|
|
difference between 95 and 100% raw
Posted by:
Pame'laVik'toria
()
Date: November 08, 2012 11:32PM So after 1 year 8 months 95-98% raw, I now am 100%. Huge difference! Not having any sauces as dip, no chips or chocolate has been really difficult. But the interesting part is I'm going back into detox, rashes, more sleep, zits. It's all very interesting. Never thought that few % would be so cleansing! My video to keep me inspired on my health quest: [www.youtube.com] Re: difference between 95 and 100% raw
Posted by:
Utopian Life
()
Date: November 09, 2012 01:20PM I agree, and I think usually people underestimate the cooked percentage by calories. Re: difference between 95 and 100% raw
Posted by:
Panchito
()
Date: November 10, 2012 08:56PM I've never had the detox symptoms experienced by others. I think some cook foods should not make a difference. But chips and chocolate do. Read about acrylamide bombs in chips
[www.google.com] Re: difference between 95 and 100% raw
Posted by:
fresherthanlife
()
Date: November 11, 2012 03:25AM Acrylamides are in more than just chips...in TONS of cooked stuff, like this: [fresherthanlife.com] Re: difference between 95 and 100% raw
Posted by:
Pame'laVik'toria
()
Date: November 30, 2012 12:46AM Panchito Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > I've never had the detox symptoms experienced by > others. I think some cook foods should not make a > difference. But chips and chocolate do. Read about > acrylamide bombs in chips > > [www.google.com] Wow! You are the first I've heard of without any! Did you not get vaccines, take pills ect? Were you in really good health when you started detoxing? (I was super sick with CF, and took oodles of toxic stuff in my lifetime  so expected to feel horrible!My video to keep me inspired on my health quest: [www.youtube.com] Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
|
|
