> for that. To work for..fruit. I hope that is not
> true on any level.

coconutcream Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If they are so rich why does she shop at goodwill,
> like in her closet tour I saw. 7 dollar
> jeans..flip flops, tank top...
>
> I dont want to make fun of her, good for her,
> entrepeneur..a taker carer of her man.
>
> Freelea did it herself, here everyone thought
> Durianrider was nuts, but it was free who stole
> the show. I watched their videos for her always.
>
> Alas. the wound is still fresh though..
>
> WAIT did you say he pimps her out? She is too rich
> for that. To work for..fruit. I hope that is not
> true on any level.

You don't know people who don't have to shop at thrift stores and yet do so? Freelee talks about it all the time, how it's a waste to spend lots of money on clothes plus the eco-friendly aspect. Actually, I think $7 or $10 for used jeans is a ripoff. But in addition to being good for the environment because the last thing we need on this planet is more sht produced and more sht ending up in the landfill, if you can score clothes from the '70s and earlier, they tend to be a higher quality. Or else you can get expensive clothes on the cheap.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/12/2015 10:10PM by banana who.

SueZ Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Straight from the horse's mouth ...
>
>
> "THE boyfriend of Freelee the Banana Girl claims
> he could “retire in 100 countries” on the
> profits he makes from “pimping her out” on
> YouTube, court documents assert."
>
>
>
> ..."We troll the internet with the health message
> and use whatever means possible to get that
> message out there ... swearing, sharks or cleavage
> usually works pretty good."...
>
>
>
> “I’m 37, (have) zero debt (and have) enough
> money in the bank to retire in about 100 different
> countries for the rest of my life ... thanks,
> YouTube!”
>
>
> ..."Among the five volumes of evidence filed in
> support of Mr Pearce and Ms Itsines’ claims is a
> copy of Mr Johnstone’s e-book.
>
> Chapter titles include “Why I’m the most sued
> person in the health movement” and “How I
> often make over $10,000 USD a month on
> YouTube”.
>
> In the book, Mr Johnstone says YouTube pays video
> uploaders between $2500 and $3000 for every 1
> million views"...
>
>
>
> ...“The only reason I delete or block someone is
> so they get fired up and talk about us on someone
> else’s video,” he writes.
>
> “That way, they advertise us — and for
> free.”...
>
>
>
> P.S. Kudo's to Roger Wyman for his most revealing
> photo of this pair!
>
>
> [www.perthnow.com.au]
> rl-versus-banana-girl-starlets-boyfriend-says-he-m
> akes-10k-pimping-her-out-on-youtube/story-fnii5yv8
> -1227279997668
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ...“The only reason I delete or block someone is
> so they get fired up and talk about us on someone
> else’s video,” he writes.
>
> “That way, they advertise us — and for
> free.”
> les include “Why I’m the most sued person in
> the health movement” and “How I often make
> over $10,000 USD a month on YouTube”.
>
> In the book, Mr Johnstone says YouTube pays video
> uploaders between $2500 and $3000 for every 1
> million views."...
>
>
> ..."

On one of Hellorodney's videos (can't remember which one it was at the moment) he was questioning DR's excuse of backing down from his previously videoed stance on how he would handle being sued. Apparently DR went from saying he was willing to go to jail or become poor for his cause to saying how important it was for him to not let down his fans by maybe missing his prearranged fruit meet ups in the parks and restaurants of Thailand festival and so he settled out of court.

Now I don't know how much Hellorodney knows about such things (or if they are the same in OZ) but he wondered why DR and F, if they were truly suddenly worried about letting down their fans to the point of caving into an immediate settlement, didn't ask the judge for a trial date that wouldn't interfere with their prior business obligations? Apparently that sort of scheduling change is done all the time in courts for such reasons. Anyone know why DR and F didn't make such a simple request for their own trial? It's not likely that their own lawyer (well, technically, Freelee's own lawyer I guess) wasn't made aware of their prior business commitment and was unaware of how to easily have their court date changed. DR's excuse sounds even fishier than ever if DR and F didn't even bother to ask the judge for a new court date, doesn't it?

This is all raw gossipy nonsense. Who the f*$k cares? Meanwhile miracle that is the Sun/Light continues to shower U.S. with Life. I think that's more worthy of OUR attention, don't you?:
Think Like the Sun!

NuNativs Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> This is all raw gossipy nonsense. Who the f*$k
> cares? Meanwhile miracle that is the Sun/Light
> continues to shower U.S. with Life. I think that's
> more worthy of OUR attention, don't you?:
> Think Like the Sun!

Clearly the amoral have no interest in concerning themselves with questions of right vs. wrong and would much prefer others turn away from such close to home subjects and get back to important things like sunbathing in campgrounds, too, lest the spotlight of the living land on their sorry tanlineless butts.

DR and FL aren't even raw. It makes no sense that they're discussed here. This is a RAW forum. How is that so hard to understand? THEY ARE NOT RAW. THIS IS A DISCUSSION FORUM FOR RAW VEGAN RELATED TOPICS. Capiche?

SueZ Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> SueZ Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Straight from the horse's mouth ...
> >
> >
> > "THE boyfriend of Freelee the Banana Girl
> claims
> > he could “retire in 100 countries” on the
> > profits he makes from “pimping her out” on
> > YouTube, court documents assert."
> >
> >
> >
> > ..."We troll the internet with the health
> message
> > and use whatever means possible to get that
> > message out there ... swearing, sharks or
> cleavage
> > usually works pretty good."...
> >
> >
> >
> > “I’m 37, (have) zero debt (and have) enough
> > money in the bank to retire in about 100
> different
> > countries for the rest of my life ... thanks,
> > YouTube!”
> >
> >
> > ..."Among the five volumes of evidence filed in
> > support of Mr Pearce and Ms Itsines’ claims is
> a
> > copy of Mr Johnstone’s e-book.
> >
> > Chapter titles include “Why I’m the most
> sued
> > person in the health movement” and “How I
> > often make over $10,000 USD a month on
> > YouTube”.
> >
> > In the book, Mr Johnstone says YouTube pays
> video
> > uploaders between $2500 and $3000 for every 1
> > million views"...
> >
> >
> >
> > ...“The only reason I delete or block someone
> is
> > so they get fired up and talk about us on
> someone
> > else’s video,” he writes.
> >
> > “That way, they advertise us — and for
> > free.”...
> >
> >
> >
> > P.S. Kudo's to Roger Wyman for his most
> revealing
> > photo of this pair!
> >
> >
> >
> [www.perthnow.com.au]
>
> >
> rl-versus-banana-girl-starlets-boyfriend-says-he-m
>
> >
> akes-10k-pimping-her-out-on-youtube/story-fnii5yv8
>
> > -1227279997668
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ...“The only reason I delete or block someone
> is
> > so they get fired up and talk about us on
> someone
> > else’s video,” he writes.
> >
> > “That way, they advertise us — and for
> > free.”
> > les include “Why I’m the most sued person
> in
> > the health movement” and “How I often make
> > over $10,000 USD a month on YouTube”.
> >
> > In the book, Mr Johnstone says YouTube pays
> video
> > uploaders between $2500 and $3000 for every 1
> > million views."...
> >
> >
> > ..."
>
> On one of Hellorodney's videos (can't remember
> which one it was at the moment) he was questioning
> DR's excuse of backing down from his previously
> videoed stance on how he would handle being sued.
> Apparently DR went from saying he was willing to
> go to jail or become poor for his cause to saying
> how important it was for him to not let down his
> fans by maybe missing his prearranged fruit meet
> ups in the parks and restaurants of Thailand
> festival and so he settled out of court.
>
> Now I don't know how much Hellorodney knows about
> such things (or if they are the same in OZ) but he
> wondered why DR and F, if they were truly suddenly
> worried about letting down their fans to the point
> of caving into an immediate settlement, didn't ask
> the judge for a trial date that wouldn't interfere
> with their prior business obligations? Apparently
> that sort of scheduling change is done all the
> time in courts for such reasons. Anyone know why
> DR and F didn't make such a simple request for
> their own trial? It's not likely that their own
> lawyer (well, technically, Freelee's own lawyer I
> guess) wasn't made aware of their prior business
> commitment and was unaware of how to easily have
> their court date changed. DR's excuse sounds even
> fishier than ever if DR and F didn't even bother
> to ask the judge for a new court date, doesn't it?

I guess it is possible that DR and F did request a new court date and were refused that option. But if that were the case wouldn't DR have used that in the video excuse explaining to viewers why he settled instead of proceeding as he told them he would for his cause? IMO, he probably would have mentioned it if he had asked as it would have made him look better for at least trying.

Why don't you delete this thread?

Prana Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What people see in others is just a reflection of
> how they view themselves. So someone who is very
> critical of other people will actually have a lot
> of self judgment and hatred. To see the worst in
> people is because one has a low opinion of
> themselves.