By the way, there was a woman named Kris Carr, who made a video called Crazy Sexy Cancer and I once rented it, expecting to hear about her cure. Instead, the video was about her doing the hippocrates program but still not being cured. At least it didn't get worse. I don't know her current state and if she is now cured. But a few years ago, her status was still not cured:

[www.youtube.com]

[www.youtube.com]

For me, I just personally wouldn't recommend such a simple program without powerful herbs and also if the wheatgrass approach wasn't working, I would definitely try other approaches. For example, the Gerson program worked for some people and it doesn't include wheatgrass juice at all.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 12/29/2015 12:41AM by Tai.

>It sounds like denial to say you are symptom free, except your lumps. THat sounds ridiculous because the lumps are one of the worst symptoms and shows an advanced problem that has not yet been unraveled.

I did read the book years ago and did not even pay attention to the point you raised.
I think at that time many people believed that wheatgrass could cure any disease and she was over excited about her progress.

You are correct, it seems like wheatgrass alone cannot cure cancer that is an advance state, you may need other helps.

>I really am so grateful to learn the astringent fruit teaching from RObert Morse

what are the major findings of I really am so grateful to learn the astringent fruit teaching from Robert Morse astringent fruit teachings? I have never read his books.



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 12/29/2015 03:45AM by RawPracticalist.

Brian Clement said in the podcast:
"she called me and said, “My tumors are growing back, but not my cancer.” So, this is our icon, I’m holding my breath saying, “Oh my God, if she goes down with cancer, I’m even doubting what we’re doing here!”

Tai
Wow, this is so telling. THis shows why Brian has attacked those dates so heavily, because he was trying to defend the wheatgrass approach, because of what the icon experienced. It's weird that Eydie became the icon and not Ann WIgmore.

Raw P wrote:
what are the major findings of Robert Morse astringent fruit teachings? I have never read his books.

Tai:
THe basic concept that certain astringent fruits can detox the lymphatic system. He didn't deny that some fresh raw greens and sprouts can do this too. It's just he taught the fruit and herb part mostly. He also goes into great depth about the role that cleaning the lymphatic system plays in helping to heal major diseases of toxicity.

From Robert Morse

Quote

The cure for acidosis is to stop consuming acid forming foods such as meats, dairy, eggs, grains, nuts and beans, and in their place, only consume alkaline forming foods. The most powerful, and therefore the most effective, alkaline forming food and lymph system cleaner is fruit; the more astringent, the better. You need to consume a minimum of 80% fruit. Dr Morse recommends fresh berries, melons, and dark colored grapes as the most effective, detoxifying fruits. And you need to find fruit which has sufficiently vine ripened in order to get the maximum benefit.

20% raw vegetables are OK if you don't have serious health problems and just want to increase vitality and energy, but if you have big health problems, then you have to go with 100% fruit for as long as it takes (months or even a year) to detoxify the lymph system and to restore the body back into regenerating and restoring itself with increased levels of energy and vitality. All of this is explained in great detail in his videos. It's not easy to switch over to all fruit suddenly because your body is so accustomed to regular food, so you can start by drinking purees of melons, grapes, or berries, or apples, or tangerines, oranges, etc., in the morning and afternoon, and then only have one vegetable meal for supper. You go back to fruit puree for the balance of the evening, until bedtime. After a few weeks, you can try going with 100% fruit for one day and see if you can do it. If so, make one day per week your 100% fruit day. Gradually, work up to two days, etc.

[educate-yourself.org]

>if you have big health problems, then you have to go with 100% fruit for as long as it takes (months or even a year) .

That is totally anti Brian Clement.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 12/29/2015 03:51PM by RawPracticalist.

It looks like the last post from Raw Practicalist was written by a man named:

Ken Adachi, Editor

It doesn't appear that the writings above are taken verbatim from Robert Morse. There are subtle differences in what Robert Morse teaches from the above summary.

Qupte:
Dr Morse recommends fresh berries, melons, and dark colored grapes as the most effective, detoxifying fruits

Tai:
see, this is putting words in Robert Morse's mouth. It's best to read his writings directly, not from a third party. The TOP fruit he recommends for cleansing is lemon, followed by dark SEEDED grapes. See, you truly cannot go by someone who paraphrases the man.

Moreover, Robert Morse has holes in his understanding, because his knowledge based was formed from high fruit and for example, it doesn't sound like he spent time in an area with some of the most amazing vegetables and greens.

Just as an example, nopal leaf IS astringent and it is rich in calcium and it can be juiced and can be easily assimilated, and if someone is having teeth problems and doing poorly with high fruit, then taking in special greens if of course the thing to do. And yet Robert has acknowledge the power of some of these greens and he is not saying that one can't take them, which is why Ken's quote above is wrong. Robert is just teaching what he has experience with.

There was a case of a woman who was cured of a severe disease while on Robert's program and it ultimately worked for her, but she lost a couple of teeth while on the program. That hurts! Obviously the program could have and should have been fine tuned to avoid that.

some incredibly powerful herbs that are astringent that Morse sells are vegetation like roots, leaves, twigs, etc, so his program consists of certain fruits, special herbs and other raw foods. He could never say only fruit, when he insists on taking herbs.

The Gerson program allows some cooked food on the program for calories, like cooked potatoes. Lou's program allows cultured seed/nut yogurt for calories (as well as high doses of enzymes). Robert's program allows more fruit for calories. Hippocrates encourages more sprouts for calories. All four programs have worked for some people. Certainly if someone was losing their teeth, they must try something differently. If someone was not experiencing rapid healing, then they should try something else.

Tai you are correct. I just grabbed the first posting on Morse I found.

I thought astringent referred to taste. What would them make astringent fruits so unique to our health. I have not read his books.

Quote

Astringent is the least common of tastes. It can be found in legumes, fruits (such as cranberries, pomegranates, pears, and dried fruit), vegetables (such as, broccoli, cauliflower, artichoke, asparagus and turnip), grains (such as rye, buckwheat, and quinoa), spices and herbs (such as turmeric and marjoram), coffee, and tea. Astringent has a cooling effect on the body.

Astringent is classified more in relation to its effect on the tongue than its actual taste. It creates a puckering sensation in the mouth or a dry, chalky feeling. Foods like broccoli or cauliflower have a mildly astringent taste that is less detectable. Dry foods such as crackers and chips, most raw vegetables, and the skins of fruits also have astringent qualities.

I like lemon or lime. always part of my diet.

None of these healing methods can help to recovery if the digestive system is impaired, astringent or not. No amount of lemon juice could help until I cleaned up with juice fasting and some fermented foods or juices.

Raw P wrote

What would them make astringent fruits so unique to our health

Tai:
They can detox and clean out the lymphatic system. Next time you eat a kiwi or sour grapes or something tart, note the grabbing action of the tartness on your lymph nodes in your neck and throat.

Regarding your last line, yes, no one is saying to eat a diet of only lemons. In fact, Robert put the worst cases on juices only at first.

Thanks Tai
You are correct, there is a different feeling in the body when I eat these fruits, lemon, kiwis, and black grapes.

2 things:

I. "some women actually died of stomach ulcerations"

Yes, plain ascorbic acid powder might do that. That is why ingesting Vitamin C in the form of sodium ascorbate is a better idea, regardless of why you are taking large quantities of the vitamin. Me, I'd go for fresh raw fruit, vegetables and young greens.

II. Cancer is not one thing in all people. The cure has to be tailored to both the patient and to the particular form of cancer. Treating people with bowel cancer and leukemia the same way will likely be a disaster for one or the other.


All diseases can be cured, but not all people.

about 2 millions new cases of cancer each year
about 600000 deaths each year.
That is tooooooooooo much
Yet diet and change in lifestyle can solve that

Quote

Each year, the American Cancer Society estimates the numbers of new cancer cases and deaths that will occur in the United States in the current year and compiles the most recent data on cancer incidence, mortality, and survival. Incidence data were collected by the National Cancer Institute (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results [SEER] Program), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (National Program of Cancer Registries), and the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries. Mortality data were collected by the National Center for Health Statistics. In 2016, 1,685,210 new cancer cases and 595,690 cancer deaths are projected to occur in the United States. Overall cancer incidence trends (13 oldest SEER registries) are stable in women, but declining by 3.1% per year in men (from 2009-2012), much of which is because of recent rapid declines in prostate cancer diagnoses. The cancer death rate has dropped by 23% since 1991, translating to more than 1.7 million deaths averted through 2012. Despite this progress, death rates are increasing for cancers of the liver, pancreas, and uterine corpus, and cancer is now the leading cause of death in 21 states, primarily due to exceptionally large reductions in death from heart disease. Among children and adolescents (aged birth-19 years), brain cancer has surpassed leukemia as the leading cause of cancer death because of the dramatic therapeutic advances against leukemia. Accelerating progress against cancer requires both increased national investment in cancer research and the application of existing cancer control knowledge across all segments of the population. CA Cancer J Clin 2016. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Thanks RP for this update and I just added it to my file on Cancer Statistics - see my File Preview below...

…File Preview…
• JR Insert from Daily Log on 2-2-08…
• Cancer death statistics in the last 100 years:
1900 – 1 in 30 …see page 8 in Udo’s book (heart disease 1 in 7)
1950 – 1 in 5*
1960 – 1 in 4
1970 – 1 in 3
2000 – 1 in 2 Q: 2004 when it hit 1 in 2?
* Research those crucial years when the processed foods from the Industrial Revolution made cancer go from 1 in 30 to 1 in 5, especially 1 in 10 and 15. [30-15-10-5-4-3-2]
• In the last century, cancer deaths have gone from 1 in 30 to 1 in 2 mainly because of the steadily increase in processed foods from the Industrial Revolution. Once again, we see what happens when we apply something we mastered (machines in the case of the Industrial Revolution) to our food. Processed foods have doubled in the last 10 years and diabetes has also doubled in the last 10 years.
• Food as Medicine 1 of 2
• And in that last 30 some odd years of cancer research we have amassed 200 billion dollars worth of research on cancer. [4 major cancer killers: Lung, Breast, Prostrate and Colorectal.]
• And by the way, there was 1.56 million medical papers published on research on cancer in this time...not 1.56 thousand...1.56 million research papers. There hasn’t been one iota, scintilla of progress in the four major killers of cancer in the United States. And yet, we unraveled the human genome in 18 years, we put a man on the moon after the space program was officiated in 9 years, we developed an atomic weapon in 17 months under the Manhattan Project during World War II before we were even sure what atomic energy was...in 17 months. And yet, 200 billion dollars later and 30 some years later we got zip on improvement on the four major cancer killers in the United States.
• 20,000 People Die Every Day From Cancer Across the Globe
• Cancer is currently responsible for 20,000 deaths per day across the world, or 7.6 million people a year, according to a new report published by the American Cancer Society. In addition, 12 million people are diagnosed with some form of cancer every year.
• The report, titled "Global Cancer Facts and Figures 2007" is based on data from the International Agency for Research on Cancer and compares the rates of different cancers between the developed and less developed world.
• Of the anticipated 7.6 million cancer deaths in 2008, 2.9 million are expected in the developed world, while 4.7 are expected to occur in less developed countries. Approximately 5.4 million new cancer cases are expected in developed countries, and 6.7 million in those less developed.
• The report notes that the most common cancers vary between the developed and less developed world. In developed countries, breast, colorectal and lung cancer are the most common forms of the disease in women. While breast cancer is still number one in the less developed world, it is followed by cervical and stomach cancer. Among men, prostate, lung and colorectal cancers are most common in the developed world. In the less developed world, the most common cancers are of the stomach, lungs and liver.
• The Coming Cancer Explosion
• 2008/12/27
• Globally, about 12.4 million people will be diagnosed with some form of cancer this year, and 7.6 million people will die. The global cancer burden doubled in the last 30 years of the 20th century, and it will likely double again between 2000 and 2020 and nearly triple by 2030.
• In the U.S., cancer dethroned heart disease as the top killer among Americans under the age of 85 back in 2002. Three years ago, a staggering 175 Americans PER HOUR were diagnosed with cancer, and the numbers have only gone up since then. Now, it looks like the rest of the world is catching up.
• Cancer statistics, 2016
• In 2016, 1,685,210 new cancer cases and 595,690 cancer deaths are projected to occur in the United States. Overall cancer incidence trends (13 oldest SEER registries) are stable in women, but declining by 3.1% per year in men (from 2009-2012), much of which is because of recent rapid declines in prostate cancer diagnoses. The cancer death rate has dropped by 23% since 1991, translating to more than 1.7 million deaths averted through 2012. Despite this progress, death rates are increasing for cancers of the liver, pancreas, and uterine corpus, and cancer is now the leading cause of death in 21 states, primarily due to exceptionally large reductions in death from heart disease. Among children and adolescents (aged birth-19 years), brain cancer has surpassed leukemia as the leading cause of cancer death because of the dramatic therapeutic advances against leukemia.
…End of File Preview…

Long ago, I heard or read somewhere that the Cancer Industry is the #2 Business in the world where there are more people making a living off of cancer than there are people who are dying from it and now that I think about it, that almost seems impossible since so many people are dying from it.

Does anyone know the actual numbers of people who work for the Cancer Industry? I have never researched this and would love for someone to shed some light on those statistics!

Frankly given the state of medical science 115 years ago, I've never understood exactly HOW a cause of death could be determined accurately back then, save for terminal accidents, suicides or crimes. Since the History Room at my city's public library contains thousands of copies of our county's original death certificates from 1895 through 1904 are available to the public eye (on-site only), it's really interesting to peruse them. I have no doubt that there were many (maybe even the majority) of incorrect death diagnosis back then, & for many decades going forward, and there was a lot of just plain guessing going on.

<<<Frankly given the state of medical science 115 years ago, I've never understood exactly HOW a cause of death could be determined accurately back then, save for terminal accidents, suicides or crimes.>>>

That's a really good point as I was just reminded of this fact when I read "Syphilis - Is it a Mischievous Myth or a Malignant Monster" by Herbert M. Shelton last week - see my File Preview below...

…File Preview…
• Syphilis - Is it a Mischievous Myth or a Malignant Monster by Herbert M. Shelton
• The Medical View
• "As a danger to the public health, as a peril to the family, and as a menace to the vitality, health, and physical progress of the race, the venereal diseases are justly regarded as the greatest of modern plagues." -Milton J. Rosenau, M. D.
• The Rational View
• "The present medical opinion of venereal diseases is an infinitely greater curse to the world than will be all the diseases of mankind when they are understood and treated properly." -J. H. Tilden, M. D.
• INDEX
• Introduction
• Chapter I The Beginning of a Myth
• Chapter II The Myth Becomes a Lie
• Chapter III A Pathological Mocking Bird
• Chapter IV The Myth Becomes a Nightmare
• Chapter V The Nightmare Becomes a Mania
• Chapter VI Tests That Do Not Test
• Chapter VII What Causes "Syphilis"?
• Chapter VIII Diagnosing a Protean Monster
• Chapter IX The Beginning of Quackery
• Chapter X New Evils for Old
• Chapter XI The Artificial Fever Cure
• Chapter XII What Is "Syphilis"?
• Chapter XIII Regular Abuse of the "Syphilitic"
• Chapter XIV . The Hygienic Care of the "Syphilitic"
• Addendum
• Dedication
• To the human race, in the sincere hope that the truths it contains may serve to emancipate mankind from the frightful slavery to the syphilis myth and the still more frightful treatment accorded so-called syphilitics, this little book is lovingly dedicated, by H. M. SHELTON
• INTRODUCTION TO THE SECOND EDITION
• Much water has flowed under the bridge since the first edition of this book came from the press. The practice of medicine soon thereafter entered upon a period of discovery of spectacular, sensational and miraculous near panaceas. Indeed, with the "fever cure" and snake venom therapy, both of which promised to be near cure-alls, they had already entered this period at the time the first edition of this book was published. There followed in rapid succession the sulfa drugs, frozen sleep, penicillin and the -other antibiotics, ACTH and Cortisone, and a few minor seven day wonders. The practice of medicine not only became increasingly spectacular, but it also became more and more commercialized until, today, the physician is nothing more than a peddler of doubtful goods, hawking his wares in the market place. He has not abandoned the pretense that medicine is a science and he is a scientist; he has not surrendered his claim that he is a public benefactor and he still strikes an altruistic pose, but all of this has worn so thin that it has become transparent to almost everybody.
•
• No man lives who knows the real meaning of a positive serologic reaction. He cannot say, with finality, that it does or does not mean "syphilis". No man lives who knows the meaning of a negative serologic reaction. When a patient gives a negative reaction, he knows no more about the condition of the patient than when a positive reaction is returned. Although the original Wassermann test is no longer used, more than eighty-five other serologic tests having been devised and used since Wassermann's original was devised, not one of them is a reliable test and the meaning of the serologic reaction with each test is not known. John H. Stokes, M. D., a leading medical syphilologist, says in an article published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, Dec. 5, . 1951:
•
• INTRODUCTION
• Today we are faced with a new crusade, the knights of which promise us everything short of the millennium itself, if we will but adopt their program and supply them with the billions of dollars needed to put it into effect and carry it on. Yes, they have launched a crusade, a crusade motivated by the highest ideals and the purest altruism, but they do ask for money and, long-time jobs at good salaries. It is amazing how much altruism a man is capable of when he sees an opportunity to reap a golden harvest out of it.
• They ask us for billions of dollars and for autocratic authority over us. They ask us to pay them well to make us do what they, in their infallible wisdom, want us to do. Give us your purse and your life, they demand, and let us spend the one and control the other as we decide best.
• The anti-venereal campaign is presented to the public as a defense measure. "Gonorrhea and syphilis constitute a menace to national defense" and the anti-venereal fight now proposed would be "a distinct measure of national preparedness."
• Indeed the ghouls who fathered this crusade have not missed a single appeal to the public, and our legislators. Their members have been present at every legislative hearing on bills providing for appropriation of millions of public funds to be put into, the empty purses of a dying profession, reminding us of the biblical statement that, "where the carcass is there will the buzzards be gathered together."
• JR Insert: Matthew 24:28 Translations - King James Version (KJV) - For wheresoever the carcase is, there will the eagles be gathered together.
• With the plea that it will cost us less money to hire these men to free us forever from venereal disease than to go on as we are, they seek to get their hands into the public purse and to gain a firmer hold on the lives of the people. Indeed they have already attained a measure of success.
• Several cities have established and maintain, at the tax payers expense, clinics for the detection and treatment of venereal disease. Several states have passed laws providing for compulsory testing and compulsory treating of certain groups. The Federal government has appropriated a huge sum of money to finance a long-term fight against "syphilis."
• Many industrial organizations have been induced to require a Wassermann test of all their employees and to require out reporting to the police. This makes it difficult for the medical profession to hound their victims. He complains about the difficulties that have been met in the effort to "establish the same control as prevailed in Europe." He especially likes the European method which he thus describes: "If a patient fails to appear for treatment, a government agency is notified and the missing syphilitic is located no matter to what part of the country he may have gone." He also approves of Denmark's laws which require treatment of "all infected persons" and which "under certain conditions" force "infectious patients" with "syphilis" to enter hospitals. He finds in the people of Denmark "respect for and obedience to authority."
• It cannot have escaped the notice of discriminating readers that this anti-venereal campaign was launched and is carried on by those who expect to reap financial rewards from the discovery and treatment of venereal disease. The doctors are clamoring loudest for the appropriation of millions of dollars and the creation of legal powers to enable them to "wipe out" the venereal diseases. That they have help from other sources, some interested, others disinterested and well-meaning, though misguided, goes without saying.
• Becker says that "the people of the United States again are syphilis conscious," while Parran speaks of a "curt popular mandate to stamp out syphilis." Of course no such popular mandate has ever been given and the "syphilis consciousness" of Americans was created by a flood of propaganda, largely financed by the hoarded loot of buccaneer, Rockefeller. A group of scare-mongers, whose scaremongering almost equals that employed in 1916-17 to get us into war, is responsible for any mass fear of "syphilis" that exists.
• JR Comment: This is classic Hegelian Problem-Reaction-Solution where the “Powers that Be” create the Problem whether it’s “Syphilis” or “AIDS” which leads to our Reaction - FEAR which ultimately leads to their Solution which is for us to “give up both our Money and our Liberties”!
• These men who expect to profit from the search for and treatment of "syphilis" have deliberately lied to the public about the prevalence and evils of "syphilis," in what de Kruif describes as "a fight that will be pretty rough on its victims." The statistics they issue are false and unreliable, but effective in creating mass fear, therefore useful. De Kruif says that doctors and "health experts" don't know how much "syphilis" there is, and that "all statistics are guesses, nothing more." They tell us there are a half-million new cases of "syphilis" each year. The figure is a mere guess and is placed high for effectiveness in producing fear and panic. Those of us who went through the propaganda that got us into war know the power of lies to create mass hysteria and cause the people to give up both their money and their liberties. Doctors who traffic in Hell's Commerce run the same kind of lie-factory the Allies did.
• Statistics are made up of diagnoses and are subject to the whims, caprices, hobbies, prejudices, misconceptions, mistakes and studied deceptions of the doctors making the diagnoses. There is nothing reliable in these.
• In Chicago, efforts were made to get a "popular mandate to wipe out syphilis." After a strenuous campaign the matter was brought to a vote and the alleged results were published. The truth about this historic ballot on the blood test has never been published. Somebody is lying about the outcome of the ballot.
• None-the-less the Chicago campaign of ballyhoo led by Wenger and that ill-famed tool of the candy companies, Bundesen, gave the doctors of Chicago a real taste of prosperity. Then Wenger, the leader of it all, had to give up because his own heart went bad — it is not reported whether from "syphilis," or from tobacco or alcohol. He is only fifty-two but the great medical scientist, who would save others, but cannot save himself, is out for the count.
• They suspect that "chronic carriers" may be a factor in "the spread of syphilis." Here is ground for the creation of more Typhoid Marys, and the life-long persecution of healthy men and women. "Soon," says Dr. Alsaker, "it will be proven that there are but two classes of people so far as the doctor is concerned; namely, one class that carries germs and is well, and another that carries germs and is sick. Soon one class will be in the hospitals and the other in quarantine."
• JR’s Comment: This is Adam Smith’s “Widen the Market” for “those who live by profit”!
• Becker tells of an "enthusiastic public health nurse of a Chicago Welfare clinic" who "keeps the number (of untested expectant mothers) in her field of work at a minimum by making periodic back door calls to ascertain what women are pregnant, so that the women may be taken to the clinic for the blood test." He seems to favor this snooping and spying and there can be no doubt that the adoption of the medical program would usher in another era of snooping such as we had during the prohibition period.
• He also recommends the use of "scouts" to seek out "syphilitic" patients and to induce those "who have allowed their treatment to lapse to return to the clinic." He says the "medical social worker is indispensable to the management of syphilis clinics," because they are "well trained in follow-up work" and do not "possess the physicians scruples against seeking out" patients. "The code of medical ethics forbids solicitation of patients, and some doctors maintain that a follow-up of any patient, syphilitic or otherwise, is a violation of the code," hence the need of "scouts" camouflaged as "social workers." He would also use the "social workers" as salesmen to sell the treatment to the "syphilitic."
• Becker wants laws passed "requiring physicians and midwives to take a blood test on every pregnant woman at her first visit." "Every pregnancy means that a Wassermann test is necessary," says Dr. Parran. He also says: "Certainly one place where there should be complete agreement as to the need for universal Wassermann tests, is in connection with applicants for marriage licenses." He adds, "Twenty-eight states now forbid marriage when either man or woman is infected with a venereal disease." He neglects to tell what people do after they are forbidden marriage. We seem not to have learned from the bootleg era — 1920-1933 — that prohibitions foster the bootlegging spirit. In an appeal for such a law in New York, Elsie Bond stated that New York state was "being flooded by diseased people who can't comply with Connecticut regulations." She wants every state in the Union to pass a law such as that in Connecticut. She too failed to say what those will do who are refused the right to marry upon the strength of a positive Wassermann, when there is no longer a free state for them to go to. The Connecticut experience shows that they will marry — legally or otherwise.
• Morris Fishbein, the great mouthpiece of the American Medical Association, issued a propaganda book under the title, Syphilis, the Next Great Plague to Go. He, like Becker and others, attempts to impress his readers with the "fact" that one out of every ten Americans have "syphilis" and need medical care. This callous, conscienceless, irresponsible promoter of medical interests says: "every woman who has ever had syphilis should have extensive anti-syphilitic treatment throughout every pregnancy. This should be done whether or not her blood reaction during the pregnancy is positive or negative or whether her infection is recent or has existed for a long time.
• JR’s Comment: This is Adam Smith’s “Widen the Market” for “those who live by profit”!
• "It has been found that the treatment for syphilis during pregnancy is not harmful to the mother."
• Depending on these unreliable tests is" going to result in many pregnant women being treated for a disease they do not have and in many young people being denied marriage license when there is really no reason why they should not be allowed to marry. Doctors and Medical journals admit this, but the campaign goes on.
• Dr. Parran seems to place chief reliance in Wassermann tests. Becker says that the "requirements of certain states that prospective husbands and wives have blood tests before marriage is not quite sufficient, since a single negative blood test, as explained in an earlier chapter, does not always mean freedom from syphilis". If one test is not reliable, will any number of repetitions of the test increase its reliability? A positive reaction is no more dependable than a negative one.
• They are after the child also and want to test all the children of the country. Parran insists that if a married person comes with "syphilis," the marital partner must also be examined. If "late syphilis" is found, not only the marital partner, but the children must also be examined.
• Other means of coercion are advocated. For instance, Parran wants life insurance companies to require a Wassermann test of every applicant for a policy, for "self-protection." He does not say in what manner the test will prevent "infection" subsequent to the test.
• They also want employers of labor to require tests of their employees. "After all," says Becker, "it is merely good business for a company to refuse to employ new employees known to be infected with syphilis." Parran and all other crusaders approve of this form of coercion. Business "for its own sake" says Parran, "must look for syphilis among its employees." By claiming that the "syphilitic" under treatment is safe, they hope to both prevent loss of jobs and to provide another means of coercing men and women who might, otherwise, reject their treatment. Palm wants every company to adopt and publicize a policy that a worker's job will not be jeopardized by reason of a venereal infection, provided the disease is treated by a legitimate physician." By "legitimate physician" he means an allopath. Thus the medical racket slowly unfolds itself — patronize us, or lose your job.
• The reader may be curious about the reason for all this effort to enslave the people of America. Why do they seek the passage of laws to compel everybody to submit to the will of the medical profession? Why do they seek the establishment of a dictatorship of the medicos?
• Power is always used to enrich those who wield it. Power always masks itself with a pretense of altruism. All tyranny is for the public good. All of this cry for compulsory treatment is motivated by a desire to control the public in the interest of a sordid profession. Let us look at a little of their own testimony.
• Parran says: "Carl Warner recently given honorable mention by the Pulitzer Award Committee for his graphic series of articles on venereal diseases in the New York Daily News," sent "a surge of new patients to the physicians and clinics." Private physicians in Chicago reported that the campaign there brought them seventeen per cent more cases of "early syphilis."
• Discussing the practice-building effect of the "sex" movies that are used as part of their devilish program, Parran says, "Certainly it works; at least in the beginning. The health officer of Oklahoma told me last week that in a small town in his state he had shown a moving picture depicting the dangers of syphilis. Shortly afterward he checked up with the 11 doctors of the town to see if they had any new patients as a result of the showing. They reported from 4 to 10 apiece." Here is a man in the pay of the public, employing public time and money to drum up trade for the medical profession, and going back later to check up on the effectiveness of his advertising campaign. It is "unethical" for doctors to advertise only when they, themselves, have to pay for the advertising.
• Parran, who is Surgeon General of the U. S. Public Health " Service, says he is "willing to go all the way to work out an American (sic) method with the whole American Medical profession." He means an "American Method" of compelling free men and women to patronize an obsolescent medical system. Decker insists that "the practitioner of medicine must not be left out of any program" of venereal control. He asks for legislative action to compel "syphilitics" to patronize the medical profession if "appeals" fail to maintain regularity of attendance for treatment. He says: "There just is no remedy available for self-treatment of syphilis. The patient must go to a physician, a clinic or a hospital." He means, to an allopathic physician, clinic or hospital.
• Besides compulsory treatment these men want to "obtain public funds which assure adequate treatment for all infected persons." They want to dip their hands into the public treasury. They want to tax all the people to support a dying profession. Becker, who wants more public money, is very guarded in promising results. Certain cities have already requested WPA funds to carry on an anti-"syphilitic" campaign.
• Of all the schools of medicine or "healing" in America, only one, the self-styled scientific school, that is the "old" or allopathic school — miscalled "orthodox medicine" — is back of these compulsory medical laws. This school of "medicine" (school of poisoning, blistering, serum-squirting, electrocuting, baking and carving) is married to the state and seeks to have all of its superstitions, dogmas and mistakes fastened upon the whole populace by law. The doctors of this school organized as the American Medical Association, "fight physicians of other medical schools with a ferocious savagery and vindicativeness rarely seen outside the jungle," as Bruce Calvert says in The Open Road, May, 1938. He adds, "They are pressing at every point and in every state for legislation preventing the other doctors from the free exercise of their chosen profession."
• JR’s Comment: This is Adam Smith’s “Narrow the Competition” for “those who live by profit”!
• Approximately half the population of America patronizes these other schools of healing, and do not patronize the Allopathic school. The present anti-"syphilis" drive is intended to compel all to patronize this school and to prevent them from receiving the care they desire. As Mr. Calvert has it: "Only one school of doctors, the strongest medico-religious church, will profit by giving the Wassermanns and Salvarsan treatments. *** Whether you like it or not you will be compelled to take the tests and swallow the holy water (medicines) of the one particular medical church in power. *** All others are taboo, spurius, anathema, expergatorious, spurlos versenkt! — he might have added, verboten!
• They want the Emperor to issue a decree that "no one shall get well of syphilis who has not felt the divine touch of King Allopathy." They want the laws of Nature and those of the land altered to favor medical bigotry and absolutism. In all such sumtuary enactments as the pre-natal and premarital laws requiring tests and treatment, there is seen the entering wedge of a union of medicine and state, for our salvation, of course, that will prove to be much more dangerous than the state religion against which we have so long struggled and only recently rid ourselves of.
• We should not think for a minute that they intend to stop with venereal diseases. Indeed they have already in-dictated that they are going to wage war on cancer, tuberculosis, rheumatism, and other diseases. The shibboleth here is the same as with syphilis—it costs the public less money to cure these diseases in their early stages than to support their victims after they have been made into helpless invalids. They are going to save the tax payers money by giving themselves fat jobs.
• Already a campaign has been launched against rheumatism, which is held responsible for much heart trouble and helpless invalidism. Rheumatism is claimed to be due to germs which find entrance into the body through the sinuses, tonsils, gall bladder, appendix, ovaries and seminal vesicles.
• Invalids cost the tax-payer money. Rheumatism causes invalidism. Prevent rheumatism and you save the tax-payer money. How prevent rheumatism? Easy! cut out the tonsils, remove the gall bladder, excise the appendix, extirpate the ovaries, chisel out the sinuses, and take out the seminal vesicles. Suppose the people don't respond to the appeal of the surgeons to have themselves dismembered; what then? The answer is, "legislative action that will enable us to force people to submit to examinations and operations."
• Where can this program logically stop? If we recognize the validity of the principal of state medicine and compulsory treatment, to save our money, as state religion saved our souls, there is no logical stopping place short of the universalization of the program. Thus, if they have their way, we are to have salvation forced upon us. We are to be placed under the autocratic control of one small group and their unstable and ever-changing theories and damaging practices are to be forced upon all.
• More than once in the world's history infant dragons have been mistaken for harmless lizards. If the American people don't awake and defend their liberties they will wake up some morning and find themselves the victims of a Medical Inquisition that will make the Spanish Inquisition look like a Sunday School picnic.
• THE BEGINNING OF A MYTH
• Chapter I
• Suddenly, out of a blue sky, "syphilis" sprang upon Europeans in the early years of the Sixteenth century or the closing years of the Fifteenth and swept over the world slaying thousands. "Scientists" have greatly puzzled their feeble gray matter to account for the origin of this terrible plague. Most of them are now content to place the responsibility for the disease upon the Indians who met Columbus when he discovered Haiti. Indeed Becker says that only a few die-hards have failed to accept this hypothesis. He says it was introduced into Spain in 1493 when Columbus and his sailors returned. At least "there is an abundance of historical and biographical writing to show that Spanish physicians recognized the disease that year and that they appreciated that the malady was one entirely new to them. They called this newly encountered ailment the disease of Espanola (now Haiti), after the island upon which the great navigator's sailors became infected."
• Both Becker and Parran tell us that there is evidence that Columbus, himself, was infected. Parran says "Kemble points out that in the early months of 1494, during Columbus second voyage, he began having attacks of fever, possibly the febrile secondary stage of syphilis. During the third voyage in 1498 he developed a 'severe attack of gout.' Since Columbus was an abstemious man; it does not seem probable that he suffered from the gout of the intemperate, especially since the inflammation was widespread and not confined to one or two of the smaller joints, as gout usually is. (He does not say, "as gout always is." Author). During this voyage, also, the first evidence of mental disorder appeared. He began to hear voices and to regard himself as 'ambassador of God' *** In spite of his disabilities Columbus made a last voyage and returned in 1504 so ill that he had to be carried ashore with his whole body dropsical from the chest downward, like that which is caused by injury to the valves of the heart, his limbs paralyzed and his brain affected — all symptoms of late, fatal syphilis."
• Doctors are better at making long-range diagnoses than in diagnosing living patients who are before them and whom they have just examined. However, I trust I will not be charged with desecrating the sacred temple of medicine if I point out that "attacks of fever" may and do occasionally develop in those who are not in the "febrile secondary stage of syphilis," that "hearing voices" and thinking oneself "ambassador of God" belongs to all religions and is older than recorded history; that the dropsy, paralysis and brain affection that are so confidently said to have been the effects of syphilis, may have been, and most likely were, due to ship dropsy (malnutritional edema) which was so common among sailors in those days.
• According to the myth we are here discussing, the Spanish sailors passed the disease on to the whores of Spain, who, in turn passed it on to the Spanish soldiers. Some of these soldiers were hired out as mercenaries to Naples (Italy) and others to Charles VIII of France. Charles invaded Naples the next year and "syphilis" became epidemic among his soldiers. Despite his military successes, his soldiers became panic stricken and "fled out of Italy," "not fearful of their human enemies but craven creatures before that mysterious plague that laid so many of them low."
• Becker says, "the initial epidemic of syphilis dates definitely from the return of Charles' warriors to their respective countries. This exodus from Italy, combined with the loose morals of the times, resulted in the unusually rapid spread of the disease to France, Germany, and Switzerland that year; to Holland and Greece the following year; to England and Scotland within two years; and to Hungary and Russia within four years." European sailors carried the infection to Africa and Asia so that "the disease was recognized in India in 1498, in Southern China in 1505, and in Japan in 1569." Patriotism leads men to do strange things. No country desires to accept the blame for the origin and spread of this "new plague," and each country blamed the other for it. The French called it the Neapolitan disease because they "met it" in Naples; the Italians called it the French or Spanish Disease; the English "caught" it from the French and, hence, called it the French Pox, the Turks called it the "disease of the Franks" (christians), and the Spaniards called it the disease of Espanola; Morbus Gallicus, or French sickness, was its accepted title for a century or more.
• In 1530, an Italian physician, wrote a poem about a shepherd boy named Syphilus who was afflicted with Morbus Gallicus because he had insulted Apollo. The name Syphilis, as Parran puts it, "was acceptable, says Abraham, because it was a new word casting no aspersions upon any nations."
• Paracelsus called the "new" disease, "French Gonorrhea," and gave its origin, "the coition of a leprous Frenchman with an impudent whore who had venereal bubos." More than five hundred names had been applied to the "disease" up to the time it was agreed to call it "syphilis."
• What was this strange new disease that spread over Europe like a wild fire, laid men low in a few days and routed victorious armies, and that is said to have "attacked its victims with a violence unknown today?" The "disease"' is said to have been "as contagious as smallpox" and to have "spread both through venereal contact and through the ordinary processes of living which, even among the noble, would seem by our standards astoundingly intimate and distressingly filthy."
• The patient had high fever, delirium, violent headaches and pains in the bones, horrible sores, and bone ulcers. We are told that "death was not uncommon during the secondary stage." Dr. Becker says it was "often so severe as to cause death."
• Now, there is not a physician living who ever saw a case of so-called "syphilis" that even remotely resembled the above description. They simply do not describe the same disease today when they describe "syphilis." To account for the difference they tell us, to use the words of Parran, that "new diseases always are devastating. An infection in a virgin soil is more severe than among peoples who have suffered with it for generations and built up a partial immunity." However he is not sure whether the early severity of the disease was due to "the lack of resistance" of Europeans, or "to the exceptional virulence of the early strain of syphilis." Becker tells us that its severity died down after fifty years, so that although at the beginning "Europeans were attacked in a more serious manner; they became very ill and often died in the early stages of the malady," "this virtually never happens at the present time." He adds that "it has been more and more inactive up to the present time, which is a fact of importance. It is now possible to contract the disease and have it for years with no visible manifestations."
• There is not a physician living who could prove that Morbus Gallicus (or the great pox) of the Sixteenth Century is the father of what is now called "syphilis." Nor can they be sure what Morbus Gallicus was. The reader should know that the physicians of that day had almost no knowledge of human anatomy, still less of physiology, little knowledge of pathology, and that diagnosis was very crude, differential diagnosis almost unknown. The National Encyclopedia says that "smallpox, or variola, in ancient writings, is confused with other skin eruptions, such as measles, syphilis, (great pox), and chickenpox." It was over a hundred and fifty years after the great outbreak of Morbus Gallicus, when Thomas Sydenham, the English Hippocrates, who practiced medicine in London from 1663 to 1689, first differentiated measles from smallpox. He is also credited with having been the first to describe scarlatina. Into the epidemic of Morbus Gallicus of that day there were thrown all the feverish and eruptive disorders the sensuous and filthy, vermin infested near-men-and-women who inhabited the continental pig stye and universal whore-house that was the Europe of that day, were afflicted with; just as colds, pneumonia, typhoid fever, sleeping sickness, menengitis, tubercular flare-ups, and other troubles were called influenza in 1918-19.
• Becker says, "There is some dispute as to whether the plague which attacked the soldiers was syphilis alone or a combination of syphilis with some other malady." Parran says, "Even if it were true that Columbus' crew had returned in 1493 with the infection, it is denied that the disease could have spread with such rapidity as to have devastated Charles' army at Naples in 1495. The almost universal reports of its spread are attributed to the fact that those years showed an extreme epidemic prevalence and because of a confused terminology among the current pests, pestilences, and contagions, there might well have been on epidemic of many diseases. Plague and typhus, for example, were known to be prevalent in Europe of that day; they followed the armies then as they do now."
• He further says; "Significance also is attached to the coincidence of the outbreak of alleged syphilis over Europe with the abolition of the Order of St. Lazarus and the scattering of the inmates of the 19,000 leper houses. Leprosy and syphilis continued to be assimilated in popular prejudice during a long period." He speaks of "the origin of syphilis and its history, which gradually emerges from 'ambiguity and rumor.'"
• No physician can separate fact from fancy in this cloud of mystery, rumor and doubt. But of one thing we may be sure (this will be proven in a subsequent chapter); the physicians of that day could not possibly have told whether a patient did or did not have "syphilis." They lacked all knowledge of the necessary tests and examinations. What they did was to build a myth that has assumed for us the appearance of reality.
• THE MYTH BECOMES A LIE
Chapter II
• Although patriotism prevented each European country from accepting responsibility for Morbus Gallicus, and hatred of their neighbors caused them to blame the disease upon neighboring countries, they all finally agreed to credit the Americans with having originated the disease. As Dr. Wm. S. Sadler says, "syphilis" is one of "America's contributions to civilization" Bloch, Becker, and most syphilographers of the present take this view. Sir Wm. Osier says in his Principles and Practice of Medicine: "The balance of evidence, according to the best syphilographers, is in favor of the American origin."
• Palm says in Death Rides With Venus, that, "the first recorded patient treated for syphilis belongs to Pinzon, Columbus' pilot. He stated that he contracted the disease in Haiti from a native woman." Becker tells us Columbus' sailors became infected in Haiti, then Espanola. This is more of the myth. It is not known what Pinzon suffered with and we are sure he did not know and could not have known that he contracted the disease from a native woman. It was not then known how the disease was contracted.
• No disease resembling the "syphilis" of today and certainly no disease resembling Morbus Gallicus was found among the Indians of America. Becker says "proof of the fact that the Indians of the new world were the source of syphilis which was spread in Europe after the return of Columbus' sailors is found *** in the historical writings of the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries." What Becker omits to say is that these writers could not have known this to be a fact. The absence of dark field tests, Wassermann tests, etc., made the whole thing impossible.
• Becker attempts to account for the failure to find "syphilis" among the Indians by saying: "The Indians from whom the disease was contracted had only slight manifestations of infection because they had had the disease for a long time, but the Europeans were attacked in a more serious manner; *** bear in mind that the Indians may have been subjected to the disease for thousands of years, and that, even now, white men have been subjected to it for less than 450 years." If Becker's theory is correct, the "slight manifestations of infection" seen among the Indians were much less marked than what is seen today among whites. At any rate the Europeans found nothing in the Indians that resembled Morbus Gallicus, and attributed the disease to the Indians not alone for patriotic, but for commercial reasons, as well. Parran says: "The insistence upon the New World origin of the disease during the early half of the sixteenth century is ascribed to a commercial motive — the effort to sell large quantities of guaiacum, or the 'holy wood' of the West Indies, as a cure for the syphilis; the argument in this case being that 'Divine Providence mercifully provides the antidote or remedy for a disease so inflicted, at the place where the disease originates or among people who were thus afflicted.'"
•
• It may be urged that it is not claimed that all cases of epilepsy, heart trouble, deafness, blindness, insanity, stillbirth, murder, rape, etc., are due to "syphilis." This is well known to the author, but he also knows that no physician is capable of looking back over the past and determining which, if any, of these things, when they occurred among the Egyptians, Babylonians, Greeks, Romans, etc., were and were not due to "syphilis." It is certain, also, that the physicians of the ancient and medieval periods would have been unable to tell which cases of heart failure or of madness were or were not due to "syphilis." On the other hand, it is claimed by medical men that locomotor ataxia is always due to "syphilis" and to nothing else.
• It seems to the writer that the whole solution of the problem hinges upon the testimony of the bones, or upon the denial of the existence of any such thing as a specific disease that runs a very variable course and passes through what amounts to four stages, which, resembles almost every other form of disease known and which is unlike any other disease.
• A PATHOLOGICAL MOCKING BIRD
Chapter III
• "Know syphilis in all its manifestations and relations," says Sir Wm. Osler, M.D., "and all other things clinical will be added unto you." He called "syphilis" the "Great Imitator," because, to use the words of Dr. Thomas Parran, Surgeon General of The U. S. Public Health Service, "in its late stages, it simulates almost every disease known to man." Osler added, "Know syphilis and the whole of medicine is opened to you." Some one else has declared "Syphilis" to be the "Great Masauerader." The Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., long notorious for spending its policy holder's money in carrying on Medical propaganda, issues a very misleading booklet "prepared with cooperation and advice of the American Social Hygiene Association," under the title, "The Great Imitator." S. Wm. Becker, M. D. Associate Professor of Dermatology and Syphilology in the University of Chicago, has a chapter in his book, Ten Million Americans Have It entitled, "Great Imitator."
•
• Today no two authors describe the effects of "syphilis" to be the same. Contrast de Kruif's description with that of Becker; yes, Becker with Becker. The whole thing is so uncertain that they don't know from one page to the next how to describe it. Becker presents two very unlike pictures, but thinks both pictures are true.
• THE MYTH BECOMES A NIGHTMARE
Chapter IV
• Parran says to the man who has "syphilis" and is not caring for it, that he should re-read the sections of Shadow on the Land that tells what is likely to happen to him, and adds: "I hope it scares you half to death and into the office of the best doctor in town."
• JR Comment: Once again, this is classic Hegelian Problem-Reaction-Solution where the Powers that Be are trying to scare you half to death and into the office of the best doctor in town.
• Parran defends the creation of syphilophobia with the claim that "syphilophobia never killed anyone; never brought a handicapped child into the world; never infected an innocent person," "there would be those to add that it never made a neurotic of someone not neurotic to start with; and if the unfortunate someone must be afraid of something, the fear of syphilis is a fear worth cherishing." He admits, however, that he is not a psychologist and this may account for his ignorance of the effects of worry, fear and apprehension.
•
• The physician who makes a specialty of "syphilis" becomes so abscessed that he can see "syphilis" in the most innocent symptom. His syphilomania causes him to drive his patients and everyone he comes into contact with into syphilophobia. The Medical Profession of the present is driving the people insane.
• The whole of the modern so-called health education places the emphasis in the wrong place. Instead of placing the emphasis on health it is placed on disease. Fear is the weapon employed to drive people to the doctors. And fear has been employed more with relation to so-called "syphilis" than with any other disease, more even than with relation to cancer and tuberculosis. It is sought to create panic and hysteria rather than to build up a sane outlook on life. This is all wrong.
• Courage, not fear; hope, not despondency; cheer, not worry and forebodings — these are the mental elements of good health and of a sound mind. May we hope for a change from the present fear creating mis-called health education.
• THE NIGHTMARE BECOMES A MANIA
Chapter V
• We may rejoice that part of the syphilitic insanity has passed away and that "the popular conception," as Becker calls it, without mentioning that his profession taught this fallacy to the public, "that a child from a syphilitic parent is apt to have hereditary mental or other defects, is unfounded."
•
• It is as difficult to tell whether or not a baby has "syphilis" as it is to tell that an adult has it. Parran says: "Like acquired syphilis, congenital symptoms are so diverse that not all are recognized. Some congenitals go through life with few symptoms. *** The mother's Wassermann may be negative; also the blood from the umbilical cord, or from the baby's veins. The placenta may appear normal, even by microscopic examination. The X-ray may show nothing in the long-bones. Yet some months or even years later the child may show signs of congenital syphilis."
• JR Comment: As T. C. Fry points out in The Great AIDS Hoax, the CDC was facing budget cuts and dismantled the 4 Stages of Syphilis into AIDS, which is an Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome.
• TESTS THAT DO NOT TEST
Chapter VI
• In 1906 the medical world manifested great enthusiasm over the announcement by Erick Wassermann, [s/b August von Wassermann] of the discovery of a test for "syphilis." Before the invention of the test, they were never sure whether or not a patient had "syphilis;" since its invention, they are equally uncertain. Indeed, they do not yet know what the test reveals. How do they know that the test reveals "syphilis" unless they know that there is such a disease as "syphilis?" How do they know what the blood condition is that gives a positive test?
• The presence of "syphilitic infection" is supposed to result in changes in the biochemical properties of the blood serum and the tests are supposed to reveal, not the germ, but the blood changes. Since the germ gives off no toxin, the blood changes are not likely to exist. However, if they do exist, they should be present in greatest quantity when the germs are most prevalent. The test should not be positive one day and negative the next.
•
• "That this may not appear a personal opinion, let me refer to the statement of Dr. Wile, who is Professor of diseases of the skin at the University of Michigan. In discussing this very point of the determination of the curability of syphilis, he said a year or so ago that we must abandon reliance on the Wassermann and must go back to the old rule proposed by Ricord (who was born in 1799): that when a patient has remained free from all signs and symptoms of the disease for seven years, he may be pronounced clinically cured.
• "Certainly no one can put forward the supposition that Dr. Wile has not had enough experience. No one is prepared to suggest that the technique used in doing Wassermann reactions at the University of Michigan, where he labors, is faulty."
• WHAT CAUSES "SYPHILIS?"
Chapter VII
• When Pasteur announced his theory that disease is due to microbes, Dr. Robert Koch, a German scientist, laid down four conditions that must be met before the theory could be regarded as scientifically proven. "Koch's postulates," as these are called, which were incautiously accepted by Pasteur and his subalterns and echoes, as reasonable, are:
1. The germ must be present in every case of the disease.
2. The germ must not be present except in connection with the disease.
3. The germ must be susceptible of cultivation in proper media outside the body, for several generations.
4. The pure culture thus obtained must be susceptible of re-transplantation into the healthy human or animal body, where it must infallibly produce the same disease, and the same microorganism must again be found in the tissues, blood, or secretions of the inoculated animal or man.
• There is not a single germ that is held responsible for a single so-called disease that fully meets a single one of these conditions, nor one that ever meets all four of them.
• It is claimed that "syphilis" is caused by a germ. Two German investigators, Fritz Schaudinn and Erich Hoffmann, announced the discovery of the germ of "syphilis" in 1905. Because of its spiral form they called it "spirochaeta" and because it was difficult to stain they attached to it the descriptive classification "pallida." Later the "spirochaeta pallida" was identified with a previously discovered organism named "treponema".
• Every ten cent mind in the medical profession has accepted this cork-screw shaped germ as the cause of a disease called "syphilis" and the public has been told frightful stories of its ravages by such promoters, with six cent minds, as Parran, de Kruif, Becker, Palm, Wenger, Cox, Pusey, Fishbein, Stokes, Munson, Wile, Moore, Schamberg, O'Leary, and that aggregation of syphilophobes, the American Social Hygiene Association, headed by Dr. Walter Clarke. However, even these men have misgivings about the office of this germ in causing hundreds of pathological conditions which they gather together and label syphilis — indeed, their doubts are so great that they cannot keep them wholly inarticulate.
• In a booklet issued by The American Social Hygiene Association, under the title, The Social Hygiene Program — Today and Tomorrow, C.- E. A. Winslow says of the treponema pallidum, "Koch's postulates have never been fulfilled here and we are not certain whether this organism is the sole cause of syphilis, or a symbiont, or a related saprophyte; yet its value as a practical index is quite clear."
• To the writer, "its value as a practical index" is not "quite clear." For, Dr. Becker says in Ten Million Americans Have It, "It is not always possible to find spirochetes, even in lesions that are proved to be syphilitic. *** Failure to find the germs on a dark field examination does not necessarily mean that the lesion is not syphilitic."
• Here, then, it fails to meet one of Koch's postulates — it is not always present where the disease is.
•
• They certainly have not reached that stage with the spirochete. It meets none of Koch's postulates and "syphilis," as described by medical authorities, never reacts the same in the human body. There is not a physician or a bacteriologist living who can honestly affirm that the spirochete has been definitely proven to cause "syphilis." If there is such a disease as "syphilis," its cause is simply not known.
• DIAGNOSING A PROTEAN MONSTER
Chapter VIII
• The reader who has read this far is already aware of the practical impossibility of ever being sure that a given case is or is not "syphilis." He knows that "syphilis" cannot be definitely determined by the clinical symptoms; that the dark-field test is not always reliable; that the various blood tests are not fully dependable and, finally, that the spinal test cannot be depended on to give an unequivocal answer. In the midst of so much uncertainty, how is it proposed to diagnose the disease? By adding all of the uncertainty together and getting a diagnosis as a final summation.
•
• A woman gives birth to a dead child. Now there are many causes for still-births, chief of which are ergot and anesthetics used in labor, but the attending physician "suspects" syphilis. He carefully questions the mother and he learns that a few years before, she had a rash on her body which she thought was due to eating strawberries. Probably it was a strawberry rash, but it becomes another link in the chain of "syphils." Next, he makes a blood test. It is negative, but he is unconvinced.
• He examines the husband. The husband recalls once having had a "cold sore" on his lip, which developed a short time after he attended a party where he took part in a kissing game. Some weeks later he had a headache and a slight fever which were accompanied with an eruption on his chest, which his physician diagnosed as shingles. A blood-test is now made of the husband. It is positive. The doctor is satisfied up to this point. He has discovered the "source of infection" and he now has the husband under treatment. He returns to the wife. He has several kinds of blood tests made and, while part of them are negative one of them is positive. Now he is getting somewhere. Spinal tests are made. Two are positive, two are negative. The woman has "syphilis." There is no doubt about it.
• He calls in an army of specialists. They examine her heart, they X-ray it and make an electrocardiogram. They examine her eyes, ears, nose, throat; her genito-urinary organs; her nervous system, etc. It's too bad, but she certainly has syphilis. He places her under treatment. It is a tragi-comedy in four acts, in which the doctor-hero traces down the corkscrew villian and saves the charming heroine from his evil designs. Since she is already married, the hero and heroine do not marry and live happily ever afterward. In this last particular the play is like a western movie in which the hero, after saving the girl and the ranch, rides away on his pinto to new adventures.
• THE BEGINNING OF QUACKERY
Chapter IX
• Quack is from the German word for mercury or quicksilver — quacksalber. The term was applied to Paracelsus and his followers because of their extensive use of this metal. Originally the word quack was applied to those who poisoned their patients with mercury. Now it is falsely applied to all who refuse to poison their patients. Every intelligent reader will readily recognize to whom the term really belongs.
• Paracelsus was not the first to use mercury in "syphilis", but he was the first to proclaim it a specific and the only specific for "the disease" (1636). To Jacob Carpensic belongs the doubtful honor of having been the first to use mercury in "syphilis." This was in the year 1502 and de Kruif tells us that his use of it "was so successful that he presently became rich thereby." The Arabians had used mercurial ointment in the treatment of scabies (itch) and because "syphilis" produced sores somewhat like scabies, the ungentum Saracenicun was used in "syphilis."
• The experiments recounted above, covering more than eighty thousand cases, in some of the leading hospitals on the European continent, under the direction of some of the very best medical talent of the age, fully established certain facts, namely:
1. That "syphilitics" treated without mercury recover in much shorter time than do those treated with mercury.
2. That the tendency to relapse is almost doubly as great in mercury treated patients.
3. That mercury ruins the constitution while "syphilis" does not.
4. That the "tertiary" affections are seldom seen in cases treated without mercury.
5 That disease of the bone (caries and exostosis) is almost unknown in the non-mercury treated cases.
6. That the "inconveniences" of mercury treatment are avoided where mercury is not employed.
• What more can the profession and the patient ask for? If these facts are not sufficient to utterly condemn mercury-therapy, nothing short of the extermination of the whole human family will satisfy them.
• Surprising as it may seem to the reader, the medical profession continued to employ mercury for the treatment of so-called "syphilis," in the face of such over-whelming evidence of the disastrous consequences of mercurialization and, although, used more carefully and in much smaller and fewer doses today than then, it was, until a very few years ago the leading remedy employed by the Allopathic school in treating so-called "syphilis." Trail, in trying to account for the continued use of this drug, in the face of such results, says: "It can only be accounted for on the ground of professional prejudice. Medical men, after being once educated, do not often change their opinions. They have, during their course of studies, learned that medical theories, on almost all subjects, are as contradictory as they are numerous, and that medical facts, opinions, and practices are as changeable as the ever-varying phases of the moon. Hence, they naturally become incorrigibly skeptical in relation to new notions, and so, with rare exceptions, go through life with the same routine in professional business. For this reason, too, they are much more inclined to adhere to old errors than to adopt new truths."
• Dr. Hermann, of Vienna, a graduate of the great medical schools of Vienna, and for thirty years superintendent of the syphilitic wards in the Hospital, Wieden, near Vienna, which is one of the greatest institutions in the world for the treatment of so-called leutic ailments, has written several books in which he vigorously combats the idea that "syphilis" is a constitutional disease, and shows that under proper hygienic conditions, the disease is self-limited, runs a regular natural course, and never produces any "tertiary stages." The doctor states that during those thirty years in this great municipal hospital, while under the closest constant scrutiny from doctors and medical schools, he treated sixty thousand cases of so-called "syphilitic" disease without the employment of mercury. He also states that in all the cases thus treated he has never observed a single spontaneous recurrence, nor the development of "tertiary symptoms," nor any evidence of hereditary transmission.
• Dr. Hermann says: "The disease conditions usually diagnosed as constitutional syphilis are the results of mercurial treatment or of other disease taints in the body.
•
• "Workers salivated in the mercury mines in Idra, who never suffered with syphilis, exhibit all the symptoms of so-called secondary and tertiary syphilis. In the blood and urine of these patients I also found mercury. In fact, the various forms of mercurialism everywhere occur among people who continually come in contact with mercury and thus absorb it; no age, no sex is immune. This is verified by physicians practicing among quick-silver miners, mirror, thermometer and barometer makers, etc."
• NEW EVILS FOR OLD
Chapter X
• In spite of all the claims made for mercury, it had long been realized that it does not "cure" the supposed "syphilis." Indeed it has become a medical axiom: "Once a syphilitic, always a syphilitic." A standard author says in a text book of materia medica for nurses: "Investigators have long believed that arsenic would be a specific against syphilis if some compound could be found which could be given in sufficiently large doses to kill the germ without killing the patient." For many years, medical alchemists have been searching for a poison that would kill germs in the body without destroying the body. They know that such a poison is, in the very nature of things, an impossible thing, but they continue to search for it.
• In 1910, Paul Ehrlich, a German Chemist, announced a combination of arsenic with other drugs which he claimed would destroy the spirochetes without killing the patient. This drug, dioxy-diamino-arsenobenzol-dihydro-chloride, he declared to be a specific for "syphilis". Because he thought the new drug would prove the salvation of "syphilitics", he called it salvarsan. Because, according to the "build-up," it was his 606th experiment, it became known as "606." Due to the failure of 606, Ehrlich continued his experiments until he performed 914 of them, giving us neo-salvarsan, or 914. This new salvarsan was produced in an effort to "avoid some of the disagreeable side actions of salvarsan."
• The salvarsan patents were held by the Germans. When the nations voided patent rights held by aliens during the World War, American pharmaceutical houses manufactured the two drugs under the names arsphenamine and neo-ars-phenamine. In England the drug is manufactured under the name, arsenobenzol.
•
• I have nothing against the fish of the seas, but I do believe that if we follow the suggestion of Dr. Oliver Wendell Holmes and throw all the drugs into the sea, there would never be another case of "syphilis." Let me repeat: "syphilis" is a medical creation. It is a disease and a state of mind that the medical profession has cursed the race with. It is a medical crime.
• THE ARTIFICIAL FEVER CURE
Chapter XI
• Fever is a curative process, a defensive process, a life-saving expedient. Although the medical profession has taught for three thousand years that fever is the enemy of life and that it kills, during the past few years they have acknowledged its beneficient character.
•
• Thus another "cure" has gone glimmering through the things that were.
• WHAT IS "SYPHILIS?"
Chapter XII
• In his discussion of a number of the "unsolved problems" of "syphilis" Parran reveals how little they know and how uncertain is everything connected with "the disease." He and others tell us one "attack" of "syphilis" does not confer immunity against "reinfection." This refers to the absurd medical notion that certain diseases confer immunity to future attacks. There is not an iota of evidence in favor of this ancient superstition and every physician knows this. Yet they all subscribe to it in the case of a few diseases, although they freely confess that most of the "infections" do not confer immunity. The whole of the vaccine and serum practice is based on this insane notion.
•
• There is no history of infection. The tests mean nothing. The cause is uncertain. The clinical symptoms, if present, are not specific. No physician living can tell that his patient has syphilis." I challenge the entire medical world to prove that there ever has been, or is now, in any part of the world, a single case of the disease called "syphilis," as defined and described by "medical science;" I challenge them to prove that the whole thing is not a clever fabrication which has deluded even its fabricators.
• REGULAR ABUSE OF THE "SYPHILITIC"
Chapter XIII
• We have seen how the popularity of mercury waxed and waned and how many other substances were used in an effort to cure "syphilis." Mercury treatment remained the treatment of choice until 1843 when it was combined with potassium iodide, which was given by mouth. This combination held sway until 1910, when 606 came into use. Due to the failure of arsphenamine "physicians adopted the plan of giving mercury and iodides in conjunction with arsphenamine. For twelve years," says Becker, "this combined treatment was adhered to, then bismuth was introduced and found to be superior to mercury, though inferior to arsphenamine. Bismuth, therefore, was given in conjunction with arsphenamine. Today, the world over, syphilis is treated largely with arsphenamine and bismuth. Mercury still is used, but to a much smaller extent than before."
•
• They pretend to be trying to wipe out a disease which they admit they cannot correctly diagnose and for which they admit they have no cure. They are employing methods of treatment that they know to be worse than the fictitious disease they are trying to wipe out. Will the American people tolerate such an outrage, or will they wipe out "syphilis" by wiping out those who create it?
• HYGIENIC CARE OF THE "SYPHILITIC"
Chapter XIV
• In "syphilis" we deal with a whole series of physical conditions arising out of a multiplicity of causes. The word syphilis could be, with profit for everyone, dropped from our language and forgotten. For as defined and described by "medical science," no such disease exists. The medical theory of its propagation is a super-colossal delusion.
•
• The symptoms described are not "specific". They are common in people in all walks of life who eat to excess of deficient and stimulating foods, imbibe alcoholics, tea, coffee, soda fountain slops, indulge in tobacco, practice excessive venery, who overwork, worry a lot, secure insufficient rest and exercise and who palliate their symptoms with drugs. I cannot see the need for a disease called "syphilis" to produce these symptoms and to finally produce degeneration of the brain. Hardening of the arteries of the brain from any cause may easily produce these symptoms. I know of no logical reason why the early stages of paresis will not yield as readily to Hygienic care as does ataxia.
• * * *
• Erratum: On page 46 we incorrectly "credit" Erick Wassermann with the discovery of the Wassermann test. "Credit" belongs to August von Wassermann, and to his two colleagues, Neisser and Bruck.
• ADDENDUM
• "Knowing what excellent results can be obtained without using drugs which impair the health and sometimes blind or even kill the patient, I never now advise their use.
• "That many in the profession are dissatisfied with the present drug treatment of syphilis is proved by the fact that less toxic drugs are, from time to time, recommended in medical journals as a cure for the disease.
• "Needless to say, such an unreliable test as the Wassermann plays no part in the guidance of my treatment. Marshall and French, in their book, Syphilis and Venereal Diseases, utter a warning against the dangerous tendency at the present day to exalt the value of laboratory diagnosis and neglect that of clinical experience. M'Donagh of the London Lock Hospital has also shown the fallacy of relying upon the test, which is not a specific one. A positive Wassermann denotes an acid condition of the blood, a state which is common to numbers of diseases other than syphilis.
• "Present-day treatment and laboratory diagnosis makes for damnable pessimism and degenerative disease of the nervous system. Again, a syphilitic suspect is kept under surveillance so long and tested so often that only the very strong-minded or callous can hope to avoid the depression of syphilophobia and its more or less acid condition of the blood, which so often spells a positive Wassermann.
• * * *
• "Those who talk learnedly of the incurability of syphilis without drugs base their opinions on what frequently happens in the case of patients feeding in the conventional manner, which, as I have already shown, makes for disease instead of health." — Major Reginal F. E. Austin, R.A.M.C. (Retired), M.R.C.S., Eng., L.R.C.P., Lond.
• Formerly Clinical Assistant London Throat Hospital Laryngologist and Otologist 3rd Lahore Division, India. Staff Surgeon and Officer-in-Charge Station Family Hospitals, Jutogh, Kasauli and Calcutta Lecturer on Anatomy and Physiology and the Art of Breathing to the Army Physical Training Classes for Instructors, Kasauli Officer Commanding British Station Hospitals, Calcutta and Rangoon
…End of File Preview…

So, given the lack of good reporting (some U.S.states didn't even require birth or death certificates until several years into the 20th century) or often the tools and/or ability to even accurately diagnose a condition was lacking, the "fact" that only 1 in 30 deaths in 1900 was caused by cancer is totally unreliable.

KFCA Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> So, given the lack of good reporting (some
> U.S.states didn't even require birth or death
> certificates until several years into the 20th
> century) or often the tools and/or ability to even
> accurately diagnose a condition was lacking, the
> "fact" that only 1 in 30 deaths in 1900 was caused
> by cancer is totally unreliable.

Not only totally unreliable - a ridiculous faux fact statistic to try to pull off as evidence of anything relevant to this thread's topic, IMO.

Brian Clement is always talking about Dr. Arthur Robinson & Eydie Mae Hunsberger.

www.thesproutarian.com

KFCA Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> So, given the lack of good reporting (some
> U.S.states didn't even require birth or death
> certificates until several years into the 20th
> century) or often the tools and/or ability to even
> accurately diagnose a condition was lacking, the
> "fact" that only 1 in 30 deaths in 1900 was caused
> by cancer is totally unreliable.

Statistics are always approximation even now.
Statisticians use other tools to sample the population under study even if it was a long time ago and surprisingly they are usually correct.
In 1900 cancer was rare so when there was a case it made news in the community. The community itself was small not in the millions.

Since the Good Doc. Robinson still apparently "believes" Eydie Mae died in an accident even though he personally knew the Hunsbergers, jointly & severally,for decades (recall that he introduced them to Linus Pauling in the 1970ties & that he, Mr Hunsberger & a third person whose name I can't recall are listed as joint authors of some kind of scientific paper involving rats & maybe Vit. C, written in the late 1990s---I guess that would constitute "decades", and of course Mr. Clement conveniently forgets to mention Eydie Mae has been dead for years & years from ANYTHING---not excluding that condition that allegedly good eats & the green juice cured herself of---whenever her name crosses his lips in interviews to this day...what can I say?

By the way still waiting for that joint study between HHI & the University of California "disproving genetics" that Mr. Clement claimed in an interview was coming out next year---but that was something like 3 years ago. Wonder what happened to it? PUBMED doesn't show it. BTW, a good scientific study does not set out to "prove" or "disprove" anything---it lets the chips fall where they may.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/09/2016 09:27PM by KFCA.

RP: Tell us exactly which statisticians made the case that in 1900 there was only 1 case of cancer amongst 30 citizens as Mr. Rose's post claims? Surely there would be a public record of it somewhere as it would be very important data, & then EXACTLY how that conclusion was reached. I've never seen it; have you?

If not, it's like that famous claim of a few decades back that more women were beaten up by their husbands/SOs on Super Bowl Sunday than any day of the year, repeated & repeated as gospel without evidence for years even by people or entities that should have known better, and then when other people actually looked at it critically, proved to be nothing but BS/unproven & this was even in "modern times". Is the 1 in 30 number from 1900 being "accepted" just because its been repeated enough times?

I'd put my two bits on there being almost as many fake self proclaimed mathematically oriented whizzes/pied pipers (and their fans) as there are fake doctors and other various self proclaimed healers (and their hypnotized subjects) practicing their crafts around this field of alternative medicine and diet.

> Is the 1 in 30 number from 1900 being "accepted" just because its been repeated enough times?

I have not looked into where the numbers came from but in most cases cancer statistics are done by team of universities professors or scientists. These studies are carefully conducted with them going to the field, taking samples and other things.

Dinosaurs were on earth 200 millions year ago yet scientists have conducted research in finding out how many specifies they were, how they lived, what part of the world they were concentrated on.

Compare 200 millions year ago with just 1900 it was like yesterday.

Everything we do in life leaves a trace, a bone for living creatures.

So, RP, you have no idea if the 1/30 1900 cancer death figure came from "teams of universities professors or scientists" OR just off the top of somebody's head with an agenda? Next...

BTW, the study Robinson, Hunsberger & Fred C. Westall co-authored was accepted for publication on July 26, 1994 and was entitled "Suppression of Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Hairless Mice By Dietary Nutrient Variation" (available on-line). Since Eydie Mae died in 1984, Dr. Robinson clearly knew both Hunsbergers for years; the remainder one for something like at least two decades. Why Dr. Robinson published in 1998 that she had unfortunately died in an accident is beyond me. But, as I said before, why ruin a Good Story?

I think I mentioned that in spite of the fact that Eydie Mae was well known in the Alternative Health Community, it's pretty clear that her death was very hush-hush, with no acknowledgment of her passing from its more prominent members. Even no local San Diego area obituary that I could find. Although I didn't look hard nor find an obit for her husband's death in 2003/2004 (forget which now), I did find a sort of memorial write-up on him in one of the business-oriented San Diego monthlies. Apparently he remarried soon after Eydie Mae's death, & left a widow and a couple of adult children at his passing.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/10/2016 02:23AM by KFCA.

You got a point.
I think for Eydie Mae, the excitement of wheatgrass curing her from cancer was great at the beginning and when they all realized that it was not the case, nobody took the courage to acknowledge that. Even that she still had lumps in her breasts she thought she was cured.