Just what I don't want!

[www.latimes.com]


USDA scientists say irradiation could be key to food safety
Al Seib / Los Angeles Times

CALIFORNIA SPINACH: New research suggests that irradiation may be the only way to penetrate leafy greens and kill bacteria inside. But consumer groups have safety concerns.

They say the process destroys E. coli and other potentially deadly microbes that chlorine doesn't kill in fruits and vegetables. But consumer groups are concerned.
By Marla Cone, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer

April 11, 2008

Before bagged leafy greens wind up on your plate, they are washed, often three times, in a potent chlorine bath. But new research shows the steps that California companies rely on to protect consumers do not kill dangerous bacteria inside the leaves, whereas zapping them with radiation wipes them out.

The debate over how to protect consumers from E. coli and other potentially deadly microbes has intensified since the fall of 2006, when at least 200 people across the nation became ill and three died after eating tainted spinach grown in San Benito County.

Irradiation, which involves bombarding food with high-energy gamma or electron beams to disrupt the DNA of pathogens, has its supporters and critics. But the new research suggests that it may be the only way to penetrate leafy greens and kill bacteria hiding inside.

Although some hamburger meat, poultry and spices are irradiated to kill bacteria, its use on fruits and vegetables to enhance food safety is not permitted in the U.S. Some produce is irradiated for insect control and shelf-life extension. The Food and Drug Administration is considering whether to allow the practice for killing pathogens, which would make it much more widespread.

No health problems have been associated with eating irradiated food. But some consumer groups say its safety is unproven, and have raised concerns about radioactive waste and accidental radiation releases.

Presenting their findings Thursday at the American Chemical Society's annual conference, U.S. Department of Agriculture scientists said irradiation could be key to destroying pathogens in hard-to-reach places inside and on the surface of fruits and vegetables.

"Irradiation kills E. coli where chlorine doesn't," said Brendan Niemira, a microbiologist at the USDA's Eastern Regional Research Center in Pennsylvania who led the research. "We used pretty aggressive levels of chlorine and found they weren't very effective at all. But when you have E. coli inside a leaf, and you irradiate it, the E. coli dies."

Every year, 1 in 4 Americans suffers a food-borne illness. About 14% of cases are linked to fresh produce, and spinach and lettuce are the biggest known culprits, causing 23 outbreaks since 1995. Most of those outbreaks were traced to California, the leading producer of greens.

Some food safety experts say that the ionizing radiation could damage leaves and that consumers won't buy bags of spinach with a radiation logo on the label. Irradiation also could increase processing and handling times.

In the spinach outbreak 19 months ago, the E. coli was traced to a cattle ranch in San Benito County, and was probably carried to the spinach field by feral pigs or by water.

The bagged spinach had been triple-rinsed at a Natural Selection Foods/Earthbound Farm plant in San Juan Bautista. The company now tests all greens for pathogens when they arrive at the plant and after they are processed.

Industry leaders such as Earthbound Farm have been searching for foolproof sanitation methods. But they are wary of irradiation. One obstacle is that irradiated foods cannot be certified organic under USDA standards.

"If it were proven effective at eradicating pathogens while preserving the freshness and nutritional integrity of the food without causing adverse environmental effects, then the National Organic Standards Board might reconsider those rules. But I don't think we have all those answers yet," said Will Daniels, an Earthbound Farm vice president in charge of food safety.

Robert Mandrell, research leader at the USDA's Produce Safety and Microbiology Research Unit in Albany, Calif., said consumers and producers might be more willing to accept irradiation if illnesses linked to leafy greens continued to grow.

"Irradiation is perhaps one of the few intervention steps that indeed can penetrate the leaf surface and kill microorganisms," said Mandrell, who was not involved in the study.

The researchers used special vacuums to force high levels of bacteria into the leaves of baby spinach and romaine, then irradiated some batches and treated others in a three-minute chlorine rinse. At least 99.9% of the E. coli, salmonella and listeria were wiped out by the irradiation, which was equally effective at killing them inside and outside the leaves. In comparison, the rinses killed 90% of the bacteria on the leaves, and none inside.

Pathogens can be absorbed by leaves through roots or stems, and also might get inside leaves when they are cut and processed. No one knows how common internal bacteria are or whether they were involved in any disease outbreaks.

"The question of the public health significance of internalized food-borne pathogens is yet to be answered," said Michael Doyle, director of the Center for Food Safety at the University of Georgia.

Some experts say aggregates, or concentrated, tightly adhering bunches of bacteria on leaf surfaces, could be triggering the illnesses. Such clusters are hard to kill with rinses, but irradiation is very effective at killing them, Mandrell said.

One potential drawback found in the study is that it took twice as much radiation to kill the bacteria inside the leaves as the amount required to kill the surface bacteria.

Food safety researchers who are skeptical about irradiation worry that doses high enough to uniformly kill pathogens could cause cell damage that shortens shelf life. Tests with irradiated greens have shown some texture changes, but no severe damage.

Niemira said irradiation would not replace conventional safety measures in fields and processing plants, but could augment them. "Irradiation is not going to kill everything on every product all the time," he said. "It's not a magic wand or a silver bullet. It's intended as another tool."

They are pushing the irradiation its a shame

that is soooo scary. Got to start getting my veggie garden to a point where I can live from it.

If you only read one sentence it tells you what the industrial-food-complex is up to:

"New research suggests that irradiation may be the only way to penetrate leafy greens and kill bacteria inside. But consumer groups have safety concerns."

YIKES!!!

Will I be able to opt out?

> The researchers used special vacuums to force high
> levels of bacteria into the leaves of baby spinach
> and romaine, then irradiated some batches and
> treated others in a three-minute chlorine rinse.

So they used special vacuums to force bacteria INSIDE of produce and then they noticed that rinsing the SURFACE of that produce wasn't effective at removing this bacteria. I don't mean to shock anyone but taking a shower won't treat cancer either. Why didn't they try using the special vacuums to force the chlorine rinse into the leaves? Oh right...because then they wouldn't have the conjured "proof" they need to push irradiation.

> No one knows how common internal bacteria are or
> whether they were involved in any disease outbreaks.

So in other words this experiment was completely contrived with no verified correlation to reality. I believe Baudrillard would have called that a simulacrum. This doesn't sound like science to me. It does sound like an agenda though.

This SCARES ME SCARES ME SCARES ME.

What would we do? Gardening/foraging for the summer and pray the demand of organic food lowers prices for the winter? Join those $25,000 classes on Breatharianism?

I think fear isn't going to help the matter. It just has us sitting here waiting for something awful to happen. I, for one, am moving to an area where I can grow my own organic produce.

I refuse to buy anything that has been tampered with. If we all refuse to buy what isn't really food in its natural state anymore, maybe it will make a big enough impact on the economy and "they'll" stop tampering with food? I don't know. It seems people get outraged about things and then once the ruling goes through many of those same outraged people just kind of unhappily accept it. This was the case with the almonds. Many were rightly upset in the beginning, but now that the rule has gone through, a majority (I know not all, but many) of those people are unhappy, but they continue buying the almonds that have been tampered with.

All of this tampering with our food may eventually drive people to doing the same thing I'm doing--changing your lifestyle any way possible so that you can live a healthier life (especially by being able to grow your own produce) that's not goverened by what "they" are saying/doing. Most will claim, "But, I can't do that. It's not possible for me to move to a place where I can grow my own vegetables throughout most of the year." I say that just about anything is possible if you really want it. Power to the people!

Lots of love to all of you,

Wendi
XOXOXO

Irradiated produce definitely isn't raw, so there's no way on earth I'd be caught dead eating it.

It just forces me to take a step further into the unknown, which is why learning all about self-sufficiency while we still have the choice is wise.

I often think, I just wish there could be an easier way, for everyone, especially when I read about things like Codex. But in the long run, people growing their own organic food sufficiently and throwing away the ailments of the processed generation is a LOT easier than most of the nonsense we're seeing right now...

phantom, I hear ya on that. I think, in the long run, more self-sufficiency and less factory farming are going to be the answer. You don't hear about crap in food (and I mean CRAP) from small, family run farms. This sort of problem comes from large-scale factory farming. It comes from growing food in... crap. The crap becomes a part of the structure of the plant. Big surprise? No.

Who can we trust?

Ourselves and some family run farms. NOT some mega-corporation with no real commitment to the land or the people who buy their Franken-products.