It amazes me how people still people that people actually landed on the moon.

Boy what a great scam this was.

A lot of People

We cant even find our way around china town yet, why would they want to go to ``the moon??? Are we spaced out yet???
Earth First!

Whooaaaa wait! O my I am one of those people, please direct me to the information that you have. hah

riverhouse that is funny,

First off in the lunar pictures no stars in the background.

Secondly how does a flag blow around in zero gravity?

Thirdly why have we never gone back and if we did there would be relics still there.

Ah, I was waiting for a thread on this. Now the circle of lunacy (pun intended) is complete.

i heard it was all filmed in disneyland

yeah, sometimes i get lost finding certain items in the supermarket ( like seaweed)

forget china town pffffftttt!!

Moon rocks are much older than earth rocks, they also have a different composition.

[en.wikipedia.org]

fact`is that Nasa has lost the original footage taken on the moon and has two `full time employes are searching micro film for them.
after they reviewed the fisrt footage they decided to take some of the fuzz and `movement out of filming it went to photo lab and was doctored. Nasa officals `who viewed said later original was so much better. then decided to relese `original copy and discoverd that it was missing so they say, and the search ``began.
And now the Orgininal is still lost, but when you have a lot of space I supose `its `easy to lose things. all jokes aside they lost the original.

What would be the advantage of faking US mooning? beside Bambozaling the pesants for sport?
most tec advanded nation on planet buy your tecs here? good ad for made in USA?
I do believe we have taken a dump on moon, but I like to think mabey we have not
I mean lets check this out first and get it right.one world at a time.

riverhousebill Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> fact`is that Nasa has lost the original footage
> taken on the moon and has two `full time employes
> are searching micro film for them.
> after they reviewed the fisrt footage they
> decided to take some of the fuzz and `movement out
> of filming it went to photo lab and was doctored.
> Nasa officals `who viewed said later original was
> so much better. then decided to relese `original
> copy and discoverd that it was missing so they
> say, and the search ``began.
> And now the Orgininal is still lost, but when
> you have a lot of space I supose `its `easy to
> lose things. all jokes aside they lost the
> original.
>
> What would be the advantage of faking US mooning?
> beside Bambozaling the pesants for sport?
> most tec advanded nation on planet buy your tecs
> here? good ad for made in USA?
> I do believe we have taken a dump on moon, but I
> like to think mabey we have not
> I mean lets check this out first and get it
> right.one world at a time.

What advantage? Exactly

Yeah, I think it's fun to question it.. like how stable was the LM (Lunar Module) really?.. it looked so unlike anything that could fly. Yet it had a standard navigation system adapted to lunar conditions where the everpresent stars overhead could be sited as a reference point and transmitted to the main computer of the command module orbitting overhead, which would transmit landing/take off instructions back to the LM.. like thrust and angle of thrust (to control pitch), adjustments that might have been made automatically at a rate of 20 to 100 times per second (according to a friend I saw today that worked in the field who reminded me they got it to work in the lab with earth's gravity which is 6 times greater than that on the moon and produces 6 times the torque (roll)).

when your in space away from the earths magnetic field there is a thing called the van allen belt named by the greatest scientist tesla.tesla said when something get into the belt it would be exposed to to something like 250 rads of radiation from the sun.if you had 8 foot walls of lead the radiation would fry you.my question is how did they protect them selfs from radiation?i saw the vechicle that went to the moon .didnt see anything for protection.

kratom : I've heard it said that when they first invented the steam engine and developed trains, people speculated that once you were traveling faster than about 20 kms or something that the sheer speed would cause damage to your body. There have been many "scientifically backed" hypothesises which have been found to be fairly crazy.

I've heard the theory that the first landing was hoaxed for the political reasons of improving national moral, and to display international superiority in the era of the cold war. This may or may not be true, but I'm sure that we have achieved the technological requirements to have made this a reality easily since that time.

My own belief for the discontinuation of space travel initiatives, is that it is due to a massive cover up taking place that we are not alone in the universe.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 07/29/2008 04:02AM by Lightform.

Lightform Wrote:
--
> My own belief for the discontinuation of space
> travel initiatives, is that it is due to a massive
> cover up taking place that we are not alone in the
> universe.

that is a great point
patty

Lightform Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> kratom : I've heard it said that when they first
> invented the steam engine and developed trains,
> people speculated that once you were traveling
> faster than about 20 kms or something that the
> sheer speed would cause damage to your body. There
> have been many "scientifically backed"
> hypothesises which have been found to be fairly
> crazy.
TESLA mastered nature and created great inventions from nothing.what i mean is tesla knew thing that are greatest science can't figure out .next time you plug something say thank you tesla . tesla had a car he drove that worked on wireless radiate energy. had this little antenna drove like a electric car.no batteries or gas .tesla wanted to give everyone free unlimited power.he was going to send it wireless to everyone in the world for free. bankers stopped him that prick jp morgon .he invented the radio .there is a van allen belt. why didn't the russians go to the moon they can send up rocket that weight ten time more and cost 100 time cheaper.i will tell you why radiation .
> I've heard the theory that the first landing was
> hoaxed for the political reasons of improving
> national moral, and to display international
> superiority in the era of the cold war. This may
> or may not be true, but I'm sure that we have
> achieved the technological requirements to have
> made this a reality easily since that ti
> My own belief for the discontinuation of space
> travel initiatives, is that it is due to a massive
> cover up taking place that we are not alone in the
> universe.
tesla was most likely a alien .okay i believe that there is all kind of technology.point is who control the technology .i don't think there good guys.i personlly think we live in a advanced ZOO.the keeper are going to do some house cleaning.the ZOO is slowly dying.look at the weather .

We went.
Period.
There is a reflector on the moon that still is active today.
So if we didnt go who put it there?

Raw1228 Wrote:

> So if we didnt go who put it there?

the aliens LOL sorry couldn`t resist
patty

ok
Bwahahahahah!

i am an invention of tesla

LaV -- YOU are the free, unlimited power that Tesla wanted to give to the world! ;}

raw, 1228

What reflector are you typing of?

These ones [en.wikipedia.org] . Here's some more evidence for the moon landings [en.wikipedia.org]

Cheers,
J





Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/02/2008 10:47AM by Jose.

One of the biggest anomalies that appear on the Moon shots are the way in which shadows seem to be cast in totally different directions, even when the objects making the shadows are a mere few feet apart?

And why exactly do you think there are hardly any stars visible on Apollo films taken from the Moon? The answers simple - Professional astronomers would quickly calculate that the configuration and distances of star formations were incorrect and so NASA had to remove them to make sure they could keep up the scam.

Instead of being able to jump at least ten feet high in "one sixth" gravity, the highest jump was about nineteen inches.

The fabric space suits had a crotch to shoulder zipper. There should have been fast leakage of air since even a pinhole deflates a tyre in short order.

During the Apollo 14 flag setup ceremony, the flag would not stop fluttering.

Why did NASA's administrator resign just days before the first Apollo mission?

In 1969 computer chips had not been invented. The maximum computer memory was 256k, and this was housed in a large air conditioned building. In 2002 a top of the range computer requires at least 64 Mb of memory to run a simulated Moon landing, and that does not include the memory required to take off again once landed. The alleged computer on board Apollo 11 had 32k of memory. That's the equivalent of a simple calculator.

If debris from the Apollo missions was left on the Moon, then it would be visible today through a powerful telescope, however no such debris can be seen. The Clementine probe that recently mapped the Moons surface failed to show any Apollo artefacts left by Man during the missions. Where did the Moon Buggy and base of the LM go?

In the year 2008 NASA does not have the technology to land any man, or woman on the Moon, and return them safely to Earth.

Ok

The reason no stars are visible in the photos is because they simply arent bright enough to overcome the objects in the foreground,Anyone with at least a basic knowledge of photography will know this.

Regarding the leftover debris being visible in a telescope,there is no earth based scope that will resolve detail that small,plus there is air turbulence in the atmosphere that can prevent seeing such small details.

Shadows can appear to come from different light sources,due to the contour of the terrain.

This controversy can go on forever............................................



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/03/2008 04:57AM by Raw1228.

It is a funny thing indeed.

hmmmm not big enough yet we can see them and photograph them from earth?

Not able to see them from the space shuttle?

Shadows appear because lighting was used on the prop mock up of the moon.

Flag flapping in zero gravity?

Couldn't Hubble take a good pic? I think that unmanned spacecraft have definitely made it to the moon - anyone question that?

They even took panorama shots on the moon. These were less well known according to this site. Probably because the public didnot have computers back then to veiw these.
[www.panoramas.dk]

global result what site did you get the above info from? i`d like to take a look at it
patty

patty,

[www.ufos-aliens.co.uk]

thank you
patty

NO problem,

Enjoy.

Take Care,

tesla was a virgin weird huh